Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-12-27

  • RT @IntegreonEDD: UK – Data destruction (balancing between destruction and preservation) http://bit.ly/8Dz0lK | timesonline.co.uk #
  • RT @mix3travel: Video: Official NORAD Santa Tracker http://bit.ly/6pdIou #

Powered by Twitter Tools

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Business and the Way of Democracy – NYTimes.com

Much like transitions to democracy over the past four decades transformed governments from mostly authoritarian to mostly democratic, we are currently witnessing a transformation of global corporations from a more or less opaque shareholder-centric model to a more transparent multi-stakeholder model.

The 1970s witnessed the beginning of a global trend toward the democratization of authoritarian and totalitarian regimes. This first appeared in Greece with a coup that led to democracy, continued in Portugal and culminated in Spain with a paradigmatic transition from Franco to democratic government. To this day all three countries continue to be thriving democracies.

The trend continued into the next three decades. Starting with the Polish Solidarity movement and epitomized by the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, democratization swept through the former Soviet bloc. Likewise, today most of Latin America can claim the democratic mantle. Successful transitions occurred in such diverse places as South Africa, the Philippines, Indonesia, Mongolia and even Iraq.

The yearning for greater political transparency and accountability continues sometimes tragically, as Iran currently exemplifies. The case of China remains a unique experiment in the liberalization of economics but not politics. Despite some business-related legal reforms, China may remain the exception that proves the rule.

As to global companies, increased government pressure and stakeholder demands for accountability (from employees, investors, customers, non-governmental organizations and others) are creating a similarly catalytic turning point that is beginning to yield a more transparent business model.

[continued] Op-Ed Contributor – Business and the Way of Democracy – NYTimes.com.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

The George Kokinis Chronicles: A Disgruntled Look at Sports and the Law

The Cleveland Browns have been a disaster both on and off the field this season, and while the team sought to usher in a new era by hiring Mike Holmgren as its new general manager this week, an arbitration claim by his predecessor, George Kokinis, will weigh over the star-crossed franchise in the months ahead.

After signing a four-year contract before the season, Kokinis was fired on November 2, with the Browns floundering on several fronts. But after the team refused to honor his contract, Kokinis got litigious, hiring Dewey & LeBoeuf global litigation cochair Jeffrey Kessler for an arbitration claim filed this week before NFL commissioner Roger Goodell. A provision in Kokinis contract calls for disputes between him and his employer to go to arbitration.

Kessler, no stranger to sports litigation battles, especially in football, says that Kokinis turned to him after consulting with a few NFL colleagues. Kessler expects the arbitration proceeding to occur sometime in the next few months at the NFLs corporate legal department in New York. Current NFL general counsel Jeffrey Pash, a former Covington & Burling partner, or former league GC Jay Moyer will likely hear the case, Kessler says.

Kokinis is seeking more than $4 million in compensation and damages from the team. Kessler says his legal adversary in the arbitration is still a bit up in the air. The Browns have long turned to Frederick Nance, the managing partner of Squire, Sanders & Dempseys Cleveland office, for outside counsel. Nance was advising the Browns early in the process, Kessler says, but earlier this month he was named the teams general counsel.

via The George Kokinis Chronicles: A Disgruntled Look at Sports and the Law.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

2010 predictions for the e-discovery market

2010 predictions for the e-discovery market

Posted using ShareThis

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Court Tells Microsoft to Edit Word | BusinessWeek

Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), the world's biggest software maker, must alter its popular Word software or stop selling the product after it lost its appeal of a $200 million patent-infringement verdict won by a Canadian company.

The company, based in Redmond, Washington, was given until Jan. 11 — five months from the original order issued in August — to make the change by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington. Word is part of Microsoft’s Office software, used by more than 500 million people.

The court today upheld a verdict which has since grown to $290 million won by closely held I4i LP of Toronto. The dispute is over a patented invention related to customizing extensible markup language, or XML, a way of encoding data to exchange information among programs. Microsoft has called it an “obscure functionality.”

via Court Tells Microsoft to Edit Word – BusinessWeek.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Video: Introducing the New Cybersecurity Coordinator | The White House

Today the White House announced the President’s new White House Cybersecurity Coordinator, Howard Schmidt.

With some forty years of experience in government, business and law enforcement, Howard brings a unique and deep experience to this important issue.  Watch this video to learn more about his background and approach:




via Introducing the New Cybersecurity Coordinator | The White House.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

OECD Recommendation: Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions

Convention on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development – Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions :

• Ensure companies cannot avoid sanctions by using agents and intermediaries to bribe for them;

• Periodically review policies and approach on small facilitation payments. These are legal in some countries if the payment is made to a government employee to speed up an administrative process;

• Improve co-operation between countries on foreign bribery investigations and the seizure, confiscation and recovery of the proceeds of transnational bribery;

• Provide effective channels for reporting foreign bribery to law enforcement authorities and for protecting whistleblowers from retaliation; and

• Working more closely with the private sector to adopt more stringent internal controls, ethics and compliance programmes and measures to prevent and detect bribery.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Video: US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on OECD anti-corruption agenda

“The United States fully supports the OECD’s anti-corruption agenda,” said US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in a video message to an OECD event in Paris. “We also are encouraging our major trading partners that have not yet acceded to the convention to join our efforts.”

via Governments agree to step up fight against bribery.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Business in China: What Does ‘Playing by the Rules’ Mean? – China Real Time Report – WSJ

Can foreigners do business in China without violating the law? A recent article in the New Yorker on foreigners doing business in China quotes one English victim of fraud that undid the joint venture for which he worked as saying that “if you played by the rules, you were finished.” (Tim Clissold, author of Mr. China, cited by Evan Osnos, “Letter from China” The New Yorker,” Nov. 23, 2009.) The article also cites a very different view, that of Don St. Pierre, Jr., who with his father, a veteran of business in China, operates a successful wine importing business: “…If you are engaged in business you are subject to the same rules as everybody else.”

The first point of view seems obvious enough if Clissold meant simply adhering to laws as they are written, rather than in practice. Or is it? If it means you have to violate Chinese laws and regulations in order to succeed, you are obviously asking for trouble, and that seems like a dangerous course of action. But what does the alternative view mean when it refers to the conduct of “everybody else” in an economy and society in which the rules are often hard to find, opaque when you find them, and subject to varying interpretations or neglect in different parts of China according to the extraordinarily wide discretion of bureaucrats?

Suppose, for example, that the general manager of the joint venture in which you have invested is asked to find a job at the venture for the son of a provincial official who has some regulatory powers over it. Or suppose your Chinese partner suggests that a group of engineers ought to be sent to the U.S for training, but proposes an itinerary that indicates the group will spend more time in Las Vegas than anywhere else? Chinese laws and regulations, as well as Communist Party rules, prohibit officials from using their positions to extract benefits, including, for example, tourism. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act prohibits giving “anything of value” to a “foreign official” with the “corrupt purpose” of obtaining business. It also permits, however, “reasonable and bona fide expenditures, such as travel and lodging expenses…of a foreign official…directly related” to promotion of products or “the execution or performance of a contract.”

[continued] Stanley Lubman: Business in China: What Does ‘Playing by the Rules’ Mean? – China Real Time Report – WSJ.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

A Case for Operating in the Cloud

A 27.5 percent drop in revenue will get your attention. It did mine in April 2009 when I reviewed my firm’s financial results for the first quarter of the year. I was shocked, and worried whether my practice could stay open. I knew some of my competitors had gone out of business and I was afraid I was next.

But, I didn't feel things were too bad and as I looked farther down the income statement I realized why.

• Rent Expense: down 50 percent;

• IT Costs: down 90 percent;

• Outside Workers Cost: down 60 percent; and

• Payroll Costs: down 40 percent.

I realized then that my movement to Microsoft’s “cloud” enabled me to survive this downturn and will help me thrive in the upturn. Without it, I may not have stayed in business. There are two ideas I would like to emphasize with this article.

First, cloud computing will drastically change the legal industry.

Second, as an IT person in your firm, your most important mission is to get your firm to move to the cloud.

This article discusses three topics: Why and how I moved to the cloud, what I’;m doing and not worrying about with cloud, and why the best ways to persuade attorneys that they have to move to the cloud.

[continued] Law.com – A Case for Operating in the Cloud.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare