Next step for Wikileaks: Crowdsourcing classified data – Computerworld

The release on Sunday by Wikileaks of more than 90,000 documents about military operations in Afghanistan may just be the start of problems for the U.S. government.

The online publication of the documents, which offer an inside — and potentially embarrassing — look at the war in Afghanistan between 2004 and the end of 2009, represent a failure by the U.S. to control its classified data from insider threat. And it throws open to the whole world a chance to crowdsource the information the documents contain.

With that in mind, Wikileaks’ Editor-In-Chief Julian Assange on Monday urged intrepid researchers to cull the documents for information that the group — and three publications given access to them — have yet to uncover. Assange said that Excel, one of the formats in which the material was released, might be the best way to sort through it.

During a news conference that was webcast, he even guided would-be researchers, saying they could use a search term such as “children” to parse the data for casualty reports.

When mining the documents for information, it’s important search for something “quite broad…,” he said. “Don’t tell th

via Next step for Wikileaks: Crowdsourcing classified data – Computerworld.

Europe Starts Antitrust Inquiries Against I.B.M. – NYTimes.com

The European Commission opened investigations Monday into whether I.B.M. had abused its dominant position in mainframe computers, signaling that the era of aggressive prosecution of American technology leaders in Europe did not end with the Microsoft antitrust case.

The commission said that it would examine whether I.B.M. had shut out rival mainframe software vendors and service providers. The investigation could lead to charges and potential fines against the company.

Joaquín Almunia, who took over in February as the European competition commissioner, “is making it clear that the Internet and the information technology sector will be an enforcement priority for him and for the commission,” said Alec Burnside, a competition lawyer in Brussels at the law firm, Linklaters. “It is clear that he is building on the precedent left him by his predecessor.”

via Europe Starts Antitrust Inquiries Against I.B.M. – NYTimes.com.

Law.com – Privileged Information in a ‘WikiLeaks’ World

The disclosure of 92,000 classified military documents about the war in Afghanistan by WikiLeaks followed by related stories in The New York Times, The Guardian and Der Spiegel surely didn’t happen without the benefit of legal counsel advising on the potential First Amendment and national security issues arising from their publication.

A note to readers published by The Times on its website highlights just how sensitive — and potentially dangerous — much of the information is. The Times states that it cross-checked data, chose not to publish information that would harm national security interests, redacted the names of diplomats, field operatives and military commanders, and avoided reporting on anything that could jeopardize U.S. and allied intelligence-gathering methods. (The Times’ reports were independent of what WikiLeaks itself published on a special site set up for the disclosures, and what was published by The Guardian and Der Spiegel.)

via Law.com – Privileged Information in a ‘WikiLeaks’ World.

Outsourced Vs. In-House e-Discovery: Making The Right Choice

A law firm’s size, its finances, and the number and technical prowess of a corporate legal department’s in-house staff are among the most important considerations when choosing to outsource e-Discovery or bring this mission-critical process in-house. Decision makers must also closely assess the complexity or “all-in-oneness” of e-Discovery software solutions and their infrastructure requirements before finalizing their decision.

The ability to manage E-Discovery is an essential business process staple at law firms and within legal departments. Access to electronic evidence, whether email messages, documents, text files, images, databases, spreadsheets, or audio files, increases efficiencies and bolsters ROI by saving immeasurable time in performing litigation and computer forensics. Making the wrong choice between outsourcing or bringing e-Discovery in-house can wreak havoc on a firm’s bottom line and its operational and procedural efficiencies.

via Outsourced Vs. In-House e-Discovery: Making The Right Choice.

Podcast: Current Issues in Computer Forensics | Legal Talk Network

Knowledge of eDiscovery is vital to today’s legal profession. On this edition of Digital Detectives, co-hosts Sharon D. Nelson, Esq., President of Sensei Enterprises, Inc. and John W. Simek, Vice President of Sensei Enterprises, welcome computer forensics technologist, Craig D. Ball, to talk about how some courts view computer forensics analysis as simply searching on a list of terms, avoiding waste in eDiscovery and the challenges of effective keyword searching.

via Current Issues in Computer Forensics | Legal Talk Network.

Podcast: Request for Idea to Offer Law School E-Discovery Clinics to Small Law Firms || ESIBytes

Listen to Karl Schieneman, Director of Analytics and Review with JurInnov, talk about an idea he is working on with others in the field for a not for profit to network law students as an E-Discovery clinic to assist in educating small law firms on electronic discovery. This podcast is really just a short description of an idea and a request to get in touch with me if you like the idea and want to help, are a law student and can provide some feedback on the idea, know a law school that teaches electronic discovery or, better yet, know a professor who teaches electronic discovery.

via Request for Idea to Offer Law School E-Discovery Clinics to Small Law Firms || ESIBytes.

Compliance Week: First Half Trends in Electronic Discovery Sanctions

It’s been a busy year already in the world of electronic discovery. Among other things, the first half of 2010 brought a number of new rulings related to e-discovery sanctions.

So far, litigants are seeking sanctions in fewer cases than in 2009, but sanctions are being awarded at almost the same rate, according to a mid-year update on e-discovery developments and trends by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher.

Of 103 e-discovery opinions issued from Jan. 1 – June 17 that were analyzed by GDC, litigants sought sanctions in 30 percent, or 31 cases, compared to 42 percent in all of 2009. They received sanctions in 68 percent (21) of those cases, compared to 70 percent in all of 2009.

Costs and fees associated with the discovery dispute itself were the most frequently awarded sanctions, imposed in 14 of the 21 cases in which courts imposed some kind of sanction. Adverse inference instructions were imposed in 4 cases, while other monetary sanctions were imposed in three cases.

via Compliance Week: The Filing Cabinet – » First Half Trends in Electronic Discovery Sanctions.

Enterprise Search and Pursuit of the Google Experience

Search is an incredibly interesting problem, one that’s so complex in the background yet so simple on the surface. In this two part article, we examine the desire to duplicate the Google search experience in the enterprise and how we need to change what we expect from enterprise search based on what we’re willing to do to make it work.

What could be easier than entering a few keywords into a single text box and, in a fraction of a second, being granted access to tens or even hundreds of millions of relevant resources — all the information we could ever really want right at the tips of our fingers. For most, this is perceived as a near perfect user experience that is today’s reality when we search online using Google.

Yet a common complaint heard internally across many organizations is the inability to easily find the right answer amongst a set of far fewer, and often less relevant results. The organization of content into intuitive information architectures is a challenging problem, and the creation of navigational constructs that classify information into meaningful categories is becoming increasingly difficult due to the sheer volume of content being produced.

The user experience is increasingly becoming both complicated and fragmented and is placing a greater emphasis on search as the silver bullet. Unfortunately, search too is failing to meet the needs of our users and is oftentimes perceived as nothing more than “a random document generator”, as one client has colorfully put it.

via Enterprise Search and Pursuit of the Google Experience.

Motorola Android 3.0 tablet may be here this year | TG Daily

Android lover Motorola is expected to be working on an iPad competitor that runs on Google’s mobile operating system, but what’s bigger news is that it could be one of the first devices to run the next-generation Android 3.0.

Analysts Roger Crenshaw and Ashok Kumar predict that Motorola could bring the tablet to the US by the end of this year, and say it’s likely to use the so-called “Gingerbread” version of Android, which no other device currently does.

via Motorola Android 3.0 tablet may be here this year | TG Daily.

Google Apps Fitted With Government Controls — InformationWeek

Catering to a growing need among cost-constrained government agencies for cloud computing that’s both affordable and secure, Google on Monday introduced a new version of Google Apps for federal, state, and local government agencies in the U.S.

Google Apps for Government offers the same suite of online applications as Google Apps Premiere Edition, with Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) certification and support for government-mandated policy and security measures.

Google claims that Google Apps for Government is the first multi-tenant cloud computing suite to receive certification under FISMA, which sets guidelines for responsible information security management in U.S. government information systems.

via Google Apps Fitted With Government Controls — InformationWeek.