Microsoft teases more Windows 8 details | Microsoft windows – InfoWorld

Microsoft has posted a detailed explanation of the new, improved, ribbonized Windows Explorer in Windows 8. In a nutshell, Microsoft is grafting a ribbon onto the top of the Windows Explorer window — no surprise — that closely resembles the ribbons in Office and a handful of Windows 7 applets.

Here’s the part that surprises me. Microsoft relies on “telemetry data” which is collected and automatically forwarded by people who participate in the Microsoft Customer Experience Improvement Program. The telemetry data for earlier versions of Windows Explorer “shows that 54.5 percent of commands are invoked using a right-click context menu, and another 32.2 percent are invoked using keyboard shortcuts… while only 10.9 percent come from the Command bar, the most visible UI element in Explorer in Windows 7 and Vista.”

From that observation, Microsoft deduces that making the command bar more accessible — with a ribbon — will improve Windows Explorer.

That same telemetry data shows that roughly 50 percent of the commands carried out in Windows Explorer are Cut, Copy, Paste, or Delete, and that Properties and Rename account for another 20 percent. Call me a heretic, but my conclusion is that Microsoft should make it easier to cut, copy, and paste files — and the best way I know to do that is to make it easy to put two copies of Windows Explorer up on the screen at the same time, side-by-side. But then I readily confess that I don’t like the ribbon in Office, and positively detest it in small apps such as Paint. I guess that makes me a Luddite, but ribbons waste so much room, especially on wide monitors, and (at least in my experience) they don’t make it any easier to locate commands that you already know about. Quite the contrary.

via Microsoft teases more Windows 8 details | Microsoft windows – InfoWorld.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Amazon Could Disrupt Apple’s Tablet Dominance, Analyst Says – WSJ.com

Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) could disrupt a tablet market dominated by Apple Inc. (AAPL) if the online retailer is willing to sell its own, widely-anticipated device at a loss, according to research published Monday.

Forrester Research analyst Sarah Rotman Epps wrote that while “Amazon taking on Apple is a bit like David taking on Goliath,” if Amazon proves willing to sell its tablet relatively cheaply and leverage its brand and surplus of online content, it could make a significant mark.

Specifically, if Amazon prices the as-yet-undisclosed tablet at less than $300, the Seattle-based company could sell up to 5 million units in the fourth quarter of this year, the analyst wrote.

Apple currently sells versions of the iPad for prices ranging between $499 and $829.

The Wall Street Journal has reported that Amazon could release its tablet as soon as October.

via Amazon Could Disrupt Apple’s Tablet Dominance, Analyst Says – WSJ.com.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

E-Discovery Moves to the Cloud – Forbes

The cloud model has a three-tiered architecture based on (i) infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS), (ii) platform as a service (PaaS); and (iii) software-as-a-service (SaaS). Cloud-based services may be used on demand, anywhere in the world (“location independent”) and independent of any specific hardware behind a corporation or law firm’s firewall.  Cloud-based e-discovery vendors offer numerous benefits for the corporations and law firms that partner with them. These include:

The ability to scale or decrease one’s service level at almost no marginal cost beyond that of the on-demand services;

Not having to purchase upgrades;

Drastic reductions in on-premise capital expenditures. IDC predicts that cloud computing will reduce the cost of owning IT infrastructure by 54 percent. The importance of such a decrease is highlighted by the statistics presented below.

Usage-based pricing with no fixed contracts or contracts with renewable terms as short as 30 days.

It’s no coincidence that these benefits share an overriding theme – cost savings. Information Week sponsored a study of 374 business technology professionals. Each was asked to identify the biggest challenges associated with on-premise business applications. Multiple responses were permitted. The results are not surprising, and should counsel corporations and law firms, which are much less likely to have adequate internal infrastructure, to partner with cloud-based e-discovery vendors.

Cost of IT staff resources that must be supported – 57%

Cost of upgrading software – 57%

Cost of maintaining infrastructure – 55%

The inability to take advantage of functionalities then-available on the newest version – 34%

The lack of flexibility to support changing business needs – 32%

Dated user interfaces – 27%

Limited number of vendors to choose from – 22%

via E-Discovery Moves to the Cloud – Forbes.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

5 tips to catch an intellectual property thief – Security – News – ZDNet Australia

Physical crimes leave behind a trail of evidence that forensic teams can analyse and bring to court, but what about cybercrime, such as the theft of intellectual property? Computer forensics expert and director of Klein & Co Nick Klein said that when companies conduct a digital forensic investigation themselves, there are five things they should do.

(Image by Mad House Photography, CC BY 2.0)

Speaking at the Security 2011 Exhibition and Conference event in Sydney yesterday, Klein said businesses that had suspected that a digital crime had been committed on their systems often took a “Bunnings” approach to forensic analysis, and suggested a four-step structure for undertaking an investigation.

Prepare the business:

Prior to a breach occurring, businesses could do some preparation, which would help them later on in an investigation, Klein said.

He said that typically, businesses had a lack of policies and procedures to secure data, with in-house legal counsel often not working together with a business’ IT department in developing policy. He said that policies, such as making a full backup of an ex-employee’s machine prior to their departure, are often overlooked, when they could provide critical information to assist a case months later.

He also said that despite most operating systems allowing businesses to enable logging on sensitive information, most businesses tended to only use minimal logging of access.

Another area that Klein suggested businesses look at was where backups and critical databases were stored, and whether policies should be implemented to require employees to store information on the company’s file server, where the business would have greater control over it.

“We have a lot of cases where people say, ‘We had an employee who deleted their email. The only copy of it was a PST archive [which contains Outlook emails] on their computer. Can you get it back?’ A simple policy change to force that person to store that PST on the network could have overcome that.”

Lastly, Klein said that businesses often didn’t do enough to protect themselves in their employment contracts.

“Does it talk about confidentiality of information? Does it talk about monitoring of their user activity? Does it include things like USB devices? Can you have something in your employment contracts that says, ‘When you leave, we may ask you for your USB devices’? — It’s something to think about.”

continued @ 5 tips to catch an intellectual property thief – Security – News – ZDNet Australia.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Is the Legal Industry Ready for SharePoint? | CMSwire.com

Microsoft Hates Legal

Okay, so maybe that’s a bit harsh. But it’s clear they want little business catering to legal, since they just recently axed their Legal & Professional Services sales team. Maybe it was the Clifford Chance partnership that made Microsoft loathe the legal beast. But to me, it’s legal in general that is to blame.

The biggest law firms in the world have a few thousand total users. The biggest corporations that Microsoft caters to are in the hundreds of thousands. You’d think that would make things easier for Microsoft. But legal tends to be the most fussy when it comes to document management, something SharePoint has been severely criticized about. After all, a law firm’s entire business model is driven by authoring, delivering and storing documents. Their competition has been perfecting this technology for many years, and SharePoint has some catching up to do.

Legal also tends to think that they are the most important vertical on the block. In my world, they are. In Microsoft’s world, they are a small catch.

However, don’t let this scare you away from SharePoint. I think Microsoft is doing what they do best. Perfect the framework, and then rely heavily on ISVs and partners to fill in the gaps. Bottom line: Microsoft does not want to be in the business of providing the kind of extensive consulting and customization services required to make legal happy. But they are in the business of providing the engine that can get you there.

via Is the Legal Industry Ready for SharePoint?.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Google beefing up its +1 button | Digital Media – CNET News

Google is enhancing its familiar Google +1 button to give people more control over the content they share and who they share it with.

Found on many a Web site these days, the +1 button lets people signed in to their Google account share and recommend specific content with their friends and contacts that can then appear as recommended pages in Google’s search results. But the button has been limited in that users have only been able to share links publicly and couldn’t comment on what their were sharing.

Now Google has tweaked the +1 button, says a blog posted yesterday, giving Google+ users the option to share a page with their circles and offer an opinion on what they’re sharing.

via Google beefing up its +1 button | Digital Media – CNET News.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

India Exempts Outsourcers From New Privacy Rules | PCWorld Business Center

Personal data sent to India by customers outsourcing work to companies in the country will not be covered under new rules governing the collection of such information, the government said on Wednesday, providing relief to India’s large outsourcing industry.

The Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules 2011 introduced in April require companies or their intermediaries to take consent in writing from individuals about the use of the sensitive personal information they collect.

The new rules would make it difficult for Indian outsourcers to operate if they were required to take written consent from individuals in other countries whose data they collect and process through call centers and business process outsourcing operations.

As a result of the new rules, companies that rely on India-based outsourcing service providers will be required to adjust their data collection practices to conform to Indian data protection rules, even though their current practices may comply fully with U.S. or European Union privacy rules, said Lawrence Graham LLP, a firm of London-based business lawyers, in a note earlier this year.

A clarification issued on Wednesday by the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, through the country’s Press Information Bureau, said that a “body corporate” providing services relating to collection, storage, dealing or handling of sensitive personal data or information under contractual obligation with any legal entity located within or outside India is not subject to the requirement of the new rules.

via India Exempts Outsourcers From New Privacy Rules | PCWorld Business Center.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Child Pornography Bill Makes Privacy Experts Skittish : NPR

Late last month, while Washington, D.C., was focused on the debt ceiling, the House Judiciary Committee approved legislation that could have long-term consequences on Internet privacy.

The bill requires all Internet service providers to save their customers’ IP addresses — or online identity numbers — for a year. The bill’s stated purpose is to help police find child pornographers, but critics say that’s just an excuse for another step toward Big Brother.

“We have to be able to get access to the data so that law enforcement has the ability to find who these people are and arrest them and be able to rescue the children who they are horrifically abusing,” says Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, the Democratic co-sponsor of the “Protecting Children from Internet Pornographers Act of 2011.”

The legislation requires the Internet providers to save IP addresses just in case one of their customers turns up as a “visitor” on a child porn site. The problem is, says Wasserman Schultz, some Internet providers don’t store IP addresses very long.

“In some cases, you have Internet service providers who are actually going in the wrong direction,” Wasserman Schultz says. “There’s one Internet service provider who holds onto it for seven days and then discards it.”

via Child Pornography Bill Makes Privacy Experts Skittish : NPR.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Microsoft Says Motorola’s Android Phones Infringe Its Patents – Bloomberg

Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), the world’s largest software maker, began arguing its U.S. trade case that Android- based smartphones made by Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. use technology derived from Microsoft inventions.

In a trial that began today before the International Trade Commission in Washington, Microsoft accused Motorola Mobility of infringing seven of its patents and requested a halt to imports of certain Motorola phones. The ITC has the power to stop imports of products that violate U.S. patent rights.

The case is the first smartphone dispute to be heard by the agency since Google Inc. (GOOG) said Aug. 15 it would buy Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion to obtain patents that could be used as a bulwark against a surge of lawsuits targeting handsets and tablet computers that use Google’s Android operating system.

“We have a responsibility to our employees, customers, partners and shareholders to safeguard our intellectual property,” David Howard, Microsoft’s corporate vice president and deputy general counsel for litigation, said in an e-mail. “Motorola is infringing our patents and we are confident that the ITC will rule in our favor.”

via Microsoft Says Motorola’s Android Phones Infringe Its Patents – Bloomberg.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Shoe-Powered Battery May Charge Mobile Phones – Mobiledia

People may soon be able to use “in-shoe technology” to charge their cell phones while going for a walk, making dead batteries a thing of the past.

Tom Krupenkin and Ashley Taylor at the University of Wisconsin at Madison’s mechanical engineering program invented a shoe insert that generates electrical energy from people’s footsteps. The creators say their technology may eventually charge people’s cell phones during a 2-hour walk.

Krupenkin and Taylor’s “in-shoe technology” works by harnessing the thermodynamic power people generate with each footfall.

To make the device, the duo reversed a process called electrowetting, in which conductive liquid applied to the surface of an electrode changes with exposure to an electrical charge. By running this reaction backwards, Taylor and Krupenkin realized they could generate electrical charge by using the changing physical form of liquid drops.

In simpler terms, “If you run a motor in reverse you get an electrical generator,” explains Krupenkin.

via Shoe-Powered Battery May Charge Mobile Phones – Mobiledia.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare