<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Technology Today&#187; Exchange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/en/tag/exchange/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legaltechtoday.com</link>
	<description>news and knowledge from around the globe compiled by Global EDD Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:24:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RT @asialegaltech: Asia Legal Technologies attending E-Discovery Exchange Platform 2010 in Singapore http://bit.ly/9gLAZp</title>
		<link>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/10/14/rt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/10/14/rt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 03:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Global EDD Group</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tweet Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/10/14/rt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RT @asialegaltech: Asia Legal Technologies attending E-Discovery Exchange Platform 2010 in Singapore http://bit.ly/9gLAZp]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @asialegaltech: Asia Legal Technologies attending E-Discovery Exchange Platform 2010 in Singapore http://bit.ly/9gLAZp</p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook_like addtoany_special_service" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/10/14/rt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp/"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter_tweet addtoany_special_service" data-count="none" data-url="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/10/14/rt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp/" data-text="RT @asialegaltech: Asia Legal Technologies attending E-Discovery Exchange Platform 2010 in Singapore http://bit.ly/9gLAZp"></a><a class="a2a_button_google_plus_share addtoany_special_service" data-annotation="none" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/10/14/rt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp/"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F10%2F14%2Frt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp%2F&amp;linkname=RT%20%40asialegaltech%3A%20Asia%20Legal%20Technologies%20attending%20E-Discovery%20Exchange%20Platform%202010%20in%20Singapore%20http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F9gLAZp" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/linkedin.png" width="16" height="16" alt="LinkedIn"/></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/pinterest?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F10%2F14%2Frt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp%2F&amp;linkname=RT%20%40asialegaltech%3A%20Asia%20Legal%20Technologies%20attending%20E-Discovery%20Exchange%20Platform%202010%20in%20Singapore%20http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F9gLAZp" title="Pinterest" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/pinterest.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Pinterest"/></a><a class="a2a_button_evernote" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/evernote?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F10%2F14%2Frt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp%2F&amp;linkname=RT%20%40asialegaltech%3A%20Asia%20Legal%20Technologies%20attending%20E-Discovery%20Exchange%20Platform%202010%20in%20Singapore%20http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F9gLAZp" title="Evernote" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/evernote.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Evernote"/></a><a class="a2a_button_wordpress" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F10%2F14%2Frt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp%2F&amp;linkname=RT%20%40asialegaltech%3A%20Asia%20Legal%20Technologies%20attending%20E-Discovery%20Exchange%20Platform%202010%20in%20Singapore%20http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F9gLAZp" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a><a class="a2a_button_blogger_post" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/blogger_post?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F10%2F14%2Frt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp%2F&amp;linkname=RT%20%40asialegaltech%3A%20Asia%20Legal%20Technologies%20attending%20E-Discovery%20Exchange%20Platform%202010%20in%20Singapore%20http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F9gLAZp" title="Blogger Post" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/blogger.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Blogger Post"/></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F10%2F14%2Frt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp%2F&amp;linkname=RT%20%40asialegaltech%3A%20Asia%20Legal%20Technologies%20attending%20E-Discovery%20Exchange%20Platform%202010%20in%20Singapore%20http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F9gLAZp" title="Email" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/email.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Email"/></a><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F10%2F14%2Frt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp%2F&amp;title=RT%20%40asialegaltech%3A%20Asia%20Legal%20Technologies%20attending%20E-Discovery%20Exchange%20Platform%202010%20in%20Singapore%20http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F9gLAZp" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/10/14/rt-asialegaltech-asia-legal-technologies-attending-e-discovery-exchange-platform-2010-in-singapore-httpbit-ly9glazp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Government&#8217;s FCPA Probe of Weatherford Expands</title>
		<link>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/06/25/u-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/06/25/u-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Global EDD Group</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrupt practices act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legaltechtoday.com/?p=3336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government&#8217;s probe into Weatherford International Ltd&#8217;s dealings in foreign countries has burgeoned far beyond a simple bribe inquiry by the Securities and Exchange Commission. It is now a multi-agency civil and criminal investigation into allegations that Weatherford did business with terrorist-friendly countries that are under U.S. trade sanctions. Weatherford is one of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal government&#8217;s probe into Weatherford International Ltd&#8217;s dealings in foreign countries has burgeoned far beyond a simple bribe inquiry by the Securities and Exchange Commission. It is now a multi-agency civil and criminal investigation into allegations that Weatherford did business with terrorist-friendly countries that are under U.S. trade sanctions.</p>
<p>Weatherford is one of the world&#8217;s largest oilfield service companies, operating in over 100 countries.</p>
<p>In an unusual twist to the tale last year, Weatherford general counsel Burt Martin left his job in mid-probe, and the company decided to move its headquarters from Houston to Geneva, Switzerland. It still has U.S. operations in Houston.</p>
<p>The company conceded in its 10-Q financial report to the SEC on May 3 that the federal inquiry that began in 2006 has now grown to include the Department of Justice, the Department of Commerce&#8217;s Bureau of Industry &amp; Security, and the U.S. Treasury&#8217;s Office of Foreign Assets Control. The latter two agencies handle matters of national security.</p>
<p>The report said the feds are looking at allegations on three fronts. They include Weatherford&#8217;s participation in the scandal-plagued Oil-for-Food program, the possible misuse of $175,000 at a European subsidiary for alleged bribes in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and the sales of services and products &#8220;in certain sanctioned countries.&#8221;</p>
<p>It specifically cited Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria — four countries under U.S. sanctions due to their support of terrorism and/or violations of human rights.</p>
<p>The company said it is cooperating with the multi-faceted probe. The report said it has incurred $53 million in costs related to its exit from sanctioned countries and incurred $108 million for legal and professional fees in connection with the ongoing investigations.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202462978969&amp;US_Governments_FCPA_Probe_of_Weatherford_Expands">U.S. Government&#8217;s FCPA Probe of Weatherford Expands</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook_like addtoany_special_service" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/06/25/u-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands/"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter_tweet addtoany_special_service" data-count="none" data-url="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/06/25/u-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands/" data-text="U.S. Government&#8217;s FCPA Probe of Weatherford Expands"></a><a class="a2a_button_google_plus_share addtoany_special_service" data-annotation="none" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/06/25/u-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands/"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F06%2F25%2Fu-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands%2F&amp;linkname=U.S.%20Government%E2%80%99s%20FCPA%20Probe%20of%20Weatherford%20Expands" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/linkedin.png" width="16" height="16" alt="LinkedIn"/></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/pinterest?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F06%2F25%2Fu-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands%2F&amp;linkname=U.S.%20Government%E2%80%99s%20FCPA%20Probe%20of%20Weatherford%20Expands" title="Pinterest" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/pinterest.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Pinterest"/></a><a class="a2a_button_evernote" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/evernote?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F06%2F25%2Fu-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands%2F&amp;linkname=U.S.%20Government%E2%80%99s%20FCPA%20Probe%20of%20Weatherford%20Expands" title="Evernote" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/evernote.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Evernote"/></a><a class="a2a_button_wordpress" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F06%2F25%2Fu-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands%2F&amp;linkname=U.S.%20Government%E2%80%99s%20FCPA%20Probe%20of%20Weatherford%20Expands" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a><a class="a2a_button_blogger_post" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/blogger_post?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F06%2F25%2Fu-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands%2F&amp;linkname=U.S.%20Government%E2%80%99s%20FCPA%20Probe%20of%20Weatherford%20Expands" title="Blogger Post" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/blogger.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Blogger Post"/></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F06%2F25%2Fu-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands%2F&amp;linkname=U.S.%20Government%E2%80%99s%20FCPA%20Probe%20of%20Weatherford%20Expands" title="Email" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/email.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Email"/></a><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F06%2F25%2Fu-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands%2F&amp;title=U.S.%20Government%E2%80%99s%20FCPA%20Probe%20of%20Weatherford%20Expands" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/06/25/u-s-governments-fcpa-probe-of-weatherford-expands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delisting Watch: Daimler the Latest to “Go Dark” in U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/05/20/delisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%e2%80%9cgo-dark%e2%80%9d-in-u-s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/05/20/delisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%e2%80%9cgo-dark%e2%80%9d-in-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 17:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Global EDD Group</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daimler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daimler ag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[york stock exchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltechtoday.globaledd.com/?p=2729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia Daimler’s delisting is the latest sign of German companies abandoning U.S. capital markets, opting instead to list solely in Frankfurt, re-fortified. The planned delisting and deregistration of Daimler AG is the latest in this months-long trend, propelled by the growth of Frankfurt and its Xetra electronic exchange, despite a weakening euro. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:NYSE_Advanced_Trading_Floor.jpg"><img title="New York Stock Exchange Advanced Trading Floor..." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4e/NYSE_Advanced_Trading_Floor.jpg/300px-NYSE_Advanced_Trading_Floor.jpg" alt="New York Stock Exchange Advanced Trading Floor..." width="300" height="234" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:NYSE_Advanced_Trading_Floor.jpg">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>Daimler’s <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/delisting" title="Delisting (stock)" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delisting_%28stock%29">delisting</a> is the latest sign of German companies abandoning U.S. <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/capital_market" title="Capital market" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_market">capital markets</a>, opting instead to list solely in <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/frankfurt" title="Frankfurt am Main" rel="geolocation" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=50.1102777778,8.68222222222&amp;spn=1.0,1.0&amp;q=50.1102777778,8.68222222222 (Frankfurt%20am%20Main)&amp;t=h">Frankfurt</a>, re-fortified. The planned delisting and deregistration of <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/daimlerchrysler" title="NYSE: DCX" rel="googlefinance" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:DCX">Daimler AG</a> is the latest in this months-long trend, propelled by the growth of Frankfurt and its <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000000523808" title="Xetra (trading system)" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xetra_%28trading_system%29">Xetra</a> electronic exchange, despite a weakening euro. It is also residual of Daimler’s bitter end in the Chrysler saga.</p>
<p>The carmaker announced its intention to “go dark” in a letter to the <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/nyse" title="New York Stock Exchange" rel="homepage" href="http://www.nyse.com/">New York Stock Exchange</a>, detailing its plans to delist its shares and to deregister with the SEC. As cited in a statement by Daimler, the primary reason for the planned listing is “a significant change in the behavior of international investors, who now primarily trade in Daimler shares in Germany and through electronic trading platforms.” Of note, however, Daimler, in its recent annual report, reported consistently low trading volumes in the United States, which amounted to well below 5% of the worldwide trading volume.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://currents.westlawbusiness.com/Articles/2010/05/20100518_0032.aspx?src=RSS">Delisting Watch: Daimler the Latest to “Go Dark” in U.S.</a>.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/05/14/financial/f055420D42.DTL&amp;feed=rss.business">Daimler to pull shares off New York Stock Exchange</a> (sfgate.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory%3Fid%3D10645856&amp;a=18034677&amp;rid=f2c40299-f489-4498-b5c6-5be5eb5684d4&amp;e=00dfe9510818dd80c76200a9ec45a90f">Daimler to Pull Shares off New York Stock Exchange</a> (abcnews.go.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.nytimes.com/2010/02/19/business/global/19daimler.html%3Fpartner%3Drss%26emc%3Drss&amp;a=13250367&amp;rid=f2c40299-f489-4498-b5c6-5be5eb5684d4&amp;e=773b1630b1d8c830b1ccaa22704669d1">Daimler Cancels 2009 Dividend After Quarterly Loss</a> (nytimes.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/15/electronic-exchanges-empt_n_577586.html">Electronic Exchanges Empty NYSE Trading Floor</a> (huffingtonpost.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=f2c40299-f489-4498-b5c6-5be5eb5684d4" alt="" /><span class="zem-script more-related more-info pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook_like addtoany_special_service" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/05/20/delisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%e2%80%9cgo-dark%e2%80%9d-in-u-s/"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter_tweet addtoany_special_service" data-count="none" data-url="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/05/20/delisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%e2%80%9cgo-dark%e2%80%9d-in-u-s/" data-text="Delisting Watch: Daimler the Latest to “Go Dark” in U.S."></a><a class="a2a_button_google_plus_share addtoany_special_service" data-annotation="none" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/05/20/delisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%e2%80%9cgo-dark%e2%80%9d-in-u-s/"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F05%2F20%2Fdelisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%25e2%2580%259cgo-dark%25e2%2580%259d-in-u-s%2F&amp;linkname=Delisting%20Watch%3A%20Daimler%20the%20Latest%20to%20%E2%80%9CGo%20Dark%E2%80%9D%20in%20U.S." title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/linkedin.png" width="16" height="16" alt="LinkedIn"/></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/pinterest?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F05%2F20%2Fdelisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%25e2%2580%259cgo-dark%25e2%2580%259d-in-u-s%2F&amp;linkname=Delisting%20Watch%3A%20Daimler%20the%20Latest%20to%20%E2%80%9CGo%20Dark%E2%80%9D%20in%20U.S." title="Pinterest" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/pinterest.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Pinterest"/></a><a class="a2a_button_evernote" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/evernote?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F05%2F20%2Fdelisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%25e2%2580%259cgo-dark%25e2%2580%259d-in-u-s%2F&amp;linkname=Delisting%20Watch%3A%20Daimler%20the%20Latest%20to%20%E2%80%9CGo%20Dark%E2%80%9D%20in%20U.S." title="Evernote" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/evernote.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Evernote"/></a><a class="a2a_button_wordpress" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F05%2F20%2Fdelisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%25e2%2580%259cgo-dark%25e2%2580%259d-in-u-s%2F&amp;linkname=Delisting%20Watch%3A%20Daimler%20the%20Latest%20to%20%E2%80%9CGo%20Dark%E2%80%9D%20in%20U.S." title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a><a class="a2a_button_blogger_post" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/blogger_post?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F05%2F20%2Fdelisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%25e2%2580%259cgo-dark%25e2%2580%259d-in-u-s%2F&amp;linkname=Delisting%20Watch%3A%20Daimler%20the%20Latest%20to%20%E2%80%9CGo%20Dark%E2%80%9D%20in%20U.S." title="Blogger Post" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/blogger.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Blogger Post"/></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F05%2F20%2Fdelisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%25e2%2580%259cgo-dark%25e2%2580%259d-in-u-s%2F&amp;linkname=Delisting%20Watch%3A%20Daimler%20the%20Latest%20to%20%E2%80%9CGo%20Dark%E2%80%9D%20in%20U.S." title="Email" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/email.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Email"/></a><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F05%2F20%2Fdelisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%25e2%2580%259cgo-dark%25e2%2580%259d-in-u-s%2F&amp;title=Delisting%20Watch%3A%20Daimler%20the%20Latest%20to%20%E2%80%9CGo%20Dark%E2%80%9D%20in%20U.S." id="wpa2a_12"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/05/20/delisting-watch-daimler-the-latest-to-%e2%80%9cgo-dark%e2%80%9d-in-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inspector General Report: Investigation of the SEC’s Response to Concerns Regarding Robert Allen Stanford’s Alleged Ponzi Scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/inspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%e2%80%99s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%e2%80%99s-alleged-ponzi-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/inspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%e2%80%99s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%e2%80%99s-alleged-ponzi-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Global EDD Group</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponzi scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities and exchange commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltechtoday.globaledd.com/?p=2057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[REPORT OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Case No. OIG-526 Investigation of the SEC’s Response to Concerns Regarding Robert Allen Stanford’s Alleged Ponzi Scheme March 31, 2010]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REPORT OF INVESTIGATION<br />
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION<br />
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL<br />
Case No. OIG-526<br />
Investigation of the SEC’s Response to Concerns<br />
Regarding Robert <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/allen_stanford" title="Allen Stanford" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Stanford">Allen Stanford</a>’s Alleged <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/ponzi_scheme" title="Ponzi scheme" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme">Ponzi Scheme</a><br />
March 31, 2010</p>

<iframe src="http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2010/oig-526.pdf&hl=en_US&embedded=true" class="gde-frame" style="width:100%; height:800px; border: none;" scrolling="no"></iframe>

<p class="gde-text"><a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2010/oig-526.pdf" target="_blank" class="gde-link">Download (PDF, 981.51KB)</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=84e727a6-bfee-479d-9083-b2af8b800fcd" alt="" /><span class="zem-script more-related more-info pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook_like addtoany_special_service" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/inspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%e2%80%99s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%e2%80%99s-alleged-ponzi-scheme/"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter_tweet addtoany_special_service" data-count="none" data-url="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/inspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%e2%80%99s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%e2%80%99s-alleged-ponzi-scheme/" data-text="Inspector General Report: Investigation of the SEC’s Response to Concerns Regarding Robert Allen Stanford’s Alleged Ponzi Scheme"></a><a class="a2a_button_google_plus_share addtoany_special_service" data-annotation="none" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/inspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%e2%80%99s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%e2%80%99s-alleged-ponzi-scheme/"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Finspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%25e2%2580%2599s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%25e2%2580%2599s-alleged-ponzi-scheme%2F&amp;linkname=Inspector%20General%20Report%3A%20Investigation%20of%20the%20SEC%E2%80%99s%20Response%20to%20Concerns%20Regarding%20Robert%20Allen%20Stanford%E2%80%99s%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/linkedin.png" width="16" height="16" alt="LinkedIn"/></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/pinterest?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Finspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%25e2%2580%2599s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%25e2%2580%2599s-alleged-ponzi-scheme%2F&amp;linkname=Inspector%20General%20Report%3A%20Investigation%20of%20the%20SEC%E2%80%99s%20Response%20to%20Concerns%20Regarding%20Robert%20Allen%20Stanford%E2%80%99s%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme" title="Pinterest" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/pinterest.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Pinterest"/></a><a class="a2a_button_evernote" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/evernote?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Finspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%25e2%2580%2599s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%25e2%2580%2599s-alleged-ponzi-scheme%2F&amp;linkname=Inspector%20General%20Report%3A%20Investigation%20of%20the%20SEC%E2%80%99s%20Response%20to%20Concerns%20Regarding%20Robert%20Allen%20Stanford%E2%80%99s%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme" title="Evernote" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/evernote.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Evernote"/></a><a class="a2a_button_wordpress" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Finspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%25e2%2580%2599s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%25e2%2580%2599s-alleged-ponzi-scheme%2F&amp;linkname=Inspector%20General%20Report%3A%20Investigation%20of%20the%20SEC%E2%80%99s%20Response%20to%20Concerns%20Regarding%20Robert%20Allen%20Stanford%E2%80%99s%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a><a class="a2a_button_blogger_post" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/blogger_post?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Finspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%25e2%2580%2599s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%25e2%2580%2599s-alleged-ponzi-scheme%2F&amp;linkname=Inspector%20General%20Report%3A%20Investigation%20of%20the%20SEC%E2%80%99s%20Response%20to%20Concerns%20Regarding%20Robert%20Allen%20Stanford%E2%80%99s%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme" title="Blogger Post" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/blogger.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Blogger Post"/></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Finspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%25e2%2580%2599s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%25e2%2580%2599s-alleged-ponzi-scheme%2F&amp;linkname=Inspector%20General%20Report%3A%20Investigation%20of%20the%20SEC%E2%80%99s%20Response%20to%20Concerns%20Regarding%20Robert%20Allen%20Stanford%E2%80%99s%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme" title="Email" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/email.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Email"/></a><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Finspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%25e2%2580%2599s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%25e2%2580%2599s-alleged-ponzi-scheme%2F&amp;title=Inspector%20General%20Report%3A%20Investigation%20of%20the%20SEC%E2%80%99s%20Response%20to%20Concerns%20Regarding%20Robert%20Allen%20Stanford%E2%80%99s%20Alleged%20Ponzi%20Scheme" id="wpa2a_16"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/inspector-general-report-investigation-of-the-sec%e2%80%99s-response-to-concerns-regarding-robert-allen-stanford%e2%80%99s-alleged-ponzi-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Complaint for Investment Fraud &#124; Securities and Exchange Commission v Goldman, Sachs &amp; Co. &#124; Justia.com &#8211; JDSupra</title>
		<link>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/civil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/civil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Global EDD Group</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collateralized debt obligation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldman sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage backed securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities exchange act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltechtoday.globaledd.com/?p=2047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Securities and Exchange Commission is suing Goldman, Sachs for defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages as the U.S. housing market was beginning to falter. The SEC alleges that Goldman Sachs structured and marketed a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) that hinged on the performance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission is suing Goldman, Sachs for defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages as the U.S. housing market was beginning to falter.</p>
<p>The <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/united_states_securities_and_exchange_commission" title="U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission" rel="homepage" href="http://www.sec.gov">SEC</a> alleges that <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/goldman_sachs" title="NYSE: GS" rel="googlefinance" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GS">Goldman Sachs</a> structured and marketed a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) that hinged on the performance of subprime <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/residential_mortgage_backed_security" title="Residential mortgage-backed security" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residential_mortgage-backed_security">residential mortgage-backed securities</a> (RMBS). Goldman Sachs failed to disclose to investors vital information about the CDO, in particular the role that a major <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/hedge_fund" title="Hedge fund" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedge_fund">hedge fund</a> played in the portfolio selection process and the fact that the hedge fund had taken a short position against the CDO.</p>
<p>Investors are alleged to have lost more than $1 billion.</p>
<p>The SEC&#8217;s complaint charges Goldman Sachs and Goldman Sachs Vice President Fabrice Tourre with violations of Section 17(a) of the <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/securities_act_of_1933" title="Securities Act of 1933" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securities_Act_of_1933">Securities Act of 1933</a>, Section 10(b) of the <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/securities_exchange_act_of_1934" title="Securities Exchange Act of 1934" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securities_Exchange_Act_of_1934">Securities Exchange Act of 1934</a>, and Exchange Act <a class="zem_slink freebase/en/sec_rule_10b-5" title="SEC Rule 10b-5" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEC_Rule_10b-5">Rule 10b-5</a>. The Commission seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest, and financial penalties.</p>

<iframe src="http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.jdsupra.com/post/fileServer.aspx?fName=0139f8fb-221d-4061-8f60-5ee043131a84.pdf&hl=en_US&embedded=true" class="gde-frame" style="width:100%; height:800px; border: none;" scrolling="no"></iframe>

<p class="gde-text"><a href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/fileServer.aspx?fName=0139f8fb-221d-4061-8f60-5ee043131a84.pdf" target="_blank" class="gde-link">Download (PDF, 176.05KB)</a></p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=0139f8fb-221d-4061-8f60-5ee043131a84">Civil Complaint for investment Fraud | Securities and Exchange Commission v Goldman, Sachs &amp; Co. | Justia.com &#8211; JDSupra</a>.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=9b40b087-b7f9-4e5c-9a2b-8d4802ed6693" alt="" /><span class="zem-script more-related more-info pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook_like addtoany_special_service" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/civil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra/"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter_tweet addtoany_special_service" data-count="none" data-url="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/civil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra/" data-text="Civil Complaint for Investment Fraud | Securities and Exchange Commission v Goldman, Sachs &#038; Co. | Justia.com &#8211; JDSupra"></a><a class="a2a_button_google_plus_share addtoany_special_service" data-annotation="none" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/civil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra/"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Fcivil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra%2F&amp;linkname=Civil%20Complaint%20for%20Investment%20Fraud%20%7C%20Securities%20and%20Exchange%20Commission%20v%20Goldman%2C%20Sachs%20%26%20Co.%20%7C%20Justia.com%20%E2%80%93%20JDSupra" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/linkedin.png" width="16" height="16" alt="LinkedIn"/></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/pinterest?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Fcivil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra%2F&amp;linkname=Civil%20Complaint%20for%20Investment%20Fraud%20%7C%20Securities%20and%20Exchange%20Commission%20v%20Goldman%2C%20Sachs%20%26%20Co.%20%7C%20Justia.com%20%E2%80%93%20JDSupra" title="Pinterest" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/pinterest.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Pinterest"/></a><a class="a2a_button_evernote" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/evernote?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Fcivil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra%2F&amp;linkname=Civil%20Complaint%20for%20Investment%20Fraud%20%7C%20Securities%20and%20Exchange%20Commission%20v%20Goldman%2C%20Sachs%20%26%20Co.%20%7C%20Justia.com%20%E2%80%93%20JDSupra" title="Evernote" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/evernote.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Evernote"/></a><a class="a2a_button_wordpress" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Fcivil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra%2F&amp;linkname=Civil%20Complaint%20for%20Investment%20Fraud%20%7C%20Securities%20and%20Exchange%20Commission%20v%20Goldman%2C%20Sachs%20%26%20Co.%20%7C%20Justia.com%20%E2%80%93%20JDSupra" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a><a class="a2a_button_blogger_post" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/blogger_post?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Fcivil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra%2F&amp;linkname=Civil%20Complaint%20for%20Investment%20Fraud%20%7C%20Securities%20and%20Exchange%20Commission%20v%20Goldman%2C%20Sachs%20%26%20Co.%20%7C%20Justia.com%20%E2%80%93%20JDSupra" title="Blogger Post" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/blogger.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Blogger Post"/></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Fcivil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra%2F&amp;linkname=Civil%20Complaint%20for%20Investment%20Fraud%20%7C%20Securities%20and%20Exchange%20Commission%20v%20Goldman%2C%20Sachs%20%26%20Co.%20%7C%20Justia.com%20%E2%80%93%20JDSupra" title="Email" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/email.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Email"/></a><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F04%2F16%2Fcivil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra%2F&amp;title=Civil%20Complaint%20for%20Investment%20Fraud%20%7C%20Securities%20and%20Exchange%20Commission%20v%20Goldman%2C%20Sachs%20%26%20Co.%20%7C%20Justia.com%20%E2%80%93%20JDSupra" id="wpa2a_20"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/04/16/civil-complaint-for-investment-fraud-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-goldman-sachs-co-justia-com-jdsupra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alcatel-Lucent signs deal with U.S. on bribery case &#124; Reuters</title>
		<link>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/02/19/alcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/02/19/alcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Global EDD Group</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcatel lucent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bribery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bribery case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrupt practices act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltechtoday.globaledd.com/?p=1280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telecoms equipment gear maker Alcatel-Lucent  set aside 93 million euros ($125.5 million) last quarter to settle a U.S. bribery investigation that began six years ago. The Franco-American group said that it had reached agreements with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Committee under which it would pay fines, be put on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telecoms equipment gear maker Alcatel-Lucent  set aside 93 million euros ($125.5 million) last quarter to settle a U.S. bribery investigation that began six years ago.</p>
<p>The Franco-American group said that it had reached agreements with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Committee under which it would pay fines, be put on a three-year probationary period, and be subject to a French anti-corruption monitor.</p>
<p>In exchange, the Department of Justice would defer prosecution of the company over charges that it violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act&amp;apos;s anti-bribery provisions.</p>
<p>The accord must be approved by U.S. courts in order to take effect, according to a February 11 regulatory filing from Alcatel-Lucent.</p>
<p>&#8220;If finalized, the agreements would relate to alleged violations of the FCPA involving several countries, including Costa Rica, Taiwan, and Kenya,&#8221; said the company in the filing.</p>
<p>The investigation centered on an Alcatel executive Christian Sapsizian who pleaded guilty in 2007 to arranging for bribes to be paid to Costa Rican officials to obtain mobile contracts.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE61I1GK20100219?type=marketsNews">Alcatel-Lucent signs deal with U.S. on bribery case | Reuters</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook_like addtoany_special_service" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/02/19/alcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters/"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter_tweet addtoany_special_service" data-count="none" data-url="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/02/19/alcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters/" data-text="Alcatel-Lucent signs deal with U.S. on bribery case | Reuters"></a><a class="a2a_button_google_plus_share addtoany_special_service" data-annotation="none" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/02/19/alcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters/"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F02%2F19%2Falcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters%2F&amp;linkname=Alcatel-Lucent%20signs%20deal%20with%20U.S.%20on%20bribery%20case%20%7C%20Reuters" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/linkedin.png" width="16" height="16" alt="LinkedIn"/></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/pinterest?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F02%2F19%2Falcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters%2F&amp;linkname=Alcatel-Lucent%20signs%20deal%20with%20U.S.%20on%20bribery%20case%20%7C%20Reuters" title="Pinterest" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/pinterest.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Pinterest"/></a><a class="a2a_button_evernote" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/evernote?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F02%2F19%2Falcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters%2F&amp;linkname=Alcatel-Lucent%20signs%20deal%20with%20U.S.%20on%20bribery%20case%20%7C%20Reuters" title="Evernote" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/evernote.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Evernote"/></a><a class="a2a_button_wordpress" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F02%2F19%2Falcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters%2F&amp;linkname=Alcatel-Lucent%20signs%20deal%20with%20U.S.%20on%20bribery%20case%20%7C%20Reuters" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a><a class="a2a_button_blogger_post" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/blogger_post?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F02%2F19%2Falcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters%2F&amp;linkname=Alcatel-Lucent%20signs%20deal%20with%20U.S.%20on%20bribery%20case%20%7C%20Reuters" title="Blogger Post" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/blogger.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Blogger Post"/></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F02%2F19%2Falcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters%2F&amp;linkname=Alcatel-Lucent%20signs%20deal%20with%20U.S.%20on%20bribery%20case%20%7C%20Reuters" title="Email" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/email.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Email"/></a><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2010%2F02%2F19%2Falcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters%2F&amp;title=Alcatel-Lucent%20signs%20deal%20with%20U.S.%20on%20bribery%20case%20%7C%20Reuters" id="wpa2a_24"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2010/02/19/alcatel-lucent-signs-deal-with-u-s-on-bribery-case-reuters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Exchange 2010 Dumpster</title>
		<link>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/12/18/the-new-exchange-2010-dumpster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/12/18/the-new-exchange-2010-dumpster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Global EDD Group</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumpster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email archiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal discovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltechtoday.globaledd.com/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my previous blog I exposed the naked truth about Exchange deleted items and how easy it is to destroy potential email records. Microsoft must have listened because the new version Exchange 2010 includes substantial improvements to the “dumpster” and deleted item behavior and closed the potential “leak” for eDiscovery. The new Exchange 2010 dumpster is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my previous blog I exposed the naked truth about Exchange deleted items and how easy it is to destroy potential email records.</p>
<p>Microsoft must have listened because the new version Exchange 2010 includes substantial improvements to the “dumpster” and deleted item behavior and closed the potential “leak” for eDiscovery.</p>
<p>The new Exchange 2010 dumpster is a complete new design.  Here is a link if you want the complete story.</p>
<p><a href="http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2009/09/25/452632.aspx" target="_blank">http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2009/09/25/452632.aspx</a></p>
<p>The new Exchange 2010 dumpster features that are key for legal discovery are:</p>
<p>-          The new dumpster now includes all deleted items from the mailbox including email, calendars, contacts, and more.  The old dumpster only included email.</p>
<p>-          The new dumpster is indexed so it can be searched using the new multi-mailbox search tool in Exchange 2010. The old dumpster was not indexed and could not be searched.</p>
<p>-          The new dumpster has been extended with new Purges and Versions folders.  Users can no longer bypass the dumpster behavior with a manual purge.</p>
<p>The Purges folder keeps items that users purge from the dumpster and keeps them for the length of the dumpster retention period.</p>
<p>The Versions folders keeps a copy-on-write snapshot of email that users modify.</p>
<p>The new Exchange 2010 dumpster still operates with a retention period (14 day default) or custom.  The new dumpster features are a welcome addition to Exchange.</p>
<p>By capturing all deleted items and by preventing users from purging email, it closes all of the  major “leaks” for email discovery and compliance.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.mimosasystems.com/blog/ediscovery/the-new-exchange-2010-dumpster/">The New Exchange 2010 Dumpster | Email Archiving &amp; Storage Management Experts</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook_like addtoany_special_service" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/12/18/the-new-exchange-2010-dumpster/"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter_tweet addtoany_special_service" data-count="none" data-url="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/12/18/the-new-exchange-2010-dumpster/" data-text="The New Exchange 2010 Dumpster"></a><a class="a2a_button_google_plus_share addtoany_special_service" data-annotation="none" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/12/18/the-new-exchange-2010-dumpster/"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F12%2F18%2Fthe-new-exchange-2010-dumpster%2F&amp;linkname=The%20New%20Exchange%202010%20Dumpster" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/linkedin.png" width="16" height="16" alt="LinkedIn"/></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/pinterest?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F12%2F18%2Fthe-new-exchange-2010-dumpster%2F&amp;linkname=The%20New%20Exchange%202010%20Dumpster" title="Pinterest" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/pinterest.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Pinterest"/></a><a class="a2a_button_evernote" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/evernote?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F12%2F18%2Fthe-new-exchange-2010-dumpster%2F&amp;linkname=The%20New%20Exchange%202010%20Dumpster" title="Evernote" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/evernote.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Evernote"/></a><a class="a2a_button_wordpress" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F12%2F18%2Fthe-new-exchange-2010-dumpster%2F&amp;linkname=The%20New%20Exchange%202010%20Dumpster" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a><a class="a2a_button_blogger_post" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/blogger_post?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F12%2F18%2Fthe-new-exchange-2010-dumpster%2F&amp;linkname=The%20New%20Exchange%202010%20Dumpster" title="Blogger Post" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/blogger.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Blogger Post"/></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F12%2F18%2Fthe-new-exchange-2010-dumpster%2F&amp;linkname=The%20New%20Exchange%202010%20Dumpster" title="Email" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/email.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Email"/></a><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F12%2F18%2Fthe-new-exchange-2010-dumpster%2F&amp;title=The%20New%20Exchange%202010%20Dumpster" id="wpa2a_28"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/12/18/the-new-exchange-2010-dumpster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Adds E-mail Archiving to Exchange 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/13/microsoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/13/microsoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Babineau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery requests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASDAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage capabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltechtoday.globaledd.com/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) announced general availability of Exchange Server 2010 this week, and the messaging platform comes with new data storage and protection features. E-mail archiving, e-discovery, regulatory compliance and security figure prominently in the new release, with features such as a Personal Archive, retention policies, legal hold, single-item restore, multi-mailbox search and access control. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) announced general availability of Exchange Server 2010 this week, and the messaging platform comes with new data storage and protection features.</p>
<p>E-mail archiving, e-discovery, regulatory compliance and security figure prominently in the new release, with features such as a Personal Archive, retention policies, legal hold, single-item restore, multi-mailbox search and access control.</p>
<p>Personal Archive is a special mailbox that appears alongside the primary mailbox folders in Outlook or Outlook Web App, so users have direct access to e-mail within the archive.</p>
<p>Exchange 2010 also offers new database availability, replication and failover capabilities for stronger disaster recovery, and storage I/O reductions and SATA and JBOD support reduce data storage costs.</p>
<p>Storage vendors such as EMC (NYSE: EMC), Dell (NASDAQ: DELL), Mimosa, Symantec (NASDAQ: SYMC), NetApp (NASDAQ: NTAP), Seagate/i365 (NASDAQ: STX), Azaleos and NeverFail have pledged support for Exchange 2010.</p>
<p>Despite the new storage capabilities, Enterprise Strategy Group analyst Brian Babineau said the new release still leaves plenty of room for storage vendors.</p>
<p>&#8220;We believe that the latest version of Exchange, including its archiving and retention capabilities, actually drives the need for purpose-built archive solutions,&#8221; Babineau said. &#8220;It is readily apparent that Microsoft wants Exchange 2010 customers to manage everything — storage, data protection, retention, discovery, etc. — inside of Exchange. However, this can get very complicated when a company goes through a significant amount of discovery requests, has several large mailboxes, and a multitude of retention policies that must be enforced.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/continuity/news/article.php/3848266">Microsoft Adds E-mail Archiving to Exchange 2010 &#8211; www.enterprisestorageforum.com</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook_like addtoany_special_service" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/13/microsoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010/"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter_tweet addtoany_special_service" data-count="none" data-url="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/13/microsoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010/" data-text="Microsoft Adds E-mail Archiving to Exchange 2010"></a><a class="a2a_button_google_plus_share addtoany_special_service" data-annotation="none" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/13/microsoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010/"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F13%2Fmicrosoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Adds%20E-mail%20Archiving%20to%20Exchange%202010" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/linkedin.png" width="16" height="16" alt="LinkedIn"/></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/pinterest?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F13%2Fmicrosoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Adds%20E-mail%20Archiving%20to%20Exchange%202010" title="Pinterest" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/pinterest.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Pinterest"/></a><a class="a2a_button_evernote" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/evernote?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F13%2Fmicrosoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Adds%20E-mail%20Archiving%20to%20Exchange%202010" title="Evernote" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/evernote.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Evernote"/></a><a class="a2a_button_wordpress" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F13%2Fmicrosoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Adds%20E-mail%20Archiving%20to%20Exchange%202010" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a><a class="a2a_button_blogger_post" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/blogger_post?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F13%2Fmicrosoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Adds%20E-mail%20Archiving%20to%20Exchange%202010" title="Blogger Post" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/blogger.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Blogger Post"/></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F13%2Fmicrosoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Adds%20E-mail%20Archiving%20to%20Exchange%202010" title="Email" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/email.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Email"/></a><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F13%2Fmicrosoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010%2F&amp;title=Microsoft%20Adds%20E-mail%20Archiving%20to%20Exchange%202010" id="wpa2a_32"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/13/microsoft-adds-e-mail-archiving-to-exchange-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Drops the Price for SharePoint Online</title>
		<link>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/03/microsoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/03/microsoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profile organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legaltechtoday.globaledd.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems increased competition with Google is making Microsoft look twice at its pricing for online services such as SharePoint news, site and Exchange. The company has reduced the monthly rates for its Business Productivity Online Suite BPOS which includes SharePoint from US$ 15 to US$ 10. They also dropped the monthly subscription for Exchange Online from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems increased competition with Google is making Microsoft look twice at its pricing for online services such as SharePoint news, site and Exchange.</p>
<p>The company has reduced the monthly rates for its Business Productivity Online Suite BPOS which includes SharePoint from US$ 15 to US$ 10. They also dropped the monthly subscription for Exchange Online from US$ 10 to US$ 5.</p>
<p>In addition to the price reduction, BPOS is also available in Singapore, and soon India. BPOS will be available in over 36 countries by the end of this year and there are a number of new high profile organizations using the service. Trials are slated to begin in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Czech Republic, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Puerto Rico, Romania and Taiwan.</p>
<p>Its this adoption that is pushing the price of the online services down. According to Microsoft specifically, &#8220;“rapid customer adoption, global scale and improved efficiencies from new software such as Exchange Server 2010.&#8221;</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-20/microsoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online-005946.php">Microsoft Drops the Price for SharePoint Online</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook_like addtoany_special_service" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/03/microsoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online/"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter_tweet addtoany_special_service" data-count="none" data-url="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/03/microsoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online/" data-text="Microsoft Drops the Price for SharePoint Online"></a><a class="a2a_button_google_plus_share addtoany_special_service" data-annotation="none" data-href="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/03/microsoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online/"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fmicrosoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Drops%20the%20Price%20for%20SharePoint%20Online" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/linkedin.png" width="16" height="16" alt="LinkedIn"/></a><a class="a2a_button_pinterest" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/pinterest?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fmicrosoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Drops%20the%20Price%20for%20SharePoint%20Online" title="Pinterest" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/pinterest.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Pinterest"/></a><a class="a2a_button_evernote" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/evernote?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fmicrosoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Drops%20the%20Price%20for%20SharePoint%20Online" title="Evernote" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/evernote.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Evernote"/></a><a class="a2a_button_wordpress" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fmicrosoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Drops%20the%20Price%20for%20SharePoint%20Online" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a><a class="a2a_button_blogger_post" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/blogger_post?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fmicrosoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Drops%20the%20Price%20for%20SharePoint%20Online" title="Blogger Post" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/blogger.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Blogger Post"/></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fmicrosoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online%2F&amp;linkname=Microsoft%20Drops%20the%20Price%20for%20SharePoint%20Online" title="Email" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/email.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Email"/></a><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legaltechtoday.com%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fmicrosoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online%2F&amp;title=Microsoft%20Drops%20the%20Price%20for%20SharePoint%20Online" id="wpa2a_36"><img src="http://www.legaltechtoday.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legaltechtoday.com/2009/11/03/microsoft-drops-the-price-for-sharepoint-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

