European Union Concerned With Cloud Deployments Storing Sensitive Data Offshore

Cloud computing is not only a technical and business concern, but also a legal and regulatory issue given the fact that users are essentially handing over the management or storage of their content and data to third-party service providers. In some jurisdictions, it is unlawful to store sensitive data offshore, hence reducing the viability of running cloud deployments. A recent study commissioned by the European Union warns that public clouds might not be suitable for government use, given certain restrictions.

A study published by the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) entitled Security & Resilience in Governmental Clouds has warned EU government agencies to avoid running public cloud deployments that involve sensitive data. This is due to legislation in some EU member states that restrict certain types of information from leaving national borders. In the case of public cloud deployments, the ENISA says storing sensitive data on public clouds will effectively violate these restrictions, particularly if the data centers are physically located in other countries.

An example of such a legal restriction is included in the UK’s Data Protection Act, which is based on the EU’s Data Protection Directive. The directive is currently being amended to include provisions for exchanging data across national borders.

via European Union Concerned With Cloud Deployments Storing Sensitive Data Offshore.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Is Britain Backpedaling on the Bribery Act? – Law Blog – WSJ

Corporations have been sweating bullets about Britain’s Bribery Act, which is set to take effect in April.

But is a reprieve on the horizon?

The Act, which some people call the FCPA on steroids, is set to undergo a review in the name of making sure it doesn’t impede Britain’s recovering economy, according to media reports. White & Case notified its clients today that reports have said the Ministry of Justice is going to take a look at the Act to make sure regulatory burdens on businesses are not overly broad.

The WSJ’s Corruption Currents blog gives a summary of the various news reports about the issue and points out that the Daily Telegraph has editorialized against the Act saying it could do “serious damage to our long-term commercial interests.”

FCPA experts have been warning the Bribery Act may be enforced less enthusiastically than anti-bribery laws on our shores. However, it would be a surprise if government officials who had passed the law in hopes of being tough on corruption already are backpedaling. That notion flies in the face of the guidance offered by anti-bribery groups such as Transparency International, which has written tomes on how bribery in the end is bad for business.

via Is Britain Backpedaling on the Bribery Act? – Law Blog – WSJ.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Firms Vulnerable In Corrupt Practices Crackdown

Authorities have been escalating their campaign against corruption in the last few years, resulting in a sharp spike in enforcement actions in the United States and the enactment of a new anti-bribery law in the United Kingdom.

For years, the United States has led the way in the fight against corruption with the Federal Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits companies with U.S. operations from engaging in corrupt practices overseas.

Although the law has been in effect since 1977, it is in the last few years that enforcement activity has skyrocketed. This comes at a time when other countries are also cracking down on corruption.

The U.K.’s Bribery Act, for instance, goes into effect in April 2011 and prohibits companies with U.K. operations from engaging in bribery. Germany and other members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development also have increased investigations and are collaborating more with the United States.

As corporate business practices come under increasing scrutiny, U.S. companies that do business outside the country are more vulnerable than ever. The risk goes beyond their own internal operations.

Many companies that have solid policies in place for their own operations are vulnerable when it comes to their supply chains and past activities of entities that have been acquired in a merger or buyout.

Losses associated with this risk can be substantial. Businesses face the prospect of hefty defense costs as well as the possibility of fines and penalties if convicted. Individuals, including chief executives, chief financial officers and other executives can be charged with violations of the law and be sentenced to serve jail time. An investigation and negative publicity also can result in significant damage to a company’s reputation.

via Firms Vulnerable In Corrupt Practices Crackdown.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Bringing eDiscovery In-house: What Corporate Counsel Want

That’s riiiiiiiiiiiight, in-house lawyers, get ready for another huge work pile to fall in your lap!

It seems that 2011 is the year for “bringing more work in-house” — which inevitably means more work dumped on in-house counsel.

The modern corporate counsel had better be ready.

EDD Blog Online writes in an interesting recent post that a large portion of eDiscovery technology and services will likely move in-house in 2011.

Corporate counsel have historically worked with outside counsel, litigation technology consulting groups, litigation service providers and computer forensic companies to get this work done.

EDD Blog speculates that the reasoning behind the old-school “outsourcing” method was a byproduct of the days when litigation required thousands and thousands of documents to be reviewed, scanned and digitized. In “the old days,” this was always been done by third parties.

Well, not anymore, in-house lawyers — and it’s time to get ready to take on this mess!

The post goes on to discuss many other problems and changes including:

  • Practicing Law, Not Technology
  • Cost
  • Technology
  • Cooperation and Collaboration

via Bringing eDiscovery In-house: What Corporate Counsel Want.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Consumer Reports: Wait for a better Verizon iPhone – FierceMobileIT

Consumer Reports concludes that consumers might want to hold off on the iPhone 4 that is slated to debut on Verizon (NYSE: VZ) Wireless’ CDMA network on Feb. 10.

“The Verizon Wireless iPhone 4 has plenty in its favor, especially compared with its AT&T (NYSE: T) sibling,” wrote editors Paul Reynolds and Mike Gikas in a blog post. “But it may be quickly replaced by a newer, cooler version more quickly than is customary even for the die-young life expectancy of most smartphones.”

The editors suggest that since Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) is expected to introduce a new version of the iPhone this summer, it may not be worth it to sign on for what they describe as a “transitional phone” that Apple put together to “tide Verizon through until the summer.”

via Consumer Reports: Wait for a better Verizon iPhone – FierceMobileIT.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

KnowledgeTree Signs Record Volume of New Customers in December — RALEIGH, N.C., Jan. 19, 2011 /PRNewswire/ –

KnowledgeTree, a provider of cloud-based document management solutions, today announced that December was a record month for new customer wins, capping a fourth quarter in which customer acquisitions increased 215 percent over the previous quarter. New customers range from small and medium-sized businesses to departmental teams at large enterprises, and include Caldwell Securities, Cubic Motion, Fuji Chemical, Multisensor Systems, Orbitz, Sental Clinical Research Services, and Vasomedical.

The strong December concluded a successful 2010 overall for KnowledgeTree, during which the company experienced a strong uptick in sales for its SaaS-based offering, thanks largely to new product features, partnerships, and pricing models.

Delivered via both SaaS and an on-premise solution, KnowledgeTree addresses unique challenges faced by attorneys and other lines of business workers in finance, human resources, and sales and marketing who need more than just document sharing and ad hoc collaboration.

via KnowledgeTree Signs Record Volume of New Customers in December — RALEIGH, N.C., Jan. 19, 2011 /PRNewswire/ –.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Verizon’s iPhone Unable to Make Calls Outside of the U.S.

Those considering getting Verizon’s version of the Apple iPhone 4 should consider that this model will not be able to make calls in Europe or much of the rest of the world, while AT&T’s version can.

Verizon’s cellular network uses the CDMA standard, while most countries only have networks using a rival standard: GSM. This means that a majority of Verizon’s phones can’t make calls outside of the U.S.

This carrier does offer a few phones that support both CDMA and GSM. Included in the list of worldphones is the Motorola Droid Pro and the BlackBerry Bold 9650 – but not the iPhone 4.

This means that outside of the U.S., most travelers with Verizon’s iPhone 4 will be unable to cellular-wireless networks to make voice calls. Their only option will be connection to Wi-Fi networks to use VoIP software like Skype.

via Verizon’s iPhone Unable to Make Calls Outside of the U.S..

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Verizon’s iPhone Unable to Make Calls Outside of the U.S.

Those considering getting Verizon’s version of the Apple iPhone 4 should consider that this model will not be able to make calls in Europe or much of the rest of the world, while AT&T’s version can.

Verizon’s cellular network uses the CDMA standard, while most countries only have networks using a rival standard: GSM. This means that a majority of Verizon’s phones can’t make calls outside of the U.S.

This carrier does offer a few phones that support both CDMA and GSM. Included in the list of worldphones is the Motorola Droid Pro and the BlackBerry Bold 9650 – but not the iPhone 4.

This means that outside of the U.S., most travelers with Verizon’s iPhone 4 will be unable to cellular-wireless networks to make voice calls. Their only option will be connection to Wi-Fi networks to use VoIP software like Skype.

via Verizon’s iPhone Unable to Make Calls Outside of the U.S..

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Google Holding a Data Privacy Day Event at Washington, DC Office on January 28th

Google is inviting for the Data Privacy Day event at the Washington, DC offices for a light breakfast and a panel discussion about how privacy affects technology and vice versa.

This discussion won’t linger on policy alone. Instead, it will focus on engineering and the mechanics behind the best practices of online privacy.

Friday, January 28, 2011

Light breakfast with the panelists begins at 9:00 AM

Panel begins at 10:00 AM

Google DC 1101 New York Avenue, NW 2nd Floor

Entrance on Eye Street Washington, DC

Moderator:

Kim Hart, Reporter, Politico

Panelists:

Peter Eckersley, Senior Staff Technologist, Electronic Frontier Foundation

Ed Felten, Chief Technologist, Federal Trade Commission

Ari Schwartz, Senior Internet Policy Advisor, National Institute of Standards and Technology

Alma Whitten, Director of Privacy, Product and Engineering, Google

via Google Holding a Data Privacy Day Event at Washington, DC Office on January 28th.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Interesting Computer Stuff with Professor Cameron: Metadata and You

Metadata is something that is used today in many areas, from computer forensics to corporate espionage. I will give you a regular example first. As a professor, there are times when I think something might be an exact copy of someone else’s file. The first thing I will do is take a look at the file properties. In Office 2010, I would go to the File tab and select “Info”. On the right side are properties. I can see very easily the name of the person who created the file. In a computer lab, most people probably have the same user name, so that may not tell me anything. However, if you created it at home and gave it to a friend, there is pretty damning evidence since your friend has handed in a file with your name in it. Other ways include “date created” – this tells me the day and time the file was created. I am of course not opening up my whole bag of tricks here, but these are two ways to investigate a file further.

In terms of corporate espionage and hacking…many times, the metadata in programs such as Word (and most of the rest of Office) includes data like username, company name and a file path. If this file was created on a network drive, I now know the name of one of your company’s internal servers and possibly your username. This information is valuable for hackers!

If you are distributing a file from Office, also be aware if your company uses tracking changes, revisions, comments, or hidden text, that information can be included in a file you distribute. If a member of a company’s staff left a comment in the file, there is a good chance it could be found. You can use the Office 2010 Prepare for Sharing options to minimize this risk, though once again, most people do not realize this.

via Interesting Computer Stuff with Professor Cameron: Metadata and You.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare