Laporan: Geng Rusia terkait dengan besar Citibank hack

AS. berwenang sedang menyelidiki pencurian dari puluhan diperkirakan jutaan dolar dari Citibank oleh hacker sebagian menggunakan software Rusia disesuaikan untuk menyerang, menurut sebuah laporan berita.

Pelanggaran keamanan di U.S utama. bank terdeteksi pertengahan tahun berdasarkan lalu lintas dari alamat internet yang sebelumnya digunakan oleh geng Jaringan Bisnis Rusia, The Wall Street Journal mengatakan Selasa, mengutip sumber pemerintah yang tidak disebutkan namanya. Jaringan Bisnis Rusia adalah kelompok yang terkenal terkait dengan perangkat lunak berbahaya, hack, pornografi anak dan spam. Biro Investigasi Federal adalah menyelidik kasus, kata laporan itu.

Itu tidak diketahui apakah uang itu telah pulih dan perwakilan Citibank mengatakan perusahaan tidak memiliki sistem pelanggaran atau kerugian, menurut laporan.

melalui Laporan: Geng Rusia terkait dengan besar Citibank hack.

Mingguan twitter Update untuk 2009-12-20

  • @eMagSol I think you are a victim of spambots, many of which are targeting blogs. in reply to eMagSol #
  • To expand references & links to their sites. RT @ eMagSol: @globaledd but what purpose does it serve? i'm so confused! must have reasons! #
  • RT @ mix3travel: Was Secret TSA Screening Manual Posted By a Temp? – ABC News http://bit.ly/6LO5Ww #
  • Examining a Move to Change Securities Litigationhttp://nyti.ms/6cnqNd #
  • Ya! RT @ eMagSol: did anyone else's timeline freeze for a couple of minutes? #
  • RT @ IntegreonEDD: RT @jfehrman Interoperability: The Other Side of Our Settlement w/ European Commission http://tinyurl.com/yj969eo #
  • RT @ IntegreonEDD: RT @econwriter5 WSJ: How to Write an Operations Manual http://tinyurl.com/ycx9gsg (standardsand procedures for business) #

Didukung oleh Alat twitter

Akhir Korupsi? Opini – Korea Times

Amerika Serikat tampak tidak realistis, dan mungkin bahkan eksentrik ketika U.S. Kongres melewati Foreign Corrupt Practices Act FCPA di 1977, membuatnya ilegal untuk perusahaan publik yang diadakan untuk menyuap pejabat asing.

Banyak U.S. perusahaan mengeluhkan tentang hukum ini, dengan alasan bahwa di banyak negara pembayaran suap adalah biasa dan pajak dikurangkan.

Mereka juga mengklaim bahwa hukum menghambat upaya mereka untuk bersaing secara internasional terhadap perusahaan dari negara-negara yang tidak memiliki undang-undang anti-suap seperti.

Penelitian di saat mendukung klaim ini dengan menunjukkan bahwa pada tahun-tahun setelah undang-undang anti-suap disahkan, AS. kegiatan usaha menurun drastis di negara-negara di mana para pejabat pemerintah secara rutin menerima suap.

Sejak itu, isu suap telah diambil pada momentum baru. Tiga puluh delapan negara, delapan lebih dari keanggotaannya dari 30 negara sekarang berlangganan aturan OECD yang melarang penyuapan pejabat publik, di antara mereka Korea Selatan, Jepang, Meksiko, Afrika Selatan dan Argentina.

Perusahaan-perusahaan besar seperti Siemens telah dibawa ke pengadilan dan dihukum untuk membayar suap. Semakin, perusahaan menyatakan bahwa gerakan anti-suap sekarang memberikan mereka sebuah alasan yang jelas untuk mengatakan “tidak ada” ketika diminta suap. Kemajuan yang baik. Beberapa pertanyaan tetap meskipun: Haruskah aturan lintas batas sama, terutama ketika datang ke alokasi biaya dan pengobatan anggota keluarga, atau harus ada peran diakui untuk perbedaan budaya? Perkiraan saat ini tingkat suap berkisar antara 5 dan 20 persen dari kontrak internasional. Apa yang dimaksud dengan tingkat yang realistis tentang bagaimana rendah kita dapat berharap untuk drive ini limbah merusak.

melalui Akhir Korupsi?.

Generated Komputer Bukti | Ohio Hakim Agung Paulus Pfeifer

Kasus yang dimaksud adalah: V Negara. Rivas, 121 Ohio St.3d 469, 2009-Ohio-1354. Tidak ada kasus. 2007-1611. Memutuskan Maret 31, 2009. Mayoritas pendapat secara tertulis oleh Hakim Terrence O'Donnell.

Oleh Ohio Hakim Agung Paulus Pfeifer

Pada tanggal 3, 2005, Detektif Alonzo Wilson, anggota Unit Perlindungan Anak-Internet Xenia Polisi Divisi, login ke layanan chatting internet menyamar sebagai seorang perempuan 14 tahun bernama Molly. Seorang pria bernama Jose Rivas - menggunakan nama layar JRivas123 - dihubungi "Molly" meminta usianya, jenis kelamin, dan foto.

Kedua dilakukan pada percakapan online, dan akhirnya Wilson e-mail Rivas foto remaja seorang detektif polisi Xenia. Rivas e-mail Molly sebuah foto eksplisit yang, ia mengklaim, adalah dari dirinya. Dia kemudian propositioned dan menawarkannya $200 untuk terlibat dalam aktivitas seksual dengan dia. Rivas akhirnya diatur untuk bertemu Molly di sebuah hotel. Setelah polisi memeriksa Rivas diamati di, Wilson menangkapnya.

Sebelum ke pengadilan, Rivas mengajukan mosi untuk melestarikan bukti elektronik negara dan ia mencari gambar cermin dari hard drive komputer negara yang digunakan oleh Wilson untuk berkomunikasi dengan dia. Sidang pengadilan memerintahkan negara untuk memungkinkan Rivas untuk memeriksa komputer, namun penuntut menolak untuk mengizinkan pertahanan untuk mengambil gambar cermin dari hard drive, mengutip "alasan keamanan." Penuntut tidak memberikan transkrip dari percakapan dan compact disc yang berisi salinan elektronik dari komunikasi online.

Rivas kemudian mengajukan mosi untuk menekan bukti yang dihasilkan komputer dan untuk memaksa negara untuk memberikan citra cermin dari hard drive komputer. Namun sidang pengadilan membantah gerak, menyimpulkan bahwa Peraturan Pidana 16 - Salah satu aturan yang mengatur proses sidang - tidak memerlukan negara untuk menghasilkan salinan tepat dari hard drive komputer yang "tanpa adanya tuduhan dan beberapa bukti bahwa apa yang telah diberikan tidak akurat."

[terus] Hakim James Kimble Blog: Bukti komputer.

Federal Trade Commission Picks Intel As Target for Separate Section 5 Claim Beyond the Sherman Act

After a lengthy investigation, pada tanggal 16, 2009, Komisi Perdagangan Federal (FTC) filed an administrative complaint against Intel Corporation (Intel) alleging that it has engaged in anticompetitive and unfair conduct in order to maintain a superior position in several markets. The FTC action is particularly notable because the Commission is attempting to invoke authority under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act) recognized by the Supreme Court in 1972 to pursue arguably anticompetitive conduct that does not violate the Sherman Act. Only time will tell how successful the Section 5 revival will be, but companies should be aware of the FTC’s current willingness to exercise its full authority under the broader Section 5 and reach conduct that the Sherman Act would permit.

melalui JD Supra: Artikel Hukum – Antitrust and Federal Regulation Alert: Federal Trade Commission Picks Intel As Target for Separate Section 5 Claim Beyond the Sherman Act.

Pengadilan Paris Narapidana Google dalam Kasus Buku – WSJ.com

A French court found Google Inc. guilty of copyright infringement for scanning books and publishing extracts online without a French publisher’s consent, a ruling that could hinder the U.S search company&setelah;s ongoing drive to create a giant global online library.

In a Friday ruling that Google said it would appeal, the court ordered the U.S. company to pay €300,000 ($501,000) to French publisher La Martinière and to remove online extracts of the publisher’s books.

Putusan, which is the first of its kind in France and applies only to this country, could set a legal precedent for any future copyright infringement cases by French publishers, said Valerie Barthez, head of the legal department at the French publishersassociation Société des Gens de Lettres de France, which was one of the plaintiffs in the case.

Google has been working for several years to make a vast array of books available online through its search engine. Sejak 2004 the search engine company has been working with libraries throughout the U.S. in order to digitize millions of books. Google has also signed 9000 partnerships with several European publishers that have agreed to have extracts from their books put online, a spokeswoman for Google said.

melalui Pengadilan Paris Narapidana Google dalam Kasus Buku – WSJ.com.

New Bursa 2010 Sampah

In my previous blog I exposed the naked truth about Exchange deleted items and how easy it is to destroy potential email records.

Microsoft must have listened because the new version Exchange 2010 includes substantial improvements to the “dumpster” and deleted item behavior and closed the potential “leak” for eDiscovery.

The new Exchange 2010 dumpster is a complete new design.  Here is a link if you want the complete story.

http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2009/09/25/452632.aspx

The new Exchange 2010 dumpster features that are key for legal discovery are:

-          The new dumpster now includes all deleted items from the mailbox including email, kalender, kontak, and more.  The old dumpster only included email.

-          The new dumpster is indexed so it can be searched using the new multi-mailbox search tool in Exchange 2010. The old dumpster was not indexed and could not be searched.

-          The new dumpster has been extended with new Purges and Versions folders.  Users can no longer bypass the dumpster behavior with a manual purge.

The Purges folder keeps items that users purge from the dumpster and keeps them for the length of the dumpster retention period.

The Versions folders keeps a copy-on-write snapshot of email that users modify.

The new Exchange 2010 dumpster still operates with a retention period (14 day default) or custom.  The new dumpster features are a welcome addition to Exchange.

By capturing all deleted items and by preventing users from purging email, it closes all of the  major “leaks” for email discovery and compliance.

melalui New Bursa 2010 Sampah | Email Archiving & Storage Management Experts.

Perlindungan Data Uni Eropa Bertemu U.S. Penemuan

As a result of an increase in U.S. lawsuits requiring the transfer of personal data from France to the United States, the French Data Protection Agency CNIL published a recommendation in August 2009, which is designed to offer guidance on data transfers in connection with U.S. civil discovery proceedings.[FOOTNOTE 1] The CNILs recommendation expands on the guidelines adopted by the body of European data protection agencies the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party in February 2009.[FOOTNOTE 2]

EU member states increasingly enforce their data protection laws. Misalnya, di 2008, the Spanish data protection agency imposed fines amounting in total to €22.6 million. In France and other EU countries, companies are under pressure to comply with U.S. Penemuan permintaan, which frequently call for the production of personal data about employees, clients, or customers. The CNILs recommendation reflects a tension between a companys obligation to respond to U.S. discovery requests and its obligation to comply with EU data protection laws. Because data protection laws pursue a legitimate interest and are increasingly enforced in Europe, courts and litigants in the U.S. should take them into account when ordering discovery abroad.

CNIL RECOMMENDATION

The CNIL acknowledges that the parties to a U.S. lawsuit have a legitimate need for documents, and that European and French data protection laws do not prohibit the transfer of personal data to the U.S. for litigation purposes. Such transfers, Namun, should be subject to certain requirements to comply with data protection laws.

[terus] Law.com – Perlindungan Data Uni Eropa Bertemu U.S. Penemuan.

Western District of Oklahoma Mengadopsi Best Practices untuk Discovery Elektronik dalam Kasus Pidana : Elektronik Discovery Hukum

If you needed more proof that electronic discovery is not just for civil cases, the Western District of Oklahoma has adopted “Best Practices for Electronic Discovery of Documentary Materials in Criminal Cases.”  Adopted on August 20th, these Best Practices recognize the lack of guidance in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 or in U.S.C. § 3500 regarding the production of discovery materials in electronic from and are intended to “summarize proposed electronic discovery practices.”

Included in the Best Practices are requirements that counsel for the parties shall, by a time proscribed, address issues including the volume of discovery, the litigation capabilities of counsel, and timeframes for production, among other things.  Additional requirements include the production of electronically stored information in .PDF format, the production of an index identifying the “source and/or nature of the materials” produced, and mandatory good-faith discussions of possible cost-sharing measures when handling voluminous discovery.

melalui Western District of Oklahoma Mengadopsi Best Practices untuk Discovery Elektronik dalam Kasus Pidana : Elektronik Discovery Hukum.

Transliteration goes global

Most of us use a keyboard to enter text; it’s one of the most basic activities we perform on a computer. However even this simple activity can be cumbersome in many parts of the world. If you’ve ever tried to type in a non-Roman script using a Roman keyboard, you know that it can be difficult to do. Many of us at Google’s Bangalore office experienced this problem firsthand. Roman keyboards are the norm in India, making it difficult to type in Indian languages. We decided to tackle this problem by making it very easy to type phonetically using Roman characters and we launched this service as Google Transliteration.

Using Google Transliteration you can convert Roman characters to their phonetic equivalent in your language. Note that this is not the same as translation — it’s the sound of the words that are converted from one alphabet to the other.

melalui Blog Resmi Google: Transliteration goes global.