AFP: Serangan hack hit jackpot ATM

Peneliti keamanan komputer Barnaby Jack lelucon bahwa ia terpaksa bersembunyi di bawah tempat tidur kas sejak mencari tahu bagaimana untuk memecahkan mesin teller otomatis jarak jauh menggunakan Internet.

Selandia Baru asli pada Sabtu menunjukkan nya “Jackpotting ATM” penemuan untuk kerumunan limpahan hacker selama presentasi di pertemuan terkenal DefCon di Las Vegas.

“Anda tidak harus pergi ke ATM di semua,” Jack mengatakan kepada AFP setelah penjelasan rekan-rekan sarjana perangkat lunak. “Anda dapat melakukannya dari kenyamanan kamar tidur Anda sendiri.”

Jack membuktikan temuannya menggunakan dua jenis ATM biasanya ditemukan di toko pojok, bar atau lainnya “berdiri sendiri” tempat di Amerika Serikat tetapi mengatakan cacat mungkin ada di mesin di bank.

Bank menggunakan “remote manajemen” perangkat lunak untuk memantau dan mengontrol mereka ATM, dan Jack menggunakan kelemahan dalam semacam kode untuk mengendalikan mesin dengan cara Internet.

melalui AFP: Serangan hack hit jackpot ATM.

Twitter Blows Telah 20-miliar Tweet | Berita & Opini | PCMag.com

A graphic designer in Tokyo has unlocked a fairly significant accomplishment on Twitter—posting the service’s 20-billionth message since the site’s inception in July of 2006. It’s somewhat difficult to translate exactly what userGGGGGGo_Lets_Gowas saying in the official tweet. Namun, his translated response to the news is far clearer:

It looks like I posted the 20 billionth tweet. I’m getting replies from people all over the world. It’s scary. What are the chances? Maybe I’m going to die. Is it more amazing than winning the lottery? I thought it was a joke,” he wrote, as reported and translated by Computerworld.

melalui Twitter Blows Telah 20-miliar Tweet | Berita & Opini | PCMag.com.

Bentrokan antara e-penemuan di arbitrase internasional dan hukum perlindungan data Eropa | Lexology

Dalam lingkungan bisnis saat ini, terus meningkat jumlah informasi yang disimpan dan dikomunikasikan dalam format elektronik. Informasi ini disimpan secara elektronik (“ESI”) tidak hanya ditemukan pada komputer, server dan perangkat penyimpanan, tetapi juga pada PDA, ponsel dan MP3 player. Tidak mengherankan, seperti alam semesta informasi adalah tanah subur bagi permintaan untuk produksi dokumen arbitrase internasional.

Pada saat yang sama, Uni Eropa prihatin tentang perlindungan pihak ketiga’ data pribadi, dan telah mengeluarkan arahan melindungi data seperti. Tapi apa yang terjadi ketika sebuah permintaan untuk menghasilkan dokumen dalam arbitrase internasional akan membutuhkan pihak untuk bertentangan dengan direktif Uni Eropa pada data privasi? Pedoman Uni Eropa ada untuk masalah perlindungan data yang terkait dengan penemuan di lintas perbatasan litigasi, tetapi konflik antara produksi dokumen dan data Uni Eropa pedoman privasi di arbitrase internasional tetap belum terpecahkan.

melalui Lexology – Bentrokan antara e-penemuan di arbitrase internasional dan hukum perlindungan data Eropa.

Bridging the Communication Gap in E-Discovery | Perusahaan Counsel

Several years ago, I was the technical lead for a mission-critical application at a Fortune 100 insurance company. The application quoted and issued policies for the company’s largest commercial line of business, booking revenues upward of $28,000 per minute of scheduled uptime. One day, I received a request from the chief litigator to stop automatic deletion from the system. Simple enough, yang tepat? Wrong. Complying with this request — yang, translated into IT terms, meant suspending the purge processwould have locked the database in 11 jam, crashing the application, crippling the company’s ability to sell a policy, and suspending 30 percent of the company’s revenue stream.

This was my first experience with e-discovery, and a classic example of the process disconnects I see at the companies for which I now consult. E-penemuan, like litigation, can be a frenzy. Most companies are simply not set up with the streamlined channels of communication they need to respond effectively.

melalui Bridging the Communication Gap in E-Discovery.

Peraturan Otoritas Pengacara Inggris Santai Aturan Konflik Setelah Review Penggunaan ‘Cina Dinding’

London law firms will now be able to make wider use ofChinese wallsafter the Solicitors Regulation Authority finalized a review of the rules governing conflicts.

The rule changes, approved by the Legal Services Board earlier this month (Juli 13), lift the restrictions which formerly only allowed law firms to act for multiple clients with information barriers in place if the firm had already been instructed at the time the conflict arose.

Rule four of the SRA Code of Conduct previously only permitted work involving Chinese walls to be completed after a conflict became apparent.

Namun, firms will now be able to accept new instructions, even when it is apparent that there are risks concerning confidentiality, provided the firm in question has the infrastructure in place to set up legally compliant information barriers.

The SRA has warned that most law firms will not have such capabilities and that Chinese walls should therefore continue to be used withextreme caution”.

melalui Peraturan Otoritas Pengacara Inggris Santai Aturan Konflik Setelah Review Penggunaan ‘Cina Dinding’.

Podcast: Bagaimana Hukum Negara Bisa Berbeda Dari federal E-Penemuan Hukum di New York||ESIBytes

Dengarkan Karl Schieneman, Direktur Analytics dan Review dengan JurInnov, talk about how state law and federal law can differ in electronic discovery cases.  In this episode, we will be discussing New York state law and how it contrasts with federal electronic discovery practice. Our first panelist for today’s show is Mark Berman from Ganfer & Shore who has written over a dozen articles on electronic discovery in the New York Law Journal.  Our other panelist is Jay Safer from Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell who has extensive electronic discovery experience and also was appointed by Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye to serve on a Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts as well as being on the Planning Committee for the Judicial Conference of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2010.

They have a unique perspective on how electronic discovery has developed in state court in New York as well as strong backgrounds working with electronic discovery in federal court in the Second Circuit. Bersama-sama, we will discuss what some of the differences are and how practicing lawyers need to appreciate the differences between federal e-discovery law and state electronic discovery practice.

melalui Bagaimana Hukum Negara Bisa Berbeda Dari federal E-Penemuan Hukum di New York||ESIBytes.

Diebold 2Q Penjualan Jatuh, Probe Rusia Ops Kepatuhan – WSJ.com

Diebold Inc. (DBD), which posted lower sales data as financial institutions continued to show hesitation in spending on new automated teller machines, said it is conducting an internal review of its compliance with international corruption standards after finding potential irregularities at its Russian subsidiary.

Diebold, which manufactures ATMs and provides related security and outsourcing services, said Thursday that its Russian unit may have run afoul of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’s books and records provisions. Diebold said it identifiedcertain transactions and paymentsin Russia while conducting due diligence in connection with a potential acquisition there.

The company is now conducting a review of its global Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance and is reporting its findings to the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

melalui UPDATE: Diebold 2Q Penjualan Jatuh, Probe Rusia Ops Kepatuhan – WSJ.com.

Pengadilan New York Menyediakan Instruksi lengkap mengenai Protokol untuk Penemuan Kloning Hard Drive : Elektronik Discovery Hukum

In this matrimonial action, plaintiff sought access to her husband’s (terdakwa) office computer to determine his true financial condition.  After denying plaintiff’s initial motion, the court directed (by stipulated order) that a clone of defendant’s office hard drive be made at plaintiff’s expense.  Thereafter, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for access to the cloned drive upon finding her request for unrestricted access overbroad.  “Equally important” to the court was plaintiff’s failure to propose any protocol for investigation of defendant’s hard drive.  The court instructed that should the plaintiff wish to renew her motion, her renewal “must contain a detailed, step-by-step discovery protocol that would allow for the protection of privileged and private material.”  Moreover, the court provided detailed instruction for what such a protocol should contain:

melalui Pengadilan New York Menyediakan Instruksi lengkap mengenai Protokol untuk Penemuan Kloning Hard Drive : Elektronik Discovery Hukum.

E-Discovery SaaS dan On Software Lokal Menyatu di Vendor sebagai Mereka berumur | Gartner

Pasar untuk e-penemuan kemampuan digunakan sebagai perangkat lunak perusahaan konvensional, peralatan atau perangkat lunak sebagai layanan yang konvergen cepat dalam menanggapi tekanan pasar.

melalui E-Discovery SaaS dan On Software Lokal Menyatu di Vendor sebagai Mereka berumur.

Kata-kata Goldman Sachs Larangan Nakal di Email – WSJ.com

Tidak akan pernah ada lagi s-kesepakatan di Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

Dalam bangun dari sidang Kongres baru-baru ini, Goldman Sachs telah pindah untuk melarang karyawan dari sumpah dalam email. Cassell Bryan-rendah membahas.

Perusahaan New York memberitahu karyawan bahwa mereka tidak akan lagi dapat pergi dengan senonoh dalam pesan elektronik. Itu berarti semua 34,000 pedagang, bankir investasi Goldman dan karyawan harus menahan diri dari menggunakan kosakata yang luas sering digunakan kata-kata kotor di Wall Street, termasuk sumpah serapah enam-surat yang datang kembali untuk menghantui perusahaan pada sidang Senat pada bulan April.

melalui Kata-kata Goldman Sachs Larangan Nakal di Email – WSJ.com.