AFP: Attacco Hack colpisce jackpot ATM

La sicurezza informatica ricercatore Barnaby Jack battute che ha fatto ricorso al denaro contante nascosto sotto il suo letto dal capire come crepa sportelli automatici in remoto utilizzando Internet.

La Nuova Zelanda nativo il Sabato ha dimostrato la sua “ATM jackpotting” scoperta di una folla troppo pieno di hacker durante una presentazione al raduno DefCon infame a Las Vegas.

“Non c'è bisogno di andare al bancomat a tutti,” Jack ha detto AFP dopo sapienti compagni conferenza software. “Puoi farlo dal comfort della vostra camera da letto.”

Jack ha dimostrato le sue scoperte con due tipi di bancomat tipicamente presenti nei negozi angolo, barre o altri “indipendente” sedi negli Stati Uniti, ma ha detto che la falla esiste probabilmente in macchine presso le banche.

Le banche utilizzano “gestione remota” software per monitorare e controllare il loro bancomat, e Jack utilizzato un punto debole in questo tipo di codice a prendere il controllo di macchine per mezzo di Internet.

attraverso AFP: Attacco Hack colpisce jackpot ATM.

Colpi twitter Past 20-miliardesimo Tweet | News & Parere | PCMag.com

A graphic designer in Tokyo has unlocked a fairly significant accomplishment on Twitter—posting the service’s 20-billionth message since the site’s inception in July of 2006. It’s somewhat difficult to translate exactly what userGGGGGGo_Lets_Gowas saying in the official tweet. Tuttavia, his translated response to the news is far clearer:

It looks like I posted the 20 billionth tweet. I’m getting replies from people all over the world. It’s scary. What are the chances? Maybe I’m going to die. Is it more amazing than winning the lottery? I thought it was a joke,” he wrote, as reported and translated by Computerworld.

attraverso Colpi twitter Past 20-miliardesimo Tweet | News & Parere | PCMag.com.

Lo scontro tra e-discovery in arbitrati internazionali e leggi europee sulla protezione dei dati | Lexology

In today’s business environment, ever-increasing amounts of information are stored and communicated in electronic format. This electronically stored information (“ESI”) is not only found on computers, servers and storage devices, but also on PDAs, mobile phones and MP3 players. Non sorprende che, such a universe of information is fertile ground for requests for document production in international arbitrations.

Nello stesso tempo, the EU is concerned about the protection of third parties’ dati personali, and has issued directives protecting such data. But what happens when a request to produce documents in an international arbitration would require a party to contravene an EU directive on data privacy? EU guidelines exist for data protection issues related to discovery in cross-border litigation, but the conflict between document production and EU data privacy guidelines in international arbitration remains unresolved.

attraverso Lexology – Lo scontro tra e-discovery in arbitrati internazionali e leggi europee sulla protezione dei dati.

Colmare il divario nella comunicazione in E-Discovery | Corporate Counsel

Several years ago, I was the technical lead for a mission-critical application at a Fortune 100 insurance company. The application quoted and issued policies for the company’s largest commercial line of business, booking revenues upward of $28,000 per minute of scheduled uptime. Un giorno, I received a request from the chief litigator to stop automatic deletion from the system. Simple enough, destra? Wrong. Complying with this request — che, translated into IT terms, meant suspending the purge processwould have locked the database in 11 orario, crashing the application, crippling the company’s ability to sell a policy, and suspending 30 percent of the company’s revenue stream.

This was my first experience with e-discovery, and a classic example of the process disconnects I see at the companies for which I now consult. E-discovery, like litigation, can be a frenzy. Most companies are simply not set up with the streamlined channels of communication they need to respond effectively.

attraverso Colmare il divario nella comunicazione in E-Discovery.

U.K.’s Solicitors Regulation Authority Relaxes Conflicts Rules After Review of Use ofChinese Walls

London law firms will now be able to make wider use ofChinese wallsafter the Solicitors Regulation Authority finalized a review of the rules governing conflicts.

The rule changes, approved by the Legal Services Board earlier this month (Luglio 13), lift the restrictions which formerly only allowed law firms to act for multiple clients with information barriers in place if the firm had already been instructed at the time the conflict arose.

Rule four of the SRA Code of Conduct previously only permitted work involving Chinese walls to be completed after a conflict became apparent.

Tuttavia, firms will now be able to accept new instructions, even when it is apparent that there are risks concerning confidentiality, provided the firm in question has the infrastructure in place to set up legally compliant information barriers.

The SRA has warned that most law firms will not have such capabilities and that Chinese walls should therefore continue to be used withextreme caution”.

attraverso U.K.’s Solicitors Regulation Authority Relaxes Conflicts Rules After Review of Use ofChinese Walls.

PODCAST: Come legge dello Stato può differire da federale E-Discovery legge a New York||ESIBytes

Ascolta Karl Schieneman, Direttore di Analytics e commenta con JurInnov, talk about how state law and federal law can differ in electronic discovery cases.  In this episode, we will be discussing New York state law and how it contrasts with federal electronic discovery practice. Our first panelist for today’s show is Mark Berman from Ganfer & Shore who has written over a dozen articles on electronic discovery in the New York Law Journal.  Our other panelist is Jay Safer from Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell who has extensive electronic discovery experience and also was appointed by Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye to serve on a Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts as well as being on the Planning Committee for the Judicial Conference of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2010.

They have a unique perspective on how electronic discovery has developed in state court in New York as well as strong backgrounds working with electronic discovery in federal court in the Second Circuit. Insieme, we will discuss what some of the differences are and how practicing lawyers need to appreciate the differences between federal e-discovery law and state electronic discovery practice.

attraverso Come legge dello Stato può differire da federale E-Discovery legge a New York||ESIBytes.

Diebold vendite 2Q Autunno, Sonde di conformità Ops russo – WSJ.com

Diebold Inc. (DHF), che ha registrato i dati di vendita inferiori come gli istituti finanziari hanno continuato a mostrare esitazioni della spesa per nuovi sportelli automatici, ha detto che sta conducendo una revisione interna della sua conformità agli standard corruzione internazionale dopo aver scoperto irregolarità potenziale a propria controllata russa.

Diebold, che produce bancomat e relativi alla sicurezza e fornisce servizi di outsourcing, Giovedi detto che la sua unità russe possono conciliarsi con i libri del Foreign Corrupt Practices Act e dei documenti disposizioni. Diebold ha dichiarato che identificare “determinate transazioni e pagamenti” in Russia, durante lo svolgimento di due diligence in relazione ad una potenziale acquisizione si.

La società sta ora conducendo una revisione globale dei suoi Foreign Corrupt Practices Act conformità e riporta i suoi risultati negli Stati Uniti. Dipartimento di giustizia e la Securities and Exchange Commission.

attraverso UPDATE: Diebold vendite 2Q Autunno, Sonde di conformità Ops russo – WSJ.com.

New York Corte fornisce istruzioni dettagliate sul protocollo per la scoperta di clonati disco rigido : Electronic Discovery legge

In this matrimonial action, plaintiff sought access to her husband’s (the defendant) office computer to determine his true financial condition.  After denying plaintiff’s initial motion, the court directed (by stipulated order) that a clone of defendant’s office hard drive be made at plaintiff’s expense.  Thereafter, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for access to the cloned drive upon finding her request for unrestricted access overbroad.  “Equally important” to the court was plaintiff’s failure to propose any protocol for investigation of defendant’s hard drive.  The court instructed that should the plaintiff wish to renew her motion, her renewal “must contain a detailed, step-by-step discovery protocol that would allow for the protection of privileged and private material.”  Moreover, the court provided detailed instruction for what such a protocol should contain:

attraverso New York Corte fornisce istruzioni dettagliate sul protocollo per la scoperta di clonati disco rigido : Electronic Discovery legge.

E-Discovery SaaS and On-Premises Software Converge at Vendors as They Mature | Gartner

The market for e-discovery capabilities deployed as conventional enterprise software, appliances or software as a service is converging swiftly in response to market pressures.

attraverso E-Discovery SaaS and On-Premises Software Converge at Vendors as They Mature.

Goldman Sachs Bans Naughty Words in Emails – WSJ.com

There will never be another s— deal at Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

In the wake of recent Congressional hearings, Goldman Sachs has moved to prohibit employees from swearing in emails. Cassell Bryan-Low discusses.

The New York company is telling employees that they will no longer be able to get away with profanity in electronic messages. That means all 34,000 traders, investment bankers and other Goldman employees must restrain themselves from using a vast vocabulary of oft-used dirty words on Wall Street, including the six-letter expletive that came back to haunt the company at a Senate hearing in April.

attraverso Goldman Sachs Bans Naughty Words in Emails – WSJ.com.