Customers, Service Providers May Have E-Discovery Gap | Law.com

E-discovery customers and service providers need to better understand each other to improve the state of early case assessment tools, analysts at Enterprise Strategy Group found in their latest legal technology report.

Law firms and legal departments too often underappreciate service providers’ expertise, while service providers focus too broadly on custom projects and too narrowly on research and development, analysts Brian Babineau and Katey Wood concluded in Initial Case Assessments with e-Discovery: Integrating e-Discovery Tools in Corporate Investigations.

The disconnect is a major reason why software companies rule the e-discovery market despite common complaints about legal technology being overly influenced by engineers. “In ESG’s conversations with general counsel over the last five years, many in-house attorneys found that the software market’s concept of ECA didn’t sufficiently support their approach,” the report from Milford, Mass.-based ESG states.

via Customers, Service Providers May Have E-Discovery Gap.

iPhone 5 to launch in early September, report says | Apple Talk – CNET News

Hang on to your hats, because there’s another rumored release date for Apple’s next-generation iPhone.

The latest comes from the China Times (translation), which says that Apple plans to produce 4 million units of the device following a production run of 400,000 test units. That’s all to ready the device for a release in the second week of September.

Other tidbits from the report, which was picked up this morning by Macrumors, include Apple purportedly working to ready another version of the iPad to bring to market “before Thanksgiving.” That would give Apple a late-year product launch that–as the last two iPad launches have proven–would make for a tough-to-get gadget during the frenzied holiday shopping season.

The China Times report has some weight in terms of timing. Apple has made a habit of holding its annual iPod-focused music event in September, usually during that first or second week of the month. Apple has also promised to release iOS 5 in “the fall,” which officially begins a few weeks later.

Turning to CNET’s lovingly updated iPhone 5 rumor roundup, this is the latest in a series of September mentions, the earliest being a Reuters report saying that the new device would be ready to go by then. In early May, Jefferies & Co. analyst Peter Misek weighed in, saying something akin to an iPhone 3GS-like update would be hitting store shelves in September. That was followed just a few days later by a Digitimes report, echoing the same timeline and noting that it would be an incremental update.

via iPhone 5 to launch in early September, report says | Apple Talk – CNET News.

Anonymous Claims Network Breach of FBI Security Contractor ManTech – Security – News & Reviews – eWeek.com

As promised, Anonymous has sought to embarrass the FBI with a network attack, this time going after defense contractor ManTech International.

“Hacktivist” collective Anonymous claims to have “owned” the defense contractor ManTech International and promised to release the stolen information within 24 hours, according to a post on Twitter that appeared shortly after midnight on July 29.

Some documents have already been posted as “teasers,” including a resume of an individual with significant military and law enforcement background and a statement of work memo for NATO Communication & Information Systems Services Agency. About 500MB of files are expected to be released.

This latest attack is in apparent retribution for the July 20 arrests of individuals who are accused of participating in Anonymous group hacking attacks.

Earlier this week, in the midst of news reports about British police arresting a suspected member of hacker group LulzSec and regular updates on Twitter about people canceling PayPal accounts in protest, Anonymous posted the following warning on Twitter, “Also, tomorrow: Expect something nice. Looks like the FBI asked for a slap in the face. Well, we can deliver. #FFF (On Thursday, who cares).”

via Anonymous Claims Network Breach of FBI Security Contractor ManTech – Security – News & Reviews – eWeek.com.

It’s official! Internet Explorer users are totally dumb | Information, Gadgets, Mobile Phones News & Reviews | Herald Sun

NERDS the world over are rejoicing at news that they’re smarter than their mum.

For years, computer geeks have taken pride in using a “real” browser like Opera or Firefox to browse the web, while n00bs stick with simple old Internet Explorer.

Now a new study has backed up all that boasting by finding that ditching Microsoft’s default browser really is the smart choice.

In an online IQ test of 100,000 people, AptiQuant Psychometric Consulting found that users of Firefox, Chrome, Safari or Opera were likely to have a higher IQ than Internet Explorer users.

“There was a clear indication… that the subjects using any version of Internet Explorer ranked significantly lower on an average than others,” said Aptiquant.

Out of all the Internet Explorer versions, “subjects using IE 8 (fared) a little better”.

via It’s official! Internet Explorer users are totally dumb | Information, Gadgets, Mobile Phones News & Reviews | Herald Sun.

Apple now holds more cash than US government – Telegraph

The figures, released by the US Treasury department this week, show the country currently has a total operating cash balance of $73.7bn (£45.3bn).

This compares with Apple’s $76.4bn of cash reserves, which it has built up during a phenomenal half-decade of strong sales.

Apple said last week that sales of its popular iPad tablet device had more than doubled to 9.25m in the three months to the end of June, while iPhone sales reached 20.3m as quarterly profits also doubled to $7.31bn.

Meanwhile, US politicians are currently struggling to agree a deal on the best way to raise the country’s $14.3 trillion debt ceiling.

via Apple now holds more cash than US government – Telegraph.

Can We Get Addicted to Our Smartphones? | News & Opinion | PCMag.com

I recently took a weekend trip to Canada with four other tech editors. Within seconds of our crossing the border back into the U.S., everyone immediately grabbed their smartphones and reactivated their data, hungry for the emails, text messages, and Twitter updates that had been inaccessible thanks to roaming charges. Had I not been driving, I would have eagerly joined them.

We were all excited to tap back into the digital world and are probably guilty of checking those smartphones just a bit too much in social settings, but are we addicted? A new study finds that while smartphones contribute to the development of a “checking habit,” those habits are not yet harmful to our health.

“Brief usage sessions repeating over time, or ‘checking behaviors,’ comprise a large part of smartphone use,” according to the report, which was published in the journal Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

Researchers tracked smartphone users over the past few years on Android and Nokia devices and found that brief but frequent interactions with the devices were common, especially with the home screen, contact book, email, and social media and news apps.

“Comparing smartphones to laptops, we observed that smartphone use is significantly shorter in duration, more evenly spread throughout the day, and nearly twice as abundant (in terms of total time spent using the device),” report authors found.

In news that is likely to be welcomed by phone and app makers alike, this behavior could actually increase overall phone use. “We call these ‘gateway habits.’ In our data, the frequency of brief ‘checks’ to a phone showed a slight increase with the use of a small set of applications,” the report said.

via Can We Get Addicted to Our Smartphones? | News & Opinion | PCMag.com.

Infographic: Keeping Tabs on Google+ Privacy | News & Opinion | PCMag.com

Google+ has proven popular, but is it secure? In the few weeks that it has been open to a small group of Google users, the new social network has not had any major privacy snafus, but as more and more people join Google+, keeping tabs on how your data is presented, and secured, will likely become a bigger issue.

Check Point, which produces the ZoneAlarm security suite, put together a list of Google+ privacy tips, the first of which is to take advantage of the Circles feature, which lets you select which group of people can see your links, photos, and other updates.

“It’s no big shock that cybercriminals–perhaps too easily caught on other social networking platforms such as Facebook–will pick Google+ as a new target,” Check Point said in a blog post. “Should this give Google+ users a cause for concern? Maybe, but let’s take a look at several ways you can keep your privacy secure.”

via Infographic: Keeping Tabs on Google+ Privacy | News & Opinion | PCMag.com.

Becoming E-Discovery Ready – An Introduction to Litigation Software for E-Discovery

 

Introduction

Litigation costs have been rising in recent years, attributable in part to an increase in the volume of documentary evidence and corresponding complexity of cases. This trend, fueled by the widespread use of e-mail communication in business and cheaper digital storage, is likely to set the tone for the future. The explosion in documentary evidence means trial lawyers are now spending significantly more time reviewing documentary evidence; and trial teams are growing larger as more support resources are now required for trial preparation.

However, the assumption that an increase in the volume of documentary evidence must necessarily result in a corresponding increase in the number of lawyers engaged in the case is fallacious. It is a fallacy because it is premised on the fact that trial preparation methods remain unchanged. More significantly, it fails to take into account the changing nature of documentary evidence (data in electronic form as opposed to physical paper files stored in filing cabinets) and fails to recognise the availability of new technologies designed to facilitate the trial preparation process.1

Just as technology has given rise to the document explosion, technology also offers a solution to litigation teams ready to adopt methodologies more befitting to digital information. Law firms tied to traditional hour-billing model may question the wisdom of deploying methods that promote fewer review hours and less lawyer involvement. In the long run, however, we believe that a competitive marketplace and more knowledgeable clientele guarantees that more efficient modes of production will triumph over less efficient ones. [Read more...]

Attorney General Holder and DOJ Officials Host Intellectual Property Enforcement Meeting with Industry Representatives « USDOJ: Justice Blog

On July 22, 2011, the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) of the Criminal Division hosted the fifth annual law enforcement and industry meeting on intellectual property (IP) enforcement at the Robert F. Kennedy Justice Building.  Attorney General Holder delivered the opening remarks at the meeting along with Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division.

Attorney General Holder emphasized the Department’s ongoing commitment to intellectual property protection.  He outlined the continued growth of Department’s intellectual property criminal enforcement program, highlighting:

The establishment of a Department-wide Task Force on Intellectual Property;

The expertise provided by 40 prosecutors and four computer forensics experts in CCIPS, who guide the Department’s overall intellectual property and computer crime strategy and prosecute key cases;

The addition of 15 new prosecutors to the Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property (CHIP) Network, which includes over 260 specially-trained prosecutors and 25 CHIP units located in U.S. Attorney’s Offices throughout the country;

The addition of 51 specially-trained FBI Special Agents to investigate intellectual property crime;

Ongoing support to the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center (IPR Center);

Increased international engagement as well as coordination with state and local law enforcement; and

Ongoing partnerships with a broad range of IP rights holders.

via Attorney General Holder and DOJ Officials Host Intellectual Property Enforcement Meeting with Industry Representatives « USDOJ: Justice Blog.

Foreign Applicant’s Request for Secret Access to Foreign Debtor’s Emails “Manifestly Contrary” to U.S. Public Policy : Electronic Discovery Law

In re Toft, No. 11-11049 (ALG), 2011 WL 3023544 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. July 22, 2011)

In this case, a foreign applicant, Dr. Martin Prager, sought recognition and enforcement of a German court’s “Mail Interception Order” which authorized Prager, as insolvency administrator, to intercept the debtor’s postal and electronic mail.  The court, following its determination that there was a sufficient basis to exercise jurisdiction, denied the application upon finding that the relief requested was manifestly contrary to U.S. public policy.

In the course of proceedings before the Munich District Insolvency Court, a “Mail Interception Order” was issued which authorized Prager, as administrator of the German estate, to intercept the debtor’s postal and electronic mail.  Prior to application for recognition of the order in the United States, Prager applied for and was granted recognition and enforcement of the order by the English High Court of Justice.  Because two of the debtor’s email accounts were stored on servers of ISP providers located in the U.S., Prager then initiated action in the Southern District of New York asking the court to “‘grant comity’ to the orders of the German and English Courts and enter an order . . . compelling the ISPs . . . to disclose to Prager all of the Debtor’s emails currently stored on their servers and to deliver to Prager copies of all e-mails received by the debtor in future.” (Emphasis added.)  Further, Prager requested that the order be enforced without notice to the debtor.

via Foreign Applicant’s Request for Secret Access to Foreign Debtor’s Emails “Manifestly Contrary” to U.S. Public Policy : Electronic Discovery Law.