AFP: Hack attack hits ATM jackpots

Computer security researcher Barnaby Jack jokes that he has resorted to hiding cash under his bed since figuring out how to crack automated teller machines remotely using the Internet.

The New Zealand native on Saturday demonstrated his “ATM jackpotting” discovery for an overflow crowd of hackers during a presentation at the infamous DefCon gathering in Las Vegas.

“You don’t have to go to the ATM at all,” Jack told AFP after briefing fellow software savants. “You can do it from the comfort of your own bedroom.”

Jack proved his findings using two kinds of ATMs typically found in corner stores, bars or other “stand-alone” venues in the United States but said the flaw likely exists in machines at banks.

Banks use “remote management” software to monitor and control their ATMs, and Jack used a weakness in that kind of code to take control of machines by way of the Internet.

via AFP: Hack attack hits ATM jackpots.

Twitter Blows Past 20-Billionth Tweet | News & Opinion | PCMag.com

A graphic designer in Tokyo has unlocked a fairly significant accomplishment on Twitter—posting the service’s 20-billionth message since the site’s inception in July of 2006. It’s somewhat difficult to translate exactly what user “GGGGGGo_Lets_Go” was saying in the official tweet. However, his translated response to the news is far clearer:

“It looks like I posted the 20 billionth tweet. I’m getting replies from people all over the world. It’s scary. What are the chances? Maybe I’m going to die. Is it more amazing than winning the lottery? I thought it was a joke,” he wrote, as reported and translated by Computerworld.

via Twitter Blows Past 20-Billionth Tweet | News & Opinion | PCMag.com.

The clash between e-discovery in international arbitration and European data protection laws | Lexology

In today’s business environment, ever-increasing amounts of information are stored and communicated in electronic format. This electronically stored information (“ESI”) is not only found on computers, servers and storage devices, but also on PDAs, mobile phones and MP3 players. Unsurprisingly, such a universe of information is fertile ground for requests for document production in international arbitrations.

At the same time, the EU is concerned about the protection of third parties’ personal data, and has issued directives protecting such data. But what happens when a request to produce documents in an international arbitration would require a party to contravene an EU directive on data privacy? EU guidelines exist for data protection issues related to discovery in cross-border litigation, but the conflict between document production and EU data privacy guidelines in international arbitration remains unresolved.

via Lexology – The clash between e-discovery in international arbitration and European data protection laws.

Bridging the Communication Gap in E-Discovery | Corporate Counsel

Several years ago, I was the technical lead for a mission-critical application at a Fortune 100 insurance company. The application quoted and issued policies for the company’s largest commercial line of business, booking revenues upward of $28,000 per minute of scheduled uptime. One day, I received a request from the chief litigator to stop automatic deletion from the system. Simple enough, right? Wrong. Complying with this request — which, translated into IT terms, meant suspending the purge process — would have locked the database in 11 hours, crashing the application, crippling the company’s ability to sell a policy, and suspending 30 percent of the company’s revenue stream.

This was my first experience with e-discovery, and a classic example of the process disconnects I see at the companies for which I now consult. E-discovery, like litigation, can be a frenzy. Most companies are simply not set up with the streamlined channels of communication they need to respond effectively.

via Bridging the Communication Gap in E-Discovery.

U.K.’s Solicitors Regulation Authority Relaxes Conflicts Rules After Review of Use of ‘Chinese Walls’

London law firms will now be able to make wider use of “Chinese walls” after the Solicitors Regulation Authority finalized a review of the rules governing conflicts.

The rule changes, approved by the Legal Services Board earlier this month (July 13), lift the restrictions which formerly only allowed law firms to act for multiple clients with information barriers in place if the firm had already been instructed at the time the conflict arose.

Rule four of the SRA Code of Conduct previously only permitted work involving Chinese walls to be completed after a conflict became apparent.

However, firms will now be able to accept new instructions, even when it is apparent that there are risks concerning confidentiality, provided the firm in question has the infrastructure in place to set up legally compliant information barriers.

The SRA has warned that most law firms will not have such capabilities and that Chinese walls should therefore continue to be used with “extreme caution”.

via U.K.’s Solicitors Regulation Authority Relaxes Conflicts Rules After Review of Use of ‘Chinese Walls’.

PODCAST: How State Law Can Differ From Federal E-Discovery Law in New York || ESIBytes

Listen to Karl Schieneman, Director of Analytics and Review with JurInnov, talk about how state law and federal law can differ in electronic discovery cases.  In this episode, we will be discussing New York state law and how it contrasts with federal electronic discovery practice. Our first panelist for today’s show is Mark Berman from Ganfer & Shore who has written over a dozen articles on electronic discovery in the New York Law Journal.  Our other panelist is Jay Safer from Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell who has extensive electronic discovery experience and also was appointed by Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye to serve on a Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts as well as being on the Planning Committee for the Judicial Conference of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2010.

They have a unique perspective on how electronic discovery has developed in state court in New York as well as strong backgrounds working with electronic discovery in federal court in the Second Circuit. Together, we will discuss what some of the differences are and how practicing lawyers need to appreciate the differences between federal e-discovery law and state electronic discovery practice.

via How State Law Can Differ From Federal E-Discovery Law in New York || ESIBytes.

Diebold 2Q Sales Fall, Probes Russian Ops Compliance – WSJ.com

Diebold Inc. (DBD), which posted lower sales data as financial institutions continued to show hesitation in spending on new automated teller machines, said it is conducting an internal review of its compliance with international corruption standards after finding potential irregularities at its Russian subsidiary.

Diebold, which manufactures ATMs and provides related security and outsourcing services, said Thursday that its Russian unit may have run afoul of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’s books and records provisions. Diebold said it identified “certain transactions and payments” in Russia while conducting due diligence in connection with a potential acquisition there.

The company is now conducting a review of its global Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance and is reporting its findings to the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

via UPDATE: Diebold 2Q Sales Fall, Probes Russian Ops Compliance – WSJ.com.

New York Court Provides Detailed Instruction on Protocol for Discovery of Cloned Hard Drive : Electronic Discovery Law

In this matrimonial action, plaintiff sought access to her husband’s (the defendant) office computer to determine his true financial condition.  After denying plaintiff’s initial motion, the court directed (by stipulated order) that a clone of defendant’s office hard drive be made at plaintiff’s expense.  Thereafter, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for access to the cloned drive upon finding her request for unrestricted access overbroad.  “Equally important” to the court was plaintiff’s failure to propose any protocol for investigation of defendant’s hard drive.  The court instructed that should the plaintiff wish to renew her motion, her renewal “must contain a detailed, step-by-step discovery protocol that would allow for the protection of privileged and private material.”  Moreover, the court provided detailed instruction for what such a protocol should contain:

via New York Court Provides Detailed Instruction on Protocol for Discovery of Cloned Hard Drive : Electronic Discovery Law.

E-Discovery SaaS and On-Premises Software Converge at Vendors as They Mature | Gartner

The market for e-discovery capabilities deployed as conventional enterprise software, appliances or software as a service is converging swiftly in response to market pressures.

via E-Discovery SaaS and On-Premises Software Converge at Vendors as They Mature.

Goldman Sachs Bans Naughty Words in Emails – WSJ.com

There will never be another s— deal at Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

In the wake of recent Congressional hearings, Goldman Sachs has moved to prohibit employees from swearing in emails. Cassell Bryan-Low discusses.

The New York company is telling employees that they will no longer be able to get away with profanity in electronic messages. That means all 34,000 traders, investment bankers and other Goldman employees must restrain themselves from using a vast vocabulary of oft-used dirty words on Wall Street, including the six-letter expletive that came back to haunt the company at a Senate hearing in April.

via Goldman Sachs Bans Naughty Words in Emails – WSJ.com.