Analysis: Microsoft’s Skype deal aims at consumer market – USATODAY.com

Microsoft’s bid for Skype follows a long series of moves the software giant has been executing to cater more to consumers than corporations.

It’s $8.5 billion bid for the Voice over IP market leader comes after reports last week that Skype was entertaining offers for a buyout or joint venture from Google and Facebook.

The value for Facebook: it could instantly supply premium voice and video conferencing to its 500 million users.

Google already has Google Chat, a voice and video chat service, that hasn’t generated much of a following. Part of Microsoft’s bid might have been to keep its rival from the grabbing the top VoIP player.

“Microsoft doesn’t want Google to get Skype,” says Rob Enderle, principal analyst at the Enderle Group. “It would much rather grab the technology and share it with Facebook.”

IDC analyst Al Hilwa says the defensive element helps explain the steep price. “If Skype ended up in the hands of Google, it might have been able to use it to strengthen its ecosystem at the expense of Microsoft,” says Hilwa.

Skype could help Microsoft achieve its much coveted goal to become a big player in the consumer market. Microsoft has come to the realization that it must do more partnering with the suppliers of popular technologies to reach that goal, says Gartner analyst Lief-Olaf Wallin.

via Analysis: Microsoft’s Skype deal aims at consumer market – USATODAY.com.

Surprise Winner in Oracle v. Google: Microsoft – PCWorld

Oracle’s suit against Google has one clear winner: Microsoft. With Google’s Android tied up in litigation, and Oracle becoming the latest villain in the open source community, Microsoft has a chance to make inroads in the mobile market and elsewhere.

Oracle is suing Google, claiming that Android infringes on Oracle copyrights and patents that are related to Java. Oracle spokeswoman Karen Tillman said in a statement:

“In developing Android, Google knowingly, directly and repeatedly infringed Oracle’s Java-related intellectual property. This lawsuit seeks appropriate remedies for their infringement.”

Google begs to differ. Android doesn’t use Java in Android, but instead a Java compatible technology called Dalvik. Google claims the Oracle suit is “baseless,” and will fight it.

No matter what happens with the suit, though, it hurts Google, and helps Microsoft at a time when Microsoft is particularly vulnerable in mobile. Android use has skyrocketed, jumping to 17.2% market share today compared to 1.8% a year ago. Meanwhile, Windows Mobile has become practically a footnote in mobile, dropping to 5% of the market.

Android’s success has been fueled by the large number of phone makers building smartphones based on it. Those phone makers, though, may be scared away by this suit. IDC analyst Al Hilwa told Computerworld:

via Surprise Winner in Oracle v. Google: Microsoft – PCWorld.