New FCPA Guidance..Coming Right Up! – Law Blog – WSJ

In the world of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, defense lawyers labor over every detail of settlement agreements, looking for subtle markers laid down by the Justice Department and the SEC.

It’s not like they have any case law to lean on. Bribery cases against companies settle. That’s a fact. If you want to know where the line between legitimate business expense and bribe falls, good luck finding it. What’s a facilitation payment? Who knows. When is a company “controlled” by a foreign government? Depends. Who qualifies as a foreign official? Factual question.

Companies don’t know how to comply with the law — which bars bribery of foreign officials, in the simplest terms — because the government won’t tell them.

OK, that’s an argument the defense bar has been making for years. And, honestly, Law Blog thinks it’s a bit much, but there is no doubt that more guidance is better. Which brings us, finally, to today’s news.

The Justice Department is planning to release “detailed new guidance on the Act’s criminal and civil enforcement provisions” in 2012, Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer said Tuesday at the National Conference on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. in Washington, D.C., according to these prepared remarks.

Breuer (pictured) said he hoped the guidance would amount to “a useful and transparent aid.” He gave no further details, but the announcement by itself is likely to cause a stir.

“This is a big step,” Homer Moyer, a partner at the law firm Miller Chevalier who is chairing the conference, told WSJ’s Corruption Currents.

via New FCPA Guidance..Coming Right Up! – Law Blog – WSJ.

A new landscape for competition enforcement: new challenges via e-discovery? | Gregory P. Bufithis, Esq. – JDSupra

Almost a month before the adoption of a package of measures improving the system of competition enforcement in Europe, we attended the 15th Annual Competition Conference presented by the International Bar Association Antitrust Committee … and what better place than in Florence, Italy.

The IBA conference is one of those rare settings where you can discuss current developments in merger law and enforcement, the next steps in antitrust litigation, and the challenges posed by the growing internationalisation of cartel investigations.

And the speakers and attendees are the major players in the field. Joaquin Almunia, EU Commission Competition Commissioner, gave the keynote speach with subsequent presenters including U.S. Federal Trade Commissioner Edith Ramirez, Andreas Mundt who is President of the Bundeskartellamt in Bonn, and Sharis Pozen, Acting Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division.

Please see full article below for more information.

via A new landscape for competition enforcement: new challenges via e-discovery? | Gregory P. Bufithis, Esq. – JDSupra.

Telecoms Exec Receives Longest FCPA Sentence Ever – Corruption Currents – WSJ

The former president of a telecommunications company was sentenced to 15 years in prison, the longest term ever handed down in a U.S. foreign bribery case.

Joel Esquenazi, the former president of Terra Telecommunications Corp., received the sentence Tuesday from U.S. District Judge Jose E Martinez in the Southern District of Florida. Carlos Rodriguez, the former vice president of Terra, received seven years in prison.

Both were convicted in August for their roles in a scheme to bribe officials at the Haiti state-owned telecoms company. They were found guilty of seven counts of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 12 counts of money laundering, one of money laundering conspiracy and one of conspiracy to violate the FCPA and wire fraud.

“This sentence ––the longest sentence ever imposed in an FCPA case — is a stark reminder to executives that bribing government officials to secure business advantages is a serious crime with serious consequences,” said Lanny Breuer, assistant attorney general, in a statement.

via Telecoms Exec Receives Longest FCPA Sentence Ever – Corruption Currents – WSJ.

Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer Speaks on the Importance of IP Crime Enforcement « USDOJ: Justice Blog

Earlier this month, Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division represented the U.S Department of Justice as a keynote speaker at the 5th International Law Enforcement Intellectual Property (IP) Crime Conference in Madrid, hosted by INTERPOL, EUROPOL, and the Cuerpo Nacional de Policia. Breuer joined China, Ghana, Nigeria, Canada, Chile, Sweden and other countries to discuss solution-driven proposals to IP crime enforcement at the conference, which brought together more than 400 law enforcement and customs personnel from more than 50 countries.

Criminals manufacture and distribute counterfeit and pirated goods across the globe. While advances in technology bring our world closer together, those same advances allow those who would commit intellectual property crimes to operate globally without ever needing to leave their homes.

Assistant Attorney General Breuer spoke about the importance of devoting time and effort toward IP crime and raising global awareness about its harmful consequences:

“Counterfeit pharmaceuticals, counterfeit automotive and defense-industry parts, and other counterfeit consumer products can cause serious harm to people and endanger their lives; and . . . companies whose trade secrets are stolen or whose goods are counterfeited may be forced to downsize or go out of business, costing individuals their jobs. Nevertheless, the public perception at times persists that IP crime is victimless. It is therefore one of our important duties here this week to spread the message about the significant, and very real, costs of IP crime.”

via Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer Speaks on the Importance of IP Crime Enforcement « USDOJ: Justice Blog.

Economist: UK Bribery Act Is ‘Smarter’ Than FCPA – Corruption Currents – WSJ

“Bribing foreign officials is wrong, but not everything governments do to prevent it is wise or proportional,” begins a new piece in The Economist comparing the U.K. Bribery Act (which went into force this summer) and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (which was born in 1977, the same year the world’s first personal computer, the Commodore PET, went to market.)

This Pepsi Challenge ends poorly for the American anti-bribery law, which the magazine says is written “confusingly” and applied “vigorously.”

The law’s muddled language and broad reach — bosses can be held accountable for bribes paid by their subordinates in far-flung subsidiaries, even if they didn’t know about them — coupled with aggressive enforcement by the Justice Department and the SEC, has deterred foreign investment, the piece argues.

The central complaint is that the FCPA, unlike the U.K. Bribery Act, has no compliance defense, a shield for companies that show they have tough procedures and processes in place to prevent corrupt practices. This feature of the Bribery Act will minimize crippling investigations “into an otherwise blameless company,” the magazine says.

(The FCPA Professor has a great post on reform bills in the 1980s that sought to create a compliance defense for the FCPA — this in light of a forthcoming bill Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner that will likely include such a defense.)

Anti-corruption groups have argued that a compliance defense would engender fig-leaf compliance programs, and Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, has flatly rejected the notion of one.

via Economist: UK Bribery Act Is ‘Smarter’ Than FCPA – Corruption Currents – WSJ.

Attorney General Holder and DOJ Officials Host Intellectual Property Enforcement Meeting with Industry Representatives « USDOJ: Justice Blog

On July 22, 2011, the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) of the Criminal Division hosted the fifth annual law enforcement and industry meeting on intellectual property (IP) enforcement at the Robert F. Kennedy Justice Building.  Attorney General Holder delivered the opening remarks at the meeting along with Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division.

Attorney General Holder emphasized the Department’s ongoing commitment to intellectual property protection.  He outlined the continued growth of Department’s intellectual property criminal enforcement program, highlighting:

The establishment of a Department-wide Task Force on Intellectual Property;

The expertise provided by 40 prosecutors and four computer forensics experts in CCIPS, who guide the Department’s overall intellectual property and computer crime strategy and prosecute key cases;

The addition of 15 new prosecutors to the Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property (CHIP) Network, which includes over 260 specially-trained prosecutors and 25 CHIP units located in U.S. Attorney’s Offices throughout the country;

The addition of 51 specially-trained FBI Special Agents to investigate intellectual property crime;

Ongoing support to the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center (IPR Center);

Increased international engagement as well as coordination with state and local law enforcement; and

Ongoing partnerships with a broad range of IP rights holders.

via Attorney General Holder and DOJ Officials Host Intellectual Property Enforcement Meeting with Industry Representatives « USDOJ: Justice Blog.

Tenaris to Pay $9 Million Over US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Violations | Latin American Herald Tribune

Tenaris S.A., a publicly traded corporation headquartered in Luxembourg, has agreed to pay a $3.5 million penalty for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and has entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the Department of Justice, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer for the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.

Tenaris, a global manufacturer and supplier of steel pipe products and related services to the oil and gas industry throughout the world, admitted that its employees and agents offered and made improper payments to officials of OJSC O’ztashqineftgaz (OAO), an Uzbekistan state-controlled oil and gas production company, and failed to record such payments accurately in Tenaris’s books and records.

In connection with four public bids to provide oilfield pipe and related services for energy extraction and transportation projects, Tenaris retained an agent to obtain competitors’ bid information, which Tenaris then used to secretly submit revised bids to its advantage.

Tenaris agreed to pay the agent 3.5% of the value of four separate contracts, while being aware or substantially certain that the agent would pay all or a portion of the money to one or more OAO employees.

According to the agreement, Tenaris voluntarily disclosed this conduct to the department in a timely and complete manner, conducted an internal investigation, provided thorough, real-time cooperation to the department and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and undertook extensive remediation, including voluntary enhancements to its compliance program.

via Latin American Herald Tribune – Tenaris to Pay $9 Million Over US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Violations.

DOJ Pitches GPS Surveillance Case to Supreme Court – The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times

DOJ Pitches GPS Surveillance Case to Supreme Court

The Justice Department today urged the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve a conflict among federal appellate courts over whether law enforcement officers must obtain a warrant before using GPS technology to covertly follow a person.

Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated the life sentence of a Washington area man named Antoine Jones, saying the government violated Jones’ privacy rights in clandestinely tracking his movement for a month in a drug trafficking investigation.

Federal prosecutors used data from a global positioning system device to link Jones to an alleged drug house in Maryland, where the authorities found nearly 100 kilograms of cocaine and about $850,000 in cash. Jone was the co-owner of a nightclub in Washington.

At issue in the Jones case is the extent to which his movement in a vehicle on streets in Maryland and in Washington was public and whether the warrantless GPS tracking constituted a “search” under the Fourth Amendment. The appeals court, in a 5-4 vote, rejected rehearing the dispute, setting up the potential for a Supreme Court case.

Today, the Justice Department filed a petition (PDF) asking the Supreme Court to step in. Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal and Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer of the Criminal Division are among the lawyers on the petition. DOJ lawyers said federal appellate courts are squarely in conflict over whether the authorities need to obtain a warrant to use GPS tracking technology.

via DOJ Pitches GPS Surveillance Case to Supreme Court – The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.

2010: A Scammer’s Delight

In 2010 alone, the Department of Justice (DoJ) imposed the highest criminal penalties in FCPA-related cases ‘in any single 12-month period: well over $1 billion,’ according to Lanny Breuer, the assistant attorney general. Those targeted include foreign companies doing business in the US, which are also liable under US laws.

Breuer notes that in 2009 and 2010, ‘we have charged more than 50 individuals with FCPA-related offenses – compared with, for example, two individuals in 2004, and five in 2005.’

Those individuals include Charles Jumet, who was sentenced last April to 87 months in prison for his role in a conspiracy to bribe former Panamanian government officials to award Ports Engineering Consultants Corporation a contract to maintain lighthouses and buoys along Panama’s waterways. It was the longest prison sentence in FCPA history, and it’s perhaps those individual prosecutions that are sending the largest shivers down the spines of corporate leaders.

‘In my consulting with various companies around the world, I find the biggest deterrent is having some of these top officials investigated and hauled into court,’ notes Errol Mendes, a University of Ottawa law professor and ethics consultant. ‘This is hugely damaging to brand equity, and most head offices don’t want something like that to happen.’ Individual prosecutions are, Mendes believes, part of a deliberate DoJ strategy.

via 2010: A Scammer’s Delight.

Justice Department seeks mandatory data retention | Privacy Inc. – CNET News

Criminal investigations “are being frustrated” because no law currently exists to force Internet providers to keep track of what their customers are doing, the U.S. Department of Justice will announce tomorrow.

CNET obtained a copy of the department’s position on mandatory data retention–saying Congress should strike a “more appropriate balance” between privacy and police concerns–that will be announced at a House of Representatives hearing tomorrow.

“Data retention is fundamental to the department’s work in investigating and prosecuting almost every type of crime,” Jason Weinstein, deputy assistant attorney general for the criminal division, will say, according to his written testimony. “The problem of investigations being stymied by a lack of data retention is growing worse.” (See related article.)

The Bush Justice Department endorsed such proposals under Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Tomorrow’s announcement demonstrates that the Obama Justice Department is following suit and appears to be its first public statement embracing mandatory data retention.

That aligns the Justice Department with data retention’s more aggressive supporters among House Republicans and places it at odds with privacy advocates, civil libertarians, and the Internet industry. Those groups have questioned the privacy, liability, cost, and scope, including whether businesses such as coffee shops would be required to identify and monitor whoever uses their wireless connections.

via Justice Department seeks mandatory data retention | Privacy Inc. – CNET News.