Many Fortune 500 Policies Unclear on Foreign ‘Grease Payments’ | Corporate Counsel

Among Fortune 500 companies, only 19 of those with public codes of conduct prohibit their employees from making so-called “grease payments” to foreign officials. But a whopping 373 companies deal with the same issue by simply not mentioning it at all in their codes of conduct, according to a new study.

Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a facilitation or grease payment is legal if made to a foreign official, political party, or party official for “routine government action,” such as processing papers or issuing permits in order to expedite an act that would occur anyway. The payment becomes a bribe, however, if it attempts to influence the outcome of an official’s action—such as approval of a permit—rather than the timing of it.

One of the 19 companies that are explicit about banning this kind of payment is Cincinnati-based Procter & Gamble Company. “At P&G, we strive to do the right thing, and this often means that our policies exceed legal requirements,” said Libby Rutherford, P&G’s vice president and general counsel for global compliance.

Rutherford explained, “We know that bribery harms the company and the communities in which we do business. P&G’s policy is to prohibit facilitating payments worldwide, even though they are permissible under U.S. law. In this regard, we support government efforts around the world in combating bribery, while helping to improve local communities.”

via Many Fortune 500 Policies Unclear on Foreign ‘Grease Payments’.

TRACE Report Offers Global Anti-Bribery Enforcement Stats | Law.com

Key findings in the report include:

  • The United States has pursued 3.5 foreign bribery enforcement actions for every one by all other countries combined since the year 2000.
  • Top industries for anti-bribery enforcement are in the sector covering oil, gas, and coal, accounting for nearly 20% of all enforcement activity.
  • There’s a near three-way tie for second place, with the aerospace/defense, manufacturing, and health care sectors each accounting for about 12% of enforcement activity.
  • The largest number of enforcement actions involve alleged bribe payments to officials in China, Iraq, and Nigeria.
  • While the U.S. was pursuing actions at a record pace, enforcement by countries other than the U.S. actually fell in 2010.

via TRACE Report Offers Global Anti-Bribery Enforcement Stats.

An FCPA Compliance Defense? No Way, Breuer Says – Corruption Currents – WSJ

The chief of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division flatly rejected the need for a compliance defense in the FCPA, saying “we can’t engage in some sort of formalistic solution from a script that says if you check the following six boxes you’re guaranteed this outcome.” His comments came two days after the U.K. government issued six principles for complying with the country’s Bribery Act.

via An FCPA Compliance Defense? No Way, Breuer Says – Corruption Currents – WSJ.

An FCPA Compliance Defense? No Way, Breuer Says – Corruption Currents – WSJ

The chief of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division flatly rejected the need for a compliance defense in the FCPA, saying “we can’t engage in some sort of formalistic solution from a script that says if you check the following six boxes you’re guaranteed this outcome.” His comments came two days after the U.K. government issued six principles for complying with the country’s Bribery Act.

via An FCPA Compliance Defense? No Way, Breuer Says – Corruption Currents – WSJ.

UK Bribery Act Guidance: Freeing Foreign Companies

(Westlaw Business) The UK Bribery Act guidance is out and it looks like foreign companies and Wimbledon fans may breathe a sigh of relief as the guidance suggests that sporting events and non-UK companies may not be caught by the new regime.

Released this week, the guidance seeks to provide practical advice to companies ahead of the Bribery Act (“the Act”) coming into force on July 1, 2011, although questions remain over the legal standing of the guidance. The 45-page guide builds upon and departs from earlier draft guidance in that it provides substantially more concrete examples and describes the policies that sit behind many of the new provisions of the Act. Some commentators have, however, complained that the guidance does not have the force of law and that it will be up to the government and the courts not to revise the new provisions

via UK Bribery Act Guidance: Freeing Foreign Companies.

Schlumberger Faces Bribery Probe – WSJ.com http://bit.ly/95gUSH #ediscovery

Schlumberger Faces Bribery Probe – WSJ.com http://bit.ly/95gUSH #ediscovery

Merck Is Subject of U.S. Bribery Inquiries – NYTimes.com

Two federal agencies are investigating the drug maker Merck related to antibribery laws, the company acknowledged on Monday.

Merck, one of the world’s largest drug companies by revenue, said in a regulatory filing on Friday that it had received inquiry letters from the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The letters “seek information about activities in a number of countries and reference the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,” according to Merck.

via Merck Is Subject of U.S. Bribery Inquiries – NYTimes.com.

Bribery Is Losing Its Charm in China – BusinessWeek

In late June, more than 150 executives from Siemens (SI), the German industrial giant, met in Beijing to discuss compliance with Chinese and U.S. anticorruption laws. That a multinational would spend millions to strategize about avoiding bribery charges in a country where bribery is rampant shows how much business is changing in China.

via Bribery Is Losing Its Charm in China – BusinessWeek.

UK bribery law escalates business risk of regional companies – Business Intelligence Middle East

The UK Bribery Act, enacted in the United Kingdom on 8 April 2010, is one of the most significant issues to affect businesses and increases the risk of doing business for regional companies.

The law applies not only to British nationals and UK companies but to any commercial organisations even if they carry on only “part of a business” in the UK.

Under the new rules, companies with UK operations will be criminally liable for bribery and corruption in their business, supply chain or sales channels irrespective of where the bribery offences take place.

The bribe does not need to be directed at a government official, the provision is triggered even if the bribe relates to business activities amongst private entities.

The law creates a new strict liability offence for any commercial organization which has a “close connection” with the UK for failing to prevent bribery, with the defense of showing that it has adequate (anti-bribery) procedures in place.

This is without any requirement for the prosecuting authority to show that any directors or partners were directly involved in the crime.

The maximum jail term for bribery is now 10 years and companies convicted will also face unlimited fines.

Although some of its features are similar to the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), this law is likely to have a bigger impact on regional businesses.

It uses UK standards of what constitutes bribery and disregards local custom and practice, unless the practice is permitted by written law. Unlike the FCPA, it also makes no allowances for small facilitation payments consistent with local culture.

via UK bribery law escalates business risk of regional companies – Business Intelligence Middle East – bi-me.com – News, analysis, reports.

Changes Coming: FCPA, Bribery Bill and OECD-Part III | Thomas Fox – JDSupra

At its April 7, 2010 meeting the United States Sentencing Commission approved amendments to its Sentencing Guidelines. The next day on April 8, 2010, the UK Bribery Bill received Royal Assent. These two events follow the December 9, 2009 release by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development’s (OECD) Recommendation for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials, when the OECD marked the tenth anniversary of the entry into force of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.

These three releases, which comprise of two changes in the legal schemes by two of the world’s largest economic players and the proposal of one of the largest Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) dedicated to ending corruption across the globe portend significant changes in how companies will be structured and transact business going forward in the new decade. This is the third and final of three postings which have discussed the changes that companies, with any US or UK presence, will be required to implement. In the initial post we considered the changes to the US Sentencing Guidelines; we then discussed the changes required by the UK Bribery Bill; and in this third and final post in this series, we will end with the recommendations regarding facilitation payments as found in the OECD’s Recommendation for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials.

via Changes Coming: FCPA, Bribery Bill and OECD-Part III | Thomas Fox – JDSupra.