Electronic Discovery: The Imperative of Private Clouds – Forbes

It is important to review the history of e-discovery’s move to the cloud, As background, then Google CEO Eric Schmidt began evangelizing the cloud as early as 2006. According to Steve d’Alencon, Chief Marketing Officer of e-discovery vendor CaseCentral, 2006 also witnessed corporations beginning to view e-discovery as a strategic business process. He added: “CaseCentral has been delivering its software as a service since 1994, essentially pioneering the notion of cloud-based eDiscovery. When the cloud paradigm began to gain traction, we were already prepared to take advantage of this shift due to our SaaS-based architecture.  As a result I decided to go all-in on the cloud from a marketing perspective, and even trademarked the term ‘CaseCentral eDiscovery cloud.’”

Source: CaseCentral Case In Point

Boeing, for example, a CaseCentral client, centralized its e-discovery in-house while still working closely with outside counsel. Boeing thus achieved consistency and efficiencies the absence of which previously made e-discovery much more challenging and dispersed among outside counsel using different technology platforms.

The Underpinnings of the Cloud

Before we turn to the topic of security in public and private clouds, it’s worth examining the

various elements of the cloud computing model.

The cloud model itself is a three-tiered structure based on (1) infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS); (2) platform-as-a-service (PaaS); and (3) software-as-a-service (SaaS). Infrastructure and software are particularly important for corporate counsel to master.

Provisioning infrastructure from a third-party cloud vendor allows corporations to take advantage of processing, storage, networks, and other fundamental computing resources on which its computers can run software, including platforms, Operating Systems, and applications.

As the National Institute of Standard and Technology definition of the cloud makes clear, “[t]he consumer does not manage or control the underlying infrastructure, but has control over what to deploy on it. An example of IaaS is Amazon’s Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2).

Source: rswallpapers.com

Corporate counsel must have an intimate understanding of—and must help define from the start—their corporation’s business and IT strategies in this area, particularly the nature of their company’s cloud infrastructure.

via Electronic Discovery: The Imperative of Private Clouds – Forbes.

Nathan Newman: Is Google Cruising Towards a Legal Meltdown?

Remember when the big financial companies were masters of the universe, making money hand-over-fist, and widely respected for their “innovation”?  And then it all came crashing down in a financial crisis that exposed the fact that their profits were built on illegal or near-illegal shady dealings that were unsustainable — and when those subprime antics were removed undermined their whole business structure?

Enter Google, whose string of legal scandals could be taking it down a similar road.

This is company who’s former CEO, Eric Schmidt, described Google’s approach this way:  ”There is what I call the creepy line. The Google policy on a lot of things is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it.”  The problem is that Google keeps crossing the line, both on the creepy and legal scale.

The latest example is a Department of Justice report that Google lied about having the proper government security certification when it applied for a multi-million dollar government contract to sell its Google Apps for a Government product to run email and online collaboration services for the Interior Department. During an investigation, the DOJ found that the product lacked what’s known as Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) certification, “notwithstanding Google’s representations to the public at large, its counsel, the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and this court.”  Such misrepresentation in a government contract opens opens the company to significant legal liability, including potentially violation of the federal False Claims Act.

via Nathan Newman: Is Google Cruising Towards a Legal Meltdown?.

ChromeOS Delayed, Launch Sometime in the (Near) Future

The long expected launch of ChromeOS has been delayed — again. The news depressed millions of geeks all over the world who have been waiting impatiently for ChromeOS — the cloud computing operating system for personal computers.

When Google CEO Eric Schmidt recently admitted that the long expected cloud computing OS will be launched (hopefully) sometime in the (near or not so near) future, yet another feeling of disappointment came across all ChromeOS enthusiasts. At first, ChromeOS was expected to hit the market in the second half of 2010. It was then delayed until November 2010, a perfect time for many people’s Christmas lists.

Now, the latest news, there will be no ChromeOS devices sitting under this Christmas tree this year, but hopefully by next Christmas the anticipation will be over. Of course this is not an official announcement, rather, estimates indicate it may take a few months more, but sometime in the first quarter of 2011, ChromeOS will be available to the public.

Did Android Delay ChromeOS?

There was no mention of any particular reasons why ChromeOS will be delayed, but obviously Google is not ready yet to release it and this is why we’ll have to wait a bit longer. Most likely, the delay is due to the rush to release Android, which many consider more important so, as a top priority, most resources were concentrated on its release.

Android and ChromeOS are two operating systems that Google plans to use as a way to conquer the market. According to Eric Schmidt, Android is for touch devices while ChromeOS works best on devices with a keyboard. A brave jump considering, until now, in addition to being the world’s number one search engine, Google was more of an ad company that developed web applications as a side project. All said, launching an operating system is more complex than launching a web app, even if this operating system is based on an already existing piece of software — i.e. the Chrome browser.

via ChromeOS Delayed, Launch Sometime in the (Near) Future.

Nexus One successor to be a mobile credit card? | TG Daily

While we still have virtually no details about what Google’s alleged follow-up to the Nexus One phone will be able to do, thanks to a presentation from CEO Eric Schmidt yesterday, we’re pretty sure that mobile payments is at the top of the list.

Schmidt showed off a device that was obscured so as not to reveal the manufacturer or other specifics. What he did demonstrate was that it was running Android 2.3, the latest version of the mobile operating system, and that it is able to function as a mobile payment solution.

The device has what’s called a Near Field Communication chip, which could replace credit cards for point-of-sale transaction payments.

“This could replace your credit card,” said Schmidt. It will assumedly become a regular feature for future phones. Any device with an NFC chip and Android 2.3 could function as a mobile payment device.

Mobile payments are being looked at by a whole bunch of players in the mobile segment. Right now, the credit card oligopoly has an exclusive hold on cashless retail payments in the US. There is no alternative, period. Google is the frontrunner on the technology lines to change that.

via Nexus One successor to be a mobile credit card? | TG Daily.

Google CEO: Don’t like Street View? ‘Move’ – Computerworld

Google CEO Eric Schmidt has again kicked up something of an online firestorm with a statement about privacy.

In a CNN interview Monday, Schmidt responded to questions about what Google knows about people by saying that if people don’t like having their homes photographed for Google Street View for the world to see, they can “just move.”

The comment came during an interview on the Parker Spitzer show. “With Street View, we drive by exactly once, so you can just move,” said Schmidt, eliciting uncomfortable laughter from interviewer Kathleen Parker. “The point is, we only do it once. This is not a monitoring situation.”

Those few sentences stirred up the blogosphere, and various news sites erupted with stories about Schmidt apparently telling people they can move if they don’t like having their houses on Street View.

via Google CEO: Don’t like Street View? ‘Move’ – Computerworld.

Google Street View ‘single biggest breach of privacy in history’ – Telegraph

Earlier this month, Google announced it had discovered that the roving cars it uses to create its online mapping services were inadvertently gathering data on people's website use over unsecured wireless networks.

Google apologised, but the admission caused alarm across the globe.

Germany’s consumer protection said that Google had acted “illegally” and failed to show respect for the privacy of its citizens. The UK Information Commissioner has asked Google to delete information gathered on British citizens as soon as possible.

Now Stephen Conroy, Australia’s minister for broadband, communications and the digital economy, has told a senate committee that Google deliberately decided to collect the private information.

Mr Conroy, whose plan to implement an internet filter in Australia has been strongly criticised by Google, blamed the company’s CEO Eric Schmidt.

“I think the approach taken by Mr Schmidt is a bit creepy frankly,” Mr Conroy said.

“When it comes to their attitude to their own censorship, their response is simply, ‘trust us’. That is what they actually state on their website: ‘Trust us&’.”

Mr Conroy said that the search engine considered itself above government.

“They consider that they are the appropriate people to make the decisions about people’s privacy data and that they are perfectly entitled to drive the streets and collect as much private informatio

via Google Street View ‘single biggest breach of privacy in history’ – Telegraph.

Google CEO: Were now paranoid about security | Relevant Results – CNET News

Google Inc.
Image via Wikipedia

Google learned some hard security lessons after it was attacked late last year by hackers, CEO Eric Schmidt said Monday.

“Google is now particularly paranoid about that,” Schmidt said during a question-and-answer session following Googles Atmosphere 2010 conference before about 400 CIOs. After the company learned that some of its intellectual property was stolen during an attack that originated from inside China, it began locking down its systems to a greater degree and accelerated plans to move to Web-based systems like Chrome OS netbooks.

The attacks took advantage of a flaw in Internet Explorer 6 that was quickly patched, although the damage had been done. More than 30 U.S. companies were believed to be targeted by the attacks, but Google was one of the few that publicly identified itself as a victim because “we decided we had to tell people as a warning,” Schmidt said.

via Google CEO: Were now paranoid about security | Relevant Results – CNET News.