IBM’s Next-Gen Memory Is 100 Times Faster Than Flash | PCWorld

Phase Change Memory (PCM) technology–one of the new forms of faster, smaller, and denser memory chips destined to replace flash–has been on the table for a while now. Now IBM has come up with a breakthrough making PCM data transfer “instantaneous” and 100 times faster than flash memory.

IBM scientists in Zurich came to these new breakthroughs for their PCM chips while solving two major problems with the architecture. PCMs work by using a specialized alloy that can change its physical state, between a low-resistance crystalline to a high-resistance amorphous phase, by applying voltage.

When the resistance of the chip goes up the chip can store multiple bits of data over the one bit that flash can handle. Combine this with a write latency of 10 microseconds and PCM performs 100 times better than flash.

via IBM’s Next-Gen Memory Is 100 Times Faster Than Flash | PCWorld.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

BBC News – Icann increases web domain suffixes

A global internet body has voted to allow the creation of new website domain suffixes, the biggest change for the online world in years.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) plans to dramatically increase the number of domain endings from the current 22.

Internet address names will end with almost any word and be in any language.

Icann will begin taking applications next year, with corporations and cities expected to be among the first.

“Icann has opened the internet’s addressing system to the limitless possibilities of the human imagination,” said Rod Beckstrom, president and chief executive officer for Icann.

“No one can predict where this historic decision will take us.”

There will be several hundred new generic top-level domain names (gTLDs), which could include such addresses as .google, .coke, or even .BBC.

There are currently 22 gTLDs, as well as about 250 country-level domain names such as .uk or .de.

Costly process

Click to play

Icann’s senior vice-president, Kurt Pritz explains why the new gTLDs are being created

It will cost $185,000 (£114,000) to apply for the suffixes, and companies would need to show they have a legitimate claim to the name they are buying.

Analysts say it is a price that global giants might be willing to pay – in order to maximise their internet presence.

The money will be used to cover costs incurred by Icann in developing the new gTLDs and employing experts to scrutinise the many thousands of expected applications.

A portion will be set-aside to deal with potential legal actions, raised by parties who fail to get the domains they want.

The vote completes a six-year negotiation process and is the biggest change to the system since .com was first introduced 26 years ago.

Icann said it was beginning a global communications programme to raise awareness of the new domain names.

Continue reading the main story

Existing Generic TLDs

.com : companies, now broader

.edu : educational institutions

.gov : government institutions

.int : international organisations, e.g. Interpol

.mil : military organisations

.net : networking technologies, now broader

.org : non-profit organisations

.arpa : first ever domain, now technical use

.aero : air travel industry

.biz : business alternative to .com

.coop : co-operatives

.info : information, but open for general use

.museum : museums

.name : personal names – johnsmith.name

.pro : professionals, e.g. doctors

.asia: Asian websites

.cat : Catalan language

.jobs : employment websites

.mobi : mobile phones

.post : postal services

.tel : telecoms

.travel : travel

Source: Icann

Applications will start on 12 January.

via BBC News – Icann increases web domain suffixes.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Open Source Could Change the Future of E-Discovery

Software developers on the outskirts of the e-discovery field are working on several open-source projects to make the electronic search-and-analysis process into a cost-free, standards-based proposition.

Independent projects are underway from a contract programmer in Houston, a team of information management experts throughout Europe and Australia, and a search engine consulting firm in Virginia. Their mutual goal: to help companies get respectable e-discovery software and make the technology feasible for every size of lawsuit and budget.

“I think where we’ll see open-source software come into its own is if we get a generation of really computer-savvy lawyers. … It’ll work best if it changes the way lawyers do discovery rather than compete with the way lawyers do it now,” said The Beached Consultancy founder Richard Careaga, a former general counsel-turned-computer programmer in Lakewood Ranch, Fla., who is following the developments.

Such aspirations are shared by programmer Mark Kerzner, of Houston, and attorney Ron Chichester, of nearby Tomball, who released version 1.0 early this month of their open-source code base called FreeEed and are now at version 1.2. Their philosophy is that using an open-source approach means anyone can try e-discovery without buying licenses and that the same code can run unchanged whether on a single server or a cloud-based cluster.

“I’ve previously created two e-discovery systems which were closed-source and moderately commercially successful, but open source allows me to follow my ideas on how e-discovery should be done, and I can express my urge to do e-discovery unimpeded. I can also get people to try and eventually use my software much easier compared to closed-source licensed offering, and for a software developer the satisfaction of knowing that people use your software is also a great reward in itself,” Kerzner said. “I do plan to go to both ends of the [Electronic Discovery Reference Model], that is, I am leaving hooks for forensics information, and I would like to add a collection piece, and I am also keen on the advanced text analysis known as predictive coding. All of that is on my roadmap,” he said.

via Open Source Could Change the Future of E-Discovery.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

AppleInsider | Verizon will offer only $30 unlimited data plan for iPhone 4 users

A leaked memo from Verizon shows that the carrier will no longer offer its entry-level capped data plan smartphones, requiring new iPhone 4 customers to buy the $30-per-month unlimited offering.

The new pricing, leaked to Engadget, shows that Verizon intends to cease its $15-per-month 150MB data plan. Buyers of new 3G smartphones will be required to pay $29.99 per month for unlimited data allowance.

The change is reportedly set to come as Verizon prepares to offer a CDMA variant of the iPhone 4 to its customers on Feb. 10.

via AppleInsider | Verizon will offer only $30 unlimited data plan for iPhone 4 users.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Facebook gives apps access to users addresses, phone numbers – Jan. 17, 2011

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Facebook is giving app developers access to some of the most sensitive personal data it possess: Members’ addresses and phone numbers.

The company slipped the change in quietly, announcing it late last week in a post on its developer blog.

Facebook members will need to explicitly grant permission for apps to tap into their contact information. And they’ll only be able to grant that permission for their own data — users can’t choose to allow access to their friends’ contact information.

But that may not be enough of a shield. Facebook frequently comes under fire for its constantly changing privacy policies, and many users find the tools it makes available for adjusting privacy settings very confusing.

Privacy researcher Christopher Soghoian thinks Facebook botched the message by publicizing the change on its the developer’s blog.

“They should have had an announcement: ‘This is why were doing this, and is why it’s not a privacy problem,’” he says

via Facebook gives apps access to users addresses, phone numbers – Jan. 17, 2011.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Gartner Predicts Business Intelligence Will Go Mobile and Social

According to new research from Gartner, significant changes in the Business Intelligence (BI) market indicate that by 2014 most enterprises will possess BI that is IT-owned and report focused. The result — a change in how enterprises access BI and where they buy it from.

By 2014, four major trends will emerge and mature, completely transforming the market and forcing companies to adapt or lose out. Not the least of these trends is the development of the BI market for mobile devices which will see 33% of all BI functionality used exclusively on handhelds.

The research, which has just been published in Gartner’s (news, site) Predicts 2011: New Relationships Will Change BI and Analytics, indicates that enterprises are starting to create entire environments consisting of collaboration technology, social software and BI to give companies competitive edges.

…Organizations will change what types of BI and analytics they use. They will change how they procure them and where they procure them from, and they will modify how information feeds decision making. BI and analytics leaders should embrace the technology, market and management trends that will transform this field within a few years,” Neil Chandler, research director at Gartner said.

via Gartner Predicts Business Intelligence Will Go Mobile and Social.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

eDiscovery Forcing Change of Business Model For Law Firms? | eDiscovery Journal

Analysts are told they are crazy all the time (and in some cases, it’s probably true).  Years ago, I suggested that the business models of law firms would have to change because of the realities of eDiscovery.  Most people I knew told me I was crazy.  I even knew some general counsel that told me that if they were still paying hourly fees to their law firms in five years (this was circa 2005), that they would have failed in their jobs.  Meanwhile, the law firm folks I talked to said it didn’t matter what corporations did – good law firms can command the hourly rates that they want.  The recent Fulbright and Jaworski Litigation Trends Survey results pointed to an increase in fixed fee engagements (which we pointed out in an earlier post), so it looks like the business model is, in fact, changing.

What helps me to feel less crazy and more justified is more evidence of changing business models. This article by Gina Passeralla in law.com points out that “other [law] firms are providing certain outsourced services themselves rather than let an e-discovery or document review LPO do it, Stanton said. They have created “e-discovery mills” or information centers in which lower-cost attorneys are working in lower-cost markets to handle work formerly done by more expensive junior and senior associates.”  It looks like law firms see the opportunity to capture more business by providing eDiscovery services.

via eDiscovery Forcing Change of Business Model For Law Firms? | eDiscovery Journal.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

The “Bring Your Own Device” Policy – Technology Review

The increased diversity, capability, and popularity of smart phones is leading to a fundamental change in the way mobile technology is being handled in large businesses. Once upon a time, you started a job and IT would provide you with a corporate-sanctioned computer and, for millions of employees, a BlackBerry—a device that became synonymous with mobile e-mail. Most important, the BlackBerry gave corporate IT departments control over what employees could and couldn’t do with their devices.

The landscape has shifted dramatically over the past year. The explosion of new devices featuring high-resolution screens, engaging user interfaces, and access to entire app stores has ignited a revolution at the workplace. More and more companies have had to respond to the popular preference for BYOD (“bring your own device”) policies. Sometimes the change comes from the bottom up, but sometimes, as with Western Union, it comes from the top down. Either way, it often leads to a clash between freedom and security, a conflict that’s especially tricky now that mobile phones are used interchangeably for both personal and professional purposes.

At some companies, the IT department won’t budge. ING Investment Management Services issued BlackBerry phones to more than 1,000 employees and prohibited the use of anything else for work. As a global financial firm that manages billions of its clients’ dollars, it is naturally concerned about data confidentiality, and it has spent years testing and implementing BlackBerry security functions. Its BlackBerrys run an app that monitors text messaging, in order to enforce a rule that employees cannot send texts unless they are traveling abroad. Employees’ use of instant messaging is strictly audited.

But with the allure of rival mobile devices, “there’s constant conflict around here,” says Michele Thurston, ING’s BlackBerry administrator. “Sales and marketing want the iPhone because they want to do streaming video, which the BlackBerry can’t do.” She notes that another financial-services company recently started supporting Droid devices, whose main screen makes it easy to access applications such as Skype. “I’d have to have a whole team just to manage all that,” Thurston laments.

Apple’s iPhone, Google’s Android, and Nokia’s Symbian platforms have all made significant progress toward meeting such key enterprise requirements as support for the data synchronization technology Exchange ActiveSync, which offers many security features for e-mail. They’ve also introduced remote data wiping and remote locking in case the phone gets lost. And IT departments can distribute and manage applications on the devices remotely.

via The “Bring Your Own Device” Policy – Technology Review.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

jiplp: IP, civil procedure and arbitration in Germany

As a change from the publication of Current Intelligence pieces and editorials, here’s a recent JIPLP book review:

Intellectual Property Law in Germany: Protection, Enforcement and Dispute Resolution (2nd edn.), by Klett, Sonntag, and Wilske

Published by CH Beck, 2010, ISBN: 9783406545306, Hard cover, 628 pp. Price: €98.

Reviewed by Guido Westkamp (Queen Mary, University of London)

There is very little literature on German IP law in English. This book promises, according to the publisher, to close that gap, having predominantly a practitioner audience in mind. The book covers, by way of an introduction, all aspects of German IP law. In addition to the salient categories (trade marks, designs, copyright and neighbouring rights, patents and utility models, plant varieties), specific emphasis is placed on enforcement, including the recent changes brought about by European legislation in that area. In addition, the editors provide basic information concerning practical enforcement by way of both judicial proceedings, including interim injunctions, and arbitration and mediation. Much of the text consists of a translation of each relevant German IP statute into English, complemented by a brilliant glossary. This is welcome and doubtless reflects a great deal of excellence and linguistic skill.

via jiplp: IP, civil procedure and arbitration in Germany.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Managed Services: The New Era of e-Discovery | SFLegal

A new era of e-discovery service delivery is upon us. The goals of the e-discovery process remain relatively constant: win the case at the least possible cost while mitigating risk. The change will be in how corporations and law firms procure services. Until recently, the e-discovery battle has been primarily a “feature war.” Service companies built their own software and competed based on the notion that “our tool can do something other tools can’t.” Buyers spent their time evaluating software capabilities. Robust, market-leading software is now ubiquitous and freely available – and more is coming. Now the game is: “Who can build the most effective, defensible process around best-in-class software?” – in order to maximize the potential efficiencies. The winning service companies are going to be the ones who best define processes and who invest intelligently in people and infrastructure. Just as with ERP implementation and management, it will generally not make sense for law firms and corporations to make these investments – though of course some will try, and most will fail. Rather, the current market conditions and trends suggest the next three to five years will be characterized by both corporations and law firms outsourcing the e-discovery function via managed services and retaining relatively lean teams in-house to provide oversight. The e-discovery equivalents of Accenture, EDS and Perot Systems will be born.

via Managed Services: The New Era of e-Discovery « SFLegal.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare