Courts push back on bribery prosecutions | Reuters (Aruna Viswanatha)

As the Justice Department has stepped up its enforcement of an anti-foreign bribery law, it has faced the expected stiff resistance from the business community.

Now it faces the unexpected as courts are pushing back, too.

In an unusual verbal order issued earlier this week, a federal judge in Houston dismissed without sending to the jury a case against a Texas man accused of authorizing bribes to government officials in Mexico, on behalf of his former employer, a unit of ABB Group (ABBN.VX).

The government’s principal witness “knows almost nothing”, U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes said in announcing his decision to acquit the defendant, John O’Shea, according to a transcript.

Prosecutors also did not produce evidence to “conclude beyond a reasonable doubt” that a middleman did nothing for Swiss power products company ABB beyond pay the bribes, he said.

The decision is the latest in a string of setbacks for the Justice Department unit that prosecutes violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a 1970s law that bars U.S.-linked companies and individuals from paying bribes to officials of foreign governments in exchange for business.

via Courts push back on bribery prosecutions | Reuters.

How Social Media Affects E-Discovery | Business 2 Community

If you’re not exactly sure what e-discovery is, simply tune in to one of the many CSI shows currently airing; they’re bound to feature the latest form of forensic science, which uses electronic data gathered from computers, cell phones, and other devices as evidence for courtroom trials.  In many cases, the process of electronic discovery is carried out by software that searches through the multitude of data to find keywords that could be of use during an investigation and trial.  This process is both time and cost effective, which is why it has become so popular.  But what is the role that social networking plays in the process of e-discovery?  Can it help during a trial, or will it only hinder forward progress?  Here’s the 411 on how social networking coincides with e-discovery.

In most cases, social networking provides a gold mine for any lawyer wishing to dig up dirt, so to speak.  Nearly everyone seems to be involved in some type of social networking these days, whether they have a page on MySpace or Facebook or a Twitter feed that they post to daily.  In addition to offering a public forum for discussions on issues personal, political, and other, social networking sites also tend to foster an atmosphere that is uninhibited.  Surprisingly, people will post all kinds of information that can be used in a trial setting as evidence.  So in this way, social networking can be a major boon in the e-discovery arena.

Of course, not every instance of e-discovery is linked to litigation.  In fact, many corporations are beginning to utilize e-discovery tactics to keep tabs on what their employees are doing online.  For example, businesses may use software that monitors the Facebook pages and Twitter feeds of employees in order to catch them making derogatory statements about the company they work for, or even disseminating information that is considered to be company property (in other words, leaking corporate secrets).  Because people often feel the no one is looking, they may say things that the company would rather they didn’t.  But someone is always watching.

via How Social Media Affects E-Discovery | Business 2 Community.

Podcast: Sham Exam? The Controversy over E-Discovery Certification | Legal Talk Network

Providers are now offering certification courses and tests for e-discovery workers. Critics charge that the programs target the most vulnerable members of the legal community, advocates say they are a step in the right direction to provide better education and standards.  On the August edition of Law Technology Now, host Monica Bay (editor of Law Technology News) discusses the controversy with attorneys Patrick Oot, of Washington, D.C.’s eDiscovery Institute, and Albert Barsocchini, a San Francisco-based e-discovery consultant.

via Sham Exam? The Controversy over E-Discovery Certification | Legal Talk Network.

Singapore International Arbitration Forum 2011

The biannual Singapore International Arbitration Forum took place on 1st June 2011, at the beautiful Capella Hotel at the island resort of Sentosa. The event was jointly organised by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre and Maxwell Chambers.

Eminent arbitration practitioners from around the world gathered to discuss current and developing concerns in the international arbitration industry, with a particular focus on Asia. This year’s forum, themed “The Future for International Arbitration”, was attended by close to 200 experts and practitioners  from  the international  legal and  arbitration community. The speakers at this year’s event included: Dr Michael Pryles, Harpreet Singh SC, John Savage, Prof Lawrence Boo, Philip Jeyaretnam SC, EY Park, Sally Harpole, Nakul Dewan, Hop Dang, Liu Yuwu, Justice Quentin Loh SC, Justyn Jagger, Dr Andreas Shell, John Pyall, Peter Newall, Judith Gill QC, Meef Moh, Nikolaus Pitkowitz, Zia Mody, Chelva Rajah SC.

Litigation Edge participated in the exhibition, and we enjoyed our exposure to the world of arbitrators. We were struck by how international the community was, as we met with lawyers from UK, Australia, India, Maldives, Malaysia, Vietnam. The international community brings a rich diversity of personalities and an incredible breadth of know-how to our shores.

The amount of documents involved in and the cross border nature of arbitration makes a strong case for parties to digitize their evidence, and from there to e-discovery, perhaps.

We produced a special Litigation Edge Newsletter for SIAF 2011 to mark our first exhibition.

via Singapore International Arbitration Forum 2011.

Microsoft joins pre-emptive patent protection program

In an effort to avoid costly patent litigation, Microsoft has become the first company to sign up to a crowdsourcing service that seeks to find prior art and eliminate patents that should not have been awarded.

The new Litigation Avoidance Program comes from Article One Partners, a startup that pays cash rewards to discoverers of prior art. Article One pays out rewards of between $5,000 and $50,000 to members of its claimed million-strong community of patent researchers, and says it has paid out more than $1.3 million so far.

So far, Article One has operated a scheme enabling those on the receiving end of patent litigation to crowdsource the search for relevant prior art; with that prior art the defendents can then seek to have the patents being wielded against them invalidated. The Litigation Avoidance Program goes a step further, proactively seeking out patents purchased by non-practising entities, and then hunting down prior art relevant to those patents. Non-practicing entities—better known as patent trolls—are those companies who perform no research and make no products, but instead buy patents and then use them in lawsuits.

The Litigation Avoidance Program should enable companies to more easily identify poor-quality patents that ought not have been issued, and use the prior art to overturn those patents and avoid costly damages awards.

via Microsoft joins pre-emptive patent protection program.

Will OpenOffice Survive After Oracle Offers It to Community?

In retrospect, Oracle’s (news, site) announcement on Friday that it is finally throwing in the towel on OpenOffice.org (OOo) seemed inevitable, but when the original fork happened and the Document Foundation’s LibreOffice project was set up last October, just about anything was in the cards.

Even now, there are still a number of questions, the answers to which will only become clear in time, and which stem from the announcement from Oracle itself.

That Oracle has been a bit vague about its intentions is not really surprising, but this goes beyond vague and really poses the question as to whether OpenOffice is going to disappear, mutate into another project or join with LibreOffice, thus closing the fork — as many of those in LibreOffice’s community, the Document Foundation (TDF), would like to see.

On Friday, Oracle, issued a statement that contained the following:

Oracle Corporation today is announcing its intention to move OpenOffice.org to a purely community-based open source project and to no longer offer a commercial version of Open Office.

… we believe the OpenOffice.org project would be best managed by an organization focused on serving that broad constituency on a non-commercial basis…We intend to begin working immediately with community members to further the continued success of Open Office….”

The problem is that Oracle hasn’t identified what community it will release it to, or where it expects OOo to go. It hasn’t even said whether Oracle will still hold the trademark for OOo, or release it.

via Will OpenOffice Survive After Oracle Offers It to Community?.

Liferay 2011 Plans Include Microblogging and an Apps Marketplace

Growth, Community Support and Liferay Portal 6EE

Liferay, for those not familiar with the platform, provides a Java-based portal framework for building sites and web applications. The product is available in two levels, the free Liferay Portal Community Edition and the commercial Liferay Portal Enterprise Edition.

CMSWire spoke with Liferay CEO, Brian Cheung, and Paul Hinz, CMO, about their accomplishments last year and their plans for the remainder of 2011. By all measures, Liferay had a big year in 2010. The company experienced a 100% growth in revenues and employee headcount; they also managed to expand their partner network to 89. Liferay demonstrated its commitment to the open source model growing its community to 35,000 members and hiring a community manager from commercial software behemoth Oracle.

From a technology perspective, Liferay made equivalent strides with the introduction of version 6 of its portal platform. Version 6 introduced features such as:

Enhanced workflow

Rules engine integration

Custom fields

One click page creation

Configurable teams which sub-divide communities

These features were welcome additions to the platform and well received by Liferay users. In addition to the 6EE release, Liferay launched new projects like Alloy UI and an Eclipse-based integrated development environment.

via Liferay 2011 Plans Include Microblogging and an Apps Marketplace.

Open Source Email Archiving with Linux Box Enkive

Last April, open source vendor Linux Box announced that it would be releasing a number of new editions of its email archiving software. Recently, it launched the community edition — which is currently free to download — with the release of enterprise and cloud expected in the first half of next year.

The new software, Enkive, is an advanced open source email archiving solution that runs in tandem with a number of other open source email systems, without impacting their performance.

For the moment, it supports open source SMTP supported email systems including, but not limited to, Postfix/Zimbra, Sendmail,Horde/Imp Squirrel mail.

Linux Box Enkive search

Other supported email systems include Outlook, Gmail and Lotus Notes, although Linux Box says that it will require some customization.

via Open Source Email Archiving with Linux Box Enkive.

5 Trends for Life on the Cloud in 2011

While the cloud provides many benefits for businesses, it may not be the best solution for all. The more companies learn about what the cloud entails, the better prepared they will be for what’s to come. Here are just a few of the trends Forrester will be keeping an eye on in 2011.

  1. Empowered employees lead by example. Since Forrester released its newest book, Empowered, more attention is being paid to employees who feel empowered to embrace and employ new technologies all in the name of productivity. In order to implement company-wide initiatives, executives are urged to learn what solutions are needed to solve problems rather than create more.
  2. Privatizing the cloud doesn’t work. But it does provide valuable opportunities for companies to learn what it takes to operate in a cloud environment. The quicker you fail, the faster you can learn, re-group and do it right.
  3. Community clouds get more support. Companies within specific industries are joining forces and creating community clouds. Not only does this provide safety in numbers, industries that face stricter security and compliance standards will find it easier to enforce and comply.
  4. Don’t look for standardization. The cloud is not expected to adopt standards anytime soon, but that shouldn’t slow you down. Existing security, web services, networking and protocol standards are all in use by clouds, and 2011 is bound to bring more specifications.
  5. Security is shared. Now that your data is in the cloud, whose responsibility is it anyway? As more and more cloud providers seek to bring HIPAA, PCI and other compliance standards to the cloud, not only will we learn that security is a shared responsibility, but we’ll also see more best practices developed.

via 5 Trends for Life on the Cloud in 2011.

Surprise Winner in Oracle v. Google: Microsoft – PCWorld

Oracle’s suit against Google has one clear winner: Microsoft. With Google’s Android tied up in litigation, and Oracle becoming the latest villain in the open source community, Microsoft has a chance to make inroads in the mobile market and elsewhere.

Oracle is suing Google, claiming that Android infringes on Oracle copyrights and patents that are related to Java. Oracle spokeswoman Karen Tillman said in a statement:

“In developing Android, Google knowingly, directly and repeatedly infringed Oracle’s Java-related intellectual property. This lawsuit seeks appropriate remedies for their infringement.”

Google begs to differ. Android doesn’t use Java in Android, but instead a Java compatible technology called Dalvik. Google claims the Oracle suit is “baseless,” and will fight it.

No matter what happens with the suit, though, it hurts Google, and helps Microsoft at a time when Microsoft is particularly vulnerable in mobile. Android use has skyrocketed, jumping to 17.2% market share today compared to 1.8% a year ago. Meanwhile, Windows Mobile has become practically a footnote in mobile, dropping to 5% of the market.

Android’s success has been fueled by the large number of phone makers building smartphones based on it. Those phone makers, though, may be scared away by this suit. IDC analyst Al Hilwa told Computerworld:

via Surprise Winner in Oracle v. Google: Microsoft – PCWorld.