SEC Breaks Enforcement Record, Begins Tracking FCPA Separately – Corruption Currents – WSJ

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a record of 735 enforcement actions in the last fiscal year, and broke out violations of foreign bribery law for the first time.The record number of enforcement actions, however, netted a slight decrease in disgorgement and penalties paid in the past fiscal year over the year before. In fiscal year 2011, which ended Sept. 30, the SEC collected $2.81 billion in disgorgement and penalties, down from $2.85 billion in fiscal 2010.Notably, the SEC broke out enforcement statistics for the first time for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which bars bribing foreign officials for business purposes. The SEC recorded 20 enforcement actions in fiscal year 2011.

via SEC Breaks Enforcement Record, Begins Tracking FCPA Separately – Corruption Currents – WSJ.

Do We Have the Luxury to Remain Compliance-Curious? | The Moscow Times

If you are a Russian company that is subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) or U.K. Bribery Act (BA), now is an excellent time to switch from being merely FCPA or BA-curious to FCPA or BA-compliant.

There are a number of solid reasons for this. On the one hand there is the increased level of FCPA enforcement with an almost exponentially growing number of staff at the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) looking at Russia ever more closely. On the other hand, as if this were not enough, beginning this summer companies and individuals alike must now also contend with BA enforcement.

What does being compliant mean? It certainly does not mean you should attempt to structure business operations to avoid these two laws. The laws are statutes with long-arm jurisdictions and, as such, cast their nets far and wide. This means that, if you are an international company with a presence and/or a public listing in the United States and the United Kingdom, it is more likely than not that both the FCPA and the BA will apply to you. Furthermore, I would not trust the statement in the Official Guidance to the Bribery Act that a listing by itself will not constitute carrying out business or part of business in the United Kingdom. Instead, I would urge following what the SFO has said, which is that a listing by itself may be just enough to trigger BA jurisdiction.

Being compliant means you should have a proper compliance program in place. It is as “simple” as that.

Your compliance program should cover both the FCPA and BA. Careful analysis and review of existing enforcement practice indicate that, despite textual differences, the two laws are about similar prohibitions. For instance, it is true that the BA does not contain an exception for facilitation or “grease” payments, whereas the FCPA does. Note, however, that U.S. enforcement has rendered this FCPA exception practically obsolete. Commercial bribery is another example. The BA expressly prohibits commercial bribery, whereas the FCPA does not. Nevertheless, the DoJ has charged companies for commercial bribery in the past under the so-called books and records provisions of the FCPA, and with the help of jurisdictional mechanisms available under the U.S. Travel Act.

via Do We Have the Luxury to Remain Compliance-Curious? | The Moscow Times.

Las Vegas Sands Probe: Explained – Law Blog – WSJ

Since the initial news of the U.S. government’s bribery investigation into Las Vegas Sands’ Macau operations, we’ve scarcely heard a peep about it.

The casino owner and operator disclosed in March that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Justice Department were investigating whether LVS violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which bars bribery of foreign officials.

FCPA aficionados know that this case holds intense interest. The government, no doubt, wants to make a splash by pegging a casino, and, in the words of the Fixx, one thing leads to another. The SEC and Justice Department rarely stop with one company in any particular industry when it comes to overseas bribery. They are likely to start looking at other casinos, if they haven’t already.

So, with that windup, WSJ’s Kate O’Keeffe has a report on an internal memo from LVS general counsel Gayle Hyman that points to a possible focus of the probe.

Hyman’s memo, reviewed by the WSJ,  instructs employees at Sands to retain documents regarding “transmission of anything of value” to current and former Macau government officials and their family members. The memo also names several Sands employees and contractors about whom documents must be preserved. Among those people is a prominent Macau lawyer who is a focus of a dispute between the company and its former chief executive for Macau.

The memo mirrors a subpoena sent by the SEC, a person familiar with the matter told the Journal.

via Las Vegas Sands Probe: Explained – Law Blog – WSJ.

Economist: UK Bribery Act Is ‘Smarter’ Than FCPA – Corruption Currents – WSJ

“Bribing foreign officials is wrong, but not everything governments do to prevent it is wise or proportional,” begins a new piece in The Economist comparing the U.K. Bribery Act (which went into force this summer) and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (which was born in 1977, the same year the world’s first personal computer, the Commodore PET, went to market.)

This Pepsi Challenge ends poorly for the American anti-bribery law, which the magazine says is written “confusingly” and applied “vigorously.”

The law’s muddled language and broad reach — bosses can be held accountable for bribes paid by their subordinates in far-flung subsidiaries, even if they didn’t know about them — coupled with aggressive enforcement by the Justice Department and the SEC, has deterred foreign investment, the piece argues.

The central complaint is that the FCPA, unlike the U.K. Bribery Act, has no compliance defense, a shield for companies that show they have tough procedures and processes in place to prevent corrupt practices. This feature of the Bribery Act will minimize crippling investigations “into an otherwise blameless company,” the magazine says.

(The FCPA Professor has a great post on reform bills in the 1980s that sought to create a compliance defense for the FCPA — this in light of a forthcoming bill Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner that will likely include such a defense.)

Anti-corruption groups have argued that a compliance defense would engender fig-leaf compliance programs, and Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, has flatly rejected the notion of one.

via Economist: UK Bribery Act Is ‘Smarter’ Than FCPA – Corruption Currents – WSJ.

Tickle The Wire » Oracle Investigation Latest in Trend in Foreign Corrupt Practice Act Crackdown by Justice Dept.

The Software company Oracle is being investigated by the FBI, reports the Guardian, in what some see as a trend in the increase of prosecutions under the foreign corrupt practices act (FCPA), which forbids U.S. companies from paying bribes to foreign government officials or employees of state-owned companies.

“Every week there seem to be more and more companies going through what Oracle is going through,” said Butler University professor Mike Koehler, who maintains a blog on the subject, according to The Guardian.

Koehler cited increasing globalization and the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which brought stricter corporate disclosure requirements, for the increase. He said  FCPA actions in 2010 accounted for 50% of the fines levied by the Justice department’s criminal division.

via Tickle The Wire » Oracle Investigation Latest in Trend in Foreign Corrupt Practice Act Crackdown by Justice Dept..

What are GCs and Directors Thinking About Corporate Governance? | Law.com

Risk

The top concerns for directors this year are operational risk, data security, and managing the company’s reputation.

Over 50 percent of GCs, meanwhile, cite major concerns about electronic discovery for litigation/ investigation, managing outside legal fees, and data security, too.

A bit further on down the line, at least a third of GCs consider governance/compliance, operational risk, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and managing company reputation to be major concerns.

 

Dodd-Frank Act

Not many fans of the 2,300-page financial reform legislation in these parts. Directors and GCs were evenly aligned in their thoughts on Dodd-Frank: 94 percent of directors and counsel alike think the measures need to be re-evaluated, while 94 and 95 percent, respectively, think the law incentivizes employees to bypass internal whistleblower procedures and go straight to the SEC.

Additionally, most directors and GCs “agree that the ultimate impact of Dodd-Frank will be increased oversight, reduced earnings, and a less-attractive capital market environment for prospective public companies.”

 

Compliance

There’s some ambivalence amongst GCs about the possibility of regulatory actions against their companies. Fifty-six percent of general counsel said they are more fearful of regulatory action than in the previous year’s study, while 42 percent said their level of concern is about the same as before.

With regards to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the landscape looks a little dicey: “Just 36% of responding general counsel serving companies subject to FCPA believe their board and management have done a good job with FCPA training and compliance. Another 63%. . .believe there is room for improvement.”

Finally, 69 percent of general counsel respondents think that regulatory compliance is what will increase their law department’s workload the most over the next year. That’s up from 37 percent of GCs who thought that way in 2009.

via What are GCs and Directors Thinking About Corporate Governance?.

U.K. Bribery Act Finally Takes Effect | Law.com

After being delayed for almost a year, the new U.K. Bribery Act finally takes effect today.

The controversial and wide-ranging legislation, rushed through Parliament before the 2010 general election, was originally scheduled to take effect last October. The new law’s start date was pushed back twice, however, to allow companies to put in place what the U.K. Ministry of Justice describes as “adequate procedures” for preventing bribery.

The final guidance, issued in April, eased worries among multinational companies by stating that a listing on the London Stock Exchange will not, in itself, make a business subject to the act. However, any company that has a U.K. office, has employees who are U.K. citizens, or provides any services to a U.K. organization will still be covered by the bill, which carries unlimited fines and an increased maximum jail term of 10 years.

Although the act is primarily designed to tighten the U.K.’s regulatory framework — the first change to the country’s bribery laws in more than a century — its broad jurisdictional reach means that the majority of U.S. public companies are likely to be affected by what some regulatory experts have described as the world’s most draconian anti-corruption legislation.

“It’s wider ranging even than the [U.S.' Foreign Corrupt Practices Act],” said Lord Peter Goldsmith, the former U.K. attorney general, now head of Debevoise & Plimpton’s European litigation practice. ”It’s going to affect all companies with business in the U.K., even if they’re not incorporated here. The enforcement agencies have greater powers and the penalties are much tougher than under previous U.K. law. Boardrooms throughout America and beyond should have this on their agenda.”

While the U.K. and U.S. laws will regularly act in tandem, there are a number of key differences. Most fundamentally, where the U.S. FCPA deals only with governmental bribery, the U.K. act also covers corruption between commercial entities. And where U.S. law requires prosecutors to prove intent and awareness of the bribe at a senior level, the Bribery Act imposes strict liability on any company that fails to prevent bribery from taking place, regardless of awareness or intent. This not only covers bribes made by its own employees, but also by any individual “associated” with the company, a fact likely to concern smaller enterprises, which are more likely to rely on third-party agents for international matters.

via U.K. Bribery Act Finally Takes Effect.

10 Big FCPA Compliance Tips for Small Legal Departments | Law.com

Earlier this month, the Association of Corporate Counsel published a resource for its members, “Top Ten Basics of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance for the Small Legal Department.

The article, written by California attorney Stephen Clayton, maps out baseline standards for hewing to the FCPA, including “Train your board, management, employees and third parties who distribute your products” (#5); “Include clear FCPA terms in every international contract” (#10); and “Plan for the likelihood you will have to conduct high quality international internal investigations.”

The full list helps outline a clear framework for smaller companies (and their legal departments) that are working in complex or high-risk international business environments.

via 10 Big FCPA Compliance Tips for Small Legal Departments.

Is Goldman the Next to Get Into FCPA Trouble? – Law Blog – WSJ

It’s a you-got-your-chocolate-in-my-peanut-butter moment.

Two of the hottest things going, stepped-up regulation of banks and enforcement of foreign bribery laws, are on a possible collision course, according to this WSJ story out Thursday.

That’s right, U.S. securities regulators are examining whether Goldman Sachs and other financial firms might have violated bribery laws in dealings with Libya’s sovereign-wealth fund, according to people familiar with the matter. SEC lawyers are reviewing documents that detail the firms’ relationships with the Libyan Investment Authority controlled by Col. Moammar Gadhafi, these people said.

Among other things, SEC officials are interested in a $50 million fee Goldman initially agreed to pay the Libyan sovereign-wealth fund as part of a proposal by the bank to help the fund recoup losses, according to these people.

The Libyan Investment Authority would have passed on the $50 million payment to an outside adviser, The Wall Street Journal reported last month. But that outside adviser, Palladyne International Asset Management, was run at the time by the son-in-law of the head of Libya’s state-owned oil company.

The $50 million payment was never made, because discussions between Goldman and the sovereign-wealth fund stalled before violence erupted in Libya in February, according to people familiar with the matter.

But the fact the payment wasn’t made doesn’t necessarily exempt it from trouble under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

via Is Goldman the Next to Get Into FCPA Trouble? – Law Blog – WSJ.

Given recent FCPA cases, M&A risk management is key

Commentators broadly and accurately highlight intensified enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and acquiring companies’ FCPA hazards in mergers and acquisitions. One might infer that an acquirer should, when buying a business, deploy limitless resources to identify and resolve all anti-corruption compliance risk. Since resources are not unlimited, effective management of anti-corruption exposure in an M&A context requires informed, transaction-by-transaction judgment and protections that are tailored to and commensurate with risk profiles of target companies.

Acquirers’ concerns about anti-corruption risk are well-founded. The U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission do not hesitate to pursue alleged FCPA violations on a “successor liability” basis. Recent settlements for preclosing activities of target companies include Vetco International Ltd. ($26 million in fines), InVision Technologies ($1.8 million) and Latin Node Inc. ($2 million). “Three Vetco International Ltd. Subsidiaries Plead Guilty,” DOJ press release (Feb. 6, 2007); “SEC Settles Charges Against InVision Technologies,” SEC litigation release No. 19078 (Feb. 14, 2005); “Latin Node Inc. Pleads Guilty,” DOJ press release (April 7, 2009). The Latin Node FCPA enforcement action resulted in eLandia International Inc. writing off the totality of its acquisition of Latin Node.

via Given recent FCPA cases, M&A risk management is key.