Cross-border litigation: A sign of things to come? | The Economist

THIS week, a New York court threatened to prevent an Irish bank from selling assets, because it would prejudice an American hedge fund. Expect to see more of this should euro-zone bank insolvencies create cross-border claims.

Fir Tree Capital, a hedge fund which owns $200m of subordinated Anglo Irish bank bonds, is trying to block the bank’s attempts to dispose of its last remaining US assets, unless it repays its debt. The backdrop is a law passed by the Irish government in December granting the government sweeping powers to restructure the junior debt of state-rescued banks. Essentially the law allows Ireland’s banks to default on junior debt if the Irish Finance Minister approves.

The law passed its first test in April when the Irish High Court rubber-stamped a Finance Ministry backed plan for Allied Irish to indefinitely suspend coupon payments on subordinated bonds and not redeem them on maturity. But what if the subordinated bondholders are not Irish, and their bond contracts are not governed by Irish law? After all many banks and even governments issue debt under English or New York law precisely to reassure creditors they are protected in the event of default.

One of the most striking clauses in the Irish legislation allows the government to “modify the applicable law” of a bond contract. The Irish government could change its banks’ bond contracts to prevent bank creditors suing in foreign courts, blocking at the source cases like Fir Tree’s against Anglo Irish.

via Cross-border litigation: A sign of things to come? | The Economist.

FCPA Watch: IBM Fined for Past Violations in Asia

(Westlaw Business) Cross-border businesses beware: U.S. regulators have been busy bringing up the past. International Business Machines Corp (IBM) is the latest to be slapped, or rather lightly tapped, on the wrist for alleged wrongdoing committed overseas. The internationally recognized computer maker recently disclosed that it had agreed to pay US$10 million in connection with alleged violations of the FCPA from 1998 to 2009.

According to IBM, the fine is categorized as follows: disgorgement in profits amounting to US$5.3 million, prejudgment interest on the disgorgement of US$2.7 million and a civil penalty of US$2 million, which covers the alleged misconduct committed by IBM subsidiaries during the time period of 1998 to 2009.

via FCPA Watch: IBM Fined for Past Violations in Asia.

Secret EU Asset Freezes May Saddle Banks With Costs, Lawsuits, Lawyers Say – Bloomberg

European Union banks may face new costs and liabilities next year under a law allowing claimants to freeze debtors’ assets in the bloc with court orders from any EU jurisdiction, lawyers say.

The European Commission wants the proposal in place as soon as March, allowing judges to grant cross-border account freezes in secret and apply them to banks in other EU nations before a debtor is aware of the claim.

The legislative arm of the 27-nation EU says 63 percent of cross-border debt can’t be recovered, and it blames a network of diverging national laws and the high cost of winning separate freezes in each country where assets are located. Lawyers aren’t convinced the new law will help.

via Secret EU Asset Freezes May Saddle Banks With Costs, Lawsuits, Lawyers Say – Bloomberg.

Canada joins APEC cross-border privacy enforcement initiative | Privacy News – PogoWasRight.org

Canada has been accepted as a participant in a new Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) mechanism for cross-border cooperation on data privacy enforcement.

The initiative – the APEC Cross-border Privacy Enforcement Arrangement – was developed to facilitate information sharing and cooperation between authorities responsible for data and consumer protection in the APEC region.

via Canada joins APEC cross-border privacy enforcement initiative | Privacy News – PogoWasRight.org.