U.S. Is Said to Scrutinize Apple’s Online Music Tactics – NYTimes.com

The Justice Department is examining Apple’s tactics in the market for digital music, and its staff members have talked to major music labels and Internet music companies, according to several people briefed on the conversations.

The antitrust inquiry is in the early stages, these people say, and the conversations have revolved broadly around the dynamics of selling music online.

But people briefed on the inquiries also said investigators had asked in particular about recent allegations that Apple used its dominant market position to persuade music labels to refuse to give the online retailer Amazon.com exclusive access to music about to be released.

All these people spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the delicacy of the matter. Representatives from Apple and Amazon declined to comment. Gina Talamona, a deputy director at the Justice Department, also declined to comment.

In March, Billboard magazine reported that Amazon was asking music labels to give it the exclusive right to sell certain forthcoming songs for one day before they went on sale more widely. In exchange, Amazon promised to include those songs in a promotion called the “MP3 Daily Deal” on its Web site.

The magazine reported that representatives of Apple’s iTunes music service were asking the labels not to participate in Amazon’s promotion, adding that Apple punished those that did by withdrawing marketing support for those songs on iTunes.

via U.S. Is Said to Scrutinize Apple’s Online Music Tactics – NYTimes.com.

Lawyers Galore in FTC’s Intel Case – The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times

Lawyers Galore in FTC’s Intel Case

As discovery heats up in the Federal Trade Commission’s monopolization lawsuit against Intel Corp., at least seven tech giants have been dragged into the fray.

Microsoft, Oracle, Hewlett-Packard, Via Technologies, Lenovo, Acer and Gateway have all been hit with subpoenas for documents either by the FTC, Intel, or both. Lawyers for the companies have responded with motions asking for more time to comply or to quash or limit the scope of the requests.

The FTC on Dec. 16 charged Intel with using its dominant market position to illegally stifle competition in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. Trial is set for September.

via Lawyers Galore in FTC’s Intel Case – The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.

F.T.C. Accuses Intel of Trying to Stifle Competition – NYTimes.com

The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday sued the chipmaker, Intel, accusing it of using its dominant market position to stifle competition and strengthen its monopoly.

In its complaint, the agency accused Intel of a systematic campaign to prevent rivals from selling their microchips by cutting off their access to the market.

In doing so, the agency said in a statement, Intel deprived consumers of choice and innovation in the microchips used for a computers’ central processing unit.

“Intel has engaged in a deliberate campaign to hamstring competitive threats to its monopoly,” said Richard A. Feinstein, director of the commission’s Bureau of Competition. “It’s been running roughshod over the principles of fair play and the laws protecting competition on the merits.”

According to the complaint, Intel’s tactics were intended to put the brakes on superior competitive products that threatened its monopoly in the microchip market.

via F.T.C. Accuses Intel of Trying to Stifle Competition – NYTimes.com.