Google Holding a Data Privacy Day Event at Washington, DC Office on January 28th

Google is inviting for the Data Privacy Day event at the Washington, DC offices for a light breakfast and a panel discussion about how privacy affects technology and vice versa.

This discussion won’t linger on policy alone. Instead, it will focus on engineering and the mechanics behind the best practices of online privacy.

Friday, January 28, 2011

Light breakfast with the panelists begins at 9:00 AM

Panel begins at 10:00 AM

Google DC 1101 New York Avenue, NW 2nd Floor

Entrance on Eye Street Washington, DC

Moderator:

Kim Hart, Reporter, Politico

Panelists:

Peter Eckersley, Senior Staff Technologist, Electronic Frontier Foundation

Ed Felten, Chief Technologist, Federal Trade Commission

Ari Schwartz, Senior Internet Policy Advisor, National Institute of Standards and Technology

Alma Whitten, Director of Privacy, Product and Engineering, Google

via Google Holding a Data Privacy Day Event at Washington, DC Office on January 28th.

Want privacy? Take Responsibility. | ZDNet

There are many organizations today focused on the issue of information and privacy, ranging from the Electronic Frontier Foundation to the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, but the bottom line is that you need to be proactive about protecting what you deem to be private information, be it configuring your smartphone to not include location data in snapshots you post online to getting actively involved with organizations that want to do something about privacy issues, to staying in touch with your congressional representatives and continually voice your concerns when privacy related policies are crossing theirdesk.

via Want privacy? Take Responsibility. | ZDNet.

HTTPS Everywhere: Fend Off Firesheep – Computerworld

The Web is an insecure place and getting more insecure all the time. The latest threat, the Firesheep add-in for Firefox, is particularly dangerous because it is exceedingly simple to use. Someone with absolutely no hacking experience can grab your private login information to sites such as Facebook and Amazon, and then log in as you and do anything they want, as if they were you. The free Firefox add-in HTTPS Everywhere helps protect against that threat and other privacy invaders by effectively encrypting information when you visit certain Web sites.

A collaboration between the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Tor Project (which employs a network and free software to help protect people’s privacy), HTTPS Everywhere ensures that when you visit certain sites, all of your communications are encrypted and secure.

via HTTPS Everywhere: Fend Off Firesheep – Computerworld.

HTTPS Everywhere: Fend Off Firesheep – Computerworld

The Web is an insecure place and getting more insecure all the time. The latest threat, the Firesheep add-in for Firefox, is particularly dangerous because it is exceedingly simple to use. Someone with absolutely no hacking experience can grab your private login information to sites such as Facebook and Amazon, and then log in as you and do anything they want, as if they were you. The free Firefox add-in HTTPS Everywhere helps protect against that threat and other privacy invaders by effectively encrypting information when you visit certain Web sites.

A collaboration between the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Tor Project (which employs a network and free software to help protect people’s privacy), HTTPS Everywhere ensures that when you visit certain sites, all of your communications are encrypted and secure.

via HTTPS Everywhere: Fend Off Firesheep – Computerworld.

EFF Urges EU Data Protection Authorities to Call for the Repeal of the EU Data Retention Directive | Electronic Frontier Foundation

This week, EFF is taking part in the 32nd Annual Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, where we urged the Privacy Authorities to call for the repeal of the European Union’s 2006 Data Retention Directive, which requires Internet service providers operating in Europe to retain telecom and Internet traffic data about all of their customers’ communications for a period of at least six months and up to two years, for possible use by law enforcement.

The Data Retention Directive is highly controversial, if not wildly unpopular throughout the European Union. The directive was strongly opposed by European privacy activists. For several years, mass protests have been held in cities across Europe under the banner of “Freedom Not Fear.” As each country in the EU has implemented the Data Retention Directive in their own law, they have faced challenges in state courts. In 2007, the German Working Group on Data Retention (AK Vorrat) filed a class-action lawsuit representing 35,000 people challenging the German law. The court found the law was unconstitutional and ordered the immediate deletion of all the data stored since the law went into effect in 2008 and the suspension of data collection until a revised national law is proposed. In 2009, the Romanian Constitutional Court ruled that the Romanian implementation of the EU directive fundamentally violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to respect for private life and correspondence. The Swedish government has so far refused to implement the Data Retention Directive at all, leading to a lawsuit from the European Commission.

As if the data retention obligations in the Data Retention Directive were not bad enough, European privacy Authorities have found that compliance at national level of Telecom and ISPs with the obligations required from national traffic data retention legislation was unlawful. Data retention periods were found to be as high as ten years, well in excess of the 24-month maximum set in the directive. While the directive itself is limited to the storage of traffic data, Privacy Authorities found that data relating to the contents of communications is also being stored. Several service providers were found to retain URLs of websites, headers of e-mail messages as well as recipients of e-mail messages in “CC”- mode at the destination mail server. And when monitoring phone traffic data, phone companies continuously track the location of the caller.

via EFF Urges EU Data Protection Authorities to Call for the Repeal of the EU Data Retention Directive | Electronic Frontier Foundation.

US Federal Agents Monitoring Social Networks To Uncover Fraud – ITProPortal.com

Government documents recently released under the Freedom of Information act has revealed that the US federal agents befriended social networking platform users to uncover frauds.

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, key US government agencies are exploiting social networking platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and MySpace to spy on citizens and coax personal information from them that might aid them to uncover fraud.

The EFF cited a memo from the Office of Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS), which detailed how federal agents can befriend people suspected of fraud to uncover their true intentions.

Some of the websites which the government uses to spy on its citizens include Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Digg, Craiglist and Wikipedia.

One of the FDNS documents procured by the EFF said: “Narcissistic tendencies in many people fuel a need to have a large group of ‘friends’ link to their pages, and many of these people accept cyber-friends that they don’t even know.”

via US Federal Agents Monitoring Social Networks To Uncover Fraud – ITProPortal.com.

Homeland Security Harvested Social Network Data – Tech Talk – CBS News

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security monitored social networking sites to harvest information – described as “items of interest” — during the lead up to Barack Obama’s inauguration.

The existence of the surveillance program is laid out in a set of slides obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The EFF and the University of California, Berkeley’s Samuelson Clinic last year filed a Freedom of Information lawsuit against six government agencies in response to news articles reporting government monitoring of social networks.

In the document, DHS details how it would collect and use social network information. It also refers to privacy guidelines it would employ as its operatives went about gathering data for what it called its Social Networking Monitoring Center or (SNMC.) The target list reads like a “Who’s Who” of the most popular social networking sites, including the likes of Twitter, Facebook, MySpace and CraigsList, among others

via Homeland Security Harvested Social Network Data – Tech Talk – CBS News.

Facebook Places Privacy Controls Get EFF Approval – Security from eWeek

Despite complaints from some consumer advocates about the privacy measures in Facebook Places, the Electronic Frontier Foundation called privacy controls for the location-based service a “substantial improvement” over those of earlier products.

That praise from the EFF comes with the caveat that Facebook Places settings are only good if users understand them and judiciously use them.

Facebook launched its Places location-based service Aug. 18. The service lets users “check in” to a location via their smartphone to share their locations with Facebook friends.

Places will tell those users if their friends are nearby in case the parties want to meet up. Users may also tag friends who are with them. Facebook Places rivals check-in services from Foursquare and Gowalla. TechCrunch runs down the controls here.

The EFF is highly sensitive to location-based Web services, having tussled with Google over its Latitude friend-finding service to make sure that it protects user privacy.

via Facebook Places Privacy Controls Get EFF Approval – Security from eWeek.

U.S. Government Says Jailbreaking iPhone Is Legal – ABC News

Federal regulators lifted a cloud of uncertainty when they announced it was lawful to hack or “jailbreak” an iPhone, declaring Monday there was “no basis for copyright law to assist Apple in protecting its restrictive business model.”

Jailbreaking is hacking the phone’s OS to allow consumers to run any app on the phone they choose, including applications not authorized by Apple.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation asked regulators 19 months ago to add jailbreaking to a list of explicit exemptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s anti-circumvention provisions.

via U.S. Government Says Jailbreaking iPhone Is Legal – ABC News.

EFF: Forget cookies, your browser has fingerprints – Computerworld

Even without cookies, popular browsers such as Internet Explorer and Firefox give Web sites enough information to get a unique picture of their visitors about 94 percent of the time, according to research compiled over the past few months by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

The research puts a quantitative assessment on something that security gurus have known about for years, said Peter Eckersley, the EFF senior staff technologist who did the research. He found that configuration information — data on the type of browser, operating system, plugins, and even fonts installed can be compiled by Web sites to create a unique portrait of most visitors.

This means that most Internet users are a lot less anonymous than they believe, Eckersley said. “Even if you turn off cookies and you use a proxy to hide your IP address, you could still be tracked,” he said.

The data doesn’t actually identify the Web user, but it creates a unique browser “fingerprint,” that can be used to identify the user when he visits other Web sites.

Using JavaScript, Web sites are able to probe PCs and learn a lot. No single piece of data is enough to identify the visitor on its own, but when it’s all strung together — browser version, language, operating system, time zone details — a clearer picture emerges. Some things — what combination of plugins and fonts are installed, for example — can be a dead giveaway.

And using the private mode offered by some browser-makers does nothing to stop this analysis. “They provide you with some protection against other people who may be in your house or who have access to your computer, but they haven’t got to the point where they’ve provided protection against the companies that are profiling Web users,” Eckersley said.

In fact, there are already a handful of companies have already started offering this kind of cookie-less Web tracking to help e-commerce sites identify fraudsters. Companies such as 41st Parameter, ThreatMetrix, and Iovation are widely used in the banking, e-commerce and social Web sites.

via EFF: Forget cookies, your browser has fingerprints – Computerworld.