EC resolves antitrust probe into IBM mainframe biz • The Register

IBM rivals now have a better chance of competing with the tech giant in the mainframe market, after the European Commission got Big Blue to loosen its grip on the business.

In a legally binding agreement, IBM will make spare parts and technical information “swiftly available”.

It will do this, the EC added, under commercially reasonable and non-discriminatory terms. The move should allow independent mainframe maintainers that operate within the European Union to get their hands on more powerful computer kit.

“I am pleased that we could find a swift solution with IBM to our competition concerns. Timely interventions are crucial in fast moving technology markets,” said competition policy Commissioner veep Joaquín Almunia.

via EC resolves antitrust probe into IBM mainframe biz • The Register.

EU opens antitrust probe into Apple’s e-book deals | AFP

European antitrust officials launched a probe on Tuesday to determine whether iPad maker Apple and five international publishers struck illegal deals to fix the price of e-books in Europe.

The European Commission will look at deals between the US gadget giant and US publishing powerhouses Simon & Schuster and Harper Collins, Britain’s Penguin, France’s Hachette Livre and Germany’s Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck.

Amelia Torres, the commission’s competition spokeswoman, said the probe will see whether the agreements “had the objective or effect of restricting competition and fixing the price of e-books at a high level in Europe.”

“This is an important issue for consumers, for people like me and you who love to read books, including on an electronic platform,” Torres told a news briefing, adding that the case will be treaty as a matter of priority.

Apple is in a fierce battle over the growing e-reader market with US online retail giant Amazon, which launched a new version of its Kindle tablet in the United States in September costing $199, half the price of the iPad.

The opening of the probe follows surprise raids in March by EU competition authorities in the offices of several companies active in the e-book sector in several EU states.

The commission said in a statement that it would investigate whether Apple and the five publishers engaged in illegal deals or practices that “would have the object or the effect of restricting competition in the EU.”

via AFP: EU opens antitrust probe into Apple’s e-book deals.

AFP: US, EU sign airline passenger data sharing deal

The United States and the European Union have signed a draft pact on sharing passenger data for flights between the two continents, which both sides have welcomed as a significant step forward.

The agreement, which must be adopted by the European Council and parliament, aims to combat transnational crime and terrorism while improving data protection, according to a European Union statement.

Cecilia Malmstrom, the EU commissioner for home affairs, said Monday that the deal “contains robust safeguards for European citizens’ privacy, without undermining the effectiveness of the agreement in terms of EU and US security.”

via AFP: US, EU sign airline passenger data sharing deal.

Data Protection in Dubai: The DIFC Data Protection Law | iitr.us

Articles 8 to 16: General Regulations

This section can be described as the general portion of data protection law. DPL-DIFC 07, Article 8, governs data protection principles, such as the principles of restricting the appropriation of data, and of data accuracy. Similarities to the wording of Great Britain’s DPA 1998 are noteworthy. Moreover, one can ascertain that the data protection principles in certain sections were taken partially verbatim from those of the EU Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and European Council of October 24, 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data.

Thus, DPL-DIFC 07, Article 8, governs the following data protection principles:

Processing according to law and legislation, and in good faith (Article 8 (1)(a))

Principle of limitation to specified purpose (Article 8(1)(b))

Data accuracy (Article 8(1)(c)(d); (2))

Data minimization (primarily from a chronological perspective (Article 8(1)(e))

 

Ban with reservation to grant permission

DPL-DIFC 07, Article 9, establishes the ban with reservation to grant permission. The wording of the provision reads: “Personal Data may only be processed if…” Thus, here as well, the European tenet of the exception-to-the-rule principle applies: accordingly, data processing actions are basically illegitimate and justified only on an exceptional basis, namely if the affected party has granted permission or the law has allowed such processing.

 

Permission must be granted in writing

According to data protection law in Dubai, permission is only deemed to be on an authorized basis if it was granted in writing (DPL-DIFC 07, Article 9(1)(a)).

 

Data processing without permission

Irrespective of the aforementioned, there are four circumstances that are not contingent on the granting of permission (DPL-DIFC 07, Article 9(1)(b)-(f)). These can be summarized to the effect that processing data without permission is only legitimate if the preponderant interests of a third party or the common welfare justify such acts. DPL-DIFC 07, Article 10, confines these permissible circumstances to the category of sensitive data, as is found under the system of European data protection guidelines.

 

Regulation of technical data protection

Article 16 of DPL-DIFC 07 is additionally of paramount importance. According to this article, each responsible office commits to establish “appropriate technical and organizational measures to protect Personal Data against willful, negligent, accidental or unlawful destruction or accidental loss, alteration, unauthorized disclosure or access and against all other unlawful forms of Processing, in particular where the Processing of Personal Data is performed pursuant to Article 10 or Article 12 above.” The parallels to the European standards here are obvious.

 

Rights of the affected party

The rights of the affected party are governed in DPL-DIFC 07, Articles 17 to 18. They cover the right to information, correction, deletion and blockage (DPL-DIFC 07, Article 17). The conditions essentially correspond to European standards (Data Protection Guideline Section 12 et seq.). Deletion is required in any case if storage is not permitted.

via Data Protection in Dubai: The DIFC Data Protection Law.

Watchdog slams EU data retention directive – 01 Jun 2011 – Computing News

Following patchy adoption and the recent publication of a report critical of its effectiveness, the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) has weighed in on the European Union (EU) Data Retention Directive.

The EDPS yesterday said the current law does not meet the requirements of fundamental rights to privacy and data protection and called for its revision or replacement.

It said the directive has failed to meet its main purpose, in response to the recent publication of the European Commission’s evaluation of the 2006 Data Protection Directive.

The purpose was, “namely, to harmonise national legislation concerning data retention,” wrote EDPS and Dutch Data Protection Commissioner Peter Hustinx.

The Commission’s own evaluation released on 18 May found that, while the directive has proven useful in criminal investigations, it needed revision and improvements in response to the fact that not every EU member state has adopted it and, in cases where they have, retention requirements vary wildly.

“Such a lack of harmonisation is detrimental to all parties involved: citizens, business operators and law enforcement authorities,” he concluded.

via Watchdog slams EU data retention directive – 01 Jun 2011 – Computing News.

Europe moves to give consumers control of online ads – Computerworld

More companies that advertise on the Internet in Europe will give consumers the option to turn off advertisements that collect data on their audiences ahead of European Union regulations soon to come into effect.

The Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) Europe released guidelines on Thursday called the OBA (Online Behavioral Advertising) Framework. It details how advertisers can inform consumers of behavioral tracking technologies and give them the option of turning the tracking off.

The framework was released before the E.U.’s so-called “Cookie Directive” takes effect on May 25. It requires companies to get explicit consent before using tracking cookies, or data files that record information such as people’s Web browsing and their approximate location, among other parameters.

The law is the result of increasing concern over data collected by advertisers. Tracking people’s browsing on the Internet offers the potential for higher revenue since more relevant ads can be shown to consumers. But privacy campaigners have warned that consumers are often unaware of the tracking and that it could be viewed as an invasion of privacy.

IAB Europe said 39 companies and websites have agreed to comply with the framework, which requires that behavioral advertisements carry a label informing consumers that tracking technologies are being used and giving consumers the choice to opt out.

Companies participating in IAB Europe’s initiative include Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL and websites such as the BBC, Financial Times and the Telegraph.

via Europe moves to give consumers control of online ads – Computerworld.

RAND Report Explores Conflict Between European Data Privacy Laws and… — WEST PALM BEACH, Fla., Dec. 7, 2010 /PRNewswire/ –

FTI Technology LLC, the e-discovery business segment of global advisory firm FTI Consulting, Inc. (NYSE: FCN), today announced the availability of a RAND Europe report entitled “E-Discovery and Legal Frameworks Governing Privacy and Data Protection in European Countries.” The complimentary report, which is available for download at the FTI Technology site, provides guidance on a common challenge for multinational organizations: preserving EU citizens’ right to privacy versus the duty to produce relevant emails and documents for legal or regulatory investigations.

“Whether for the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the UK Bribery Act or a multinational legal matter, many corporations struggle with how to collect and produce relevant information in a safe and defensible manner,” said Joe Looby, senior managing director practicing in the FTI Technology business segment. “While multinational e-discovery is complex, this RAND Europe report shows that there are reasonable processes that legal teams can follow.”

Incorporating guidelines from the European Directive’s Article 29 Working Party, the Sedona Conference, as well as national data privacy experts from five European countries, the RAND report is a practical review of data privacy requirements and processes that will help corporations and law firms legally collect, process, review and transfer data for litigation, regulatory requests or investigations in line with European values. For those involved with multinational e-discovery, the report includes a checklist of recommended actions, as well as an appendix of country-specific requirements for France, Germany, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

via RAND Report Explores Conflict Between European Data Privacy Laws and… — WEST PALM BEACH, Fla., Dec. 7, 2010 /PRNewswire/ –.

Google Probed by EU Over Online-Ad Restrictions, Price Comparison Results – Bloomberg

Google Inc. is being probed by European Union antitrust regulators for allegedly discriminating against competing services in its search results and for stopping some websites accepting rival ads.

The European Commission said it’s investigating whether Google’s AdSense contracts prevent publishers from striking deals to place ads from other services on their sites. It will also look at allegations that Google limits advertisers’ ability to move data such as key search terms from AdWords to another service.

Google rivals including Microsoft Corp.’s Ciao from Bing filed an antitrust complaint against Google this year. There has been separate criticism from French, German and U.K. data protection regulators over Google’s Street View service that collects data from private homes.

“Given the dominance of Google in the European search market this doesn’t come a huge surprise,” said Sam Hart, a media analyst at Charles Stanley in London. Competition remedies “often end up being relatively insignificant in terms of market position” and are more likely to include “minor tweaking” of some of Google’s search functionality if they are demanded, he added.

via Google Probed by EU Over Online-Ad Restrictions, Price Comparison Results – Bloomberg.

European banks see new ATM skimming attacks – Computerworld

Banks in Europe are seeing innovative skimming attacks against ATMs, where fraudsters rig special devices to the cash machines to record payment card details.

Many banks have fitted ATMs with devices that are designed to thwart criminals from attaching skimmers to the machines. But it now appears in some areas that those devices are being successfully removed and then modified for skimming, according to the latest report from the European ATM Security Team (EAST), which collects data on ATM fraud throughout Europe.

Skimming devices are designed to record the account details from the magnetic stripe on the back of a payment card. The data can then be encoded onto a dummy card. A person’s PIN (personal identification number) is often captured with a micro-camera, which was done with the illicitly modified anti-skimming devices, according to the report.

Banks in five countries also reported seeing a new type of skimming device, which uses a modified MP3 player to record card details. It also has a micro-camera to record PINs, according to a photo seen by IDG News Service.

via European banks see new ATM skimming attacks – Computerworld.

EFF Urges EU Data Protection Authorities to Call for the Repeal of the EU Data Retention Directive | Electronic Frontier Foundation

This week, EFF is taking part in the 32nd Annual Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, where we urged the Privacy Authorities to call for the repeal of the European Union’s 2006 Data Retention Directive, which requires Internet service providers operating in Europe to retain telecom and Internet traffic data about all of their customers’ communications for a period of at least six months and up to two years, for possible use by law enforcement.

The Data Retention Directive is highly controversial, if not wildly unpopular throughout the European Union. The directive was strongly opposed by European privacy activists. For several years, mass protests have been held in cities across Europe under the banner of “Freedom Not Fear.” As each country in the EU has implemented the Data Retention Directive in their own law, they have faced challenges in state courts. In 2007, the German Working Group on Data Retention (AK Vorrat) filed a class-action lawsuit representing 35,000 people challenging the German law. The court found the law was unconstitutional and ordered the immediate deletion of all the data stored since the law went into effect in 2008 and the suspension of data collection until a revised national law is proposed. In 2009, the Romanian Constitutional Court ruled that the Romanian implementation of the EU directive fundamentally violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to respect for private life and correspondence. The Swedish government has so far refused to implement the Data Retention Directive at all, leading to a lawsuit from the European Commission.

As if the data retention obligations in the Data Retention Directive were not bad enough, European privacy Authorities have found that compliance at national level of Telecom and ISPs with the obligations required from national traffic data retention legislation was unlawful. Data retention periods were found to be as high as ten years, well in excess of the 24-month maximum set in the directive. While the directive itself is limited to the storage of traffic data, Privacy Authorities found that data relating to the contents of communications is also being stored. Several service providers were found to retain URLs of websites, headers of e-mail messages as well as recipients of e-mail messages in “CC”- mode at the destination mail server. And when monitoring phone traffic data, phone companies continuously track the location of the caller.

via EFF Urges EU Data Protection Authorities to Call for the Repeal of the EU Data Retention Directive | Electronic Frontier Foundation.