FBI seeks social media monitoring tool – Computerworld

Computerworld – In a move that’s unlikely to sit well with privacy advocates, the FBI has begun scouting for a tool that will allow it to gather and mine data from social networks like Facebook, Twitter and blogs.

The goal is to use the tool to keep on top of breaking events, incidents and emerging threats, the agency said in a recent Request for Information (RFI) from IT vendors.

The FBI said it’s seeking a “secure, lightweight web application portal using mashup technology.”

According to the RFI document, “The application must have the ability to rapidly assemble critical open source information and intelligence that will allow [the FBI's Strategic Information and Operations Center] to quickly vet, identity and geo-locate” potential threats to the U.S.

The FBI said the tool must have the ability to automatically search and scrape data off social networking and news sites based on specific queries. It must also be able to display alerts on geo-spatial maps and give users the ability to quickly summarize the “who, what, when, where and why” of specific threats and incidents.

via FBI seeks social media monitoring tool – Computerworld.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Electronic Discovery: It’s Just Technology, Right? | AmericanBar.org (Howard Reissner & Daryl Shetterly)

Newly minted lawyers who barely remember the days before texting, Facebook, and smartphones were part of our daily lives may be forgiven for wondering why so much angst has developed at the intersection of law and technology. Surely our sophisticated legal system can adapt to the increased use of electronic communication, right?

If you weren’t on the scene to watch it unfold, it may be hard to appreciate the ways the explosion of information our clients create and store has changed the face of discovery. There was a time when clients sent us a folder or box of paper containing the documents relevant to the litigation.

Now the data is likely to come on a hard drive containing gigabytes or terabytes of data that, if printed to paper, would fill the lobby of our law firm with boxes. Finding the relevant documents is like looking for a needle in the proverbial haystack. Depending on the value of the case, it may cost more to find the relevant documents than the case is worth.

So how can you help litigants meet the goal of a “just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding” referenced in Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?

When faced with an electronic discovery issue, think about it in terms of people, process, and technology.

via Electronic Discovery: It’s Just Technology, Right?.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Can cloud unravel the data-sharing puzzle? | Cloud | ZDNet UK (Lori MacVittie)

People think the cloud can overcome the problems that have derailed big data-sharing efforts in the past. Those hopes may be misplaced, says Lori MacVittie.

The term big data has come to mean big headaches for IT organisations and big problems for consumers. Privacy is a growing concern as more and more data is not only collected but voluntarily shared by consumers in exchange for free access to applications and functionality.

Those wondering how much sites such as Facebook might know about them have to jump through hoops to find out and are likely to be surprised by how many personal details websites actually store.

The TV documentary Erasing David, screened on More 4 in 2010, detailed an attempt by film maker David Bond to do just that — find out how private his identity really is. After deliberately disappearing for a month, he hired detectives to track him down.

Before his disappearing act, Bond spent weeks trying to find out just how much information various websites held on him. Big data took on a whole new meaning as he sat at a desk, poring over more than 1,000 printed pages from Facebook alone.

via Can cloud unravel the data-sharing puzzle? | Cloud | ZDNet UK.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

In civil litigation, ‘private’ social media data isn’t private – Computerworld (Aaron Crews)

From time to time, new communications technologies force courts and legislatures to adapt existing standards and even develop entirely new ones. The telephone raised issues related to wiretapping, among other things. Email became a factor in litigation-related discovery actions. Social media is likely to do the same, if only because use of such sites has become so widespread.

Over the last several years, user participation in social media websites has exploded. For example, Facebook claims to have more than 800 million users on its network, Twitter users post something approaching 150 million tweets a day, and YouTube claims that more video is uploaded to its site every month than the three major U.S. networks created in the last 60 years. Such statistics tend to confirm that social media websites are here to stay, and their emergence as commonplace communication platforms suggests that the law will have to take notice.

For example, websites’ privacy guidelines might not carry much weight when it comes to litigation. When a lawsuit is filed, attorneys inevitably scour the Internet for evidence relevant to the claims and parties, which frequently leads to one or more social media websites, such as Facebook and LinkedIn. Social media users (and lawyers representing them in litigation) should realize that data posted on social media websites is likely subject to review and disclosure when relevant to the issues in a lawsuit, without regard to the particular website’s privacy guidelines or the user’s privacy settings.

via In civil litigation, ‘private’ social media data isn’t private – Computerworld.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Tips for Facebook Timeline Apps: Beware What You Share | PCWorld (Kristin Burnham)

Facebook opened the floodgates to its “new class of apps” this week, unveiling its partnership with more than 60 applications that let users share more about their daily lives.

Facebook TimelineIn September at the F8 developer conference, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced Timeline, Facebook’s new profile design, and the forthcoming apps that “let you express who you are through all the things you do,” according to Facebook.

For example, rather than “liking” something as you traditionally would on Facebook, you can now show what you’re doing, such as running, eating and watching, right on your timeline. These new actions are determined by the individual app.

Among the 60 new applications released yesterday are food apps Foodily, which helps you discover recipes and Snooth, a wine recommendation app; fitness app MapMyFitness, in which you log and share your fitness goals and accomplishments; and an app for Pinterest, an up-and-coming social network that creates pin boards for fashion, decorating and more.

via Tips for Facebook Timeline Apps: Beware What You Share | PCWorld.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Facebook to Change European Service After Data-Privacy Probe – Businessweek

Facebook Inc., the world’s biggest social networking site, will overhaul its service in Europe over the next six months as a result of an investigation into how the social network handles personal data.

Facebook “has agreed to a wide range of best practice improvements” to its service that will get a formal review in July, the Irish data-protection agency said today, after concluding a three-month audit. Facebook’s Ireland operation is responsible for all the Palo Alto, California-based company’s users outside the U.S. and Canada, the agency said.

“This was a challenging engagement both for my office and for Facebook Ireland,” Billy Hawkes, Ireland’s data-protection commissioner, said in an e-mail. The report said there has to be “increased transparency and controls for the use of personal data for advertising purposes” and “the deletion of data held from user interactions with the site much sooner.”

via Facebook to Change European Service After Data-Privacy Probe – Businessweek.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

E-Discovery: What Businesses Should Know | The Small Business Authority

Remember the Enron email scandal? As part of a federal investigation into the fraudulent activities going on at Enron in the early part of this century, hundreds of emails were released to the court and eventually to the public. ABC News1 reported that many of these emails “could prove to be embarrassing,” not only for Enron but also for employees whose names were attached to the personal emails they’d sent that were now being revealed to the world. The gathering of these emails was an example of e-discovery, a trend that companies and individuals will continue to face as part of the digital era.

What is E-Discovery?

E-discovery is a broad term used to describe any situation in which electronic data, such as email or internet postings, are sought in a criminal or civil case. The discovery process allows plaintiffs and defendants to exchange information during pretrial preparation, and the court will actually compel information to be turned over if it’s relevant or “probative” to the case.

In days past, discovery was limited to phone records, paper documents, and the like, since those were all that existed. Records were available only of the things people had chosen to write down, and the extensive amounts of paperwork turned over in cases were cumbersome to go through.

Today, however, e-discovery is changing the game. According to figures compiled in a recent Law.com2 article, Twitter users send more than 200 million status updates every day, and people on the internet send 13,800,000 messages every single hour. All these tweets and emails and instant messages and Facebook posts and chats that are flying around cyberspace create a written record of things that might otherwise have been discussed over the phone or in person. Because the records are digital, all of the data and information are stored somewhere and rarely eliminated, no matter how hard you try to get rid of the data. Further, the digital format makes it easy to sort through data quickly to find relevant information.

These online communications are generally not privileged except in certain unusual and limited circumstances. This means that all of these records can be accessed as part of e-discovery, and they can have a significant impact on litigation by providing evidence of things that otherwise might have been unprovable. For example, according to USA Today,3 the twins who sued Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg argued that evidence existed in instant messages that would prove that Zuckerberg had stolen the idea for Facebook from their own website plan. Although a judge dismissed the twins’ suits, it’s easy to imagine a case in which a message sent and forgotten many years ago could be uncovered and used in litigation.

via E-Discovery: What Businesses Should Know | The Small Business Authority | Small Business Services and Small Business Solutions.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Google’s Opt-in Facial Recognition Avoids Facebook’s Missteps – Security – News & Reviews – eWeek.com

Google+ Find My Face is an opt-in service that uses facial recognition for photo tagging. Facebook launched its service as opt-out, which is why Google is trying to score points with privacy aficionados.

Google’s (NASDAQ:GOOG) quiet introduction of facial recognition for its photos application on Google+ is drawing praise from analysts and security researchers alike because it stands in stark contrast to the way Facebook employed similar technology earlier this year.

That is, it’s opt-in. Google’s Find My Face feature lets its Google+ social network users opt-in to photo tagging. When users opt-in to Find My Face, the next time one of their Google+ contacts adds a photo they’re in, they’ll see their name as a suggested tag. Users will receive a tag prompt can accept or reject any instance where someone wants to tag them.

“Despite the fact that I am not comfortable with my information being gathered in this manner, providing people with a choice is never a bad thing,” wrote Chester Wisniewski, a senior security advisor at security software provider Sophos Canada. “It is up to every individual to make an *informed* choice about how their personal information is shared and asking their permission is the right approach.”

via Google’s Opt-in Facial Recognition Avoids Facebook’s Missteps – Security – News & Reviews – eWeek.com.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Federal judge orders Google, Facebook to “de-index” 700 domain names

In a move likely to send counterfeit product sites scrambling for new homes on the Internet, a federal judge has ordered in favor of a fashion company seeking to protect the brand.

Announced earlier today out of Nevada, Judge Kent Dawson ordered that luxury goods designer Chanel now has the legal right to seize domain names of over 700 sites that are attempting to sell counterfeit Chanel products. These domain names can be taken over by Chanel and transferred to domain registrar GoDaddy. All pages would then be redirected to an online notice of the seizure.  The federal judge also ordered that all search engines and social networks “de-index” the sites in question. Sites specifically named in the ruling include Google, Bing, Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter and Google+. None of the site owners have the right to contest the removal of the domain from search engines or contest the transfer of ownership until after the domains are seized.

via Federal judge orders Google, Facebook to “de-index” 700 domain names.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

E-Discovery For Defendants Cheat Sheet | Dechert LLP – JDSupra

After getting the latest favorable Facebook discovery decision in Largent v. Reed, and seeing that Largent cited to a recent New York case that we didn’t know about, we’ve come to the (probably belated) conclusion that the fast-developing area of e-discovery for defendants with respect to social media maintained by plaintiffs is worthy of a cheat sheet to keep up with the cases as they’ve come down. So here it is – a compilation of all the favorable opinions we’re aware of concerning the right of defendants to take the offensive on e-discovery in personal injury cases, rather than merely having to grin and bear it on the receiving end. As with our other posts of this nature, it’s in purely chronological order, and we’ll update it whenever we learn of additional case law, so if you on the right side of the “v.” win something, feel free to pass it along to us.

By the way, we’ve cited some Canadian cases as well, because, particularly early on, they’ve been cited several times on this side of the border. The citation forms may look unusual to American lawyers, but we’ve tried them out. This is how they appear on WL.

continued @  E-Discovery For Defendants Cheat Sheet | Dechert LLP – JDSupra.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare