Russian, Chinese Companies ‘Most Likely’ To Offer Bribes | Radio Free Europe

In a new report, the anticorruption group Transparency International (TI) says bribing public officials when doing business abroad is a regular occurrence.

According to a survey of 3,000 business executives from developed and developing countries, companies from Russia are seen as most likely to do that.

On November 2, the Berlin-based group released its 2011 “Bribe Payers Index,”  which ranks 28 leading international and regional exporting countries by the likelihood of their firms to bribe abroad.

Russia ranked 28th, scoring worse than China, Mexico, and India.

According to Robin Hodess, TI’s group director for research and knowledge, the fact that China and Russia are at the bottom of the index is a major worry.

“Of course it’s a concern, because the economy in both countries has been growing dramatically as has the level of investment coming from both,” she said. “In terms of their economic power abroad, it’s really matching their political power.”

The report itself says: “Given the increasing global presence of businesses from these countries, bribery and corruption are likely to have a substantial impact on the societies in which they operate and on the ability of companies to compete fairly in these markets.”

It pointed out that foreign-direct-investment (FDI) flows alone amounted to $120 billion in 2010 for both countries, more than five times the value of FDI outflows from Brazil and India combined.

Dutch, Swiss, Belgians, Germans, and Japanese companies get the top scores.

But TI says not one of the 28 countries surveyed is perceived as “wholly clean of bribery” and few have made a major improvement since the last bribery index in 2008.

via Russian, Chinese Companies ‘Most Likely’ To Offer Bribes.

FCC sued over new Internet rules – BusinessWeek

A media and Internet advocacy group is suing the federal government over its new rules covering Internet traffic, saying they don’t protect wireless traffic from interference by phone companies.

The group Free Press filed its challenge to the Federal Communications Commission’s so-called “net neutrality” rules in federal court in Boston on Wednesday.

The rules were adopted in December and are set to take effect in two months.

via FCC sued over new Internet rules – BusinessWeek.

FCC sued over new Internet rules – BusinessWeek

A media and Internet advocacy group is suing the federal government over its new rules covering Internet traffic, saying they don’t protect wireless traffic from interference by phone companies.

The group Free Press filed its challenge to the Federal Communications Commission’s so-called “net neutrality” rules in federal court in Boston on Wednesday.

The rules were adopted in December and are set to take effect in two months.

via FCC sued over new Internet rules – BusinessWeek.

Free Speech and Privacy Rights Collide on Twitter – NYTimes.com

What began as seamy gossip about an affair between a famous British soccer player and a reality TV star has quickly become another test over how far the rights to privacy and free speech extend online, where social media operate in countries with vastly different laws.

The soccer player has been granted a so-called super-injunction, a stringent and controversial British legal measure that prevents media outlets from identifying him, reporting on the story or even from revealing the existence of the court order itself.

But tens of thousands of Internet users have flouted the injunction by revealing his name on Twitter, Facebook and online soccer forums, sites that blur the definition of the press and are virtually impossible to police.

Last week, amid growing outrage in Britain over the use of super-injunctions, the athlete obtained a court order in British High Court demanding that Twitter reveal the identities of the anonymous users who had posted the messages. A Twitter spokesman, Matt Graves, said the company could not comment on the court order or how it planned to respond.

Eric Goldman, director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University, said, “It’s really going to the core of Twitter’s service and trying to balance the speech of its users and the fact that countries have different laws and norms about speech.”

via Free Speech and Privacy Rights Collide on Twitter – NYTimes.com.

Google’s Free Predictive Software – Quentin Hardy – At Your Servers – Forbes

Google expects to put predictions everywhere.

The company just quietly announced that a prediction API will be added to its cloud developer suite of products. That means that people can build software that analyzes data being uploaded to its online storage, then suggest actions as new data comes in.

The initial uses are likely to be in things like Web page design (you increase the parts people are looking at, and rethink the others) or sentiment analysis in online marketing. But if the service holds up, other more complex applications will probably come along.

“The goal is to make applications across the Web smarter,” says Travis Green, a manager at Google. “This is the cloud goes to machine learning – you send up a lot of examples, our machines look for the best (analytic) models to apply, and when new data comes up it will look for the likely outcome. Like Google storage, we want that to be generally available.”

Initially, Google will offer a “gallery” of prediction models, Green said, with the expectation that developers will build on what it offers. Future software will depend on feedback from the market.

via Google’s Free Predictive Software – Quentin Hardy – At Your Servers – Forbes.

LogMeIn Taunts Cisco and Citrix With Free Web Meeting App – NYTimes.com

Microsoft, I.B.M., Cisco Systems and Citrix have some new, plucky competition when it comes to Web meeting software.

LogMeIn, a small company I profiled earlier this month, has released its own online meeting and collaboration tool, join.me. As usual, LogMeIn has tried to undercut its much larger rivals by dishing out a free service that requires less configuration set-up. Both home and office users can conduct meetings with up to 250 people — free.

To use the software, you go to the join.me Web site, click to share your computer and then get a code. You can send that code to anyone you like and off you go. People receive a phone number for holding conference calls, can send instant messages during presentations and can share control of a screen.

Cisco charges $49 per host, per month for its popular WebEx software. Citrix also charges $49 per month for GoToMeeting.

LogMeIn charges $29 per month for a “pro” version of join.me that has meeting schedulers, personalized access codes, and some others bits and bobs around account management.

via LogMeIn Taunts Cisco and Citrix With Free Web Meeting App – NYTimes.com.

iPhone user privacy at risk from apps that transmit personal info | ars technica

The user data collected by some iOS apps can be correlated to real-world identities, posing a privacy risk to iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad users. According to research from Bucknell University, a majority of iOS apps transmit user data back to their own servers. But because some store more info than others—and in some cases, in plaintext—it can be easily pieced together to reveal more about individual users than they bargained for.

Bucknell University Assistant Director of Information Security and Networking Eric Smith authored the paper, entitled “iPhone Applications & Privacy Issues: An Analysis of Application Transmission of iPhone Unique Device Identifiers (UDIDs).” He and his team studied a total of 57 applications from the App Store—a combination of the Top 25 Free apps as well as some from the News: Top Free app sections. Sixty-eight percent of those applications transmitted the device’s UDID back to the app’s servers, though “several instances” were encrypted via SSL.

This in itself isn’t much cause for alarm—it’s likely that your own UDID has been bandied about a few times online already. However, Smith warned that many of the apps that collected UDID data also requested user credentials, and that personally identifiable information was often affiliated with their accounts. Apps that did so included ones from Amazon, Chase Bank, Target, and Sam’s Club.

via iPhone user privacy at risk from apps that transmit personal info.

Global EDD Group Adds Regional Offices, Updates Telephone Contact Information

As of 03 May 2010, Global EDD Group will be adding regional offices in New York City and San Francisco to provide localized service to our current and prospective clients.  Please note the following company contact information:

Headquarters

+1.216.539.8448     Main Number
+1.888.865.9548     Toll Free (US)
info@globaledd.com

Asia Pacific

c/o Data Management Corporation
+65 6275 0775     Main Number
infoasiapacific@globaledd.com

New York City

+1.646.502.8068     Main Number
+1.888.865.9548     Toll Free (US)
infonyc@globaledd.com

San Francisco

+1.415.315.9762     Main Number
+1.888.865.9548     Toll Free (US)
infosfo@globaledd.com

International Direct Dial

London  +44.020.8123.8228
Hong Kong   +852.8179.8901
Tokyo   +81.50.5806.6101