Electronic Discovery: It’s Just Technology, Right? | AmericanBar.org (Howard Reissner & Daryl Shetterly)

Newly minted lawyers who barely remember the days before texting, Facebook, and smartphones were part of our daily lives may be forgiven for wondering why so much angst has developed at the intersection of law and technology. Surely our sophisticated legal system can adapt to the increased use of electronic communication, right?

If you weren’t on the scene to watch it unfold, it may be hard to appreciate the ways the explosion of information our clients create and store has changed the face of discovery. There was a time when clients sent us a folder or box of paper containing the documents relevant to the litigation.

Now the data is likely to come on a hard drive containing gigabytes or terabytes of data that, if printed to paper, would fill the lobby of our law firm with boxes. Finding the relevant documents is like looking for a needle in the proverbial haystack. Depending on the value of the case, it may cost more to find the relevant documents than the case is worth.

So how can you help litigants meet the goal of a “just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding” referenced in Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?

When faced with an electronic discovery issue, think about it in terms of people, process, and technology.

via Electronic Discovery: It’s Just Technology, Right?.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Anonymous hacks call between FBI and Scotland Yard about hackers | Digital Trends (Trevor Mogg)

A recent trans-Atlantic call between the FBI and the UK’s Scotland Yard in which operatives from the two law enforcement agencies discussed ongoing cases regarding a number of alleged hackers was intercepted and recorded—by hackers.

“Do you want to talk about cheese?” is the conversation opener in a trans-Atlantic phone call intercepted by hacker collective Anonymous between the FBI and the UK’s Metropolitan Police (aka Scotland Yard).

Once the issue of cheese had been dealt with, the participants in the conversation moved on to more pressing matters—such as how to deal with Anonymous. Of course, they had no idea the group was recording their conversation. And once it was over, the hackers uploaded the call to the Web.

Though part of the conversation centered on trivial matters, such as the merits of the British city of Sheffield (“it’s not exactly a jewel in England’s crown”), more important subjects were covered, such as the current situation with Ryan Cleary, a British man arrested last June for his alleged involvement with hacking group LulzSec. Another alleged hacker, whose name was bleeped out by Anonymous, was described by a British operative as “a pain in the bum.”

The FBI admitted that the call, which took place some time in January, was genuine and that it was now looking for those responsible for recording it and putting it online.

via Anonymous hacks call between FBI and Scotland Yard about hackers.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Courts push back on bribery prosecutions | Reuters (Aruna Viswanatha)

As the Justice Department has stepped up its enforcement of an anti-foreign bribery law, it has faced the expected stiff resistance from the business community.

Now it faces the unexpected as courts are pushing back, too.

In an unusual verbal order issued earlier this week, a federal judge in Houston dismissed without sending to the jury a case against a Texas man accused of authorizing bribes to government officials in Mexico, on behalf of his former employer, a unit of ABB Group (ABBN.VX).

The government’s principal witness “knows almost nothing”, U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes said in announcing his decision to acquit the defendant, John O’Shea, according to a transcript.

Prosecutors also did not produce evidence to “conclude beyond a reasonable doubt” that a middleman did nothing for Swiss power products company ABB beyond pay the bribes, he said.

The decision is the latest in a string of setbacks for the Justice Department unit that prosecutes violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a 1970s law that bars U.S.-linked companies and individuals from paying bribes to officials of foreign governments in exchange for business.

via Courts push back on bribery prosecutions | Reuters.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Breaking Into E-Discovery | ABA Law Practice Today (Sally Kane)

The legal industry is slow to embrace change and adopt new practices.  However, the past two decades have witnessed the dawn of the digital age and, with it, advancements in technology that have reshaped the legal landscape.  This evolving technology and recent amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have spawned a new and lucrative law practice specialty: electronic discovery.  The e-discovery niche, which combines the legal expertise of attorneys with the technical skills of IT professionals, is one of the fastest growing specialties in the legal industry.

Increasing volumes of electronically stored information (ESI), evolving e-discovery case law, the automation of legal processes, changing ESI protocols and harsher judicial sanctions have fueled the need for e-discovery specialists.  In response to this trend, a growing number of firms are investing in consultative e-discovery talent by establishing dedicated e-discovery practice groups or, in smaller firms, creating the role of an e-discovery attorney.  According to a 2011 survey by The Cowen Group, a legal technology staffing firm, 30% of firms are adding e-discovery attorneys, with an anticipated 150-250 openings at major law firms.

E-discovery attorneys operate under a variety of titles:  electronic discovery advisor, e-discovery counsel, EDD partner, electronic discovery consultant, special counsel, e-discovery specialist, and e-discovery director are a few. Most e-discovery attorneys work in law firms serving corporate clients although a growing number of attorneys are developing niche e-discovery roles within corporations and government agencies. Responsibilities vary according to practice environment and firm size.  Below are a few of the roles the e-discovery attorney may tackle.

via Breaking Into E-Discovery.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Carmel Valley eDiscovery Retreat (CVEDR) Announces Craig Ball as a 2012 Keynote Speaker

Mr. Ball, an Austin, Texas-based trial law technologist and computer forensics expert, is a world-renowned thought leader in eDiscovery. He will address one of the most critical issues facing today’s legal profession: Persuading attorneys to learn information technology skills to uphold standards of advocacy and better serve their clients.

“Effective, affordable eDiscovery is no harder than learning to try a lawsuit … and no easier,” said Mr. Ball. Attorneys know it takes years of effort to learn courtroom skills, yet many expect to master eDiscovery in a few hours. Mr. Ball hopes to encourage them to “get their hands dirty with data,” noting that events like the Carmel Valley eDiscovery Retreat (CVEDR) are needed to allow the exchange of ideas amongst eDiscovery professionals. He adds, “I’m looking forward to seeing old friends and making new ones in a setting that is one of America’s loveliest places.”

Mr. Ball is one of the most sought-after presenters in the eDiscovery industry. He is a prolific writer and the recipient of numerous awards. Mr. Ball’s work has been featured in national media outlets such as The New York Times. His passion is educating legal professionals about the powerful tools they can use to offer cost-effective discovery solutions for their clients.

via Carmel Valley eDiscovery Retreat (CVEDR) Announces Craig Ball as a 2012 Keynote Speaker.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Breach Response: The Legal View | Gov Info Security (Jeffrey Roman)

As legal issues surrounding data breaches become increasingly complex, more organizations are turning to attorneys for post-breach response, says Lisa Sotto, a managing partner for New York-based law firm Hunton & Williams.

Complying with a multitude of regional and international laws when consumers’ personal information is compromised is critical. And depending on the size and reach of the organization breached, that could mean complying with dozens of mandates and regulations in various parts of the country and world.

Sotto, who focuses on privacy and information security, says the role of attorneys has changed significantly in recent years. After a data breach, attorneys handle many facets during the response process. “A lawyer who’s well-versed in managing data breaches knows that she or he needs to manage really much more than the straight legal compliance issues,” Sotto says in an interview with BankInfoSecurity’s Tracy Kitten

via Breach Response: The Legal View.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

FBI rejects FOIA request for Carrier IQ info – Computerworld

The FBI has denied a request for the release of information regarding its use of Carrier IQ’s software, saying that releasing the information could interfere with ongoing law enforcement operations.

The response does not make it clear whether the agency is using Carrier IQ for investigative purposes, or whether the documents it has, are related to an investigation of the controversial software.

The request under the Freedom of Information Act was filed Dec. 1 by Michael Morisy, co-founder of MuckRock, a website that helps people file FOIA requests with the government. Morisy asked the FBI for any manuals, documents or other written material it might have related to the FBI’s use of data gathered by Carrier IQ.

In response, David Hardy, the section manager of the FBI’s Records Management Group said the FBI has in its possession “responsive documents” pertaining to Carrier IQ. However, Hardy said the FBI would not release the documents as requested because doing so would compromise ongoing investigations.

via FBI rejects FOIA request for Carrier IQ info – Computerworld.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Wal-Mart Discloses Internal FCPA Review – WSJ

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. disclosed late Thursday that it had started an internal review into potential violations of a U.S. foreign bribery law.

The global retailer said in its quarterly report that it had voluntarily contacted the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission about the investigation.

“[T]he Company has begun an internal investigation into whether certain matters, including permitting, licensing and inspections, were in compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,” the company said.

via Wal-Mart Discloses Internal FCPA Review – Corruption Currents – WSJ.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

EDD Update: Ediscovery Production Without Review | Albert Barsocchini

More law firms are producing electronically stored information without going through linear review. After potentially-relevant ESI has been collected and sent out for processing, the producing party is normally focused on boiling down the ocean of documents and identifying privileged documents for sequestering. Linear review of the identified subset has been the traditional last step and most expensive in the production cycle.

Advanced analytics, judicial acceptance of computer aided coding, claw back/quick-peek agreements, and aggressive use of Rule 16 hearings have given attorneys a level of confidence that they can produce responsive ESI without spending time and money on a final linear review.

An attorney at a major law firm recently said to me, “In many cases we just give them what they want without reviewing them. Usually after our interviews and privilege cull using analytics and sampling, we have a pretty good idea of what we have and we don’t want to waste our client’s money on attorneys going through every single document before production … and yes we do use claw back agreements”.

via EDD Update: Ediscovery Production Without Review.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

81 Percent of E-Discovery Users Head for Cloud Services | TalkinCloud

Most law firms and corporate legal departments aim to bring portions of their e-discovery tasks in-house, according to a recently released Kroll Ontrack survey. But survey results also reveal some major cloud services trends tied to e-discovery.

Kroll Ontrack, in conjunction with Harris Interactive, polled attorneys working for medium-to-large law firms and Fortune 1000 companies. The survey found that 86 percent of the respondents in-sourced some aspect of e-discovery. Information management, collection/preservation, and review ranked among the most frequently in-sourced functions. Kroll Ontrack, based in Minneapolis, provides e-discovery and data recovery among other services.

Other e-discovery providers have also noted the in-house migration of work that law firms and corporate legal teams had previously outsourced to service bureaus or other law firms. Concerns over control and cost fuel this trend.

The in-house push doesn’t exclude cloud services providers and managed services providers, however. Law firms and legal departments may opt to hire a provider to manage its e-discovery software behind the firewall or host a SaaS solution.

e-Discovery and Cloud Services

The Kroll Ontrack survey points to the legal sector’s interest in the latter scenario. Michele Lange, the company’s director of discovery, said 81 percent of the respondents said they plan to leverage the cloud for e-discovery or storage purposes over the next two years.

via 81 Percent of E-Discovery Users Head for Cloud Services | TalkinCloud.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare