Canada’s Anti-Bribery Cops Reel One In

(Business Law Currents) Though Canada has had foreign bribery legislation in effect for over a decade, prosecutions have proven very few and very far between. So it remains to be seen whether the recent guilty plea by Calgary’s Niko Resources under Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act marks a scaling-up of Canadian efforts on this front, or just another blip on the radar screen.

Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA) entered into force on February 14, 1999. The Act contemplates prosecutions in respect of three offences: bribing a foreign public official, laundering property and proceeds, and possession of property and proceeds. In addition, the CFPOA enables prosecutions for conspiracy, aiding and abetting, counselling, and the like.

One aspect of the CFPOA that has attracted criticism from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and Transparency International is that there must be a “real and substantial link” between the offence and Canada. While a Bill has been introduced to eliminate this requirement, it has not passed into law, and arguably remains a significant barrier to investigations.

According to the last report of the Minister of Foreign Affairs to Parliament on the enforcement of the CFPOA, prior to this year there had only been one conviction under the Act. In 2005, Red Deer-based Hydro-Kleen Group Inc. pleaded guilty to two counts of bribing a U.S. immigration officer at the Calgary International Airport.

In addition, in 2010, charges under the CFPOA were laid by the RCMP against an employee of Cryptometrics, a facial and fingerprint recognition software company based in Ottawa. The allegations were that payments had been made to an Indian government official to facilitate the execution of a multi-million dollar supply contract. That matter apparently remains before the Canadian courts.

via Canada’s Anti-Bribery Cops Reel One In.

ISP data retention plan hits Capitol Hill snag | Privacy Inc. – CNET News

Controversial legislation to require Internet providers to store logs about their customers for 18 months has run into an unexpected obstacle: a former supporter.

“This bill needs a lot of fixing up,” Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican and previous chairman of the House Judiciary committee, said at a hearing today. “It’s not ready for prime time.”

The bill in question is H.R. 1981, which says Internet providers must store for “at least 18 months the temporarily assigned network addresses the service assigns to each account,” unless it’s a wireless provider like AT&T, T-Mobile, or Verizon.

Sensenbrenner’s concerns are noteworthy because he has been a prominent sponsor of data retention legislation before. In 2006, CNET was the first to report that he had drafted legislation that would require Internet providers to store whatever records the attorney general deems reasonable–or face jail time. As recently as January, Sensenbrenner convened a hearing to resuscitate the idea.

via ISP data retention plan hits Capitol Hill snag | Privacy Inc. – CNET News.

Ready Or Not, Here Comes the UK Bribery Act

(Business Law Currents) The countdown to the debut of new anti-bribery legislation from the United Kingdom is set to take the world by storm, regardless of whether the corporate executives have fortified risk management policies. Far from being limited to a regional legal matter, the new regulations are expected to raise the bar for corporate anti-corruption standards globally.

In comparison to existing anti-bribery legislation such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act is expected to cast a wider net of potential liability due to its broad extra-territorial reach over any entity with a “demonstrable business presence” in the United Kingdom.

By relegating the offence of failing to prevent bribery as a strict liability offence, the Act eliminates the defense that organizations were unaware of corrupt practices carried out by employees or affiliates. As a result, non-UK companies could find themselves ensnared via agent liability or other indirect means. Moreover, the Act, which imposes a heavy liability burden on senior corporate executives, has been designed specifically to target corruption in the private sector as well as the public sector.

Arriving amidst a global push for more robust anti-bribery controls, the UK Bribery Act joins ongoing legislative efforts around the world to crack down on corruption. In the United States, the SEC recently finalized details on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program, a move intended to assist the Commission with anti-bribery investigations. Within the Asia Pacific region, Hong Kong and Indonesia are in the process of drafting legislation to address anti-money laundering and to criminalize bribery in the private sector, respectively. Moreover, earlier this year, China amended its criminal legislation to criminalize the bribery of foreign officials and officers of international public organizations.

via Ready Or Not, Here Comes the UK Bribery Act.

U.K. Bribery Act Finally Takes Effect | Law.com

After being delayed for almost a year, the new U.K. Bribery Act finally takes effect today.

The controversial and wide-ranging legislation, rushed through Parliament before the 2010 general election, was originally scheduled to take effect last October. The new law’s start date was pushed back twice, however, to allow companies to put in place what the U.K. Ministry of Justice describes as “adequate procedures” for preventing bribery.

The final guidance, issued in April, eased worries among multinational companies by stating that a listing on the London Stock Exchange will not, in itself, make a business subject to the act. However, any company that has a U.K. office, has employees who are U.K. citizens, or provides any services to a U.K. organization will still be covered by the bill, which carries unlimited fines and an increased maximum jail term of 10 years.

Although the act is primarily designed to tighten the U.K.’s regulatory framework — the first change to the country’s bribery laws in more than a century — its broad jurisdictional reach means that the majority of U.S. public companies are likely to be affected by what some regulatory experts have described as the world’s most draconian anti-corruption legislation.

“It’s wider ranging even than the [U.S.' Foreign Corrupt Practices Act],” said Lord Peter Goldsmith, the former U.K. attorney general, now head of Debevoise & Plimpton’s European litigation practice. ”It’s going to affect all companies with business in the U.K., even if they’re not incorporated here. The enforcement agencies have greater powers and the penalties are much tougher than under previous U.K. law. Boardrooms throughout America and beyond should have this on their agenda.”

While the U.K. and U.S. laws will regularly act in tandem, there are a number of key differences. Most fundamentally, where the U.S. FCPA deals only with governmental bribery, the U.K. act also covers corruption between commercial entities. And where U.S. law requires prosecutors to prove intent and awareness of the bribe at a senior level, the Bribery Act imposes strict liability on any company that fails to prevent bribery from taking place, regardless of awareness or intent. This not only covers bribes made by its own employees, but also by any individual “associated” with the company, a fact likely to concern smaller enterprises, which are more likely to rely on third-party agents for international matters.

via U.K. Bribery Act Finally Takes Effect.

House Passes Patent Overhaul – Law Blog – WSJ

House lawmakers passed a bill today to overhaul the U.S. patent system for the first time in nearly 60 years.

The House passed the America Invents Act on a 407 to 117 vote, WSJ reports.  The bill would change how the U.S. grants patents and award them to the party which is “first to file” an invention instead of the “first to invent” it. The change would bring the U.S. in line with other countries, according to WSJ.

The Senate passed similar legislation in March on a 95-to-5 vote. (Click here to see LB background on the Senate vote.)  The House and Senate must now negotiate a final bill before President Obama gets a crack at the legislation.

Why, you ask, do we need patent reform?

Some businesses complain that the current, “first to invent” standard results in too much litigation from individuals who claim they were first to own an idea even though they don’t have a formal patent.

“This bill is designed to help all inventors,” said Rep. Lamar Smith (R, TX), who chairs the House Judiciary Committee and helped author the legislation. The current system hurts inventors because it can lead to years of costly legal challenges to their patents, he said.

Some inventors and small businesses complained that switching to a “first to file” system would give large companies an advantage and hurt individual inventors, according to WSJ.

via House Passes Patent Overhaul – Law Blog – WSJ.

Data Retention Directive does not respect privacy: EU watchdog | EurActiv

The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDSP), Peter Hustinx, has determined that  current EU legislation on the retention of personal data goes against the rights to privacy and data protection. EurActiv France reports.

The supervisor presented his findings in a 16-page official opinion published earlier this week (31 May) on the application of the EU’s 2006 directive on data retention.

Hustinx said in a statement that “the quantitative and qualitative information provided by the Member States is not sufficient to draw a positive conclusion on the need for data retention as it has been developed in the Directive.”

“Further investigation of necessity and proportionality is therefore required, and in particular the examination of alternative, less privacy-intrusive means,” he added.

Hustinx argues in particular that the need for data retention has been insufficiently demonstrated, that the regulation could be less intrusive, and that existing legislation leaves too much scope to the member states on the issue.

via Data Retention Directive does not respect privacy: EU watchdog | EurActiv.

Facebook fights California privacy push – Computerworld

California is considering legislation that would tighten Facebook’s privacy practices, and the social network is not happy about it.

The bill, Social Networking Privacy Act (SB 242), would require Facebook and other social networking sites to make big changes to the way they handle users’ privacy. Industry analysts say social networks like Facebook could be wary of this move for fear that it will lead to a slippery slope of government control and privacy rules.

“Facebook has been very passive about security . They put the onus on the user to figure the security out on their own,” said Zeus Kerravala, an analyst at Yankee Group. “Now it would automatically be more secure.”

The legislation, introduced by California Senate Majority Leader Ellen Corbett, would require Facebook and other social networks doing business in the state to ensure that users set up their privacy settings during the initial registration process, instead of after they’ve already become users. It also would mandate that social networks set users’ default settings to private, as opposed to making them open and forcing users to take action to gain privacy.

The legislation also would enable parents of a child under the age of 18 to have the social network remove their child’s personally identifying information from the site.

Facebook opposes the legislation and is actively working to hinder its passage.

via Facebook fights California privacy push – Computerworld.

Safe Harbor: Why EU data needs ‘protecting’ from US law | ZDNet

Why Europe needed Safe Harbor principles

The vast majority of people using services on the web — be it web-based email like Hotmail or Yahoo!, social networks like Facebook and Twitter, or anything as minute as a website requiring registration– tend not to think about where their personal data like photos and email is stored.

On the whole, these services are designed to save us time and energy, and we have come to want the offerings of these services on-demand, without thinking too much about privacy. We expect our respective governments, wherever we are in the world, to protect us to a level where we can act and communicate freely.

However, an inequality in legal protection between the United States and the European Union could have massive consequences for users of ‘the cloud’.

Data protection legislation differs greatly between the European Union and the United States. With a vast number of organisations branching out to worldwide offices during the dot-com boom, it was clear to legislators that data transfer and protection laws needed a global overhaul. A particular area of focus for data legislation was the European Union, with dozens of countries sharing elements of the same law.

via Safe Harbor: Why EU data needs ‘protecting’ from US law | ZDNet.

Microsoft explores privacy with new feature | CBC News

Microsoft is adding a new feature to Internet Explorer that will allow users to opt out of being tracked by certain websites.

A new Internet Explorer feature will allow users to opt out of being tracked by certain websites. (iStock)The move comes amid growing demands for more privacy online, and U.S. government moves to introduce “do not track” legislation unless the internet industry does a better job of policing itself.

Data mining has grown into a $25-billion US industry as marketers scramble to better understand what makes individual consumers spend their money, and then design marketing efforts to target them.

In a presentation to the U.S. Congress last week, the Federal Trade Commission’s director of consumer protection David Vladeck pointed to a case involving Sears.

The retailer was using tracking software that collected information from shoppers about online purchases, online bank statements, email headers and subject lines, drug prescription records and other sensitive data.

In another case, a company selling software which allowed parents to spy on their children’s online activity was selling data that included children’s real time online chats to marketers and web developers.

via CBC News – Technology & Science – Microsoft explores privacy with new feature.

Senior adviser calls for stronger EU data protection laws – Computerworld

Europe needs strong and effective data protection, the European data protection supervisor said Monday.

Responding to the recent European Commission communication on data protection reform, Peter Hustinx underlined the importance of a clear legal framework that harmonizes national data protection legislation, particularly in societies where private information is widely gathered without individuals’ knowledge.

He also called for a technologically neutral approach, the inclusion of the principles of privacy by design and accountability, and the introduction of a mandatory security breach notification covering all relevant sectors.

“Data protection is not an abstract thing. It relates to everybody’s life, every moment of every day. There is no room for mistakes here: the challenges are enormous. That is why the proposed solutions must be equally ambitious and actually enhance the effectiveness of the instruments of data protection,” he said.

via Senior adviser calls for stronger EU data protection laws – Computerworld.