European Commission Sues UK over Shortcomings in Data Protection Laws – Softpedia

The European Commission has filed a complaint against the United Kingdom with the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for failure to properly implement EU directives on privacy and data protection.

The shortcomings in UK’s legislation have been identified while investigating BT Group’s testing of targeting advertising technology from a company called Phorm.

BT’s secret trials involved monitoring user’s browsing habits without their knowledge in order to serve them with targeted ads started in 2006 and were uncovered in 2008.

Privacy groups reported the incidents to the European Commission, which wrote to the UK government asking for details about the case.

The UK failed to reply within the given deadline and when it eventually did, the answer did not satisfy the Commission’s questions and concerns.

Analyzing on how Phorm’s technology, which appears to violate European Union legislation, can function legally in the UK, the Commission discovered gaps in the implementation of certain EU directives in the country.

On April 14, 2009, the Commission officially opened the infringement procedure against the United Kingdom and urged it to make the changes required for its national legislation so that it complies with EU rules.

via European Commission Sues UK over Shortcomings in Data Protection Laws – Softpedia.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Post europe – benchmark bribery legislation for europe – Postonline

European organisations breathed a sigh of relief on 20 July 2010 when the British Ministry of Justice announced a delay in the implementation of the UK Bribery Act. The act was due to come into force in October 2010, but will now be delayed until April 2011. Although it is tempting to view it this way, these extra few months should not offer a welcome rest bite period for businesses that are unsure how they will comply with the act.

The Bribery Act has struck fear into the hearts of many organisations that see financial incentives as an integral part of their work since it received Royal Assent in April 2010. The act replaces much, and codifies the remainder, of the various fragments of the UK’s existing anti-corruption legislation, dating back to 1889 with the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act. It heralds a new era in the UK’s fight against corruption by establishing distinct general criminal offences for those “offering” and those “accepting” bribes, a new offence for the failure of commercial organisations to prevent bribery by persons acting on their behalf and a discreet offence for those who bribe foreign public officials.

via Post europe – benchmark bribery legislation for europe – Postonline.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Importance of Anti-Corruption Due Diligence for International Transactions

When acquiring a company, an acquirer may inadvertently inherit significant financial liability and reputational damage associated with a target company’s prior violations under anti-corruption legislation. In order to minimize this risk, anti-corruption due diligence is becoming an increasingly important part of M&A due diligence for international transactions. U.S. enforcement authorities have made clear their expectation that acquirers and investors will conduct anti-corruption due diligence on transactions presenting corruption risk. U.S. counsel have followed this guidance and now frequently engage in detailed anti-corruption due diligence for international transactions. The same approach is being taken in Canada as many Canadian companies are subject to both U.S. and Canadian anti-corruption legislation and Canadian enforcement authorities have recently committed significant resources to robust anti-corruption compliance enforcement. U.S. acquirers are also insisting on anti-corruption due diligence when acquiring Canadian companies. The benefits of anti-corruption due diligence for both the acquirer and the target are discussed below.

continued Importance of Anti-Corruption Due Diligence for International Transactions.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

UK raises the bar in corruption battle – Emirates Business 24|7

A key feature for non-UK companies to be aware of, including those based in the Middle East, is that the corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery applies to all companies that are doing business with the UK. The individual offence, meanwhile, relates not only to UK nationals but also to those ordinarily resident in the UK. And due to the extra-territorial nature of the act, the law can be breached where an act is committed outside of the UK that would constitute an illegal act if committed in the UK. The legislation therefore has implications for a growing number of companies in the Middle East trading with the UK.

Affected companies are now in the process of assessing the implications of the act for their businesses. The priority for all managing boards is to ensure that they have adequate procedures in place to prevent anyone acting on their behalf – including third parties in other jurisdictions – from committing an act of bribery. From a regional perspective, the UK legislation is being introduced at a time when the Middle East has placed corporate governance and internal controls at the top of the agenda to safeguard economic growth. Some recent high-profile corporate crises affecting companies in the region have galvanised commitment throughout the region for stronger regulation within companies. Therefore, these two agendas are set to positively reinforce one another in the long term.

A key area in which the anti-corruption and corporate governance agendas overlap is in the importance of an embedded Code of Ethics. Many companies may have a set of principles on paper which employees may be aware of but not understand the relevance of. For a Code of Ethics to truly be effective in mitigating fraudulent or corrupt practice, strong management leadership is required and methods sought to make a Code of Ethics both relevant to staff, wherever located, as well as applicable to their roles within an organisation. Staff, agents and consultants all need training and education, especially in ‘grey areas’ such as corporate hospitality, where risks are more subtle but still real. Meanwhile, robust procedures for selecting, vetting and monitoring third parties must equally be prioritised for any company affected by the legislation, especially those trading through third parties in opaque or high-risk markets.

via UK raises the bar in corruption battle – Emirates Business 24|7.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Golden Opportunity – Opening California to International Arbitration

This Article highlights the challenges facing California in its efforts to become a center of international arbitration, provides examples of legislation for the California Bar and California State Legislature to consider, and suggests various avenues by which to bring California more fully into the international legal community. In particular, California unintentionally does not allow foreign attorneys to represent their clients in international arbitration conducted in California. Amidst both renewed efforts to make California a more likely seat of international arbitration and a legislative opening to revise this aspect of the law, change in the latter makes the former both possible and likely.

via Golden Opportunity « Opening California to International Arbitration.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

UK Bribery Bill Update | Thomas Fox – JDSupra

It has been reported that the UK Bribery Bill, introduced in March 2009, made it out of Parliament before the upcoming general election. The Bribery Bill is a significant departure for the UK in the area of foreign anti-corruption. It is significantly stronger than the FCPA. Many internationally focused US companies have offices in the UK or employ UK citizens in their world-wide operations. This legislation could open them to prosecution in the UK under a law similar to, but stronger than, the relevant US legislation.

via UK Bribery Bill Update | Thomas Fox – JDSupra.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Cayman Islands To Update Data Privacy Legislation

The Cayman Islands government has announced that it is developing legislation to regulate how personal information is collected and processed by all businesses and organizations to ensure that data privacy is maintained.

The new law will also ensure that individuals are able to access information about themselves that is held by government entities and private sector groups. It will also require that such data is accurate.

A Cabinet-appointed data protection working group has been meeting to consider a framework wherein such legislation might be introduced.

David Archbold, Chairman from the Information and Communications Technology Authority (ICTA), has reported that the group is presently reviewing laws from other jurisdictions that it feels may be relevant to the local situation, and is developing policy recommendations.

Explaining that data protection mandates a comprehensive, principled approach to protecting personal data, Archbold commented: “The law will impose requirements on 'data controllers' to handle personal information fairly and lawfully.”

“Personal data may only be collected, used, stored and accessed for specified purposes, and must always be adequately safeguarded. Data controllers will be accountable for complying with these principles and liable for breaches, such as unauthorized use or disclosure,” he continued.

In early 2010, the group will submit recommendations to the Cabinet Secretary and Attorney General for an approach to the introduction of such legislation, including how best to monitor and enforce compliance. It will also prepare a paper on key issues for public consultation.

via Cayman Islands To Update Data Privacy Legislation.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare