Law Firm Inks $852 Million Outsourcing Deal

Legal process outsourcing (LPO) company Integreon has entered into what it describes in a press release as the largest legal outsourcing deal ever, worth $852 million over 10 years, with British law firm CMS Cameron McKenna.

The work covered by the agreement — nonbillable support tasks such as accounting, human resources, marketing, training and information technology — does not affect lawyers directly.

According to the U.K. publication Legal Week, that means current law firm jobs won’t necessarily be shipped overseas. Instead, CMS employees whose “middle office” duties are covered by the deal will continue with their jobs but will start drawing a paycheck from Integreon rather than from the law firm.

CMS managing partner Duncan Weston told Legal Week, “We are not anticipating any redundancies at the moment. We want this to be seen as something which will be positive for the career development of our business support staff with the opportunities that they will have at Integreon.”

The deal is not the first of its kind for Los Angeles-based Integreon, but it is the largest, according to the company. Integreon, which maintains outsourcing centers in India as well as in the Philippines and South Africa, has previously handled support services for Clifford Chance and DLA Piper.

One notable aspect of Integreon’s agreement with CMS Cameron is the openness about the price tag. Most firms that turn to LPOs for discovery and other legal work ask not to be identified, much less have the value of their contracts disclosed. Thus, while rough estimates of the potential multibillion-dollar market for legal outsourcing have been bandied about for several years, the true scale of the industry has so far been hard to capture. That may be changing.

via Law Firm Inks $852 Million Outsourcing Deal.

Parties in Toyota Securities Suit Told to Resolve Discovery Fight | National Law Journal

A federal judge in Los Angeles has declined a request by plaintiffs lawyers in a shareholder class action to force attorneys for Toyota Motor Corp. to turn over documents that were provided to Congress, which has been investigating vehicle recalls associated with sudden unintended acceleration defects.

Instead, U.S. District Judge Dale Fischer of the Central District of California on Monday ordered the parties to reach a discovery agreement on their own within a week.

The suit, filed on Feb. 8, is the first shareholder class action to allege that Toyota’s executives and directors made false and misleading statements to shareholders regarding the defects. The recall caused Toyota’s stock price to drop from $90.42 on Jan. 21 to $71.78 on Feb. 4.

In court documents, lawyers for the plaintiff, Harry Stackhouse, had asked Fischer to lift a stay on discovery and instead order that documents relevant to the case be preserved or turned over. Under securities law, discovery is stayed in a shareholder case if a judge has yet to rule on pleading motions, such as a motion to dismiss.

To support their argument, the lawyers pointed to “serious allegations” that Toyota failed to disclose the defects. They specifically mentioned a $16.4 million fine that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration imposed after finding that Toyota waited four months to report the defects.

via Law.com – Parties in Toyota Securities Suit Told to Resolve Discovery Fight.

Switching From MS Office? 4 Things to Consider Other Than Cost

Google Apps, StarOffice and other competitors are becoming viable alternatives to the once unassailable Microsoft Office. And while cost is always a driver in purchasing decisions, IT has to be aware of other significant issues when implementing new software.

The cost, access and interoperability of emerging Office applications are causing Microsoft customers to consider other options when it comes to upgrading. For example, the City of Los Angeles and Jaguar dropped Microsoft in favor of Google and its cloud software.

This article will talk about the not so obvious costs of migrating away from Microsoft Office including security, access, support and collaboration.

Security

Moving from Microsoft Office to a competitor’s Office suite can have subtle, but important, effects on the security of your documents. The fairly obvious concern is whether or not the new Office applications meet all of the regulatory requirements of your business. A more subtle concern is how to control access to your information.

Moving to a Cloud based solution enables users to access all of the documents they need wherever they may be located. But what happens when an employee leaves the company? If access to a Cloud based solution is based on an employee’s email account, simply shutting off their access to the company’s domain is not sufficient.

The first step an organization must take is to meet with their vendor to discuss all aspects of their security model . Once the new Office suite security functions are understood, the necessary policies, procedures and checklists for your organization can be updated.

[continued] Switching From MS Office? 4 Things to Consider Other Than Cost.

How Altria Is Winnowing Out Fake Marlboros – BusinessWeek

Cigarette smuggling is booming, in part because New York and 21 other states have raised cigarette excise taxes in recent years. On top of that, the U.S. government increased the federal tax on cigarettes last year by 159%, to $1.01 per pack. A pack now typically sells for about $10 in New York City, more than double what it cost 10 years ago, and the state is considering yet another excise increase.

The high levies, meant to help close huge budget gaps and discourage smoking, have had the unintended side effect of spurring the illicit market. One passenger car filled with Marlboros bought in low-tax Virginia and driven up Interstate 95 to resell in New York can yield more than $30,000 in profit, says Crisanto Perez, a senior official with the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives.

In Asia, Altria employees have begun to build an intelligence network to combat the counterfeiting problem. The company cites academic research estimating that factories in China manufacture 400 billion knock-off cigarettes a year. Altria has hired detectives to try to infiltrate the international distributors that sell Chinese fakes to mom-and-pop shops in the U.S. The company says it will funnel the information it gathers to government authorities.

Back in the U.S., Altria has 21 employees in its brand integrity unit, which it created in 2002. They are assisted by outside contractors hired nationwide. The company even has given nearly $2 million over the past eight years to cash-strapped public police departments in such places as Los Angeles and Suffolk County, N.Y., to help fund contraband investigations.

Tax collectors have their own concerns. New York currently loses $1 billion a year because of cigarette tax cheating, according to a 2009 study by the New York Association of Convenience Stores. Across the country, tobacco excise revenue lost annually to smuggling totals $5 billion, the U.S. Justice Dept.'s Inspector General concluded last year.

via How Altria Is Winnowing Out Fake Marlboros – BusinessWeek.

Firms Angle for Advantage in Toyota Cases | Law.com

Plaintiffs lawyers are positioning themselves for a front seat in the mounting litigation over sudden unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.

Approximately 150 lawyers assembled on March 5 at the InterContinental Chicago hotel to discuss sharing experts and legal strategies in the Toyota litigation, which now exceeds 80 lawsuits. Many of the lawyers have broken into camps based on which jurisdiction they believe should hear the multidistrict litigation against Toyota — and, perhaps more important, which judge should decide the cases.

One of the most popular venues under consideration is the Central District of California, near the Torrance, Calif., headquarters of Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. Lawyers supporting this locale include products liability attorneys Mark Robinson Jr. and Richard McCune as well as Toyota’s lawyers, Cari Dawson and Lisa Gilford, both partners at Atlanta’s Alston & Bird. McCune was the first into court against Toyota.

Another group is advocating for Kentucky, where Toyota operates its largest manufacturing plant outside Japan. A third group is pushing for the Eastern District of Louisiana in New Orleans.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation plans a hearing in the Toyota litigation in San Diego on March 25.

“This is going to be like a feeding frenzy,” said Robinson, a partner at Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson in Newport Beach, Calif., who filed a motion with the MDL panel on Feb. 26 to transfer the cases to Los Angeles.

via Law.com – Firms Angle for Advantage in Toyota Cases.

U.S. Law Firm That Sued China Reports Cyberattack

A Los Angeles law firm that recently filed a $2.2 billion copyright infringement suit against the People&’s Republic of China said that it has become the target of cyberattacks originating in China.

“I was the first one to get one of these e-mails,” said Gregory Fayer, a lawyer at Gipson Hoffman & Pancione, which began receiving unsolicited e-mails on its firm computers on Monday.

“Something about it didn’t seem right. It didn't seem quite in the manner in which the person who was supposedly sending it to me would put something, and so I called up the other attorney and said: ‘Did you just send me an e-mail?’; That person said,’No.’  That’s how we discovered the first one.”

Fayer, who is handling the suit, could not say whether the attacks on the firm were related to it but noted, “It is difficult to believe that the timing is merely coincidental.”

The e-mails came the same week that Google Inc. declared that it would stop complying with Chinese censorship requirements for the Internet following reports that several of its computer systems had drawn cyberattacks believed to originate in China. Some of the attacks were aimed at Chinese human rights activists’ Gmail accounts.

The firm has contacted the FBI and U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., a senior member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, who on Tuesday urged companies to come forward about suspected cyberattacks in light of the Google revelation.

via U.S. Law Firm That Sued China Reports Cyberattack.

$2.2 Billion IP Suit Filed Against Computer Makers, Chinese Government

A family-owned firm in Santa Barbara, Calif., has filed a $2.2 billion copyright infringement lawsuit against the People's Republic of China, two Chinese software makers and seven major computer manufacturers that helped distribute Green Dam Youth Escort software.

Critics claim that the Chinese government used the software to block its citizens from accessing political and religious Web sites that the government deemed objectionable.

A lawyer for the plaintiff, Solid Oak Software Inc., called the lawsuit a test case for U.S. companies.

“Here you've got seven major computer manufacturers conspiring with the Chinese government and two software developers to take a program they all knew came from a U.S. company and integrate that into another program and then distribute tens of millions of copies of it,” said Gregory Fayer, an attorney at Los Angeles-based Gipson Hoffman & Pancione. “We think this is an important test case for enforcement of U.S. IP rights in U.S. courts against folks who are not respecting those rights in places other than the U.S.”

via $2.2 Billion IP Suit Filed Against Computer Makers, Chinese Government.

Los Angeles adopts Google e-mail system for 30,000 city employees

The Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously today to outsource its e-mail system to Google Inc., making it the largest city in the nation to make the move and handing the Web search giant a major victory in its quest to become a software provider to the world’s cities and businesses.

After more than two hours of debate, council members voted 12-0 to approve the $7.25-million contract that would move all 30,000 city employees to Google’s so-called cloud over the coming year.

“The City of Los Angeles, the second largest city in the nation, made a world-class decision today to support a state-of-the art e-mail system,” said Councilman Tony Cardenas, who made the motion to approve the Google system.

via Los Angeles adopts Google e-mail system for 30,000 city employees | Technology | Los Angeles Times.