Secrets of Windows Back Office Servers: Doing e-Discovery / Message Retention / Legal Recovery in Exchange 2010 – Office 365

The topic has come up many times recently on how organizations can leverage Microsoft Exchange 2010 (on-premise) or Microsoft Office 365 (in the cloud) to retain messages, legally hold and recover messages, and successfully perform eDiscovery tasks as required by legal counsel, by law, and/or as needed.

This document clarifies what’s included “in the box” in Exchange 2010 and Office 365, and goes through the step by step procedures for setting up what is necessary to retain content and detailed procedures on how to query and look up information.

Basic Background

To be able to retrieve information for legal or official purposes, information must be properly retained so that the integrity of the information retrieved is valid.  As an example, if the Human Resources department, Legal department, or outside Legal Counsel wants to gather information, it’s not good enough to just go into a user’s mailbox and extract information because the information in a mailbox is considered “fragile.”  It is fragile because a user can easily “delete” a key message or the user can even go in using the Microsoft Outlook client and EDIT a message.  If someone opens a user’s mailbox, the messages in the Outlook client can be tampered with and are NOT considered valid evidence.

In the past with Exchange 2007, Exchange 2003, or earlier, it required specific technologies and practices to protect the messages from tampering.  The old way of doing things was to buy a 3rd party archiving product like Symantec Enterprise Vault, Iron Mountain / Mimosa NearPoint for Exchange, EMC EmailXtender, Zantaz EAS, or the like.  The 3rd party tools required a separate server, typically a special agent to be installed on all Exchange servers and clients, and a relatively high expense to manage, maintain, and support the archiving server and services.

With Exchange 2007, Microsoft included email “Journaling” that allowed a copy of any/all emails to be forwarded to a Journaling Server so that while a user’s mailbox content might have been tampered with, the Journaling Server mailbox would have a un-modified version of the content.  Legal review of the Journal copy provided assurances that the copy has not been edited.

With the release of Exchange 2010 and the Archiving capabilities of Exchange 2010, some mistakenly believe they must create an “Archive Mailbox” for all users to preserve data, that is not true.  An Archive Mailbox creates a 2nd mailbox store for a user to move content from their Primary mailbox to the Archive mailbox to get it out of their Primary mailbox, but data retention can actually be done on Exchange 2010 (or Office 365) simply by extending the Deleted Item Retention period and enabling the Single Instance Recovery function of Exchange / Office 365.

The Archive Mailbox feature in Exchange 2010 / Office 365 simply allows users (or the organization through rules) move messages out of their primary mailbox to the Archive box to keep the primary mailbox small, and the archive as large as the user requires.  The Archive Mailbox replaces PST files that users have used for years to backup or archive their messages, but instead of being scattered across filesystems, hard drives, USB drives, and other devices, archived mail can be kept in the user’s Archive Mailbox for quick and easy search and access.  For the balance of this article, the reader can be assured that the Archive Mailbox is completely separate and not needed for the “in the box” message retention / discovery discussed in the balance of this article.

via Secrets of Windows Back Office Servers: Doing e-Discovery / Message Retention / Legal Recovery in Exchange 2010 – Office 365.

Law.com – Harvesting Evidence From the Sea of Text Messages

The explosive growth of text messaging presents unique opportunities and challenges for the litigator. This challenge is made greater by the merging of social and professional use in “texting” along with the tendency for most people to adopt a more casual tone in texts than they might in a letter conveyed on professional letterhead.

Like e-mails, texts also have metadata, thus raising preservation challenges, and often this metadata reveals potentially relevant and powerful information (think Tiger Woods). As with e-mails, information regarding the frequency or even the mere existence of a text message at a given time may itself be significant, as in a 2008 case involving a train engineer in California who was alleged to have been texting at the time of a fatal accident.[FOOTNOTE 1]

In addition, depending on the format of the message, some texts, like e-mails, may contain attachments of other electronically stored information aside from the content of the text.

Text messaging also has some unique attributes that make texts different from e-mails. For example, texts, unlike e-mails, typically travel from device to device the same way a cell telephone call travels, rather than over enterprise e-mail servers; text messages leave footprints that can reveal the general geographic locations of the sender and recipient at the time of dispatch and receipt.[FOOTNOTE 2]

The collection and preservation of text messaging is much more difficult than most e-mails because it is device dependent and even carrier dependent since, with some services, like AT&T, the text may be preserved on a subscriber identity module card small chip that contains information such as text messages and contacts. With other providers, a SIM card may not be available, and the data must be taken directly from the device.

In almost all instances, a litigator will need to have the device itself available, unlike e-mails that can typically be collected from a central server or from a user’s hard drive.

via Law.com – Harvesting Evidence From the Sea of Text Messages.

In Antitrust Blitz, FTC Targets Consummated Mergers | National Law Journal

There’s no such thing as a done deal. That’s the message from federal antitrust enforcers, who in recent months have ramped up attacks against consummated mergers, aggressively breaking up already combined companies.

In the past two weeks alone, the Federal Trade Commission announced two consent orders requiring companies to sell off assets from past mergers deemed anti-competitive. Court cases are pending as well. The FTC in May filed suit against The Dun & Bradstreet Corp., targeting its purchase of a competing education data provider 15 months after the fact, while the U.S. Department of Justice has challenged Dean Foods Co.’s acquisition of Foremost Farms last year. “If evidence of an anti-competitive effect emerges, we’ll take a look at that,” said Richard Feinstein, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition. “Our track record makes that clear.”

via Law.com – In Antitrust Blitz, FTC Targets Consummated Mergers.

Google Docs Viewer Now Supports Microsoft Word Files

We’re out of catchy ways to talk about new Google tools that work to keep you from going Microsoft, so this time we’ll just come out and say it: The Google Docs Viewer now displays Microsoft Word attachments in your browser.

Let’s say someone sends a message to your Gmail account with a Microsoft Word document attached.

Now you don’t have to download, save, and open in Microsoft Word to view it. In other words, you don’t need Microsoft Word. At all.

As you’re viewing the document in your browser, you can also edit it.

The Google Docs viewer also allows users to view .pdf, .ppt, .docx and .tiff files in your browser, all you have to do is click the “View” link.

via Google Docs Viewer Now Supports Microsoft Word Files.

Apache Says ‘Premature E-Mail’ Caused Takeover Rumor (Update3) – BusinessWeek

Apache Corp., the second-biggest independent U.S. oil company, said it accidentally sent out an e-mail about its $2.7 billion takeover of Mariner Energy Inc. last night, before announcing the transaction today.

“We can’t tell you how pleased we are to confirm the rumors of the Mariner transaction that were prompted by our premature e-mail,” Apache President Roger Plank told investors today on a conference call about the acquisition.

Jim Byrne, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets in Calgary, said he received the e-mail from Gina Gorczynski of Houston- based Apache and later got a message trying to recall it. Gorczynski, Apache spokesman Bill Mintz and other company contacts didn’t respond to messages yesterday seeking confirmation of the e-mail.

“It went out after the market closed,” Mintz said today in a telephone interview. “We put our release out before the market opened, so there was no harm, no foul.”

The message copied to Byrne was addressed to dozens of recipients at Apache and more than 300 people outside the company, including other analysts. It contained a notice about a conference call for an Apache-Mariner merger. A later message said Gorczynski “would like to recall the message, ‘Conference Call — Apache Corp. and Mariner Energy Merger Agreement.’

via Apache Says ‘Premature E-Mail’ Caused Takeover Rumor (Update3) – BusinessWeek.

The Power of Social Media: Revealing Facebook posts promote cancer awareness – CNN.com

Facebook took a colorful turn this week, when its female users began posting cryptic status updates.

“Beige,” “sexy black and gold,” “crimson red,” “turquoise,” “nude with a lot of padding,” read some.

The color scheme has left male users scratching their heads and asking “Huh?”

So, what is behind the trend? Its all part of an effort to raise awareness for breast cancer by asking women to post the color of the bra theyre wearing.

Female Facebookers started catching on this week as a message made its rounds through the inboxes of the social media network.

“We are playing a game for Breast Cancer Awareness,” one form of the message read. “Write the color of your bra as your status — just the color, nothing else!! Copy this and pass it on to all girls — NO MEN!! This will be fun to see how it spreads.”

By Friday, all the colors of the Victorias Secret rainbow were present in users news feeds when they logged in.

A spokeswoman for Facebook said its not clear where or how the message started, calling it an example of a grass-roots movement beginning on the social networking site.”

What is particularly unique about this grass-roots campaign is that it seems to have been started by a user or group of users, as opposed to an official entity, and spread virally throughout Facebook,” Facebooks Malorie Lucich said. “Its an ideal example of how an individual voice can be magnified to create awareness for a good cause and ignite action among millions by using a site like Facebook.”

via Revealing Facebook posts promote cancer awareness – CNN.com.

Some Courts Raise Bar on Reading Employee Email – WSJ.com

Big Brother is watching. That is the message corporations routinely send their employees about using email.

But recent cases have shown that employees sometimes have more privacy rights than they might expect when it comes to the corporate email server. Legal experts say that courts in some instances are showing more consideration for employees who feel their employer has violated their privacy electronically.

Driving the change in how these cases are treated is a growing national concern about privacy issues in the age of the Internet, where acquiring someone else's personal and financial information is easier than ever.

“Courts are more inclined to rule based on arguments presented to them that privacy issues need to be carefully considered,” said Katharine Parker, a lawyer at Proskauer Rose who specializes in employment issues.

In past years, courts showed sympathy for corporations that monitored personal email accounts accessed over corporate computer networks. Generally, judges treated corporate computers, and anything on them, as company property.

Now, courts are increasingly taking into account whether employers have explicitly described how email is monitored to their employees.

via Some Courts Raise Bar on Reading Employee Email – WSJ.com.

Internet Turns 40 Today: First Message Crashed System

Everyone surfing for last-minute Halloween costumes and pictures of black Lolcats today—what you might call the 40th anniversary of the Internet—can give thanks to the simple network message that started it all: “lo.”

On October 29, 1969, that message became the first ever to travel between two computers connected via the ARPANET, the computer network that would become the Internet.

via Internet Turns 40 Today: First Message Crashed System.