UK Firm Crowdsources Security Camera Monitoring So You Never Know Who’s Watching | Popular Science http://bit.ly/b9p544 #ediscovery

UK Firm Crowdsources Security Camera Monitoring So You Never Know Who’s Watching | Popular Science http://bit.ly/b9p544 #ediscovery

Homeland Security Harvested Social Network Data – Tech Talk – CBS News

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security monitored social networking sites to harvest information – described as “items of interest” — during the lead up to Barack Obama’s inauguration.

The existence of the surveillance program is laid out in a set of slides obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The EFF and the University of California, Berkeley’s Samuelson Clinic last year filed a Freedom of Information lawsuit against six government agencies in response to news articles reporting government monitoring of social networks.

In the document, DHS details how it would collect and use social network information. It also refers to privacy guidelines it would employ as its operatives went about gathering data for what it called its Social Networking Monitoring Center or (SNMC.) The target list reads like a “Who’s Who” of the most popular social networking sites, including the likes of Twitter, Facebook, MySpace and CraigsList, among others

via Homeland Security Harvested Social Network Data – Tech Talk – CBS News.

Electronic Privacy and the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court will soon weigh in for the first time on the permissible scope of employer monitoring of employees electronic communications. Such monitoring activity raises many issues that remain the subject of uncertainty in this developing area of the law.The case under consideration by the Court, Ontario v. Quon, arises in the context of government employees, who are protected from unreasonable searches by the Fourth Amendment. Private-sector employees have no such constitutional protection. Nonetheless, the Supreme Courts forthcoming ruling will likely have implications for private employers who face employee claims alleging an invasion of their common-law privacy rights.

via Law.com – Electronic Privacy and the Supreme Court.