Post europe – benchmark bribery legislation for europe – Postonline

European organisations breathed a sigh of relief on 20 July 2010 when the British Ministry of Justice announced a delay in the implementation of the UK Bribery Act. The act was due to come into force in October 2010, but will now be delayed until April 2011. Although it is tempting to view it this way, these extra few months should not offer a welcome rest bite period for businesses that are unsure how they will comply with the act.

The Bribery Act has struck fear into the hearts of many organisations that see financial incentives as an integral part of their work since it received Royal Assent in April 2010. The act replaces much, and codifies the remainder, of the various fragments of the UK’s existing anti-corruption legislation, dating back to 1889 with the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act. It heralds a new era in the UK’s fight against corruption by establishing distinct general criminal offences for those “offering” and those “accepting” bribes, a new offence for the failure of commercial organisations to prevent bribery by persons acting on their behalf and a discreet offence for those who bribe foreign public officials.

via Post europe – benchmark bribery legislation for europe – Postonline.

The Long Arm Of The Crown: New U.K. Anti-Bribery Law Reaches Private Sector Bribery And Creates Offence Of “Failing To Prevent” Bribery | Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP – JDSupra

The U.K. Bribery Act 2010 (the “Act”) represents a fundamental reform of the U.K. anti-bribery regime and greatly expands the potential legal exposure of companies and individuals that do business, including practice of a trade or profession, in the U.K. For example, it criminalizes purely private bribery with no involvement of a government official and creates a new corporate offence of “failing to prevent” bribery. These offences are subject to unlimited fines and a 10-year maximum prison sentence for individuals. The Act bears some similarity to its U.S. counter-part, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), but is in general stricter and broader. Accordingly, companies with business operations in the U.K. must not assume that even robust FCPA compliance programs will assure compliance with the requirements of the Act.

The Act creates offences that cover a variety of situations and, in some instances, appear to create a form of strict liability. The provisions of each section of the Act are discussed briefly below.

Please see full article below for more information.

via The Long Arm Of The Crown: New U.K. Anti-Bribery Law Reaches Private Sector Bribery And Creates Offence Of “Failing To Prevent” Bribery | Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP – JDSupra.

UK raises the bar in corruption battle – Emirates Business 24|7

A key feature for non-UK companies to be aware of, including those based in the Middle East, is that the corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery applies to all companies that are doing business with the UK. The individual offence, meanwhile, relates not only to UK nationals but also to those ordinarily resident in the UK. And due to the extra-territorial nature of the act, the law can be breached where an act is committed outside of the UK that would constitute an illegal act if committed in the UK. The legislation therefore has implications for a growing number of companies in the Middle East trading with the UK.

Affected companies are now in the process of assessing the implications of the act for their businesses. The priority for all managing boards is to ensure that they have adequate procedures in place to prevent anyone acting on their behalf – including third parties in other jurisdictions – from committing an act of bribery. From a regional perspective, the UK legislation is being introduced at a time when the Middle East has placed corporate governance and internal controls at the top of the agenda to safeguard economic growth. Some recent high-profile corporate crises affecting companies in the region have galvanised commitment throughout the region for stronger regulation within companies. Therefore, these two agendas are set to positively reinforce one another in the long term.

A key area in which the anti-corruption and corporate governance agendas overlap is in the importance of an embedded Code of Ethics. Many companies may have a set of principles on paper which employees may be aware of but not understand the relevance of. For a Code of Ethics to truly be effective in mitigating fraudulent or corrupt practice, strong management leadership is required and methods sought to make a Code of Ethics both relevant to staff, wherever located, as well as applicable to their roles within an organisation. Staff, agents and consultants all need training and education, especially in ‘grey areas’ such as corporate hospitality, where risks are more subtle but still real. Meanwhile, robust procedures for selecting, vetting and monitoring third parties must equally be prioritised for any company affected by the legislation, especially those trading through third parties in opaque or high-risk markets.

via UK raises the bar in corruption battle – Emirates Business 24|7.