U.K. Bribery Act Finally Takes Effect | Law.com

After being delayed for almost a year, the new U.K. Bribery Act finally takes effect today.

The controversial and wide-ranging legislation, rushed through Parliament before the 2010 general election, was originally scheduled to take effect last October. The new law’s start date was pushed back twice, however, to allow companies to put in place what the U.K. Ministry of Justice describes as “adequate procedures” for preventing bribery.

The final guidance, issued in April, eased worries among multinational companies by stating that a listing on the London Stock Exchange will not, in itself, make a business subject to the act. However, any company that has a U.K. office, has employees who are U.K. citizens, or provides any services to a U.K. organization will still be covered by the bill, which carries unlimited fines and an increased maximum jail term of 10 years.

Although the act is primarily designed to tighten the U.K.’s regulatory framework — the first change to the country’s bribery laws in more than a century — its broad jurisdictional reach means that the majority of U.S. public companies are likely to be affected by what some regulatory experts have described as the world’s most draconian anti-corruption legislation.

“It’s wider ranging even than the [U.S.' Foreign Corrupt Practices Act],” said Lord Peter Goldsmith, the former U.K. attorney general, now head of Debevoise & Plimpton’s European litigation practice. ”It’s going to affect all companies with business in the U.K., even if they’re not incorporated here. The enforcement agencies have greater powers and the penalties are much tougher than under previous U.K. law. Boardrooms throughout America and beyond should have this on their agenda.”

While the U.K. and U.S. laws will regularly act in tandem, there are a number of key differences. Most fundamentally, where the U.S. FCPA deals only with governmental bribery, the U.K. act also covers corruption between commercial entities. And where U.S. law requires prosecutors to prove intent and awareness of the bribe at a senior level, the Bribery Act imposes strict liability on any company that fails to prevent bribery from taking place, regardless of awareness or intent. This not only covers bribes made by its own employees, but also by any individual “associated” with the company, a fact likely to concern smaller enterprises, which are more likely to rely on third-party agents for international matters.

via U.K. Bribery Act Finally Takes Effect.

BBC News – Netherlands makes net neutrality a law

The Dutch may become the first in Europe to use Skype and other web-based services on smartphones for no extra charge.

On 22 June, the Dutch Parliament passed a law stopping mobile operators from blocking or charging extra for voice calling done via the net.

The bill must now pass through the Dutch senate, but its passage is expected to be a formality.

The move may prove crucial in Europe’s on-going debate over net neutrality.

Net neutrality is controversial around the world, with heated discussions on the subject taking place in the United States, Europe and many other regions.

The idea it enshrines is that all internet traffic should be treated equally, regardless of its type – be it video, audio, e-mail, or the text of a web page.

via BBC News – Netherlands makes net neutrality a law.

BBC News – Will the UK Bribery Act help Russia fight corruption?

When the UK Bribery Act, passed by Parliament earlier this year, becomes law next April, many overseas companies could find themselves in serious trouble.

But for governments in countries such as Russia, where fighting corruption on a national level has not been very successful, the new law could prove to be of significant importance.

Apart from criminalising both private sector corruption and the bribery of officials, it defines how British and foreign firms are expected to do business – not only in the UK, but also elsewhere.

“When the Bribery Act comes into force, I shall have jurisdiction in respect of foreign companies – such as Russian companies – that carry on business in the UK and are involved in bribery in any other country in the world, even if that bribery has no connection with their UK business,” Richard Alderman, the director of the Serious Fraud Office, told the BBC.

The same, according to the Act, goes for UK companies doing business internationally.

via BBC News – Will the UK Bribery Act help Russia fight corruption?.

BBC – US ambassador questioned on EU data sharing

The US ambassador to the EU has said that security must be protected as well as privacy, during an evidence session with the European Parliament’s Civil Liberties Committee on 25 October 2010.

William Kennard was speaking to MEPs as part of negotiations into a new “umbrella agreement” on the sharing of data with the US authorities.

There have been concerns that using the data of travellers to the US could constitute a breach of privacy.

Under the new proposal being negotiated, sensitive information such as religious beliefs – revealed by meal preferences – or health conditions would only be given in “very exceptional circumstances.”

The European Commission is also offering passengers the right to be informed about the processing of their data.

Earlier in the year MEPs blocked a similar agreement on the transfer of financial data – the so-called SWIFT agreement.

A new agreement had to be struck between the EU and the US that contained increased privacy safeguards.

Ambassador Kennard told the committee that the US had the same values as the EU on data privacy, but admitted that the two blocs had “different approaches”.

He expressed concerns about the retroactive aspect of any new agreement, saying it would be difficult to update existing bilateral agreements with various member states.

via BBC – Democracy Live – US ambassador questioned on EU data sharing.

Swiss Parliament Approves Tax Deal With U.S. in UBS Dispute

The Swiss parliament today approved a treaty with the United States that will hand thousands of files on suspected tax cheats to U.S. authorities, but obstacles remain that could delay the deal for several more months.

The government hopes the agreement will eventually end UBS AG's three-year battle with U.S. tax authorities that culminated in revelations the bank had for years helped American clients hide millions of dollars in offshore accounts.

Under the treaty that was painstakingly crafted by Bern and Washington last year after months of negotiations, Switzerland has agreed to divulge the names of 4,450 UBS clients suspected of tax evasion.

Swiss authorities have already transmitted the names of about 400 UBS clients who signed waivers as part of the Internal Revenue Service's voluntary disclosure program, according the Swiss Federal Tax Administration. A further 100 UBS clients gave their consent directly to Swiss authorities.

Lawmakers in Switzerland's lower house voted 81 to 61 in favor of the government-backed deal, and 53 abstained.

The vote passed after the powerful Swiss People's Party dropped its opposition. The nationalist party and the left-wing Social Democrats blocked a first attempt last week to have parliament approve the treaty, which has been portrayed by some as a nail in the coffin for Swiss banking secrecy.

via Swiss Parliament Approves Tax Deal With U.S. in UBS Dispute.

EU, U.S. Negotiators Reach New Terror-Finance Accord – BusinessWeek

European Union and U.S. negotiators reached a new agreement on transferring bank data to American counter-terrorism investigators, seeking to overcome a veto by EU lawmakers who want to protect privacy.

European Commission President Jose Barroso said the revised accord, under which the EU would let the U.S. Treasury Department view records from the Swift money-transfer system, bolsters the protection of personal data. He urged approval by the European Parliament, which rejected the previous deal in February after saying its privacy provisions were inadequate.

“This draft is compatible with the respect of fundamental rights,” Barroso told the 27-nation Parliament today in Strasbourg, France. “It is subject to strict compliance with safeguards on privacy and the protection of personal data.”

The assembly’s veto of the earlier accord deprived the U.S. of its preferred tool for collecting European data under the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program created after the Sept. 11 attacks. An EU-wide agreement spares the U.S. from having to seek bank data on a country-by-country basis and makes the transfers less politically controversial.

The rejection four months ago nullified a preliminary agreement that was meant to be a precursor to a definitive deal. The new text drafted by the commission, the EU’s executive arm, and the U.S. government would be the definitive accord, on which the Parliament plans to vote in July.

via EU, U.S. Negotiators Reach New Terror-Finance Accord (Update1) – BusinessWeek.

MEPs call for improved data security  |  European Voice

The European Parliament has called on EU negotiators to make sure they get enough safeguards in upcoming talks with the United States to protect the data rights of EU citizens.

MEPs voted through two resolutions today (5 May) that called for a more limited use of personal data collected by US authorities, fearing the data could be abused.

At issue are two separate transfers of data. One is the so-called Passenger Name Records collected by airlines about passengers on transatlantic flights, which are used by US customs and border control agents to screen people who travel to the US.

The Parliament decided to postpone its approval of a 2007 EU-US accord on the transfer of PNR, and a similar arrangement with Australia. They did so to give Cecilia Malmström, the European commissioner for home affairs, time to draft a new proposal that would answer calls by MEPs for a global agreement setting out how passenger data can be used and what legal redress citizens have over the use of their data.

The MEPs also want a separate effort to negotiate a deal with the US that would cover all data transfer deals between the two sides.

The other data transfer issue voted on today dealt with information collected on bank transfers from Europe that the US Treasury screens to weed out terrorist financiers. Negotiations on a new so-called Terrorist Tracking Finance Programme between the EU and the US are expected to start later this month. The Parliament rejected an interim deal in February because of concerns that it did no

via MEPs call for improved data security  |  Policies  |  Justice  |  Rights | European Voice.

UK Bribery Bill Update | Thomas Fox – JDSupra

It has been reported that the UK Bribery Bill, introduced in March 2009, made it out of Parliament before the upcoming general election. The Bribery Bill is a significant departure for the UK in the area of foreign anti-corruption. It is significantly stronger than the FCPA. Many internationally focused US companies have offices in the UK or employ UK citizens in their world-wide operations. This legislation could open them to prosecution in the UK under a law similar to, but stronger than, the relevant US legislation.

via UK Bribery Bill Update | Thomas Fox – JDSupra.

EUROPEAN UNION: Striking a Balance between Privacy and Security : Internet Business Law

EU prepares new negotiations with US government on transfer of bank data for purpose of fighting terrorism.

The commission is asking EU leaders to authorise new talks after parliament rejected the previous so-called SWIFT deal amid concerns that it posed a threat to privacy. MEPs also expressed their desire to be consulted more during the negotiating process.

Cecilia Malmström, the new commissioner for home affairs, says she will press for stronger privacy safeguards and make sure parliament is informed at all stages of the talks.

The future agreement should also be reciprocal, so that the US would have to provide similar banking data if the EU decides to set up its own programme for tracking funds supporting terror groups.

“Terrorism remains among the main threats that EU security has to face and we need to put in place tools that are up to the task, allowing for effective international cooperation,” she said.

SWIFT stands for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, a messaging network used by some 8000 banks and financial institutions worldwide. The SWIFT database records millions of international bank transfers every day.

via EUROPEAN UNION: Striking a Balance between Privacy and Security : Internet Business Law.

E.C. launches new drive for bank data-sharing agreement

The European Commission today began work on a new set of negotiations with the U.S. on the transfer of E.U. citizens’ bank data for counterterrorism purposes, after a previous agreement was vetoed by the European Parliament.

The agreement is needed because while European data protection laws prohibit the passing of personal data to the U.S., American authorities say the data has been a valuable tool with which to track the funding of terrorist acts.

The Parliament torpedoed the agreement last month partly because it felt that European civil liberties were being compromised, but also because it was excluded from the decision-making process.

As a result, SWIFT, the Belgian bank networking firm that transmits billions of financial transactions every day and lies at the center of the debate, is in legal limbo, with the U.S. demanding the data, while E.U. laws forbid it from continuing such cooperation.

via E.C. launches new drive for bank data-sharing agreement.