Many Fortune 500 Policies Unclear on Foreign ‘Grease Payments’ | Corporate Counsel

Among Fortune 500 companies, only 19 of those with public codes of conduct prohibit their employees from making so-called “grease payments” to foreign officials. But a whopping 373 companies deal with the same issue by simply not mentioning it at all in their codes of conduct, according to a new study.

Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a facilitation or grease payment is legal if made to a foreign official, political party, or party official for “routine government action,” such as processing papers or issuing permits in order to expedite an act that would occur anyway. The payment becomes a bribe, however, if it attempts to influence the outcome of an official’s action—such as approval of a permit—rather than the timing of it.

One of the 19 companies that are explicit about banning this kind of payment is Cincinnati-based Procter & Gamble Company. “At P&G, we strive to do the right thing, and this often means that our policies exceed legal requirements,” said Libby Rutherford, P&G’s vice president and general counsel for global compliance.

Rutherford explained, “We know that bribery harms the company and the communities in which we do business. P&G’s policy is to prohibit facilitating payments worldwide, even though they are permissible under U.S. law. In this regard, we support government efforts around the world in combating bribery, while helping to improve local communities.”

via Many Fortune 500 Policies Unclear on Foreign ‘Grease Payments’.

Nokia, Apple Reach Patent Deal, Settle Lawsuits – Bloomberg

Nokia Oyj (NOK1V) won an almost two-year patent dispute with Apple Inc. (AAPL), as the world’s largest mobile-phone makers reached a settlement that awards a one-time payment and royalties to the Finnish handset maker.

Nokia rose as much as 4.1 percent in Helsinki trading. The agreement will bolster the Devices & Services unit’s second- quarter profitability, Espoo, Finland-based Nokia said in a statement today. The details of the contract, under which Apple will pay Nokia an undisclosed sum and royalties for the term of the agreement, are confidential, the Finnish company said.

The two mobile-phone makers have been in litigation since October 2009, when Nokia filed a lawsuit accusing Cupertino, California-based Apple of infringing patents. The Finnish company also demanded royalties on the millions of iPhones sold since the device’s introduction in 2007. Nokia said in March it has 46 patents asserted against Apple in civil lawsuits and complaints lodged with the U.S. International Trade Commission.

via Nokia, Apple Reach Patent Deal, Settle Lawsuits – Bloomberg.

Is Goldman the Next to Get Into FCPA Trouble? – Law Blog – WSJ

It’s a you-got-your-chocolate-in-my-peanut-butter moment.

Two of the hottest things going, stepped-up regulation of banks and enforcement of foreign bribery laws, are on a possible collision course, according to this WSJ story out Thursday.

That’s right, U.S. securities regulators are examining whether Goldman Sachs and other financial firms might have violated bribery laws in dealings with Libya’s sovereign-wealth fund, according to people familiar with the matter. SEC lawyers are reviewing documents that detail the firms’ relationships with the Libyan Investment Authority controlled by Col. Moammar Gadhafi, these people said.

Among other things, SEC officials are interested in a $50 million fee Goldman initially agreed to pay the Libyan sovereign-wealth fund as part of a proposal by the bank to help the fund recoup losses, according to these people.

The Libyan Investment Authority would have passed on the $50 million payment to an outside adviser, The Wall Street Journal reported last month. But that outside adviser, Palladyne International Asset Management, was run at the time by the son-in-law of the head of Libya’s state-owned oil company.

The $50 million payment was never made, because discussions between Goldman and the sovereign-wealth fund stalled before violence erupted in Libya in February, according to people familiar with the matter.

But the fact the payment wasn’t made doesn’t necessarily exempt it from trouble under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

via Is Goldman the Next to Get Into FCPA Trouble? – Law Blog – WSJ.

Report: Google, Sprint to Launch NFC Payments Thursday | News & Opinion | PCMag.com

Google is preparing to roll out a payment system on Sprint phones that would use near-field communications (NFC) technology, according to a report.

Bloomberg reported Tuesday that the service would be available on the Sprint Nexus S across five different U.S. metropolitan regions: New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington, D.C.

Google has sent out announcements to a press event at 11:15 AM local time at Google’s New York offices on Thursday, advertised as a partner even where Google will show off its “latest innovations”.

Google representatives couldn’t immediately be reached for comment. NFC technology is also reportedly being used by the Apple iPhone 5. Three major U.S. wireless carriers recently announced their support for an NFC payment system called Isis, which would let Americans pay for items at retail stores with their mobile phones rather than using physical credit cards.

Google Eric Schmidt, then the company’s chief executive, showed off the NFC technology last November at the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco, running the “Gingerbread” version of the Android operating system.

NFC, or near-field communications, is a way for two devices to communicate small amounts of data when they’re placed about four inches apart. Similar technologies are used for “mobile wallet” services such as Japan’s popular Mobile Felica system, where a mobile phone stores encrypted credit-card data, transit pass information, or retail coupons, and can transmit them to readers at stores or train stations with a tap.

via Report: Google, Sprint to Launch NFC Payments Thursday | News & Opinion | PCMag.com.

DailyTech – PC Rental Company Spied on Users In Their Homes With Webcams

Class action lawsuit against Aaron’s Inc. is pending

Crystal and Brian Byrd were a hard working couple, but like many people in today’s economy, money was tight.  So when they wanted a new computer they turned to popular rent-to-own chain Aaron’s Inc. (AAN) to affordably purchase a new system.  Picking a Dell Inspiron, they were happy and productive — but they would soon make a disturbing discovery.

I. Big Brother — Your Local Store Manager — is Watching You

After entering a rent-to-own contract on the laptop in early 2010, the couple completed their last payment in October 2010, a month ahead of schedule.  But Mr. Byrd fortuitously made a mistake in his payment submission resulting in Aaron’s never logging it as received.

In December, the store manager showed up at the couple’s house with an order to repossess the computer.  And he carried with him a far more disturbing item — a picture taken from the computer’s web cam inside the couple’s home, which Aaron’s had been using as a remote spy cam.  He claimed the picture was “evidence”.

The Byrds were appalled and called the police.  A police investigation revealed that Aaron’s employees “routinely installed the PC Rental Agent” on rent-to-own laptops.  The PC Rental Agent, a product of DesignerWare, was capable of regularly taking pictures of users, taking screenshots, and logging their key presses — all without the user ever realizing it.

via DailyTech – PC Rental Company Spied on Users In Their Homes With Webcams.

Introducing The New “FCPA on Steroids” – Law Blog – WSJ

The Bribery Act covers any company that conducts business in Britain, regardless of where the company is based, and goes beyond the FCPA by targeting illicit payments to foreign officials and also bribes between private businessmen, WSJ reports. It applies even if the individual who makes the payment doesn’t realize the transaction was a bribe, legal experts say.

The Bribery Act also prohibits so-called “grease payments” — small bribes common in some countries to get mail service, phone hook-ups or other services that otherwise would be delayed, according to WSJ, which notes that those types of payments are legal under the FCPA as long as they are recorded.

Some companies are concerned that merely treating business contacts to an expensive dinner or sporting event could run afoul of the new U.K. law.

“Lots of clients are very worried, confused, uncertain,” Tim Coleman, a partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, told WSJ.

But questions remain about how vigorously the new law will be enforced.

Richard Alderman, the head of Britain’s Serious Fraud Office, told the Sunday Telegraph newspaper that “sensible and proportionate expenditure on hospitality will remain perfectly lawful” under the Bribery Act.

via Introducing The New “FCPA on Steroids” – Law Blog – WSJ.

District Court Declines to Order Incarceration for Defendant’s Bad Faith Spoliation but Orders Monetary Sanction of $337,796.37 : Electronic Discovery Law

Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc. (“Victor Stanley II”)

As previously summarized on this blog, defendant Mark Pappas, President of Creative Pipe, Inc., was ordered to “be imprisoned for a period not to exceed two (2) years, unless and until he [paid] to Plaintiff the attorney’s fees and costs that will be awarded…” as a sanction for willful, bad faith discovery violations which the Magistrate Judge ruled would be treated as contempt of the Court.  On defendants’ appeal, the District Court Judge declined to adopt the Magistrate Judge’s order regarding incarceration:

[T]he court does not find it appropriate to Order Defendant Pappas incarcerated for future possible failure to comply with his obligation to make payment of an amount to be determined in the course of further proceedings.  Certainly, if Defendant Pappas should fail to comply with a specific payment order, the Court may issue an order requiring him to show cause why he should not be held in civil contempt for failure to comply wit that payment order.  Also, under appropriate circumstances, criminal contempt proceedings might be considered.

The court upheld the Magistrate Judge’s order and recommendations in all other respects, however, and ordered defendants to pay plaintiff Victor Stanley, Inc. $337,796.37 as a sanction for their bad faith spoliation.

via District Court Declines to Order Incarceration for Defendant’s Bad Faith Spoliation but Orders Monetary Sanction of $337,796.37 : Electronic Discovery Law.

European banks see new ATM skimming attacks – Computerworld

Banks in Europe are seeing innovative skimming attacks against ATMs, where fraudsters rig special devices to the cash machines to record payment card details.

Many banks have fitted ATMs with devices that are designed to thwart criminals from attaching skimmers to the machines. But it now appears in some areas that those devices are being successfully removed and then modified for skimming, according to the latest report from the European ATM Security Team (EAST), which collects data on ATM fraud throughout Europe.

Skimming devices are designed to record the account details from the magnetic stripe on the back of a payment card. The data can then be encoded onto a dummy card. A person’s PIN (personal identification number) is often captured with a micro-camera, which was done with the illicitly modified anti-skimming devices, according to the report.

Banks in five countries also reported seeing a new type of skimming device, which uses a modified MP3 player to record card details. It also has a micro-camera to record PINs, according to a photo seen by IDG News Service.

via European banks see new ATM skimming attacks – Computerworld.

Nexus One successor to be a mobile credit card? | TG Daily

While we still have virtually no details about what Google’s alleged follow-up to the Nexus One phone will be able to do, thanks to a presentation from CEO Eric Schmidt yesterday, we’re pretty sure that mobile payments is at the top of the list.

Schmidt showed off a device that was obscured so as not to reveal the manufacturer or other specifics. What he did demonstrate was that it was running Android 2.3, the latest version of the mobile operating system, and that it is able to function as a mobile payment solution.

The device has what’s called a Near Field Communication chip, which could replace credit cards for point-of-sale transaction payments.

“This could replace your credit card,” said Schmidt. It will assumedly become a regular feature for future phones. Any device with an NFC chip and Android 2.3 could function as a mobile payment device.

Mobile payments are being looked at by a whole bunch of players in the mobile segment. Right now, the credit card oligopoly has an exclusive hold on cashless retail payments in the US. There is no alternative, period. Google is the frontrunner on the technology lines to change that.

via Nexus One successor to be a mobile credit card? | TG Daily.

GlaxoSmithKline whistleblower awarded $96m payout | Business | guardian.co.uk

A whistleblower who exposed serious contamination problems at GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK) pharmaceutical manufacturing operations has been awarded $96m (£60m).

Cheryl Eckard’s payment is thought to be the biggest ever handed to a US whistleblower. It was awarded after an eight-year fight, which ended yesterday, when GSK agreed to pay the US government $750m to settle civil and criminal charges that it manufactured and sold adulterated drug products.

Speaking outside the federal courthouse in Boston after the award was agreed, Eckard admitted she was “a little emotional”.

“It’s difficult to survive this financially, emotionally, you lose all your friends, because all your friends are people you have at work,” she said. “You really do have to understand that it’s a very difficult process but very well worth it.”

The case centred on a factory in Cidra, Puerto Rico, where GSK made a range of products including an antibiotic ointment for babies, and drugs to treat nausea, depression and diabetes. In August 2002, Eckard, a global quality assurance manager, led a team sent to the plant to investigate manufacturing violations that had been identified by the US Federal Drugs Administration (FDA). Eckard lost her job nine months later after warning that the problems ran deeper than the FDA realised.

via GlaxoSmithKline whistleblower awarded $96m payout | Business | guardian.co.uk.