Master Data Management Critical to Effective Information Governance: Gartner | eWeek.com (Nathan Eddy)

The MDM market continues to grow because it focuses on specific business drivers and business-led initiatives.

Master data management (MDM) is critical to achieving effective information governance, according to a report from IT research firm Gartner, which noted failure to manage information accurately has been the root cause of several incidents, including the leak of sensitive information to WikiLeaks, and can be fatal to the success of MDM programs. Gartner estimates worldwide MDM software revenue will reach $1.9 billion in 2012, a 21 percent increase from 2011.

MDM is a technology-enabled business discipline in which businesses and IT organizations work together to ensure the uniformity, accuracy, stewardship, semantic consistency and accountability of the organization’s official, shared master data assets. It is increasingly identified by organizations with the launch of a formal enterprise information management (EIM) strategy and the foundation of an information governance program that supports EIM.

“The recent global financial crisis has put information governance in the spotlight,” said Ted Friedman, vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner. “Information governance is a priority of IT and business leaders as a result of various pressures, including regulatory compliance mandates and the urgent need for improved decision-making.”

MDM is one of the most notable information governance programs, and the MDM market continues to grow because it focuses on specific business drivers and business-led initiatives. Gartner predicts by 2016, 20 percent of CIOs in regulated industries will lose their jobs for failing to implement the discipline of information governance successfully.

via Master Data Management Critical to Effective Information Governance: Gartner – IT Management – News & Reviews – eWeek.com.

Tablet, e-reader ownership almost double over holidays: survey | Reuters

The number of Americans owning a tablet computer or e-reader nearly doubled over the holiday period as Kindles, Nooks and iPads proved to be popular gifts, a new study found.

In early January, 19 percent of Americans surveyed by Pew owned an e-reader, up from 10 percent in December, with identical results for tablets, according to a report released on Monday by the Pew Internet and American Life Project.

As a result, the percentage of Americans owning at least one digital reading device rose to 29 percent in January from 18 percent, according to the survey.

via Tablet, e-reader ownership almost double over holidays: survey | Reuters.

In-House Compliance Requires Company-Wide Efforts | Corporate Counsel

When Frances McLeod and Greg Mason need to find missing money or probe a company’s compliance programs, they construct and analyze large datasets of the company’s financial transactions. About 75 percent of their global forensic accounting business is driven by compliance and enforcement issues, particularly those related to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)—a priority area for U.S. regulators, and a top concern for general counsel.

Even though they’ve consulted with corporations and assessed market risks the world over, McLeod continues to be amazed by gaps in company compliance programs that bear on bribery and illicit payments. “There are a lot of companies that still don’t get it,” says McLeod, who worked in investment banking and on international banking and money-laundering investigations before co-founding Forensic Risk Alliance, a consultancy, in 1999.

via In-House Compliance Requires Company-Wide Efforts.

Getting Rid of Data: Why it s So Hard | Information Management

Many organizations think they are taking the right approach to information overload: buy ever-cheaper storage solutions, lower compliance risk by saving all data and focus more resources on solutions for turning all this data into actionable intelligence. Unfortunately, storing and managing data stores that only get bigger with time is very expensive, and instead of reducing risk, it dramatically increases costs and risks associated with e-discovery.

According to Gartner, IT shops already spend between 2 and 3 percent of revenues on data management, which can add up to hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars each year. And according to IDC, corporate data volumes grew by about 50 percent last year. The fact is, no matter how inexpensive storage devices become, the total cost of managing data will continue to grow. And while some data must be retained for its business, legal or compliance value, retaining data that has no such value increases the complexity and cost of every hold issued by the legal department in response to an e-discovery request.

ADVERTISEMENT

How can IT organizations defensibly dispose of data to control IT costs while satisfying the requirement for legal holds? The answer is a robust, cross-functional information governance program.

via Getting Rid of Data: Why it s So Hard.

How to Survive Data Discovery in the Digital Age | Inc.com

Imagine your business is being sued. Suddenly, you’re required by law to unearth and deliver to a competitor or investigator massive amounts of electronic data—those emails sent by salespeople, your receptionist’s instant messages, CAD files edited by your engineers, and more—with every bit of it including metadata that reveals exactly when it was created, saved, or transmitted.

Are you prepared for that?

What we’re talking about here is e-Discovery. This is the process of collecting, analyzing, and exchanging electronic data during litigation or as part of an investigation by government agencies.

And it’s not just a concern for the Apples and the Samsungs of the world that are well-armed to take on the task. Even the smallest companies are legally on the hook for doing their own data discovery.

While you can certainly try to do it on you’re own, it’s far more common to outsource it.

“E-Discovery is a complicated, messy process,” says Andrew Sieja, founder and CEO of Chicago-based kCura, a company that makes software called Relativity that manages the processing, review, and analysis of data. “The collection phase involves the snatching of data from, say, the laptops of 50 different people. It requires experts to really understand where to pull data from the network.” And then there’s the task of reviewing it. That’s when companies rack up about 70 percent of the costs, says Barry Murphy, principal analyst with eDJ Group, an Austin, Texas-based research firm that specializes in e-Discovery.

Because of the expertise needed to pull off good e-Discovery, Sieja says there’s a whole cottage industry—a multi-billion dollar industry, in fact—built around providing consulting services for it. Research firm Gartner says the e-Discovery market is growing at a compounded annual growth rate of 14 percent and is estimated to reach $1.7 billion by 2014, but eDJ’s Murphy says that number could be much higher when you account for proactive information management—things like software for records management, e-mail archiving, and legal hold management tools. “I would say it’s upwards of $5 billion when you add in all the services and tools.”

via How to Survive Data Discovery in the Digital Age | Inc.com.

H.P. Builds Servers With Cellphone Chips – NYTimes.com

Hewlett-Packard announced on Tuesday a new design for some of the world’s largest computer centers and says it could reduce power consumption in some cases by 90 percent.

The design, called Project Moonshot, replaces the conventional microprocessors used in computer servers with the kind of chips used in cellphones and notebook computers. These mobile chips, which have usually run on small batteries, are designed as power misers, shutting down some inessential tasks and slowing others when placing calls or reaching the Web.

It is, for now, a specialty service for perhaps 50 of the world’s largest online companies, said Paul Santeler, the manager of H.P.’s hyperscale business. “Believe me, they’ll all be kicking the tires” on the new offering, he said. “For a Web architecture with tons and tons of users, where all the growth is, it makes a lot of sense.” The world is adding 7,000 computer servers a day, he said, most of them for Web activities like social networking and watching video.

The new design will use chips made by Calxeda, an Austin, Tex., maker of low-power ARM chips for servers.

via H.P. Builds Servers With Cellphone Chips – NYTimes.com.

HP Planning ARM-Based Servers With Calxeda, Challenging Intel: eWeek.com

HP reportedly will become the first major server maker to use ARM-based processors in some of its data center servers.

Hewlett-Packard reportedly will partner with chip-maker Calxeda to develop data center servers powered by low-power processors designed by ARM Holdings.

Quoting unnamed people close to the situation, Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal are reporting that HP will become the first major OEM to adopt ARM-based processors for some of its servers, a move that would heighten the growing competition between ARM and Intel, the world’s top chip maker.

Intel, which holds more than 80 percent of the overall global chip market and 90 percent of the $9 billion worldwide server chip space, has been aggressive in trying to break into the mobile device space, particularly smartphones and tablets, the bulk of which currently are powered by ARM chips manufactured by the likes of Texas Instruments, Samsung, Qualcomm and Nvidia.

At the same time, ARM executives have been vocal about their plans to move up the ladder and into PCs and low-power servers, and a number of manufacturers—including Calxeda, Marvell Technologies and Nvidia—are developing chips for the data center. Calxeda has a product-based event scheduled for Nov. 1, though the company has not yet said what the event will be about.

via HP Planning ARM-Based Servers With Calxeda, Challenging Intel: Reports – IT Infrastructure – News & Reviews – eWeek.com.

Infographic: Most Tablet Users Are Educated, Employed, Not Young | News & Opinion | PCMag.com

Tablet users are educated, employed, and earning money but are not necessarily young, according to new data.

At this point, 11 percent of Americans have a tablet device and 77 percent of them use it daily. Approximately 46 percent are in the 30 to 49 age bracket, however, and they are serious about their news, according to an infographic produced by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism and The Economist Group.

Of the 1,200 tablet owners polled by Pew, 53 percent use their device to access news every day. Getting news is actually almost as popular as email, at 54 percent compared to 53 percent, and the average user spends about 90 minutes catching up on the day’s events.

It’s not just quick bursts of breaking news users are reading, however. About 42 percent read in-depth articles on their tablets, but despite social-networking linkups at every turn, just 16 percent share what they’re reading on those services. Most stick to a small number of recognized sources, though 33 percent said they have branched out to new publications on their tablets.

via Infographic: Most Tablet Users Are Educated, Employed, Not Young | News & Opinion | PCMag.com.

Why people still use BlackBerry: keyboards, security, and IT requirements

It’s no secret Research In Motion has lost its once-dominant position in the smartphone world. Despite slight increases in sales, BlackBerry market share has plummeted in percentage terms compared to the surging iPhone and Android, falling from 18.7 percent to 11.7 percent in the second quarter. After a recent outage left RIM’s back-end systems inconsistent and unresponsive for parts of four days, we argued that RIM is destined for an eventual demise, hastened by the consumerization of IT. As long as the iPhone and Android are good enough to meet corporate IT requirements, consumer choices will erode RIM’s last area of strength: the enterprise.

But not everyone agrees that RIM’s situation is as dire as it appears on first glance, and indeed some people prefer BlackBerrys. After all, the company has 70 million subscribers. To get a sense of what RIM’s appeal is in the iPhone and Android age, we decided to talk to some users and an enterprise smartphone management vendor that handles mobile deployments of all types. Some of Ars’ Twitter followers told us they only use BlackBerrys because their employers won’t allow other devices, and blamed corporate “inertia.” But it’s also true that some people just prefer the BlackBerry form factor, BlackBerry Messenger is well-liked, and RIM is still ahead of the competition in satisfying the unique requirements of highly regulated industries.

“It’s premature to run the obituaries on RIM,” says Dan Croft, CEO of Mission Critical Wireless, which helps businesses manage mobile deployments. “Clearly they are facing some significant issues, but there are still millions and millions of BlackBerrys out there that are operating just fine. That being said, what we’re typically seeing is not RIM getting ripped out of an enterprise environment. We’re just seeing the addition of non-BlackBerry devices.”

via Why people still use BlackBerry: keyboards, security, and IT requirements.

Poor Email Mgt Risks Legal Action, Study Warns | eWEEK Europe UK

Poor email management by firms is risking legal consequences a majority of workers believe

A survey from software developer Oasys has revealed 96 percent of employees believe their companies face possible legal risks associated with poor email management.

Indeed, one in five workers stated that their company faces “high risk”, according to the survey of 1,237 employees.

The findings were part of the company’s September 2011 Business Behaviour & Email Management Project, which show that time constraints during the e-discovery process are indeed a major factor.

Lost Emails

The survey revealed that more than a third of business professionals are losing 2 hours or more every day searching for emails that are hard to find. Thirty-four percent of employees surveyed said they spend on average up to 2 hours a day searching for emails, while 8.4 percent spend up to 3 hours a day in the process.

“What most companies don’t understand are the costly challenges associated with having a disorganised email system in the event of litigation,” said attorney Joseph Dennis. “In some cases we’ve seen companies fined by regulatory agencies as much as $700,000 (£439,000) for not being able to produce specific emails under very tight timeframes imposed by the courts during the e-discovery process.”

With the volume of email set to increase, the problem is projected to get much worse, the Oasys study suggested. According to a report by The Radicati Group, a technology market research firm, the number of email users is estimated to rise to 1.9 billion by 2013, and many companies have still failed to implement effective solutions to handle the constantly increasing volumes.

via Poor Email Mgt Risks Legal Action, Study Warns | eWEEK Europe UK.