BusinessWorld Online Edition: Coming clean and the economics of bribery

With the recent promotion by the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) of the Philippines to its list of countries that have substantially implemented internationally agreed tax standards — more commonly known as the “white list” — tax evaders now face greater scrutiny from revenue authorities.

It may be recalled that our country has been on the gray list — consisting of those countries that have committed but have not yet fully complied with internationally agreed tax standards — since April 2009, following its removal from the black list of uncooperative havens for suspected tax cheats.

Although the Philippines is not a member of the OECD, it is a signatory to the Anti-Corruption Action Plan for Asia and the Pacific as well as the 2003 UN Convention Against Corruption which set the international benchmark for anti-bribery legislation.

Another anti-corruption mechanism in the international arena is the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which also finds substantial application in the Philippines due to the presence of a number of American multinational companies. The FCPA empowers the US authorities to prosecute US companies for paying bribes to foreign officials.

In US alone, as many as 120 companies have been investigated on suspicion of FCPA violations. In February 2009, an oil services company and its subsidiary were fined a penalty of $579 million — the largest fine ever paid in an FCPA case.

via BusinessWorld Online Edition: Coming clean and the economics of bribery.

BusinessWorld Online Edition: Coming clean and the economics of bribery

With the recent promotion by the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) of the Philippines to its list of countries that have substantially implemented internationally agreed tax standards — more commonly known as the “white list” — tax evaders now face greater scrutiny from revenue authorities.

It may be recalled that our country has been on the gray list — consisting of those countries that have committed but have not yet fully complied with internationally agreed tax standards — since April 2009, following its removal from the black list of uncooperative havens for suspected tax cheats.

Although the Philippines is not a member of the OECD, it is a signatory to the Anti-Corruption Action Plan for Asia and the Pacific as well as the 2003 UN Convention Against Corruption which set the international benchmark for anti-bribery legislation.

Another anti-corruption mechanism in the international arena is the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which also finds substantial application in the Philippines due to the presence of a number of American multinational companies. The FCPA empowers the US authorities to prosecute US companies for paying bribes to foreign officials.

In US alone, as many as 120 companies have been investigated on suspicion of FCPA violations. In February 2009, an oil services company and its subsidiary were fined a penalty of $579 million — the largest fine ever paid in an FCPA case.

via BusinessWorld Online Edition: Coming clean and the economics of bribery.

U.S. Is Said to Scrutinize Apple’s Online Music Tactics – NYTimes.com

The Justice Department is examining Apple’s tactics in the market for digital music, and its staff members have talked to major music labels and Internet music companies, according to several people briefed on the conversations.

The antitrust inquiry is in the early stages, these people say, and the conversations have revolved broadly around the dynamics of selling music online.

But people briefed on the inquiries also said investigators had asked in particular about recent allegations that Apple used its dominant market position to persuade music labels to refuse to give the online retailer Amazon.com exclusive access to music about to be released.

All these people spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the delicacy of the matter. Representatives from Apple and Amazon declined to comment. Gina Talamona, a deputy director at the Justice Department, also declined to comment.

In March, Billboard magazine reported that Amazon was asking music labels to give it the exclusive right to sell certain forthcoming songs for one day before they went on sale more widely. In exchange, Amazon promised to include those songs in a promotion called the “MP3 Daily Deal” on its Web site.

The magazine reported that representatives of Apple’s iTunes music service were asking the labels not to participate in Amazon’s promotion, adding that Apple punished those that did by withdrawing marketing support for those songs on iTunes.

via U.S. Is Said to Scrutinize Apple’s Online Music Tactics – NYTimes.com.