Report: Twitter deep into talks to purchase TweetDeck – FierceMobileContent

Twitter is in advanced talks to acquire social networking management solutions provider TweetDeck for about $50 million. The Wall Street Journal reports Twitter is targeting TweetDeck in an effort to simplify its microblogging services and broaden the appeal of its platform for both new and existing users. TweetDeck effectively serves as a personalized browser spanning across a user’s social networks and contacts, offering customization tools to simplify tweeting and sharing photos, videos and links. Twitter declined to comment; TweetDeck CEO Iain Dodsworth could not be reached.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Twitter’s plans to enhance its overall appeal include welcoming new users with tweets from individuals in their specific geographic region, in part to dispel the image that the platform serves as little more than a soapbox for celebrities to broadcast their opinions.

via Report: Twitter deep into talks to purchase TweetDeck – FierceMobileContent.

Brazil Summit on Anti-Corruption

Every year, more and more cases of companies and individuals violating the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) in Latin America surface, exposing the unique anti-corruption compliance challenges faced by companies doing business in the region. The heavy reliance on third-parties, such as customs brokers and sales agents, the frequent presence of state-controlled entities in the business sector, ownership interests that Latin American governments have in certain sectors including oil, pharmaceutical, infrastructure, and telecommunications industries, and the general culture of hospitality, all increase exposure to FCPA liability. Recent cases including Universal Corp., Control Components, Nature’s Sunshine Products, Latin Node, Pride International, Hioki, Helmerich & Payne, Alcatel and Siemens  highlight the dire financial and reputational consequences of non-compliance with global anti-bribery regulations.

Companies doing business in Latin America, particularly in Brazil, must also be cognizant of local anti-corruption measures and their impact. Under the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business (“OECD Convention”) and the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption (“IA Convention”), signatories are required to criminalize the bribery of foreign public officials, and several countries in Latin America, including Brazil, are taking steps to enact legislation to implement this provision. When the proposed bill in Brazil is passed, it will dramatically change Brazil’s anti-corruption legal landscape and impact compliance priorities for both local and foreign companies.

With heightened international anti-bribery standards, growing cooperation between international government agencies, and enforcement of the FCPA at an all time high, the importance of ethics and compliance programs has never been greater. If your company is doing business in Latin America, you must have a robust anti-corruption compliance program in place and be prepared to act promptly and effectively to remedy any problems that do arise.

via Brazil Summit on Anti-Corruption.

Lawyers losing cases while struggling with large quantities of Digital Evidence | Digital Forensics Magazine Blog

In today’s modern age, digitally stored evidence is of the highest importance when it comes to legal processes. A survey published by Symantec Corp has shown that many legal companies spanning the EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Asia) region are losing cases, due to the fact that they cannot manage the immense amounts of evidence that is stored on digital media.

Over half of the responses to the survey showed that the problem was identifying and recovering the evidence and that this had caused delays and sanctions as well as the previously mentioned ‘lost’ cases.

Whilst highlighting that many cases are being lost, the report does show that the ability to identify, collect and process the digital evidence from within millions of different pieces of electronic information has had an encouraging effect on many cases.

via Lawyers losing cases while struggling with large quantities of Digital Evidence | Digital Forensics Magazine Blog.

Difficulties producing ‘digital evidence’ cause lawyers to lose cases – SC Magazine UK

The challenge of processing digital information has caused lawyers to lose a case or to be fined or sanctioned in the last two years.

A survey of 5,000 lawyers across EMEA by Symantec found that they are struggling to manage the vast amounts of electronically stored information that play a vital role as evidence in legal matters across the EMEA region.

Half of those surveyed (51 per cent) admitted to problems identifying and recovering e-discovery in the last three months. However the poor availability of ‘digital evidence’, which can also hinder the legal process and the power of technology to identify and collect relevant information among millions of electronic files has had a positive impact on many cases across EMEA.

Almost all of the lawyers questioned (98 per cent) said that ‘digital evidence’ identified during e-discovery had been vital to the success of legal matters in which they had been involved in the past two years.

via Difficulties producing ‘digital evidence’ cause lawyers to lose cases – SC Magazine UK.

UK raises the bar in corruption battle – Emirates Business 24|7

A key feature for non-UK companies to be aware of, including those based in the Middle East, is that the corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery applies to all companies that are doing business with the UK. The individual offence, meanwhile, relates not only to UK nationals but also to those ordinarily resident in the UK. And due to the extra-territorial nature of the act, the law can be breached where an act is committed outside of the UK that would constitute an illegal act if committed in the UK. The legislation therefore has implications for a growing number of companies in the Middle East trading with the UK.

Affected companies are now in the process of assessing the implications of the act for their businesses. The priority for all managing boards is to ensure that they have adequate procedures in place to prevent anyone acting on their behalf – including third parties in other jurisdictions – from committing an act of bribery. From a regional perspective, the UK legislation is being introduced at a time when the Middle East has placed corporate governance and internal controls at the top of the agenda to safeguard economic growth. Some recent high-profile corporate crises affecting companies in the region have galvanised commitment throughout the region for stronger regulation within companies. Therefore, these two agendas are set to positively reinforce one another in the long term.

A key area in which the anti-corruption and corporate governance agendas overlap is in the importance of an embedded Code of Ethics. Many companies may have a set of principles on paper which employees may be aware of but not understand the relevance of. For a Code of Ethics to truly be effective in mitigating fraudulent or corrupt practice, strong management leadership is required and methods sought to make a Code of Ethics both relevant to staff, wherever located, as well as applicable to their roles within an organisation. Staff, agents and consultants all need training and education, especially in ‘grey areas’ such as corporate hospitality, where risks are more subtle but still real. Meanwhile, robust procedures for selecting, vetting and monitoring third parties must equally be prioritised for any company affected by the legislation, especially those trading through third parties in opaque or high-risk markets.

via UK raises the bar in corruption battle – Emirates Business 24|7.

Joint Ventures: MENA’s Win-Win Game (Usually)

The old days of big multinationals breezing into town, shuffling a few papers and leaving the Middle East with a valuable concession are gone. Today, regional governments and sovereign wealth funds want partners, not licensees. With billions of dollars involved, both Western companies and host countries in the Middle East & North Africa (MENA) have warmed to the form of the joint venture as a win-win for all concerned. The world’s largest companies have interests in the region, and increasingly sophisticated local players have come to appreciate the joint ventures’ (JV) many legal and commercial advantages.

JVs do more than allow cost splitting and profit sharing: They give each side a stake in the success of a project, but at the same time, maintain transparency and accountability. Unlike other forms of mergers & acquisitions where interests don’t always align neatly, the JV has a sense of common purpose about it. In some cases, especially in the West, the structure provides a mechanism to keep less-than-mature investments off the balance sheet. In developing economies, the joint venture provides a foil to the old charge of exploitation of a country’s natural resources.

Where Middle Eastern governments and sovereign wealth funds may like the structure for its ability to leverage the attractiveness of their own markets, Western companies likewise benefit from the arrangements. Whether for accounting reasons, exposure concerns, or complying with foreign ownership requirements, some of the world’s biggest companies participate in MENA JVs.

Most of these companies, not surprisingly, have their roots in either the energy or energy services sector, including: Occidental Petroleum (Bahrain, Qatar), Chevron (Qatar, Saudi Arabia), ConocoPhillips (Qatar), and Nabors Industries (Saudi Arabia). Tech companies, such as United Technologies (Qatar), MEMC Electronics (Israel), and Rockwell Collins (Israel) have also been active joint venturers in the region. Even food & beverage and hospitality concerns, such as Pepsi (Jordan), Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. (GCC), and Marriott International (Jordan, Kuwait) have at least some joint venture interests in the Middle East.

via Joint Ventures: MENA’s Win-Win Game (Usually).

Dubai – Transparency attracts foreign capital

A sophisticated economy like Dubai needs to put in place a more focused legal system to tackle issues like bankruptcy, said Brackett B Denniston III the Senior Vice-President and General Counsel with General Electric GE. Besides, almost all GCC countries need to beef up their labour laws, he added. Appreciating the anti-corruption stand of regional governments, he pointed out that more steps taken to enhance transparency could help the region attract more foreign capital.

Denniston told Emirates Business that Dubai had grown fast into a financial hub and its legal system needed to keep pace with this growth. He pointed out that legal disputes in the region were lesser as compared to many developed countries which has helped to bring financial investments into the GCC states.

Besides, the setting up of arbitration courts at Dubai International Financial Centre DIFC and other financial hubs in the Gulf had led to a more confident business environment, he felt.

GE places the UAE and the GCC high on its list of potential business locations, seeing opportunities in the regions infrastructure, energy and healthcare sectors. The company has had a presence in the region as far back as the 1930s. It has been working in the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait and has undertaken a range of projects in Lebanon and Jordan.

via Transparency attracts foreign capital.