Europe Turns to the Cloud – NYTimes.com

When the founders of Shutl, a British courier service that makes deliveries in 90 minutes in busy London, decided to set up a business that ran exclusively on cloud computing, they needed to get creative.

Data privacy laws in Europe forbade the transfer of information about individuals outside the 27-country European Union. That had prevented many companies on the Continent from moving to the cloud, where data may be stored on remote servers in Asia, the United States or elsewhere at a lower cost than what a company would pay for its own servers.

Yet despite the tricky legal landscape, Shutl, now a two-year-old start-up, has become one of Europe’s most avid users of cloud technology. The company carries out more than 1,000 deliveries a day over a cloud network operated by Amazon, the U.S. Web retailer.

Amazon.com, one of the world’s largest sellers of cloud services, helped clinch deals with Shutl and other European businesses, like the French railroad company S.N.C.F. and Bankinter, a Spanish bank, by effectively moving the cloud to Europe by setting up a data center in Dublin. Tom Allason, the Shutl founder and chief executive, said that the company planned to expand from London to all of Britain and Ireland. “Cloud computing helped make Shutl possible,” he said.

via Europe Turns to the Cloud – NYTimes.com.

Patent Litigation Weekly: Call It the Canadian Bilski

While there significant differences between Canadian and U.S. copyright law, Canada’s patent regime looks more this country’s after a judge’s decision this week in a case described by some as the “Canadian Bilski.”

The ruling in question allows online retailer Amazon.com Inc. to move ahead with an application for a Canadian patent on its “one-click” ordering system. Amazon initially applied for a one-click patent in Canada in 1998, only to have Canadian authorities reject that application for not covering patentable subject matter. The company appealed that decision in Canadian Federal Court, and on October 14 Justice Michael Phelan ruled that Canada’s patent office must consider the application because it does in fact describe patentable subject matter. [Judge's decision, PDF.]

In allowing Amazon to push forward with the application, Phelan set a standard that mirrors the one in place in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Bilski decision—that so-called “business method” patents can be granted under specific circumstances.

via Patent Litigation Weekly: Call It the Canadian Bilski.

U.S. Is Said to Scrutinize Apple’s Online Music Tactics – NYTimes.com

The Justice Department is examining Apple’s tactics in the market for digital music, and its staff members have talked to major music labels and Internet music companies, according to several people briefed on the conversations.

The antitrust inquiry is in the early stages, these people say, and the conversations have revolved broadly around the dynamics of selling music online.

But people briefed on the inquiries also said investigators had asked in particular about recent allegations that Apple used its dominant market position to persuade music labels to refuse to give the online retailer Amazon.com exclusive access to music about to be released.

All these people spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the delicacy of the matter. Representatives from Apple and Amazon declined to comment. Gina Talamona, a deputy director at the Justice Department, also declined to comment.

In March, Billboard magazine reported that Amazon was asking music labels to give it the exclusive right to sell certain forthcoming songs for one day before they went on sale more widely. In exchange, Amazon promised to include those songs in a promotion called the “MP3 Daily Deal” on its Web site.

The magazine reported that representatives of Apple’s iTunes music service were asking the labels not to participate in Amazon’s promotion, adding that Apple punished those that did by withdrawing marketing support for those songs on iTunes.

via U.S. Is Said to Scrutinize Apple’s Online Music Tactics – NYTimes.com.