High Court to Decide if Calif. Can Regulate Video Games | Law.com

The U.S. Supreme Court, wading into a clash between free-speech rights and laws protecting children, agreed Monday to decide whether California can ban the sale or rental of violent video games to minors.

The court will review a federal court’s decision to throw out California’s ban. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said the law violated minors’ constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth amendments.

California’ law would have prohibited the sale or rental of violent games to anyone under 18. It also would have created strict labeling requirements for video game manufacturers. Retailers who violated the act would have been fined up to $1,000 for each violation.

The law never took effect, and was challenged shortly after it was signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. A U.S. District Court blocked it after the industry sued the state, citing constitutional concerns.

Schwarzenegger said he was pleased the high court will review that decision. “We have a responsibility to our kids and our communities to protect against the effects of games that depict ultra-violent actions, just as we already do with movies,” the governor said.

Opponents of the law note that video games already are labeled with a rating system that lets parents decide what games their children can purchase and play. They also argue that the video games — which the Entertainment Software Association says were played in 68 percent of American households — are protected forms of expression under the First Amendment.

The decision to hear this case comes only a week after the high court voted overwhelmingly to strike down a federal law banning videos showing animal cruelty. The California case poses similar free speech concerns, although the state law is aimed at protecting children, raising an additional issue that could affect the high court's consideration.

Michael D. Gallagher, president of the Entertainment Software Association, said video games should get the same First Amendment protections as the court reaffirmed last week for videos.

Given last week’s ruling, “we are hopeful that the court will reject California’s invitation to break from these settled principles by treating depictions of violence, especially those in creative works, as unprotected by the First Amendment,” he said.

via Law.com – High Court to Decide if Calif. Can Regulate Video Games.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

10 Simple Google Search Tricks – NYTimes.com

I’m always amazed that more people don’t know the little tricks you can use to get more out of a simple Google search. Here are 10 of my favorites.

Use the “site:” operator to limit searches to a particular site. I use this one all the time, and it’s particularly handy because many site’s built-in search tools don’t return the results you’re looking for (and some sites don’t even have a search feature). If I’m looking for WWD posts about GTD, for example, I could try this search: GTD site:webworkerdaily.com.

Use Google as a spelling aid. As Rob Hacker — the WWD reader I profiled last week — pointed out, entering a word into Google is a quick way to see if you have the right spelling. If it’s incorrect, Google will suggest the correct spelling instead. Additionally, if you want to get a definition of a word, you can use the “define:” operator to return definitions from various dictionaries (for example, define: parasympathetic).

Use Google as a calculator. Google has a built-in calculator — try entering a calculation like 110 * (654/8 + 3). Yes, your computer also has a calculator, but if you spend most of your day inside a browser, typing your calculation into the browser’s search box is quicker than firing up your calculator app.

Find out what time it is anywhere in the world. This one’s really handy if you want to make sure that you’re not phoning someone in the middle of the night. Just search for “time” and then the name of the city. For example, try: time San Francisco

Get quick currency conversions. Google can also do currency conversion, for example: 100 pounds in dollars. It only has the more mainstream currencies, though — if you’re trying to see how many Peruvian nuevos soles your dollars might buy, you’ll be out of luck.

Use the OR operator. This can be useful if you’re looking at researching a topic but you’re not sure which keywords will return the information you need. It can be particularly handy in conjunction with the “site:” operator. For example, you could try this search: GTD or “getting things done” site:webworkerdaily.com

Exclude specific terms with the – operator. You can narrow your searches using this operator. For example, if you’re looking for information about American Idol but don’t want anything about Simon Cowell, you could try: “american idol” -cowell

Search for specific document types. Google can search the web for specific types of files using the “filetype:” operator. If you’re looking for PowerPoint files about GTD, for example, you could try: GTD filetype:ppt

Search within numerical ranges using the .. operator. Say, for example, you want to look for information about Olympic events that took place in the 1950’s, you could use this search: Olympics 1950..1960

Area code lookup. Need to know where a phone number is located? Google will let you know where it is, and show you a map of the area, too. For example: 415

via 10 Simple Google Search Tricks – NYTimes.com.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Global EDD Group Implements Portable E-Discovery Solution

GLOBAL EDD GROUP IMPLEMENTS PORTABLE E-DISCOVERY SOLUTION
Expands Intelligent EDD℠ Services With Addition Of Portable Processing

Cleveland, Ohio (29 March 2010) – Global Electronic Discovery & Disclosure Group (“Global EDD Group”), a boutique consulting firm that provides innovative legal technology solutions across the globe, today announced the addition of Portable Processing to its Intelligent EDD℠ line of legal technology services. Developed to be utilized at virtually any location with dependable power and connectivity, Portable Processing enables Global EDD to provide a full suite of early case assessment and electronic discovery services at onsite and near site locations across the globe without the cost, time and headaches typically associated with the shipping of servers, workstations and monitors.

“We have worked closely with our technology partners to develop an innovative early case assessment and electronic discovery processing solution that is portable, scalable and cost effective,” stated Brad Mixner, Founder and Managing Principal of Global EDD Group. “This enhancement to our Intelligent EDD Services provides a significant advantage to our clients and alliance partners managing cases with tight deadlines, data privacy, intellectual property or related security concerns. Our mobile teams can be onsite and operational with short notice, with the ability to preserve, analyze, process and review data on the same day.”

The Intelligent EDD Portable Processing service combines industry standard software and purpose-built hardware within a modular system that can be easily transported with the mobile teams to virtually any location in the world within 48 hours. Key highlights of the service include:

  • Data Analytics and Dynamic Reporting
  • File Culling and Deduplication
  • Text, Metadata and Attachment Extraction
  • XML, TIFF, TXT and Native File Exports
  • First Pass Document Review
  • Language Identification

“In essence, it’s a mobile office. ESI processing, review and analysis all within the secure confines of the client’s office. Now, when a client asks if we process data in Asia, Europe, South America or Timbuktu, the answer is ‘Yes.’” noted Joseph Turner, Principal, Global EDD Group.

About Global EDD Group

Global Electronic Discovery & Disclosure Group (“Global EDD Group”) was founded by Mixner with the vision of bridging the wide gap between domestic organizations and their growing national and international legal technology needs. Global EDD Group provides legal technology services for matters with a national or international scope, specializing in remote and onsite services ranging from data identification to document review. Global EDD Group is based in Cleveland, Ohio, USA with regional offices in San Francisco and New York City. Additional information is available by visiting www.GlobalEDD.com.

###

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

“Sexting” Town Hall Meting held in Cleveland « USDOJ: Justice Blog

Recent studies have shown that approximately one in five teens have sent or received a sexually suggestive photo via text messaging, a practice known as “sexting.” What teens do not understand are the significant and long-term negative implications such risky behavior can have on them, legally, socially and psychologically. Such implications can be as simple as embarrassment or as serious as criminal liability. Most don’t realize that sending or receiving a sexually explicit picture could result in charges of production, receipt, distribution or possession of child pornography.

“Once one of these kids hits the ‘send’ button, they expose themselves and their families to a web full of hurt,” said Steven M. Dettelbach, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio. “All control over the image is lost – it can be forwarded repeatedly all over the school, town, state, country and world. Sadly, such behavior has led to at least two teens taking their own lives after suffering harassment by classmates who received their nude pictures, which had been repeatedly forwarded by other classmates.”

According to Dettelbach, “The best service law enforcement offers is preventing crime.” With that in mind, on March 12, 2010, he sponsored a Town Hall Meeting to discuss the impact of this risky teen behavior. The U.S. Attorney’s Office will partner with WVIZ/PBS Ideastream to make this important program available to students around the state of Ohio.

The panel featured Juvenile Court Judge Thomas O’Malley, Berea Police Department Detective Charles Gute, and Assistant United States Attorney Michael A. Sullivan. Additionally, Robin Palmer, who heads the Mokita Center, where teens charged with “sexting” are sent for assessment and treatment, and Cristina Fernandez, from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, in Alexandria, Virginia also participated.

Phizzle, a San Francisco-based company, which provides Web-based mobile platforms, donated its services for the program, which allowed students viewing the program to ask questions of the panel via text messaging and to participate in survey questions, asked throughout the show, designed to assess the scope of the problem.

via “Sexting” Town Hall Meting held in Cleveland « USDOJ: Justice Blog.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Law.com – Verizon Patent Case Marks a First for Intellectual Ventures

Large patent hoarder Intellectual Ventures says it’s taking a new customer-friendly approach.

The Bellevue, Wash., company that owns around 30,000 patents for the first time assigned one of its members a patent to use as ammunition in a lawsuit. Verizon Communications, which agreed to pay IV as much as $350 million in a 2008 deal, is using one of IV's patents to strike back at TiVo in a patent fight.

Don Merino, vice president of licensing at IV, said it’s an example of IV taking “a much more customer-centric approach.”

“We want to figure out how to get out of the, ‘I win, you lose’ to a much more collaborative,’We both win,’” said Merino.

This is new talk from IV, whose secrecy and vague business plans caused big tech companies to worry in the past about what exactly IV was going to do with all of its intellectual property.

The shift comes as IV has faced competition from San Francisco’s RPX Corp., a patent aggregator that is more upfront about its business model and that has played a more active role in getting rid of patent troll lawsuits against its members. RPX has signed up some of IV’s members, including Cisco Systems Inc. and Microsoft Corp.

In the past year, IV has started to give signals about what it would do with its stockpile of patents. It has struck deals with patent trolls that are now using the IP in lawsuits. Assigning a patent to Verizon is another use of its IP. IV wouldn’t say whether it sold or simply loaned the patent to Verizon for its TiVo fight.

The original lawsuit was filed by TiVo against Verizon in August. IV then looked through its portfolio and found a patent that Verizon could use to hit back at TiVo, Merino said. Verizon asserted the patent on an “Apparatus and Method of Selecting Video Programs Based on Viewers’ Preferences” in a counterclaim (PDF) against TiVo on Wednesday in the Eastern District of Texas.

The $350 million Verizon deal was first reported by The Wall Street Journal in 2008. Merino confirmed on Thursday that Verizon is a member of IV.

via Law.com – Verizon Patent Case Marks a First for Intellectual Ventures.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Two Decades and Counting for Iran Case

Lawsuits — particularly the big-dollar, complex corporate variety — often get compared to marathons. In the case of McKesson Corp.’s legal struggle with the government of Iran, however, that comparison doesn’t quite cut it.

On Jan. 22, the dispute, a fight over shares in an Iranian dairy, reached its 28th anniversary. It has wended its way through one international arbitration, two federal trials and five trips to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Now, it could soon be heading for its sixth.

A decade ago, a federal judge awarded McKesson $20 million for claims that Iran expropriated the company’s interest in the dairy and withheld its dividends. But during the past seven years, the case has hit a series of unexpected bumps, from changes in government policy to new rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court. The longer it’s gone on, the trickier its path has seemingly become.

San Francisco-based McKesson, a medical products distributor that ranked 15th on last year’;s Fortune 500, is represented in the case by a team from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius headed by partner Mark Bravin. The company and Bravin declined to comment. Iran’s lawyers from Washington, D.C.’s Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, including partner Thomas Corcoran Jr. and associate Laina Lopez, also declined to comment.

via Law.com – Two Decades and Counting for Iran Case.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Is Climate-Change Litigation the New Asbestos? – Law Blog – WSJ

Back in October, LB colleague Nathan Koppel offered up this post on a Fifth Circuit decision allowing a lawsuit brought by Hurricane Katrina victims. The plaintiffs’ allegation: That oil and coal companies emitted greenhouse gasses that contributed to global warming that, in turn, caused a rise in sea levels, adding to Hurricane Katrina’s ferocity.

The NYT on Wednesday has spilled a goodly amount of ink exploring an unrelated but similar suit up in Alaska. Kivalina, an Inupiat Eskimo village of 400 that sits on an island north of the Arctic Circle, has sued some two dozen companies of helping to cause the climate change that it says is destroying the island.

The NYT’s John Schwartz explains that the village has asked the companies, which include ExxonMobil and Shell Oil, to pay the costs of relocating to the mainland.

Similar cases, reports Schwartz, are pushing ahead around the country. In recent months, two federal appeals courts reversed decisions by federal district courts to dismiss climate-change lawsuits, allowing the cases to go forward. Kivalina is hoping for a similar fate: A federal judge in San Francisco in October dismissed the case, but the village has appealed.

Do these cases really stand a chance? Schwartz quotes one expert who feels “the game pieces are being set for eventual Supreme Court review.”

But even if the cases fall short of the high court, they might still have an impact. They could drive industries to the negotiating table.

The cases are largely being brought under the common-law doctrine of nuisance, a theory which hasn’t gained a lot of traction in other contexts, like lead paint. But some think such suits might take hold now. Or soon.

via Is Climate-Change Litigation the New Asbestos? – Law Blog – WSJ.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Apple Launches iPad Tablet, iBooks Bookstore – Reviews by PC Magazine

After years of rumors, speculation, and leaks, Apple today announced its long-await tablet, the iPad.

Chief executive Steve Jobs complemented the introduction of the new device with a new e-bookstore, called iBooks, together with partnerships with four major publishers, and showed off new versions of its iWork application and third-party applications.

Jobs kicked off the company’s launch event in San Francisco on Wednesday by highlighting the history of the company’s mobile products. “We’re the largest mobile device company in the world,” he told the audience, showcasing the iPhone and the company’s line of MacBook products.

“There is room for something in the middle,” he told the crowd. “If there’s gonna be a third category, it has to be better at [Web browsing, e-mail, photos, video, music, games, and e-book reader]—otherwise it has no reason for being.”

While netbooks have attempted to address the space, Jobs added, “netbooks aren’t better than anything…They’re just cheap laptops.”

The key, he insisted is the tablet—a new device the company has christened the “iPad,” one of several rumored names, including the “iSlate” and, simply, the “Apple Tablet.” The iPad features a 9.7-inch, full capacitive multi-touch IPS display, weighs 1.5 pounds and measures 0.5 inches thick—”thinner and lighter than any netbook,” according to Jobs.

Pricing for the iPad starts at $499 – far lower than the early $1,000 projections of many analysts. The 16-, 32-, and 64-GB devices run $499, $599, $699 – with an additional $130 for 3G capability. The device will begin shipping in March.

For the chipset, the company went in-house, designing a 1-GHz Apple A4, contrary to rumors that the device would be powered by an Intel or Samsung chip. The iPad comes in three capacities: 16-, 32, and 64GB. It features built-in 802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 2.1, an accelerometer, company, speaker, and microphone.

via Apple Launches iPad Tablet, iBooks Bookstore – Reviews by PC Magazine.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Employment Lawyer Advises: When in Rome, Do as the Americans Do

When in Rome, do as the Romans, unless, of course, you’re an employer regulating workplace behavior. Companies with global offices should consider adopting a uniform code of conduct for all employees. That’s what Stephen Hirschfeld, CEO of the Employment Law Alliance and a partner at San Francisco’s Curiale Hirschfeld Kraemer, has been preaching to companies over the past year.

Hirschfeld, who has represented global companies for nearly three decades, said over the past year he’s heard a lot of questions from companies with an international presence about whether certain behavior by overseas employees should be tolerated because it’s acceptable under local customs or laws. For example, should an employer allow managers in Saudi Arabia to deny promotions to female employees? Or look the other way when its Chinese facility refuses to hire the best qualified engineer because he is gay?

If it’s unethical, discriminatory or retaliatory in your eyes, don’t do it, advises Hirschfeld. The following Q&A has been edited for length and clarity.

via Employment Lawyer Advises: When in Rome, Do as the Americans Do.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare