Acquisition May Create Headaches for Merck in Foreign Corruption Probe | BNET

Merck (MRK) disclosed in its quarterly 10-Q filing that it is the subject of an investigation by the Department of Justice and the SEC for possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (which prohibits paying bribes to do business in foreign countries). The investigation comes with a bit of unspoken history — and some potential risk created by Merck’s recent acquisition of Schering-Plough.

Merck says “this inquiry is part of a broader review of pharmaceutical industry practice.” That’s true: at least 10 other companies are suspected of doing the same thing, and an 11th — SciClone (SCLN.O) popped up Tuesday.

However, the fuller context is that the letters are more serious than a “review.” A DOJ assistant attorney general warned an assemblage of pharma industry lawyers last year that DOJ “will be intensely focused on rooting out foreign bribery in your industry.” A similar criminal investigation has already led to the imprisonment of one executive at Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) in the U.K., and J&J admitted in its most recent 10-Q that it had violated anti-corruption laws and that investigations are under way in several nations, including the United States.

via Acquisition May Create Headaches for Merck in Foreign Corruption Probe | BNET.

Defining the Law Firm of the Future | Legal Blog Watch

What will the law firm of the future look like? That was the question for a panel of general counsel, law firm partners and industry observers at a panel in New York City Thursday night. If there was consensus among them on any point — and I'm not sure there was — it was this: The firm that will thrive in the future is the firm that is able to deliver better value through innovation and technology.

The panel was hosted by LexisNexis to highlight its release of a survey on the state of the legal industry, which I recap in a separate post. D.M. Levine of The American Lawyer has already provided his report on the panel. It was moderated by Darryl Cross, vice president of client profitability at LexisNexis, and included:

  • Richard N. Baer, EVP, general counsel and CAO, Qwest
  • Martin F. Cunniff, partner, Howrey
  • Michael S. Helfer, general counsel and corporate secretary, Citigroup
  • William D. Henderson, professor of law, Indiana University
  • Peter J. Kalis, chairman and global managing partner, K&L Gates
  • Thomas J. Sabatino Jr., former EVP and general counsel, Schering-Plough
  • Michael F. Walsh, president and CEO, U.S. legal markets, LexisNexis

All on the panel agreed that law firms should change how they do business. All did not agree, however, on what that change should look like. In fact, the one other point of consensus among the panelists may have been that there is no one-size-fits-all answer for firms or for clients. The legal industry is not a monolith, said Kalis, and any attempt to define it as such is a fallacy.

If change is to come, it should be through the mutual efforts of law firms and clients, several panelists said. The discussion should not about “us” and “them,” said Sabatino, who is also a director of the Association of Corporate Counsel. “There should be synergy between clients and firms.” Qwest's Baer agreed: “This isn't an adversarial situation between clients and firms.”

[continued] Legal Blog Watch.