Google Sets Aside US$ 500M for Possible DoJ Settlement

Costly Settlement

In a SEC filing, Google indicates that it has set aside US$ 500 million to prepare for a possible settlement with the Justice department to avoid further inquiry or litigation. The figure was accrued over the first quarter of 2011, which now requires the company to modify its earnings report from during that period.

In May 2011, in connection with a potential resolution of an investigation by the United States Department of Justice into the use of Google advertising by certain advertisers, we accrued $500 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2011. Although we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, we believe it will not have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

As a result, Google’s net income has dropped from US$ 2.3 billion to US$ 1.8 billion for 1Q 2011, which means its per-share earnings are effectively diluted from $7.04 to $5.51 each for the period. Google is confident, though, that the decrease in earnings will not be material to its business overall.

via Google Sets Aside US$ 500M for Possible DoJ Settlement.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

SciClone Reports Possible FCPA Violations To DOJ, SEC – Corruption Currents – WSJ

An internal investigation by SciClone Pharmaceuticals Inc. uncovered evidence of sales and marketing activities that might violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the company said Tuesday. SciClone previously disclosed that a special committee of directors was investigating operations in China for compliance with the law, which bars foreign bribery.

via SciClone Reports Possible FCPA Violations To DOJ, SEC – Corruption Currents – WSJ.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

SEC sues Florida man over bids for all AMR, Kodak shares | Dallas-Fort Worth Airlines News – Business News for Dallas, Texas – The Dallas Morning News

The Securities and Exchange Commission is suing a Florida man who offered to buy all the stock in Eastman Kodak Co. and AMR Corp., parent of American Airlines Inc., in March.

In the suit filed Tuesday in a federal district court in Florida, the SEC alleges that Allen Weintraub and his Sterling Global Holdings “have substantially no assets” and “lack the means to complete the tender offers.”

Weintraub did not respond to an email and a telephone call Wednesday seeking comment.

Ed Martelle, spokesman for Fort Worth-based AMR, said, “We believe the SEC’s action speaks for itself.”

The civil lawsuit refers to Weintraub as “a convicted felon on probation for fraud in the state of Florida” and says he has been previously enjoined “against violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws.” A federal court order bars him from acting as an officer or director of a public company.

It also noted that Weintraub “filed for personal bankruptcy in April 2007” and has not paid the SEC a $1.05 million judgment from a previous lawsuit.

In the AMR case, Weintraub sent a letter March 29 to “Gerald Arpey” offering $9.75 per share of AMR stock, an offer worth about $3.25 billion. Gerard Arpey is chairman, president and chief executive of AMR.

That followed Weintraub’s March 19 offer for all shares of Kodak for about $1.3 billion.

AMR officials had brushed off the offer and referred the letter to SEC officials.

via SEC sues Florida man over bids for all AMR, Kodak shares | Dallas-Fort Worth Airlines News – Business News for Dallas, Texas – The Dallas Morning News.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

The Dodd-Frank Act’s Robust Whistleblowing Incentives – Ben Kerschberg – Law & Technology – Forbes

The Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) settled three securities cases in July 2010 worth $550 million, $100million, and $75 million, respectively. Last year alone, the SEC and the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) settled three cases involving claims of corruption under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). Those cases settled for $450 million, $300 million, and $200 million, respectively. Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), whistleblowers who bring violations of securities law, commodities law, or the FCPA to the attention of the proper government authorities—the SEC, DOJ, or Commodities Futures Trading Commission—are entitled to between 10% to 30% of any government recovery in excess of $1 million. The SEC considers three factors in determining what percentage to give the whistleblower: (i) the significance of the information; (ii) the degree of assistance provided by the whistleblower; and (iii) the extent to which the government wants to deter the violations in question. Even at the low end of the range—assume that Whistleblower (X) receives 10% of an award of $1.1 million—that can be quite a bounty, as it has become known in Dodd-Frank Act circles.

via The Dodd-Frank Act’s Robust Whistleblowing Incentives – Ben Kerschberg – Law & Technology – Forbes.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

SEC considers letting startups use social networks to raise money | VentureBeat

Federal securities regulators are considering whether to let fast-growing companies use social networks such as Facebook and Twitter to raise funding by tapping thousands of investors for small amounts of money, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The Securities and Exchange Commission may adopt rules to let internet-age technologies be used in fund-raising. The move is part of a larger review by the agency into whether to ease decades-old constraints on how companies can issue new shares to the public. The new funding techniques, known as “ crowd funding,” could usher in a new era of capital abundance for Silicon Valley’s startups.

The technique as spread from artists looking to fund their creative works to entrepreneurs trying to bootstrap companies without giving up control to venture capitalists. Typically, a company might raise $100,000 from an internet site where users could sign up to buy $100 worth of shares.

Crowd funding could be a cheap source of cash, competing with angel investors who specialize in giving seed rounds to start-ups. Since the amounts of money are small, the downside risk isn’t too bad for investors. But the trick will be in protecting the public from scammers who have no intention of following through on promises.

via SEC considers letting startups use social networks to raise money | VentureBeat.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

SEC Approves New Discovery Guide for FINRA Arbitration

After more than six years in development, and hundreds of public comment letters on two different proposed versions, the SEC approved a revised Discovery Guide applicable to customer cases in FINRA securities arbitration. FINRA is one of the few arbitration forums mandating automatic production of “presumptively discoverable” documents and information in arbitrations brought by customers against their brokers and brokerage firms. In 1999, FINRA’s predecessor, NASD, created the original fourteen separate claim-specific lists of presumptively discoverable material, in the oft-cited Notice to Members 99-90. After a few years of experience with the lists, both customer and industry counsel sought reform, as both sides perceived the lists either too broad or too limiting, depending on the category and the client. Balancing the parties’ needs for relevant documents with the burdens of production proved challenging for FINRA. Its first attempt at reform was met with considerable criticism from both customers’ and brokerage firm lawyers. Last summer, it proposed another version of a revised Discovery Guide which simplifies the fourteen lists to two: documents that customers must approve in all cases and documents that industry parties must produce in all cases. Beyond those items discoverable in all customer cases, FINRA leaves arbitrators with considerable discretion to decide discovery disputes revolving around requests for documents not specifically identified on the lists.

via SEC Approves New Discovery Guide for FINRA Arbitration.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

SEC Approves New Discovery Guide for FINRA Arbitration

After more than six years in development, and hundreds of public comment letters on two different proposed versions, the SEC approved a revised Discovery Guide applicable to customer cases in FINRA securities arbitration. FINRA is one of the few arbitration forums mandating automatic production of “presumptively discoverable” documents and information in arbitrations brought by customers against their brokers and brokerage firms. In 1999, FINRA’s predecessor, NASD, created the original fourteen separate claim-specific lists of presumptively discoverable material, in the oft-cited Notice to Members 99-90. After a few years of experience with the lists, both customer and industry counsel sought reform, as both sides perceived the lists either too broad or too limiting, depending on the category and the client. Balancing the parties’ needs for relevant documents with the burdens of production proved challenging for FINRA. Its first attempt at reform was met with considerable criticism from both customers’ and brokerage firm lawyers. Last summer, it proposed another version of a revised Discovery Guide which simplifies the fourteen lists to two: documents that customers must approve in all cases and documents that industry parties must produce in all cases. Beyond those items discoverable in all customer cases, FINRA leaves arbitrators with considerable discretion to decide discovery disputes revolving around requests for documents not specifically identified on the lists.

via SEC Approves New Discovery Guide for FINRA Arbitration.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Justice Department, SEC cracking down on U.S. companies engaging in bribery abroad – The Washington Post

To win computer business with the South Korean government, IBM allegedly delivered cash bribes in shopping bags.

In pursuit of Ni­ger­ian construction contracts, Halliburton and its international business partners allegedly routed illicit payments through bank accounts in Switzerland and Monaco.

And a middleman for a middleman of the Italian energy company ENI allegedly made repeated trips to a Ni­ger­ian hotel room and handed over briefcases containing millions of dollars in U.S. currency to a government official. But paying the balance of the alleged $5 million bribe in the local currency was more problematic — the local bills were so bulky that the bagman allegedly had to deliver them by the carload.

These alleged schemes have come to light as part of an escalating effort by U.S. law enforcement officials against companies that engage in bribery abroad. Just last week, federal authorities announced they had charged IBM with corruptly pursuing contracts in Asia.

In recent years, the Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission have filed an increasing number of foreign corruption cases, charging companies such as Tyson Foods, General Electric, Alcatel-Lucent and Daimler, the maker of Mercedes-Benz cars and the former parent of Chrysler.

The cases reach from Latin America to Africa, Asia and the Middle East, involving contracts worth billions of dollars. Together, they suggest that illicit payments often tip the scales of global business — sometimes with the blessing of top corporate executives.

via Justice Department, SEC cracking down on U.S. companies engaging in bribery abroad – The Washington Post.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

SEC, DOJ Continue to Enforce FCPA Cases Involving China and Joint Ventures | McDermott Will & Emery – JDSupra

hina’s reputation as an emerging world economy has garnered the attention of US law enforcement, including the US Securities and Exchange Commission and the US Department of Justice, which has increased its prosecution of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Conducting proper due diligence and taking meaningful action to correct risk areas can help avoid problems with joint venture partners or third-party agents that could lead to such violations.

In December 2010, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a settled enforcement action against a San Jose, California-based technology company (the Company), alleging multiple violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) due to the actions of two of its joint venture entities in China. As part of the proposed settlement, the Company agreed to pay approximately US$1.25 million and comply with certain undertakings regarding its FCPA compliance program. The Company also entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the US Department of Justice (DOJ), in which it agreed to pay a criminal fine of $1.7 million and implement certain compliance-related measures. The Company is the latest in a growing list of US firms that have run afoul of the FCPA in China, and with regard to alleged misconduct by joint venture partners.

via SEC, DOJ Continue to Enforce FCPA Cases Involving China and Joint Ventures | McDermott Will & Emery – JDSupra.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

SEC: Wall Street, Meet the FCPA – Law Blog – WSJ

When we think of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act cases, we tend to think of big, multi-national companies. Technology behemoths. Manufacturing companies. Shipping concerns.

But scrutiny under the FCPA, a 1977 law that essentially criminalizes bribery of foreign officials, seems to be making its way to Wall Street.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating whether banks and private-equity firms violated bribery laws in their dealings with sovereign-wealth funds, according to people familiar with the matter. Click here for Dionne Searcey and Randall Smith’s article in today’s WSJ; click here for the NYT story; here for the Bloomberg story.

According to the WSJ, the SEC has sent letters of inquiry to banks such as Citigroup as well as private-equity firms including Blackstone Group, the people said. Though the letters didn’t contain specific allegations of bribery, they requested that firms retain documents and asked about the firms’ dealings with sovereign-wealth funds, the people said.

via SEC: Wall Street, Meet the FCPA – Law Blog – WSJ.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare