An Outlook on eDiscovery – Trends To Watch in 2011 | CIO.com

As many have noted, 2010 was a transformational year for eDiscovery. It was the year of Pension Committee, Victor Stanley II, and other bellwether cases. It was also the year that highly automated eDiscovery review technology, such as Predictive Coding, came into its own, with some of the world’s most important law firms adopting it for daily use.

Looking out at 2011, it’s clear to us that strict new federal regulations will only accelerate the trend toward automating eDiscovery review, while the relentless growth of enterprise data will increase the drive toward a more holistic view of information governance.

Here are some of the trends we foresee driving eDiscovery in 2011:

Regulation will pass litigation as the main driver of eDiscovery software purchases

Since the financial crisis of 2008, the pendulum has swung toward increased regulation in a way not seen since the 1930s. Then, the country saw the creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Today, regulators are more involved than ever in the everyday operations of businesses they regulate.

The full effect of increased Federal Reserve oversight will come as an unwelcome surprise to many in the banking industry. As any Fed-regulated entity can tell you, it’s a whole different world, with the Fed often literally moving into the offices as a constant presence. As someone once said, “Being regulated by anyone else is like visiting home for Thanksgiving; being regulated by the Fed is like inviting your mother-in-law to live with you.” The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will probably take a similarly intrusive approach.

Even when not physically present, regulators can make a huge impact on a company’s business. For instance, a Department of Justice document request regarding a bribery allegation would require dramatic and immediate action. A company receiving such a request needs to produce documents much faster than it does in litigation, where deadlines are already tight. Courts want documents quickly. The DOJ wants documents now. That’s why, from an enterprise perspective, regulation is a lot like getting sued, but worse.

All told, the current regulatory environment has to rank in the higher quadrants of any large company’s 2011 risk assessment.

Regulators gear up

As a result of their increased enforcement activity, regulators around the globe will have more data to process than ever. And despite the common conception that the government possesses unlimited resources, most regulatory investigations are assigned to a single attorney.

The only way that agencies can fulfill their new mandate will be to invest in software that allows them to quickly winnow large sets of data down to the relevant documents. This kind of software, already in use by many regulators, will become a necessary adjunct to regulatory efforts. And since regulators will be using highly sophisticated solutions themselves, they’ll expect companies to meet those standards as well. As a result, the regulatory drive toward modern review techniques will be a key driver for enterprise usage.

via An Outlook on eDiscovery – Trends To Watch in 2011 | CIO – Blogs and Discussion.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Aggressive Use of New Enforcement Tools By The Administration | Venable LLP – JDSupra

Enacted hastily in the post-Watergate Era’s ethical fever, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) was designed to eliminate bribery of foreign officials by American companies doing business abroad. The FCPA does so by broadly prohibiting American companies from making corrupt payments to foreign officials and requiring companies to maintain books and records and accounting systems sufficient to ensure that a company’s outside auditors will discover corrupt payments.

The past 18 months have seen an unprecedented number of criminal and civil proceedings and settlements involving American companies, and in many cases, individual company officials for FCPA violations. Almost as remarkable as the recent law enforcement efforts of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Criminal Division (DOJ) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are the unprecedented sword rattling of both agencies. Senior officials have made themselves available and spoke candidly not just on their considerable enforcement record, but also about personnel staffing details and enforcement policy initiatives usually not discussed publicly.

via Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Aggressive Use of New Enforcement Tools By The Administration | Venable LLP – JDSupra.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

SEC: Wall Street, Meet the FCPA – Law Blog – WSJ

When we think of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act cases, we tend to think of big, multi-national companies. Technology behemoths. Manufacturing companies. Shipping concerns.

But scrutiny under the FCPA, a 1977 law that essentially criminalizes bribery of foreign officials, seems to be making its way to Wall Street.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating whether banks and private-equity firms violated bribery laws in their dealings with sovereign-wealth funds, according to people familiar with the matter. Click here for Dionne Searcey and Randall Smith’s article in today’s WSJ; click here for the NYT story; here for the Bloomberg story.

According to the WSJ, the SEC has sent letters of inquiry to banks such as Citigroup as well as private-equity firms including Blackstone Group, the people said. Though the letters didn’t contain specific allegations of bribery, they requested that firms retain documents and asked about the firms’ dealings with sovereign-wealth funds, the people said.

via SEC: Wall Street, Meet the FCPA – Law Blog – WSJ.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

2010: Another Record-Breaking Year for FCPA Enforcement, Confirming “New Era” | Morrison & Foerster LLP – JDSupra

Since 2007, regulators and commentators alike have touted each passing year as a record-breaking year for FCPA enforcement. 2010 was no exception. Last year saw an explosion in the number of cases brought by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The last 12 months also brought the imposition of record-breaking corporate fines and prison terms for individual defendants.

In November of last year, Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, Criminal Division, DOJ, announced that “[W]e are in a new era of FCPA enforcement.”1 A look back at 2010 confirms Mr. Breuer’s statement—in the history of FCPA enforcement, there has never been a year quite like 2010.

via 2010: Another Record-Breaking Year for FCPA Enforcement, Confirming “New Era” | Morrison & Foerster LLP – JDSupra.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Alcatel-Lucent Pays $137 Million To Settle FCPA Probe – Corruption Currents – WSJ

French telecommunications company Alcatel-Lucent S.A. and three of its subsidiaries agreed to pay more than $137 million in fines and penalties to settle a foreign bribery investigation into illicit payments in Costa Rica, Honduras, Malaysia and Taiwan.

Philippe Wojazer/Reuters

Alcatel-Lucent Chief Executive Ben Verwaayen speaks during the company’s shareholders meeting in Paris on June 1, 2010. The company settled a foreign bribery investigation Monday with U.S. regulators by agreeing to pay $137 million in penalties and fines.

The company admitted it earned $48.1 million in profits from the improper payments, of which $45 million will be paid to the Securities and Exchange Commission in the form of a disgorgement penalty. Alcatel-Lucent said it will pay $92 million to settle Justice Department charges. It has already set aside the money, according to filings released in mid-February.

“Alcatel and its subsidiaries failed to detect or investigate numerous red flags suggesting their employees were directing sham consultants to provide gifts and payments to foreign government officials to illegally win business,” said Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, in the statement. “Alcatel’s bribery scheme was the product of a lax corporate control environment at the company.”

The SEC alleged in its civil complaint that Alcatel’s subsidiaries used consultants who performed illegitimate work to funnel more than $8 million in bribes to government officials to obtain telecommunication contracts and other deals. The Justice Department said in a statement it filed a criminal information against Alcatel-Lucent charging one count of violating the internal controls provision of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and one count of violating the books and records provision of the FCPA.

via Alcatel-Lucent Pays $137 Million To Settle FCPA Probe – Corruption Currents – WSJ.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

FCPA Investigation & Response Services from Global EDD Group

FCPA Investigation & Response Services from Global EDD Group

Global EDD Group provides a broad range of advisory, investigatory and analysis services for matters involving potential or alleged violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Our experienced consultants work closely with corporate and outside counsel to implement detailed – yet discrete – collection, analysis, and review plans in preparation for notification/production to the U.S. Department of Justice ( DOJ ) and/or U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ).

Key Service Highlights:

  • International Data Collection & Preservation
  • Mobile / Onsite Processing Services
    • Scanning & Unicode OCR
    • Data Analytics & Reporting
    • File Extension Filtering, DeDuplication, DeNISTing
    • Convert Electronic Documents to TIFF/PDF format
    • Document Review
    • Export for Production
    • Machine Translation of Foreign Languages
  • Computer Forensic Analysis
  • Email Analysis
  • Forensic Accounting & Transactional Analytics
  • Utilize facilities in key locations around the world, including Beijing, Dubai, Hong Kong, Kuala Lumpur, London, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore, Taipei, Tokyo

Key Accomplishments:

  • An inquiry involving over 100 gigabytes of electronic documents requiring analyzing, processing and reviewing offline at a remote location in the European Union.  Standalone processing and review environments were created and installed in secured facilities for the duration of the project.
  • An internal investigation for a European company that involved the collection, analysis, reporting and offline hosting of several hundred gigabytes of electronic data in a variety of different languages.
  • The collection and processing of paper and electronic documents at a technology company headquartered in Asia with offices in the United States.

Key Differentiators:

  • Consultants average 15 years of industry experience
  • Bilingual project managers
  • Portable e-discovery units deployable worldwide on short notice
  • Local staffing & technology resources in Africa, Asia, Europe, Middle East and North America
  • Hosting resources in Ahmedabad, Boston, Cleveland, London, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Singapore, Tokyo &  Washington DC

CLICK LOGO FOR MORE INFORMATION

Enhanced by Zemanta
LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

International Trade: Stay OnThe Right Side of the Law | Columns | Automation World

Don’t Run Afoul of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. In 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice prosecuted 34 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) cases.

Those prosecutions resulted in $435 million in fines and penalties levied by the U.S. government. In 2008, Siemens AG pled guilty to violating the FCPA. The company agreed to pay a $450 million criminal penalty, and to disgorge $350 million in wrongful profits.

Such cases illustrate why manufacturers doing business in foreign countries need to be aware of the FCPA. They need to understand what the act prohibits. They need to understand what actions are allowable under the act. They need to implement and sustain effective FCPA compliance programs.

The FCPA was enacted in 1977. It essentially bars a U.S. public registrant from bribing a foreign official to attain business. A foreign-based company whose stock is traded on a U.S.-based exchange must comply with the FCPA. Privately held U.S. companies operating overseas face compliance as well.

The anti-bribery provision is enforced by the Department of Justice (DOJ), while the act’s books-and-record provision is enforced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). That provision addresses the need for publicly traded companies to accurately and fairly record transactions, and to design an effective system of internal accounting controls.

via International Trade: Stay OnThe Right Side of the Law | Columns | Automation World.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Business Letter | 5 Tips To Keep Loose E-Mails From Sinking Litigation

Wherever there is e-mail, the potential for trouble exists, and with the proliferation of hand-held digital devices, e-mail is everywhere. Employees today e-mail as if they were speaking on the telephone or chatting by the watercooler, and they e-mail things that they would never include in a traditional business letter or interoffice memorandum. Yet e-mail has a permanency and an ease and breadth of distribution that exceeds that of traditional paper communications. These factors combine to make e-mail one of the first targets of opposing counsel, and their discovery requests and subpoenas invariably reflect this fact.

Amazing as it may seem, some companies’ employees still behave as if their e-mails were just between them and their correspondents. Here are some examples of why your employees need to think before they type. This past May, a high-profile case provided a dramatic example of how seemingly innocuous and/or confidential e-mails can be used in litigation with devastating consequences. Former hedge fund titan Arthur Samberg had to pay nearly $28 million to settle insider trading allegations. The case was going nowhere for several years when, in an unlikely twist, the divorce of a former Microsoft employee gave the Securities and Exchange Commission the break it needed. The employee’s soon-to-be ex-wife uncovered e-mails from their home computer that proved to be the critical link the SEC needed for a successful investigation.

As this case demonstrates, lawsuits and government investigations can turn into trouble fast and with little warning, especially when “E-Trouble” happens. We coined the term E-Trouble a few years ago to refer to e-mails sent by a company’s employees that are produced in discovery or pursuant to a subpoena and then used against that company. E-Trouble can be devastating, as judges, juries, and government investigators will look at employees’ e-mails as the true story of what really happened, often discounting or disregarding after-the-fact testimony or explanations that are inconsistent with, or even simply not supported by, e-mail from the time of the events at issue.

So how can you avoid E-Trouble? Begin by teaching your employees our five tips on avoiding the slings and arrows of outrageous e-mails.

via Business Letter | 5 Tips To Keep Loose E-Mails From Sinking Litigation.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Paul Weiss chases litigation wave with world’s foremost FCPA expert | Features | The Lawyer

The startling statistics are as follows: In 2007 the total amount of FCPA-related fines was $155m £98.1m). In the first quarter of 2010 it was $1.45bn.

Although the FCPA is just a part of most firms’ litigation offerings, the figures suggest it must form an increasingly large portion. What is certain is that, with an ever-tougher line being taken by the world’s leading regulators and growing cooperation between bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the UK’s Financial Services Authority, the number of matters and size of fines look set only to increase.

No wonder there is a scramble in the US and further afield to hire the top litigation talent. And with the increasingly tough stance being taken by regulators – as reflected in the FCPA fines boom – this scramble for lawyers with an inside track is unlikely to subside.

Firms as diverse in their strategic approach to the market as Davis Polk & Wardwell, where the FCPA is currently the core of the white- collar practice, and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer at least have one thing in common – they are staffing up on disputes specialists.

via Paul Weiss chases litigation wave with world’s foremost FCPA expert | Features | The Lawyer.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

ABB to Pay U.S. $58 Million to Resolve Mexico, Iraq Corrupt Payment Claims – Bloomberg

ABB Ltd., the world’s biggest electricity-networks builder, agreed to pay about $58.3 million to resolve claims by U.S. prosecutors and regulators that its units made corrupt payments to win business in Mexico and Iraq.

The U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission accused Zurich-based ABB and three subsidiaries of conspiracy and violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which bars companies from paying foreign officials to gain a business advantage. In separate settlements, the company agreed to pay criminal penalties of $19 million and SEC civil penalties of more than $39.3 million.

ABB and its co-conspirators made “concealed, corrupt payments” from 1997 to 2005 to officials at Comision Federal de Electricidad, an utility owned by Mexico, relating an electric network upgrade contract, prosecutors said in a court filing.

Another unit, ABB Ltd.-Jordan, paid more than $300,000 in kickbacks to the government of Iraq starting in 2000 for $5.9 million in purchase orders from regional companies of the Iraqi Electricity Commission as part of the United Nations oil- for-food program, prosecutors said in a separate filing.

via ABB to Pay U.S. $58 Million to Resolve Mexico, Iraq Corrupt Payment Claims – Bloomberg.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare