1-in-5 U.S. consumers plan to buy Apple’s iPad – Computerworld

Positive press and word of mouth from very satisfied owners has convinced one-in-five U.S. consumers to buy an Apple iPad, a survey published today said.

In a poll of nearly 3,400 consumers, ChangeWave Research found that 7% are “very likely,” and 13% “somewhat likely” to buy an iPad at some point. Those numbers, noted Paul Carton, ChangeWave’s research director, are significantly higher than the 4% and 9% who answered the same way in a February survey taken after Apple CEO Steve Jobs had unveiled the media tablet, but before it went on sale in early April.

While 19% of those who plan to purchase an iPad said that they would do so in the next 90 days, the majority of consumers who want an Apple tablet will buy one in six months or more. And that has to make Apple happy this holiday season.

“Apple’s going to have an iPad holiday,” said Carton. “We’ll see a holiday spending wave on the iPad.”

Of the consumers who said they plan to buy an iPad, 24% said they would do so in 6 to 12 months, with another 24% saying they would pull the buying trigger in 12 to 24 months.

via 1-in-5 U.S. consumers plan to buy Apple’s iPad – Computerworld.

Delisting Watch: Daimler the Latest to “Go Dark” in U.S.

New York Stock Exchange Advanced Trading Floor...
Image via Wikipedia

Daimler’s delisting is the latest sign of German companies abandoning U.S. capital markets, opting instead to list solely in Frankfurt, re-fortified. The planned delisting and deregistration of Daimler AG is the latest in this months-long trend, propelled by the growth of Frankfurt and its Xetra electronic exchange, despite a weakening euro. It is also residual of Daimler’s bitter end in the Chrysler saga.

The carmaker announced its intention to “go dark” in a letter to the New York Stock Exchange, detailing its plans to delist its shares and to deregister with the SEC. As cited in a statement by Daimler, the primary reason for the planned listing is “a significant change in the behavior of international investors, who now primarily trade in Daimler shares in Germany and through electronic trading platforms.” Of note, however, Daimler, in its recent annual report, reported consistently low trading volumes in the United States, which amounted to well below 5% of the worldwide trading volume.

via Delisting Watch: Daimler the Latest to “Go Dark” in U.S..

Czech Privacy Data Watchdog Probes Google Street View Acts – WSJ.com

HANNOVER, GERMANY - MARCH 02:  The camera of a...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

The Czech Office for Personal Data Protection, or UOOU, has launched a probe of an alleged breach of privacy protection regulations in the Czech Republic by Google Inc (GOOG), an UOOU spokeswoman said Thursday.

“We initiated the administrative action Apr. 21 by sending Google a formal notice and the procedure began three days ago when Google received the letter in the U.S.,” Hana Stepankova told Dow Jones Newswires.

UOOU is investigating Google for failing to notify Czech authorities with its intentions to collect personal data used for the U.S. company’s ‘Street View‘ photo imaging service for the Google Maps program.

Google officials didn't immediately return phone calls by Dow Jones Newswires requesting comments on the UOOU probe.

via Czech Privacy Data Watchdog Probes Google Street View Acts – WSJ.com.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Italy investigates Google’s Street View | Reuters

Google Street View Car in Southampton, Hampshi...
Image via Wikipedia

Italy has started an investigation into Google Inc’s Street View web service, a local watchdog said on Wednesday following the U.S. group’s announcement it had accidentally collected personal data over wireless networks.

Google said last week its fleets of cars which have been photographing streets around the world had for several years accidentally collected personal information — which a security expert said could include e-mail messages and passwords.

Italy’s privacy regulator said it would verify whether Google treated correctly the data acquired by Street View, which allows users to navigate around a 360-degree view of city streets using pictures taken by Google’s camera vehicles.

The regulator said Google Italy had admitted it collected pictures but also “data regarding the presence of wireless networks … as well as electronic communications, eventually transmitted by users via unprotected wireless networks.”

via Italy investigates Google’s Street View | Reuters.

A Line in the Sand: Getting Tough on Money Laundering in Dubai and the UAE | Westlaw Business

Administrative map of the United Arab Emirates...
Image via Wikipedia

Whopping $500 million fines are just one reason sanctions and anti-money laundering measures continue to haunt international commerce. With advances in electronic transmittals, hundreds of billions in dirty money swirls all over the world with breathtaking speed and efficiency. Rather than passively watching the problem spiral, however, the United Arab Emirates and one of its prominent regulators have stepped in with aggressive preemptive action.

With last week’s mega fine imposed by the U.S. on ABN Amro (since acquired by Royal Bank of Scotland) for “turning a blind eye” to sanctions against Iran, Cuba and other countries, the focus of international efforts to control criminal cash flows has received renewed attention. The U.S. and the UN have traditionally borne the yoke of international trafficking cops, but when it comes to money laundering, the United Arab Emirates and the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) have drawn a line in the sand.

The Sanctions Committee of the United Nations, for example, is a subset of the UN Security Council. From Saddam’s Iraq, to Darfur in the Sudan, the UN has long advocated the use of sanctions “as an enforcement tool when peace has been threatened and diplomatic efforts have failed.” As a consequence, companies and individuals doing business with rogue states bring themselves within the legal jurisdiction of a world body.

The U.S., meanwhile, has a number of different mechanisms for combating illicit traffic. On an international scale, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), contained within the Department of Treasury, maintains a list of Specially Designated Nationals. Doing business with individuals and companies on this list subjects U.S. citizens and residents to criminal penalties. Because the list is public information, a presumption of intent when doing business with any person or entity on the list. OFAC maintains a list of 20 extant sanctions programs on its website; the site also includes a list of memoranda between OFAC and bank regulators.

Though not as large or influential as the UN or U.S., the UAE, a geographically a tiny Gulf outpost, has in its own right backed up its claim as a world financial center by committing considerable energy and resources to combating not only money laundering but the financing of terror. The DFSA oversees the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), a self-contained financial free zone with its own civil and commercial law framework located in the Emirate of Dubai. As for penal law, however, UAE federal law still applies not only to the DIFC but all free zones. The DFSA thus provides the compliance mechanisms and the UAE the criminal penalties for money laundering.

While not an Islamic issue, money laundering has received attention from both the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) and the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB). Both organizations, in their respective governance and corporate responsibility provisions, underscore the importance of compliance with relevant AML laws.

via A Line in the Sand: Getting Tough on Money Laundering in Dubai and the UAE.

DoD Issues Rule Restricting Mandatory Arbitration Agreements for Contractors : Washington D.C. Employment Law Update

The Department of Defense (DoD) will publish in tomorrow’s edition of the Federal Register an interim rule (pdf) implementing section 8116 of the DoD Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010, which restricts a contractor’s use of mandatory arbitration agreements in certain instances. Specifically, section 8116 bans contractors or subcontractors at any tier that receive funds in excess of $1 million from the appropriations bill from enforcing mandatory, pre-dispute agreements to arbitrate “any claim under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or any tort related to or arising out of sexual assault or harassment, including assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or retention.” The Secretary of Defense is permitted to waive the applicability of this prohibition to a particular contract or subcontract in the interest of national security. Additionally, the arbitration limitations do not apply to a contractor’s or subcontractor’s agreement with employees or independent contractors that cannot be enforced in the U.S.

via DoD Issues Rule Restricting Mandatory Arbitration Agreements for Contractors : Washington D.C. Employment Law Update.

Novartis Must Pay Punitive Damages in Sex-Bias Case, Jury Rules – Bloomberg.com

A Novartis AG pharmaceuticals unit discriminated against female sales representatives in the U.S. and must pay $3.4 million to a dozen women plus punitive damages to be decided, a federal jury found.

The jury in Manhattan federal court reached its decision yesterday after a monthlong trial of a class-action lawsuit on claims of discrimination against women at Novartis Pharmaceuticals, a U.S. unit of Europe’s second-largest drugmaker. The nine jurors’ award to the women for lost pay and other damages came in the first stage of deliberations. The panel will decide on the amount of punitive damages.

The women are part of the Basel, Switzerland-based company’s 14,000-member workforce in the U.S. They’ve said they’re seeking about $200 million in punitive damages. Jurors found that Novartis discriminated against women over pay and promotion and because they got pregnant.

“Novartis has been involved in systemic discrimination since 2002,” David Sanford, a lawyer for the women, said in an interview after the verdict. “The verdict supports the claims of 5,600 women.”

Novartis said in a statement that it is disappointed in the verdict and plans to appeal.

“We believe the plaintiffs’ claims were unfounded,” the company said, adding that it has been “recognized for its commitment to an inclusive environment.”

via Novartis Must Pay Punitive Damages in Sex-Bias Case, Jury Rules – Bloomberg.com.

Google deletes private data in Ireland; a complaint filed in U.S.

Google said Monday afternoon that upon the request of Ireland's Data Protection Authority, it has deleted private data it collected as part of its Street View application.

In a blog post, the company said that it deleted that information over the weekend in the presence of an independent third party. Google said it is also reaching out to other nations where it also collected data.

The controversy over Google’s data collection stems from its announcement Friday that it inadvertently collected private data off of unprotected, or unencrypted, Wi-Fi networks at homes while compiling photos for location-based services.

German officials blasted Google, saying the practice, even if in error, was illegal. California-based Consumer Watchdog filed a complaint to the Federal Trade Commission seeking an investigation on how the practice affected consumers.

“We are reaching out to Data Protection Authorities in the other relevant countries about how to dispose of the remaining data as quickly as possible,” wrote Alan Eustace, senior vice president of engineering and research at Google.

via Post Tech – Google deletes private data in Ireland; a complaint filed in U.S..

Microsoft to pay $200 million in patent dispute | Microsoft – CNET News

Microsoft will pay VirnetX Holding $200 million to settle a patent dispute over VPN technology in Windows, the companies announced Monday.

As part of the settlement, Microsoft will also obtain a license to use VirnetX technology in Microsoft products.

VirnetX first sued Microsoft in 2007, claiming the software giant had violated two of its VPN (virtual private network) patents through the use of the technology in Windows XP and Vista. A U.S. District Court ruled in VirnetX’s favor in March, determining that Microsoft had willfully infringed on the VPN patents in question and ordering the company to pay VirnetX damages of $105.75 million.

Just a few days after the verdict was handed down, VirnetX filed another lawsuit against Microsoft, claiming that the same patent-violating technologies were also in Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2.

VirnetX asserted that Microsoft had violated U.S. patents 6,502,135 and 7,188,180, which both cover specific ways to secure IP-based communications through VPNs and similar technologies.

As part of the settlement, the lawsuits will be dismissed. Although the final $200 million in damages is almost double the $105.75 million that Microsoft was first ordered to pay, that amount could have tripled had the companies not come to an agreement, according to Reuters.

via Microsoft to pay $200 million in patent dispute | Microsoft – CNET News.

Toyota Lawsuit Judge Names Lead Attorneys for Cases – BusinessWeek

The federal judge overseeing sudden- acceleration lawsuits against Toyota Motor Corp. appointed 21 plaintiffs’ lawyers to manage litigation involving U.S. claims.

Toyota, the world’s largest automaker, faces at least 228 federal and 99 state lawsuits including proposed class actions over economic loss and claims of personal injuries or deaths caused by sudden-acceleration incidents. The federal lawsuits were combined April 9 in a multidistrict litigation, or MDL, before U.S. District Judge James V. Selna in Santa Ana, California.

More than 70 plaintiffs’ lawyers sought appointments to leadership positions in the federal lawsuits, including about 60 who spoke at a hearing before Selna yesterday.

Selna’s appointments today include Steve Berman at Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP in Seattle as co-lead counsel for economic loss plaintiffs and Elizabeth Cabraser at Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP in San Francisco as co-lead for personal injury and death cases.

via Toyota Lawsuit Judge Names Lead Attorneys for Cases (Update1) – BusinessWeek.