UK Bribery Act broader than FCPA, but more guidelines needed – Risk.net

Firms in the UK will need more guidance on complying with the Bribery Act’s strict rules

The passing of the Bribery Act 2010 into UK law has created one of the toughest anti-corruption regimes in existence. Firms operating in the UK will no longer be allowed to make “facilitation payments”, which have often been thinly veiled bribes.

Previous UK anti-bribery legislation dated from the nineteenth century, whereas the new legislation goes beyond more modern laws such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

The FCPA was primarily aimed at targeting bribes to corrupt foreign government officials, whereas the scope of the UK’s Bribery Act more broadly targets corruption across the corporate gambit.

The UK Bribery Act allows unlimited fines against firms, while individual penalties are up to 10 years' imprisonment, compared with five years under the FCPA.

“All this bad activity has been illegal for a long time, but it’s the ability to prosecute companies and individuals that has been so difficult,” says Bob Hirth, vice-president and head of global internal audit at Protiviti, a financial services consultancy.

“One motive behind this Act was to provide for more effective prosecutions. It is broad and ambitious, but the devil is in the detail,” he says.

The Act requires systems and controls to be put in place to demonstrate compliance with the new regime. Compliance to the FCPA does not guarantee compliance to the Act.

via UK Bribery Act broader than FCPA, but more guidelines needed – Risk.net.

UK bribery law escalates business risk of regional companies – Business Intelligence Middle East

The UK Bribery Act, enacted in the United Kingdom on 8 April 2010, is one of the most significant issues to affect businesses and increases the risk of doing business for regional companies.

The law applies not only to British nationals and UK companies but to any commercial organisations even if they carry on only “part of a business” in the UK.

Under the new rules, companies with UK operations will be criminally liable for bribery and corruption in their business, supply chain or sales channels irrespective of where the bribery offences take place.

The bribe does not need to be directed at a government official, the provision is triggered even if the bribe relates to business activities amongst private entities.

The law creates a new strict liability offence for any commercial organization which has a “close connection” with the UK for failing to prevent bribery, with the defense of showing that it has adequate (anti-bribery) procedures in place.

This is without any requirement for the prosecuting authority to show that any directors or partners were directly involved in the crime.

The maximum jail term for bribery is now 10 years and companies convicted will also face unlimited fines.

Although some of its features are similar to the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), this law is likely to have a bigger impact on regional businesses.

It uses UK standards of what constitutes bribery and disregards local custom and practice, unless the practice is permitted by written law. Unlike the FCPA, it also makes no allowances for small facilitation payments consistent with local culture.

via UK bribery law escalates business risk of regional companies – Business Intelligence Middle East – bi-me.com – News, analysis, reports.

Relationship databases the new target for e-discovery :: PublicTechnology.net :: e-Government & public sector IT news + job vacancies:

IT professionals should be aware of a rather nasty new trend. Customer, citizen and employee relationship databases were the most common target for e-discovery-based information-gathering for litigation purposes last year.

According to IDC, among 115 litigation support and legal technology operations professionals found that the number of respondents experiencing more than 100 law suits over the last year rose to 46% from 27% in 2008.

A huge 70% of those questioned were involved in international litigation, with the most popular disputes centring on employee termination and intellectual property, which tied for first place. Investigations under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and product liability claims were joint third, while insurance claims came in fifth.

The top three regions where enterprises needed to conduct investigations as well as preserve and collect data were European Union member states, followed by Canada and North Asia, which includes Japan, South Korea and China.

via Relationship databases the new target for e-discovery :: PublicTechnology.net :: e-Government & public sector IT news + job vacancies:.