Privacy: Will Facebook Ever Get It? | PCWorld

With Facebook reportedly close to cutting a deal with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over privacy sins dating back to 2009, the question remains whether or not the social network’s brain trust really gets the privacy issue.

The details–reported by the Wall Street Journal–of Facebook’s imminent pact with the FTC describe an agreement that gives the socnet plenty of room to violate its members’ privacy in the future. That’s because the deal affects a standing target–all the data currently on the system–and not the moving one, which is data added to the network in the future. It is the latter Facebook needs to address if privacy is truly going to be protected on the network.

Under the reported agreement, Facebook would need to obtain your permission before subjecting you to changes in its privacy policy that will “materially” affect how it handles your information. In the case before the FTC–which the agreement would settle–Facebook changed its privacy policy in 2009 so that information previously kept private, such as name, picture, city, gender and friends list, was suddenly made public.

The date you joined Facebook will affect the agreement’s notification requirement. What Facebook can do with your data will vary depending on what version of its privacy policy was in effect when you joined the network. Not only will that be totally confusing to you and everyone else on the network, but it should create some nightmares for Facebook’s administrators, too.

In addition, expressed consent won’t be needed for all changes nor will it be needed for new changes. That means if Facebook rolls out a feature like facial recognition or Timelines, which have significant privacy implications, it can do so whether you want to participate in the rollout or not

via Privacy: Will Facebook Ever Get It? | PCWorld.

7 Charged with Using Malware to Rack Up $14M in Fake Ad Revenue | PCWorld

The Department of Justice has indicted seven people for allegedly hijacking millions of computers, manipulating traffic on popular websites, and generating more than $14 million in fraudulent advertising revenue.

The defendants — six Estonians and one Russian — allegedly hijacked more than 4 million computers using malware that rerouted Internet traffic to websites where they would get a cut of the ad revenue. Infected computers with users looking for popular websites such as Netflix, Amazon, and iTunes were rerouted to webpages that featured the defendants’ ads.

This case is supposedly the “first of its kind,” according to US Attorney Preet Bharara, because the suspects set up their own “rogue servers” in order to perform the rerouting. Using their rogue servers, the defendants were allegedly able to substitute legitimate Internet ads with their own ads, thereby generating millions in advertising revenue.

According to BusinessWeek, the indictment cited a case in which an American Express ad on the Wall Street Journal’s home page was replaced — instantly, once users clicked on it — with an ad for “Fashion Girl LA.”

About 500,000 of the infected computers were located in the United States, Bharara said in a news conference in New York. The alleged scheme, which ran from 2007 to 2011, was first discovered at NASA, where 130 computers were infected.

via 7 Charged with Using Malware to Rack Up $14M in Fake Ad Revenue | PCWorld.

Justice Department Gears Up for AT&T Litigation

The U.S. government doesn’t appear to be gung-ho in reaching a settlement agreement with AT&T over a lawsuit aimed at blocking the telecom titan’s purchase of T-Mobile USA.

Asked at a Senate hearing whether the U.S. Department of Justice is in the case “for the long haul,” Attorney General Eric Holder responded that the agency doesn’t file a case if it is not prepared to see it through, The Wall Street Journal reported.

“There is a trial team that is in place and they are ready and eager to go to court,” The Journal quoted Holder.

AT&T is set to battle the Justice Department in federal court during a trial that is set for February. The Justice Department plans to hire Glenn Pomerantz, a litigator at law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, to strengthen its legal team for the trial, the Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

via Justice Department Gears Up for AT&T Litigation.

AFP: BlackBerry ‘puts monitoring centre’ in India

Research In Motion (RIM) has set up a facility in Mumbai to help the Indian government conduct surveillance checks on the company’s BlackBerry services, the Wall Street Journal said on Friday.

The financial daily quoted unnamed people familiar with the matter who said the Canadian firm opened the centre earlier this year to deal with requests from Indian intelligence agencies.

No one was immediately available for comment at either RIM or India’s telecoms ministry when contacted by AFP.

RIM and the Indian government have been embroiled in a row over access to BlackBerry services, in particular encrypted email and instant message facilities that New Delhi fears could be used by extremists to plot attacks.

Multiple deadlines have been issued to the firm to comply with government requests for monitoring.

The Wall Street Journal said RIM was now allowing surveillance of BlackBerry Internet services and the company was no longer facing the prospect of shutdowns.

RIM was complying with intercept requests on suspect individuals once it was satisfied the demand had legal authorisation, it added.

via AFP: BlackBerry ‘puts monitoring centre’ in India.

As fix begins, worldwide BlackBerry users still have problems – Computerworld

BlackBerry users Wednesday reported that problems are continuing into a third day in Europe and Asia, after Research in Motion reported on Tuesday that a fix was underway.

And for the first time, BlackBerry service slowed in North America today, according to a tweet from 680 News in Toronto shortly after 7 a.m. EDT. Others in North America tweeted BlackBerry Messenger service was down.

Elsewhere, Vodafone Qatar told the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday that every one of its wireless subscribers was affected to some degree by the service slowdown. Some, it added, had difficulty sending email or instant messages.

Computerworld UK reported on Wednesday mid-day (7 a.m. ET) that users in the UK and Europe saw service resumed briefly Wednesday morning after a 17-hour outage on Tuesday, only to crash again at 9:30 a.m.local time (4:30 a.m. ET).

Computerworld UK said Twitter users in the UK resorted to using PCs to tweet concerns, with several noting the public relations problem facing RIM.

via As fix begins, worldwide BlackBerry users still have problems – Computerworld.

As fix begins, worldwide BlackBerry users still have problems – Computerworld

BlackBerry users Wednesday reported that problems are continuing into a third day in Europe and Asia, after Research in Motion reported on Tuesday that a fix was underway.

And for the first time, BlackBerry service slowed in North America today, according to a tweet from 680 News in Toronto shortly after 7 a.m. EDT. Others in North America tweeted BlackBerry Messenger service was down.

Elsewhere, Vodafone Qatar told the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday that every one of its wireless subscribers was affected to some degree by the service slowdown. Some, it added, had difficulty sending email or instant messages.

Computerworld UK reported on Wednesday mid-day (7 a.m. ET) that users in the UK and Europe saw service resumed briefly Wednesday morning after a 17-hour outage on Tuesday, only to crash again at 9:30 a.m.local time (4:30 a.m. ET).

Computerworld UK said Twitter users in the UK resorted to using PCs to tweet concerns, with several noting the public relations problem facing RIM.

via As fix begins, worldwide BlackBerry users still have problems – Computerworld.

Amazon Could Disrupt Apple’s Tablet Dominance, Analyst Says – WSJ.com

Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) could disrupt a tablet market dominated by Apple Inc. (AAPL) if the online retailer is willing to sell its own, widely-anticipated device at a loss, according to research published Monday.

Forrester Research analyst Sarah Rotman Epps wrote that while “Amazon taking on Apple is a bit like David taking on Goliath,” if Amazon proves willing to sell its tablet relatively cheaply and leverage its brand and surplus of online content, it could make a significant mark.

Specifically, if Amazon prices the as-yet-undisclosed tablet at less than $300, the Seattle-based company could sell up to 5 million units in the fourth quarter of this year, the analyst wrote.

Apple currently sells versions of the iPad for prices ranging between $499 and $829.

The Wall Street Journal has reported that Amazon could release its tablet as soon as October.

via Amazon Could Disrupt Apple’s Tablet Dominance, Analyst Says – WSJ.com.

What does HP’s PC purge mean for computer users? | Technology | guardian.co.uk

What do you call it when the world’s biggest PC manufacturer gets out of manufacturing PCs?

Wise.

Though people have been surprised by HP’s announcement on Thursday that it is getting out of all its hardware businesses – PCs, the TouchPad tablet and the smartphones that were to have followed – the inescapable conclusion is that Leo Apotheker, the new head of HP who came from the enterprise-focused SAP last September, is declining to throw good money after bad (to wit: the purchase of Palm for $1bn) and shifting HP’s focus towards the places where he sees profit: enterprise services.

The Wall Street Journal reported:

“The tablet effect is real, and sales of the TouchPad are not meeting our expectations,” Apotheker says, explaining the movement of consumers from PCs to tablets as one of the problems with the PC division. So HP is exploring options for its unit that “may include separation through spin-off or other transactions.”

For the PC market, it marks the most important inflexion point since IBM caused a collective gasp at the end of 2004 by announcing that it was selling off its PC business to Lenovo – then an unheard-of Chinese company.

via What does HP’s PC purge mean for computer users? | Technology | guardian.co.uk.

Hackers Caused $2.7 Million of Citi Card Losses – Bloomberg

Citigroup Inc. (C), the third-largest U.S. bank, said about 3,400 customers lost about $2.7 million when their credit-card information was breached by hackers earlier this year.

The customers will be reimbursed, Sean Kevelighan, a spokesman for the New York-based bank, said in a phone interview today. It’s the first public acknowledgement by Citigroup that the incident resulted in any financial losses.

Citigroup said earlier this month more than 360,000 credit- card accounts, or 1.5 percent of the bank’s total in North America, may have been compromised by hackers in May. The Wall Street Journal reported the amount of the loss earlier today.

via Hackers Caused $2.7 Million of Citi Card Losses – Bloomberg.

Multiple antitrust probes of Google reported – latimes.com

Google found itself Thursday at the center of multiple government investigations into whether it is using its dominance in search advertising to scotch competition.

At least three state attorneys general have started antitrust investigations into Google, a source familiar with the matter said.

The source declined to elaborate on the details of the investigations by the attorneys general of California, Ohio and New York, as they were still in the early stages.

The attorneys general investigation into Google was first reported by the Financial Times, citing people familiar with the investigations.

The news of the attorneys general investigation emerged on the same day the Wall Street Journal reported that the internet search giant is about to receive the civil equivalent of a subpoena from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission as part of a probe into the company’s Internet search business.

The company, which dominates U.S. and global markets for search advertising, has been accused by competitors of favoring its own services over rivals in its search results.

Google, the world’s No. 1 search engine, and the FTC declined to comment on the Journal report.

via Multiple antitrust probes of Google reported – latimes.com.