Justice Department, SEC cracking down on U.S. companies engaging in bribery abroad – The Washington Post

To win computer business with the South Korean government, IBM allegedly delivered cash bribes in shopping bags.

In pursuit of Ni­ger­ian construction contracts, Halliburton and its international business partners allegedly routed illicit payments through bank accounts in Switzerland and Monaco.

And a middleman for a middleman of the Italian energy company ENI allegedly made repeated trips to a Ni­ger­ian hotel room and handed over briefcases containing millions of dollars in U.S. currency to a government official. But paying the balance of the alleged $5 million bribe in the local currency was more problematic — the local bills were so bulky that the bagman allegedly had to deliver them by the carload.

These alleged schemes have come to light as part of an escalating effort by U.S. law enforcement officials against companies that engage in bribery abroad. Just last week, federal authorities announced they had charged IBM with corruptly pursuing contracts in Asia.

In recent years, the Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission have filed an increasing number of foreign corruption cases, charging companies such as Tyson Foods, General Electric, Alcatel-Lucent and Daimler, the maker of Mercedes-Benz cars and the former parent of Chrysler.

The cases reach from Latin America to Africa, Asia and the Middle East, involving contracts worth billions of dollars. Together, they suggest that illicit payments often tip the scales of global business — sometimes with the blessing of top corporate executives.

via Justice Department, SEC cracking down on U.S. companies engaging in bribery abroad – The Washington Post.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Agencies to look for a ‘cloud option’ | Washington Post

The federal government is adopting a “cloud-first” policy, marking the administration’s strongest statement yet in support of Web-based computing as it looks to overhaul the way it buys information technology.

Jeffrey Zients, the federal government’s first chief performance officer, announced last week that the Office of Management and Budget will now require federal agencies to default to cloud-based solutions “whenever a secure, reliable, cost-effective cloud option exists.”

The shift is part of a broader set of changes aimed at improving IT procurement. In recent months, the federal government has shut down or restructured a host of technology programs after they ran over budget and behind schedule.

“Fixing IT is central to everything we’re trying to do across government,” Zients said. “IT is our top priority.”

via Agencies to look for a ‘cloud option’.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Mobile sign language being developed at UW – Computerworld

Researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle are building the first mobile devices to effectively transmit American Sign Language via compressed video over a 3G cellular network.

The problem they are trying to solve is optimizing the compressed video for sign language so that it can be transmitted on a 3G network, instead of requiring faster 4G network speeds, according to a report published on the university’s Web site. The engineers have increased image quality around faces and hands used in ASL while still delivering intelligible sign language via video at speeds of 30Kbit/sec.

The engineers on the project are finishing a three-week initial trial of the MobileASL tool on older phones equipped with cameras for video chat, although the software is designed to work on a range of smartphones and other mobile devices.

via Mobile sign language being developed at UW – Computerworld.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Momentum building for federal online privacy rules | Washington Post

Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) said Tuesday that he plans to introduce an online privacy bill that would create standards for how consumer information is collected and used for marketing. It would also give users more control over how their Internet activity and profiles are accessed by advertisers and Web sites.

Kerry’s bill, announced in a news release during a hearing on online privacy held by the Senate commerce committee, follows two privacy bills introduced in the House in recent months aimed at protecting sensitive information such as health and financial data. Kerry said he hopes his bill will be passed at the beginning of the next Congress.

via Momentum building for federal online privacy rules.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

TSA wants cyber forensics info — Washington Technology

TSA is interested in products that would give the agency the ability to scan, capture, identify, report, and resolve IT forensics matters, according to a sources sought notice published on the Federal Business Opportunities Web site June 1. The agency said it’s not issuing a solicitation at this time.

The agency is interested in solutions that would allow TSA forensic users to deal with insider threats, e-discovery procedures, data leakage, misuse of IT assets, anomaly detection, identification of malicious code, and compliance verification, according to the notice.

TSA wants companies to provide detailed descriptions of how their products work and what makes them unique. Specifically, TSA is interested in how a product:

  • Supports legal e-discovery processes.
  • Manages and performs enterprise forensics activities across multiple IT systems.
  • Can be used to schedule periodically recurring scans.
  • Integrates with desktop products.
  • Manages and tracks forensic information.
  • Identifies suspicious system activities, including any known exploits.
  • Supports remediation activities to remove identified threats while sweeping for known malicious code.
  • Reports problems.
  • Analyzes data.
  • Interfaces with other systems.
  • Is designed from an IT architecture perspective.

via TSA wants cyber forensics info — Washington Technology.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Microsoft cracks down on ad click fraud | Seattle PI

Image representing Microsoft adCenter as depic...
Image via CrunchBase

In anticipation of a planned announcement Wednesday regarding click fraud, Microsoft has filed at least two lawsuits against companies it believes are mixed up in the illegal manipulation of online-advertising commerce.

Microsoft on Monday implicated two established websites, RedOrbit and HelloMetro, in two fraud complaints filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle. Microsoft alleges the defendants used malicious means to artificially increase the number of times that advertisements on those sites were clicked.

The defendants, Microsoft claims, used the software company’ adCenter and pubCenter platforms to surface advertisements on their websites. When a Web user clicks one of those ads, money is automatically transferred from the advertiser’s account to the ad publisher’s account.

Click-fraud perpetrators can use automated computer scripts, deploy malware, e-mail spam links or hire people to generate an inflated number of clicks on online advertisements. Such practices bring extra money to the ad publisher, and fraud is suspected when the action is hidden.

In an interestingly timed move, Microsoft filed the lawsuits two days before it announces “some significant news,” as the company has said, about click fraud trends. Seattlepi.com has learned that the announcement will provide better context for the lawsuits, though it is unclear exactly what the news will be.

A spokesperson said the announcement will also relate to a third legal filing, but Microsoft would not elaborate. Stay tuned to The Microsoft Blog on Wednesday for more information.

In the RedOrbit case (PDF), Microsoft names the company, founder Eric Ralls and 10 “John Does” as defendants. RedOrbit.com is a Tyler, Texas-based online news site that publishes articles, photos and videos about science, space, technology and health.

via Microsoft cracks down on ad click fraud.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Microsoft Accuses Salesforce.com of Infringing Software Patents – BusinessWeek

Microsoft Corp. said it sued Salesforce.com Inc. today, accusing the company of infringing nine patents for ways to make software more efficient.

The complaint targets the customer-relationship management, or CRM, software that is the hallmark of Salesforce.com’s business. It seeks a court order that would prevent the San Francisco-based company from providing features that Microsoft claims it invented.

Salesforce.com, founded in 1999, offers software that businesses subscribe to and use over the Internet for running marketing campaigns and tracking sales leads. It competes against Microsoft’s Dynamics software in the CRM market.

“Microsoft has been a leader and innovator in the software industry for decades and continues to invest billions of dollars each year in bringing great software products and services to market,” said Horacio Gutierrez, the Redmond, Washington-based company’s deputy general counsel for intellectual property and licensing. Microsoft “cannot stand idly by when others infringe” our intellectual property rights, he said.

The complaint was filed in federal court in Seattle after more than a year of talks, according to Microsoft, the world’s biggest software maker.

via Microsoft Accuses Salesforce.com of Infringing Software Patents – BusinessWeek.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Cloud Service Users Face Confusing Legal Landscape – PCWorld Business Center

Cloud computing has great benefits for businesses but legal uncertainties threaten to hamper adoption, said a group of lawyers speaking during a seminar in Seattle this week.

“We will have to create a robust legal system and we will have to do it sooner rather than later and before we have the cloud computing equivalent of an offshore oil rig blowout,” said Barry J. Reingold, a partner at Perkins Coie in Washington, D.C.

Lawyers speaking at the Law Seminars International event on Monday offered advice about the types of research companies should do before signing up for cloud services to make sure they can protect themselves from potential legal fallout.

One of the most important issues facing companies that wish to store or process data in the cloud is determining which legal systems have jurisdiction over the data. “It’s a can of worms,” said Andy James, a lawyer with Osborne Clarke.

A company using a cloud service could have users all over the world and those users’ information could be shifted to facilities around the globe. “So there are four possible legal locations for the information at any moment,” James said. Laws applicable to the location of the company’s headquarters, the location of the servers, the location of the consumer and the location of the communications equipment transmitting the information between the user and the provider could all potentially apply.

Unfortunately, he said, different jurisdictions have made different choices on which of those locations to base their cloud rules on.

via Cloud Service Users Face Confusing Legal Landscape – PCWorld Business Center.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

DoD Issues Rule Restricting Mandatory Arbitration Agreements for Contractors : Washington D.C. Employment Law Update

The Department of Defense (DoD) will publish in tomorrow’s edition of the Federal Register an interim rule (pdf) implementing section 8116 of the DoD Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010, which restricts a contractor’s use of mandatory arbitration agreements in certain instances. Specifically, section 8116 bans contractors or subcontractors at any tier that receive funds in excess of $1 million from the appropriations bill from enforcing mandatory, pre-dispute agreements to arbitrate “any claim under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or any tort related to or arising out of sexual assault or harassment, including assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or retention.” The Secretary of Defense is permitted to waive the applicability of this prohibition to a particular contract or subcontract in the interest of national security. Additionally, the arbitration limitations do not apply to a contractor’s or subcontractor’s agreement with employees or independent contractors that cannot be enforced in the U.S.

via DoD Issues Rule Restricting Mandatory Arbitration Agreements for Contractors : Washington D.C. Employment Law Update.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare

Microsoft Dealt Major Setback Over $290 Million Infringement Judgment | National Law Journal

Microsoft Word
Image via Wikipedia

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office‘s recent confirmation of the validity of a patent that netted i4i Limited Partnership a $290 million infringement judgment against Microsoft Corp. means the U.S. Supreme Court is likely Microsoft’s last hope to overturn the judgment.

On Tuesday, i4i announced that the PTO affirmed the patentability of all the claims in its patent for processing and storing information about electronic documents’ structure. In its lawsuit, i4i claimed that Microsoft Word 2007 infringed that patent, and Microsoft had requested a re-examination in the hopes that the PTO would declare the patent invalid. The PTO has yet to issue a formal certificate confirming the patent’s validity, but the agency informed Canadian software company i4i of its notice of intent to issue an ex parte re-examination certificate on April 28.

In an e-mailed statement, Kevin Kutz, Microsoft’s director of public affairs, said that while the company is disappointed, “there still remain important matters of patent law at stake, and we are considering our options to get them addressed, including a petition to the Supreme Court.”

Microsoft’s bid to use its request for a patent office re-examination of i4i’s patent “has failed in a dramatic way,” said i4i’s lawyer for the re-examination, Rob Greene Sterne, founder of Washington-based Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox.

Microsoft filed its PTO re-examination request before the jury verdict but well into the lawsuit, probably as a backup plan in case it lost the lawsuit, Sterne said. “Microsoft, I’m sure, assumed that they would win the re-exam or create significant difficulties for i4i in the re-exam that would drive a better settlement,” he said.

Lawyers say that unless Microsoft finds grounds for a motion for relief from judgment, such as newly discovered evidence or fraud, the U.S. Supreme Court is its last avenue.

Microsoft is “pretty much at the end of their line” unless the Supreme Court takes its case as one of the handful of patent matters the Court hears each year, said Thomas Engellenner, the co-chair of the patent practice group at Boston’s Nutter, McClennen & Fish. Engellenner wasn’t involved in the case.

via Law.com – Microsoft Dealt Major Setback Over $290 Million Infringement Judgment.

LinkedInPinterestEvernoteWordPressBlogger PostEmailShare