Data Furnaces Could Bring Heat to Homes – NYTimes.com

TO satisfy our ever-growing need for computing power, many technology companies have moved their work to data centers with tens of thousands of power-gobbling servers. Concentrated in one place, the servers produce enormous heat. The additional power needed for cooling them — up to half of the power used to run them — is the steep environmental price we have paid to move data to the so-called cloud.

Researchers, however, have come up with an intriguing option for that wasted heat: putting it to good use in people’s homes.

Two researchers at the University of Virginia and four at Microsoft Research explored this possibility in a paper presented this year at the Usenix Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing. The paper looks at how the servers — though still operated by their companies — could be placed inside homes and used as a source of heat. The authors call the concept the “data furnace.”

They acknowledge that it is more likely that data furnaces, if adopted, would be placed first in basements of office and apartment buildings, not in individual homes. But as a “thought-provoking exercise,” the authors give homes the bulk of their attention.

If a home has a broadband Internet connection, it can serve as a micro data center. One, two or three cabinets filled with servers could be installed where the furnace sits and connected with the existing circulation fan and ductwork. Each cabinet could have slots for, say, 40 motherboards — each one counting as a server. In the coldest climate, about 110 motherboards could keep a home as toasty as a conventional furnace does.

via Data Furnaces Could Bring Heat to Homes – NYTimes.com.

Asana Introduces a Souped-Up To-Do List to Organize Work – NYTimes.com

Two years after a Facebook co-founder and one of the early employees, Dustin Moskovitz and Justin Rosenstein, started their own clandestine business software company, called Asana, they are finally ready to open it to the public.

They took the wraps off the company Wednesday, revealing Asana’s secret product: a souped-up to-do list for people working on projects.

“Today people have all this information stuck in their heads, split across a gazillion different e-mails and documents and status meetings, just to try to stay on same page,” Mr. Rosenstein said. “Asana takes all that work and unifies it onto one page.”

Asana’s biggest competitors, he said, are the low-tech tools people use now to coordinate with one another, like meetings, Post-in notes, e-mail chains and whiteboards.

Using Asana, a Web app, employees (or members of a family or another group) can break a project into tasks, assign the tasks, add notes and tasks along the way and track the project’s progress. Asana’s founders say it saves time because everyone on the team knows the status of tasks in real-time and there is no need for meetings or for managers to spend time checking in with the people who report to them.

via Asana Introduces a Souped-Up To-Do List to Organize Work – NYTimes.com.

I.T. Departments Lose Their Clout Over Phone Choices – NYTimes.com

Corporate I.T. departments once passed judgment on every kind of technology used in the workplace. Employees had little choice of laptops and mobile phones. But today, because of a gradual loosening in company policies, employees have far greater say.

A survey published on Thursday by Forrester Research shed more light on the phenomenon by showing, for example, that 48 percent of information workers buy smartphones for work without considering what their I.T. department supports.

“It’s great for information workers, who buy a device based on their individual working style,” said Matt Brown, a vice president and research director at Forrester Research. “It’s a big challenge for I.T. departments.”

In many cases, employers reimburse employees for their phones as part of what are known as “Bring your own device” programs. In others, employees absorb the cost themselves.

Whatever the case, employee choice is shifting the kinds of technology used in the workplace to more consumer-oriented products. A number of companies that once emphasized selling to I.T. departments are now under siege.

BlackBerry, from Research in Motion, has long dominated the workplace phone market. It continues to lead, but its reach is shrinking.

BlackBerry accounts for 42 percent of smartphones at work, the survey found. Meanwhile, Android has 26 percent of the market, while Apple’s iPhone has 22 percent.

via I.T. Departments Lose Their Clout Over Phone Choices – NYTimes.com.

Chat Translation is a Priority in Legal and eDiscovery Areas

As we live, work and play in a global community, any company not leveraging a chat translation solution in order to support a multilingual customer base is missing out on key opportunities for strong growth. Lionbridge promotes the importance of chat translation technology and offers its GeoFluent platform to support this activity for companies throughout the world.

This is especially true for legal firms, as attorneys must often perform tasks for individuals who do not speak English as their first language. Quality service is still an important factor and the language barrier can be an obstacle difficult to overcome without tools like chat translation. I

n this recent Lionbridge blog, the importance of chat translation was explored in a video included in the LionDen Legal Library Session, as well as the value proposition Lionbridge offers to the broader market. Lionbridge partners with the world’s top global corporations and their legal partners to provide language translation services. The solutions that Lionbridge provides address the challenges lawyers face when performing their jobs across languages and cultures.

via Chat Translation is a Priority in Legal and eDiscovery Areas.

India Exempts Outsourcers From New Privacy Rules | PCWorld Business Center

Personal data sent to India by customers outsourcing work to companies in the country will not be covered under new rules governing the collection of such information, the government said on Wednesday, providing relief to India’s large outsourcing industry.

The Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules 2011 introduced in April require companies or their intermediaries to take consent in writing from individuals about the use of the sensitive personal information they collect.

The new rules would make it difficult for Indian outsourcers to operate if they were required to take written consent from individuals in other countries whose data they collect and process through call centers and business process outsourcing operations.

As a result of the new rules, companies that rely on India-based outsourcing service providers will be required to adjust their data collection practices to conform to Indian data protection rules, even though their current practices may comply fully with U.S. or European Union privacy rules, said Lawrence Graham LLP, a firm of London-based business lawyers, in a note earlier this year.

A clarification issued on Wednesday by the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, through the country’s Press Information Bureau, said that a “body corporate” providing services relating to collection, storage, dealing or handling of sensitive personal data or information under contractual obligation with any legal entity located within or outside India is not subject to the requirement of the new rules.

via India Exempts Outsourcers From New Privacy Rules | PCWorld Business Center.

Canadian law firms hacked | Lawyers Weekly

Canadian law firms are naive when it comes to cyber security, a blind spot that could cost millions in lost clients and reputation, not to mention the financial hit of having computer forensic work and upgrading done, says a Canadian cyber security expert.

“It comes down to risking lawyer-client confidentiality,” said Daniel Tobok, president of the Toronto-based Digital Wyzdom Inc. “That is the pure foundation of the legal community. It’s definitely a multi-million [dollar] loss when these breaches happen.”

Tobok told The Lawyers Weekly that in the past nine months or so about 20 law firms have been victims of cyber attacks, five of them hitting major Canadian law firms.

And they were unlike usual attacks which can deny service or take down systems, he said.

“These were targeted attacks,” Tobok explained. “Three had serious levels of attack.”

Indeed, said Tobok, the attacks might be fit for the script of Tom Cruise’s next Mission Impossible film.

Of the attacks, Tobok said, two involved merger-and-acquisition (M&A) work while another had to do with high-profile litigation.

“Confidential information is the new currency crooks are after,” Tobok said. “We have seen a 40 per cent rise in the theft of intellectual property since the 2008 recession.”

Digital Wyzdom’s website lists many high-profile organizations as past clients, including several Bay Street law firms. LexisNexis Canada Inc., the publisher of The Lawyers Weekly, is also listed on the site as a past client of Digital Wyzdom.

via Canadian law firms hacked.

Mozilla to add built-in PDF viewer to Firefox – Computerworld

Mozilla is working on a project that will add PDF rendering to Firefox using HTML5 and JavaScript, eliminating the need for users to run Adobe’s own plug-in.

The PDF reader may be included in Firefox within three months, said Andreas Gal, a Mozilla researcher who on Wednesday unveiled work the company had done quietly for the last month.

If Mozilla follows through on its plans, it would make Firefox the second major browser — after Google’s Chrome — to offer in-browser PDF rendering.

But while Chrome relies on an API (application programming interface) to craft its own native-code plug-in, Mozilla will exclusively use HTML5 and JavaScript to display Adobe’s popular document format.

via Mozilla to add built-in PDF viewer to Firefox – Computerworld.

Your Outside Counsel May Be Giving You Bad E-Discovery Advice

Law firms’ interests are not always aligned with their clients’. An important objective for many firms is a) increasing or maintaining the number of billable hours per year, and b) enabling the firm to be selected for lucrative litigation work. Companies, on the other hand, are looking to a) reduce costs by managing more of the e-discovery process themselves by implementing internal tools and processes, b) reduce risks and develop more consistent and defensible e-discovery, and  c) enable competition among firms vying for litigation work. I have seen a number of business conflicts arise:

One law firm developed a legal hold process for their client. Instead of having the client initiate legal holds, the process was architected such that outside counsel needed to be involved in choosing custodians for every hold at every level (assuring a near continuous stream of business for the firm). Likewise, the company’s written legal hold policy, also developed by the firm, declared that the firm should be engaged to defend all choices made in the selection of custodians.

One law firm created a detailed electronically stored information (ESI) data map for its client. To find certain data types, the map contained the following: “To find these types of data, please engage ABC Law Firm,” where ABC was the firm that created the map.

One law firm insisted that it house all documents related to a specific matter. When additional litigation arose in a similar dispute, the firm strongly argued it would be difficult for them to share or hand off these documents to another firm, and therefore they should by default handle all litigation.

Some firms subtly discouraged their clients from becoming litigation ready. One partner from a large international law firm relayed how she received grief from her partners when she encourage her client to become self-sufficient in its e-discovery processes. Law firms make a lot of money when their clients are not litigation ready, and the partners were worried about losing the revenue.

For the most part, law firms’ foray in e-discovery has not been successful. This year, many firms that launched these practices five years ago are either downsizing or eliminating them. The firms found that e-discovery is operationally a different business than practicing law.

The best firms, in my view, understand that their core competence in providing highly-skilled services, and encourage their clients to develop defensible in-house hold and discovery processes. Some outside counsel litigators I have spoken to welcome this change, allowing them and their firms to focus on high-value areas such as litigation strategy, settlement conferences and actually litigating cases.

Unfortunately, many law firms still see litigation readiness and e-discovery as excellent billing opportunities. Companies need to be careful in understanding this conflict.

via Your Outside Counsel May Be Giving You Bad E-Discovery Advice.

Data Grows, and So Do Online Storage Sites – NYTimes.com

When people had only one or two computers, file sharing wasn’t a big worry.

Now, gaining access to personal files is a chore for people who own an arsenal of computers, smartphones and tablets.

The annoyance of e-mailing documents to themselves or saving their work to a thumb drive has given new life to an old idea — online storage. People simply save their Word documents, spreadsheets and photos in “the cloud,” a Web-based file cabinet accessible from any device that has an Internet connection.

A number of companies focused on online storage are quickly gaining users and attention. New investment is driving a boomlet in the niche business, adding to an already lengthy list of competitors: Dropbox, YouSendIt.com, Cx.com, Box.net, 4Shared and SpiderOak. Apple may do something similar with its iCloud service, to be introduced on Monday.

Google began acclimating people to the notion of storing documents in the cloud with its Google Docs feature in 2005.

And online backup or storage services like MobileMe from Apple, Windows Live SkyDrive from Microsoft, Mozy from EMC and SugarSync are now familiar. What’s changed is that more people have discovered a need for them.

Aaron Levie, chief executive of Box.net, an early online storage company based in Palo Alto, Calif., said that the increased adoption of mobile devices and ubiquity of online connections had created a bigger need for companies like his.

Nearly 60 percent of adults with online access own at least two Internet connected devices, according to Forrester Research. Just under 3 percent, or 4.5 million people, have at least nine different gadgets. If that seems to be a lot, think about this: a person may have a home computer and a work computer, and other members of the family may each have computers. Then count smartphones and tablets, and it’s not hard to get to a large number of machines.

via Data Grows, and So Do Online Storage Sites – NYTimes.com.

Personal mobile devices create security headaches for biz – USATODAY.com

Companies are grappling with unforeseen security, privacy and legal conundrums introduced by a host of cool mobile devices flooding into the workplace.

Executives eager to sport the hottest tech gear and workers accustomed to mixing social and work activities on the go are multitasking on personally owned mobile devices in record numbers.

Workers are bringing mobile devices to work at such a scale that company security technicians can’t keep up. “It’s an impossible task,” says Patrick Sweeney, product management vice president at network security firm SonicWall. “Control of these devices has become very complex because of the varying software and device types.”

Results of a recent survey of 1,400 technology professionals in 14 nations show 21% of companies have no restrictions on use of personal mobile devices, while 58% have lightweight policies, and only 20% have stringent guidelines. The poll was conducted by security firm McAfee, a division of Intel.

via Personal mobile devices create security headaches for biz – USATODAY.com.