เทคโนโลยีวันนี้ทางกฎหมาย

Physical borders may be technically irrelevant in the age of online business, global corporate groups, คอมพิวเตอร์เมฆและ, but they retain legal and cultural significance. Some recent developments in data privacy law around the world suggest that the “free flow of information” is becoming more conditional, and that enterprises will have to be nimble to meet the expectations of regulators, ผู้บริโภค, and employees when the organization wants to move personally identifiable data from one country to another.

The proliferation of comprehensive data privacy laws, more or less on the European model, increasingly requires US-based multinationals and online companies to adapt to strict requirements for dealing with individuals in other countries.  While the rules may soon become more uniform in the EU, they are still new and uncertain in many other countries.

สหภาพยุโรป

ในเดือนมกราคม 2012, the European Commission published a proposed Regulation that would replace the 1995 EU Data Protection Directive. While national practices differ considerably under the 1995 framework directive, the Regulation would establish a much more consistent European approach to data protection rights and enforcement.

The Regulation would continue to authorize data transfers to “white-listed” jurisdictions with EU-style comprehensive data protection laws (such as Switzerland, อาร์เจนตินา, ประเทศอิสราเอล, และการ, for most purposes, ประเทศแคนาดา). It would also continue to recognize data transfers to US “Safe Harbor” companies and transfers protected by EU-approved standard contract clauses (“model contracts”) or binding corporate rules (“BCRs”), as well as transfers relying on informed consent. These have been subject to divergent national interpretations and procedures, อย่างไรก็ตาม, and the Regulation aims to eliminate these differences.

ผ่าน Transborder ข้อมูลไหลที่มีความเสี่ยง : กลุ่มข้อมูลกฏหมาย.