Twitter的每周更新 2010-01-31

  • RT @LegalTechShow: With LegalTech one week away, remember the hash tag is #LTNY, to follow along. #
  • @tfoxlaw 感谢您的RT in reply to tfoxlaw #
  • RT @BillGates: My foundation letter is live http://bit.ly/4Aha8Ainnovation in health, 食品, education and energy essential… #fb #
  • RT @ chrisdaleoxford: Outsourcing reaches the business press – so the clients will read all about it http://wp.me/p2KJ5-Gg #
  • RT @edrm: A draft of the EDRM Jobs Guide covering the 6 stages of talent acquisition is posted at http://bit.ly/cY3huq #
  • RT @ eMagSol: Court Rejects Total Dismissal of Claims Orders Partial & $75K Sanctions for Egregious Discovery Violations http://bit.ly/92el3D #
  • RT @BillGates: Decade of Vaccines- a $10B, 10yr pledge for vaccine research, 发展 & delivery http://bit.ly/cAAXEM #
  • RT @edrm: Measuring up! The EDRM Metrics first case study unveiling on Feb. 1 . Get a sneak peak at http://edrm.net/archives/3431 #
  • RT @nytimes: NYT NEWS ALERT: 9/11 Trial to Be Moved From New York #

技术支持 Twitter的工具

LegalTech是下周在纽约: 这就是为什么你应该去,如果你能 – 他的团伙名单

LegalTech纽约下星期一开幕 (2月1日) 在纽约希尔顿 (1335 美洲大道, New York, 纽约 1-212-586-7000).

这个节目是由资产负债管理活动提出, 的教育和网络活动的生产商。而我们大多数人都知道资产负债管理,通过各种媒体/品牌:美国律师, 企业法律顾问, Law.com, 法律杂志出版社, 国家法律杂志, 等.

它是世界上最大的法律技术会议及展览会。去年展会吸引了近 13,000 与会者和特色几乎 300 参展企业. 该 2010 大会将提供超过 60 教育会议的参加者从电子发现和知识管理等一系列重大新兴技术.

每一天, 会议被解析成多个曲目包括:风险管理,总法律顾问,网站 3.0, 情报,知识管理,国际电子发现,ILTA高级IT,全面记录保管,和新兴技术.

我们既涉及LegalTech显示 (纽约和洛杉矶) 因为我们的会员基础已经超出了我们的合同律师/临时合同鉴证律师和顾问的核心扩展到包括律师助理, 内部律师, 律师事务所律师, 单独开业, 电子发现供应商, 法律媒体, 和其他人.

如果你是合同律师/临时律师或律师助理顾问或合同鉴证, 或参与一些电子发现方面的工作, 你将在下周纽约,你应该去。无, 不一定支付 $695 单日出席费,如果你不能负担得起。因为很多的LegalTech事件向所有人开放.

通过 LegalTech是下周在纽约: 这就是为什么你应该去,如果你能 – 他的团伙名单.

Global EDD Group at LegalTech New York

Brad Mixner and Joe Turner will be networking, attending meetings and exploring the exhibit floor at LegalTech New York 2010 being held at the New York Hilton from 01 – 03 二月.  Please 联系我们 to schedule a meeting.

We look forward to seeing you there!

区法院驳回索赔总解雇, 订单部分和解雇 $75,000 在令人震惊的发现违反金融制裁 : 电子发现法

嘶叫 & Gillespie Mgmt., LLC v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2009 WL 5218035 (M.D. Fla. 八月. 3, 2009);MDB佛罗里达州 & Gillespie Mgmt., LLC v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2010 WL 55595 (M.D. Fla. 扬. 5, 2010)

她发现后,“[嘶叫 & 吉莱斯皮], 通过律师, 一意孤行和恶意未能作出合理的努力,以搜寻并产生回应法院命令的文件,并通过反复的失实陈述向法院违反联邦民事诉讼程序规则“和本法院的命令”, 除其他事项, 地方法官的建议遭致的情况下与偏见驳回原告的索赔。 (对于发现原告的虐待的其他细节, 按此在这种情况下事先意见摘要。)该建议检讨, 地方法院法官发现原告的所有债权“过度的补救”总解雇,而下令解雇金银岛物业指称的业务中断而产生的损害赔偿及原告所有索赔支付 $75,000 被告为追求其运动所产生的费用为制裁.

在其看来, 地方法院承认原告和原告律师的许多发现失误的极端恶劣的性质。尽管有这么多的侵犯, 不过, 法院认定“过度”的所有债权总额解雇的制裁和选择,而不是只解雇金银岛物业索赔, 下降到裁判的建议采取的物业后期发现的证据是相关的。, 地方法院发现被告的论点,原告的产生的宝藏岛的证据阻止的面试人的被告谁可以形容的度假村“说服力”的条件其中被告承认,某些有关个人已被“以来,向被告提供, 被告的估价师访问整个相关时期的有关财产和财产的照片,支持被告的案件. 法院还指出,原告的行为“,不仅关系到生产的对开金银岛物业”和“[吨]Ø推测没有任何证据支持,原告在这方面的行为破坏的情况下提供的所有发现的完整性,是不恰当的。“

通过 区法院驳回索赔总解雇, 订单部分和解雇 $75,000 在令人震惊的发现违反金融制裁 : 电子发现法.

法院认定数据 “没有合理可,” 否认运动,迫使 : 电子发现法

罗德里格斯 - 托雷斯v. GOV. 开发. 波多黎各银行, 2010 轮候册 174156 (D.P.R. 扬. 20, 2010)

在这种就业歧视案, 法院认定的电子存储信息 (“喷雾”) 要求原告“没有合理的,因为不必要的负担和成本的访问”,并没有表现出良好的事业,迫使生产的ESI和否认原告的议案,迫使原告.

Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel defendants’ production of “all email communications and calendar entries describing, relating or referring to plaintiff Vicky Rodriquez, both inbound and outbound from defendant GDB’s messaging system servers” for the years 2007, 2008, and 2009.  Moreover, plaintiffs sought to compel such production “in native format with its original metadata…”  Defendants objected and indicated that plaintiffs’ request was likely to produce “hundreds if not thousands of documents which will include irrelevant, confidential, and potentially privileged information.”

Prior to ruling, the court ordered additional briefing on the issue.  The parties&后; submissions included a report from a consulting service indicating an approximate cost of $35,000 to retrieve the requested ESI.  Defendants also indicated the need to perform a privilege and confidentiality review of the ESI prior to production.  Accordingly, the court found the requested ESI “not reasonably accessible” reasoning that the proposed cost was “too high of a cost for the production of the requested ESI in this type of action.”  Moreover, the court indicated its concern over the increased cost that would result from the need to review the documents prior to production stating, “the volume of such information along with the form in which the information is stored makes privilege determinations more difficult and, correspondingly, more expensive and time consuming.”

通过 法院认定数据 “没有合理可,” 否认运动,迫使 : 电子发现法.

LegalTech降落在纽约

Lawyers provide legal information to clients and courts of law. The key word is information. 有了它,, we can retain clients, render services, and manage the business of law. And with developments in information technology, we can continually improve our receipt, 分析, and delivery of legal information and account for its costs and remuneration.

With information technology, we can provide better legal services with research tools from the likes of LexisNexis and Westlaw Next and software from e-discovery vendors like Guidance Software, 克罗尔Ontrack公司, and StoredIQ that help manage and archive information, as well as cull, produce, and review data for evidence. Transactional lawyers can benefit from document assembly tools and litigators can improve their chances for success with trial technology and internet research. We can also better manage our business with time-and-billing programs, as well as case and matter management applications installed on premise or in the cloud from the likes of Clio and Rocket Matter.

What are the next big improvements in information technology that will benefit lawyers and law firms? Find out at LegalTech New York.

LegalTech brings lawyers, paralegals, law firm administrators, 开发商, manufacturers, and technologists, and more to the Hilton New York from Feb. 1-3 to share developments and improvements in legal technology, including e-discovery. 在 2009, LegalTech New York attracted nearly 13,000 与会者和特色几乎 300 参展企业. 今年&后;s attendance will be comparable to 2009, says Henry Payne Dicker, 资产负债管理活动的副总裁, and is ahead in some categories, like paid registrations.

通过 LegalTech降落在纽约.

联邦贸易委员会硅谷: 高科技企业应该保护消费者的数据 – Forbes.com

Washington wants to know: Why can’t technology protect consumersprivacy instead of violating it?

The Federal Trade Commission met today in Berkeley, 美国加利福尼亚州, with corporate technology leaders and privacy advocates, challenging them to create ways to protect consumer privacy online. The FTC is encouraging technology companies such as Facebook and Apple (to come up with self-regulatory tactics that will protect consumers without squashing corporate innovation.

Technology companies should be doing more to protect people, says Pamela Jones Harbour, the FTC’s commissioner. “Apple requires all developers to submit potential apps for review,” Harbour says. “Through that process, the company could do more to regulate privacy disclosures.” 同样, she says other companies should be taking more steps to protect consumer privacy.

The brainstorming session was the second of three the FTC has held before planning to draft new laws this summer that will control how consumer information is collected and used on the Web. Scrutiny of consumer privacy violation on the Internet has grown over the past several years, as technology advancements arm marketers with new ways to target potential buyers. Companies are buying consumer data from sources such as consumer surveys, loyalty programs and Web and mobile applications to identify potential consumers who are then tracked online and off to deliver more relevant advertising.

通过 联邦贸易委员会硅谷: 高科技企业应该保护消费者的数据 – Forbes.com.

Experts fret over iPad security risks • The Register

Apple’s much hyped iPad tablet may come tightly locked down but the device is still likely to be affected by many of the security issues that affect the iPhone, as well as some of its own.

Security experts polled by El Reg were concerned about a variety of risks, in particular phishing attacks and browser exploits.

Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos, 评论: “而iPad, from the sound of things, will be as locked down as the iPhone. Hackers will no doubt try to jailbreak it. But the main threat would be phishing and browser exploits.

Malware related risks may also trouble the iPad. The only risks to affect the iPhone to date have relied on a very small but well publicised number of worms (克. ikee) that exploited default passwords and open SSH shells on jailbroken iPhones.

不过, while the iPad uses the same OS as the iPhone, it is more powerful; that means attacks based on doctored PDF files may potentially become a risk, explained Luis Corrons, technical director of PandaLabs.

The device is really close to an iPhone, so we should expect a similar security. 不过, unlike the iPhone, it would be able to open PDF documents by default.

通过 Experts fret over iPad security risks • The Register.