最高法院法官考虑法院’ 在仲裁中的作用 | 国家法律杂志

美国. 最高法院的亲仲裁趋势似乎完好后,口头辩论中的一个关键的情况下,询问是否应该对仲裁协议的可执行性的法院或者仲裁员自己者,治星期一.

消费者团体说,案件的结果, 租一个中心, 西v. 杰克逊, 可以决定法院是否有任何在劳资协议中的仲裁条款监督的作用, 他们认为朝雇主的偏见. 商业团体, 对他们来说, 不想法院的猜测他们所看到的为有效仲裁协议商定.

“如果企业双赢, 这真的会是一个分水岭案件,” 迪帕克古普塔说, 公共公民律师, 它声称,仲裁员规则对消费者 94 %的时间.

在过去的二十年, 高等法院裁定,以加强对仲裁协议的可执行. 周一, 少数法官出现急于改变这种趋势, 虽然几个似乎认为,法院应该发挥一定的作用,在检查尤其是令人震惊的协议. 利特勒门德尔松的达拉斯律师罗伯特弗里德曼, 代表企业方的情况下, 敦促法院继续实践 “发送非常, 非常复杂的问题,以仲裁员” 而不是法院

通过 Law.com – 最高法院法官考虑法院’ 在仲裁中的作用.

ICC announces revision of arbitration costs

The International Chamber of Commerce has announced a revision of its current arbitration costs and fees. The change will become effective on 1 May 2010 and apply to all arbitrations commenced on and after that date.

The revision does not change ICC’s traditional method of calculating administrative costs and arbitrators’ fees on the basis of the amount in dispute. 不过, the rates applicable to each ‘slice’ of the amount in dispute have been adjusted. An increase averaging 0.14 of a percentage point has been applied to most slices. At the top end of the scale, a new slice has been added to distinguish between cases valued at US$ 100–500 million and those over US$ 500 万. In the latter cases, a flat rate of US$ 113,215 will be charged for administrative expenses and arbitrators’ fees will be calculated using rates that are the same, or slightly less, than before. The initial payment required when filing a request for arbitration has been raised from US$ 2,500—the level at which it has been held since 1998—to US$ 3,000.

ICC Arbitration costs were last revised in January 2008. 从那时起, the global economy has suffered a period of exceptional and unforeseen instability. The volatility of the financial markets has created a situation of great unpredictability, not least for the ICC Court. The Court’s revenue is in US dollars, but most of its expenditure is in euros. The increase in the levels of its administrative expenses will allow the Court better to withstand the impact of these developments and to maintain the quality of service for which it is recognized worldwide.

通过 仲裁.

国际诉讼: 如何文件对外国投资顾问诉讼 : 国际商法顾问

I was recently contacted by a client who lost several million US dollars due to negligent investment advice. Because the firm is based overseas, the client did not know what to do. 不幸的, this scenario has become all too common in the wake of the global financial crisis.

Whether your claim is against an institution based in the U.S., the EU or elsewhere, you have a number of options. I will very generally touch on them below.

Many wealthy investors rely on foreign investment advisers who are typically employed by international financial institutions.

不幸的, as a result of the global financial crisis many investments advisers understated the risks involved with – for example in structured products linked to stock market indices.

Almost all legal systems have a concept of negligence, which would make a financial adviser potentially liable if the quality of their advice fell below that to be reasonably expected, causing loss to a client.

Your adviser is also very likely to be subject to local financial regulation and supervision that might include compensation schemes. But where these options are not available locally, or have proved unsatisfactory, your only option might be to sue.

[继续] 国际诉讼: 如何文件对外国投资顾问诉讼 : 国际商法顾问.

中国的诉讼和仲裁. 也许. – 中国法律博客: 关于中国法律博客,并在中国开展业务的法律问题.

人们过于频繁集中在法律或法律选择, 所以常常是不规律,以至于决定进行一场官司的最佳地点, 但无形. 现实情况是,在美国的大多数合同违反也构成了中国违反合同, 在俄罗斯, 在苏丹, 或任何其他. 购买的产品,然后不付钱, 据我所知, 在世界各地违约. 同样, 醉酒和有人超过你的车运行产生行动的一个原因,可能在世界任何地方. 我不是说法律的选择并不重要, 但我说这是错误的假设,它是最重要的.

以过失. 运行由一个醉酒的司机超过入门可能是几乎同样的原因在中国和美国,这一行动的原因法律的行动可能会大同小异. 但是,让&后;这里的GET真正问,你会在哪里,而有这官司如果你是原告? 在美国,你可以把你的朋友和亲戚证人立场如何,你从来没有事故发生以来,在陪审团面前作证,其中多万美元的判决是家常便饭, 在中国您的唯一证据可能最终书面医生的报告,并在这里您将勒得到 $30,000?

或采取一种违约行为,您购买了有缺陷的部分成片的设备制造和销售为一百万美元. 在美国,你会收集未能出售百万美元的设备的利润,你失去了一个很好的机会, 而在中国,您获得这些利润损失的机会将微不足道.

通过 中国的诉讼和仲裁. 也许. – 中国法律博客: 关于中国法律博客,并在中国开展业务的法律问题..

初审法院滥用司法鉴定缺席订货生产或动作之前迫使和要求任命特别船长酌情决定 : 电子发现法

在重艺术哈里斯, 2010 轮候册 1612205 (特克斯. 应用. 四月. 22, 2010)

在这种情况下, 的上诉法庭给予申诉人的令状,训令和下令,原审法院滥用其自由裁量权,当它下令进行法医检查信访人的硬盘驱动器的生产和当它任命一个特殊的主进行该项考试后撤出三个基本发现订单.

虽然事实是有点复杂, 它足以说,在发现的过程中, 请愿艺术哈里斯被勒令交出法医调查有关“电子媒体”,尽管事实上有没有生产这种媒体的挂起请求, 没有挂起的请求与他没有遵守任何一种生产, 并没有待处理的议案,强迫命令,迫使生产, 而不是, 尽管最初表示,哈里斯可能产生的唯一的非特权敏感的数据的一项议案,迫使从不同的被告生产的可能性不大的结果。, 但是法院的命令,引人注目的电子存储介质的生产,包括哈里斯,该法院还下令任命一个特殊的主进行法医检查.

除了引人注目的哈里斯生产相关的电子存储介质, 法院还未能解决哈里斯的保护令和特权的债权的议案.

其顺序以下条目, 法院拒绝了哈里斯澄清和复议的议案. 因此,哈里斯提出了一项请愿书的训令令状.

上诉法院严重依赖于得克萨斯州最高法院的分析,在最近的案例, 在重波 - 维克利院, 有限合伙公司, 295 S.W.3d 309 (特克斯. 2009), 这证实,根据对TeX. ř. CIV. P. 196.4, 电子信息是受发现,只有在其生产的一个具体要求。, 最高法院确认,“”[p]roviding访问信息订购一方的电子存储设备的检查,特别是侵入和一般应劝阻, 就像一般审阅一个党的文件柜,将允许开放访问“。”

通过 初审法院滥用司法鉴定缺席订货生产或动作之前迫使和要求任命特别船长酌情决定 : 电子发现法.

Windows XP仍然不太安全运 7 和Vista | 计算机世界

微软已经发布了新的安全事故报告–微软的计算机和网络安全趋势的季度概述第八量. 该报告再次说明,安全升级到最新的软件,可以大大改善, 并通过对用户的教育.

出的一些相关数据的主要结果摘要点发现,在过去3个月. 这里有一些亮点:

•64位版本的Windows 7 和Windows Vista SP2在2009年下半年较低的感染率比其他任何操作系统配置, 虽然32位版本的感染率均小于其最先进的最新的服务包的Windows XP的一半, SP3.

•域加入电脑更可能会遇到比非域计算机的蠕虫, 这主要是因为蠕虫病毒的传播方式. 蠕虫通常传播最有效地通过不安全的文件共享和可移动存储卷, 这两者往往是丰富的在企业环境中,共同的家园.

•在视窗XP, 微软漏洞占 55.3 在研究样本的所有攻击%. (比较基于浏览器的攻击目标)

•在Windows Vista和Windows 7, 微软漏洞的比例是较小的显著, 占为刚 24.6 在研究样本的攻击百分比. (比较基于浏览器的攻击目标)

通过 Windows XP仍然不太安全运 7 和Vista – PCWorld商务中心.

保护知识产权 | USDOJ: 司法部博客

今天,司法部是认识的第10届年度世界知识产权日. 知识产权是指心灵的音乐创作, 文学, 电影, 艺术作品, 和发明. 知识产权是美国最大的资产之一. 它的保护是我们的经济繁荣和安全以及公众的健康和安全的核心. 咄咄逼人的知识产权执法是我们不断取得成功和安全的关键, 是司法部的首要任务.

今年早些时候, 司法部长埃里克霍尔德宣布建立知识产权专责小组. 专责小组加强通过密切协调与州和地方执法合作伙伴以及我们的国际同行的努力,打击知识产权犯罪.

今天, 该专责小组变得更强大. 署理副检察长加里摹. Grindler, 他担任专责小组主席, 宣布任命 15 新助理中美. 检察长职位和 20 联邦调查局特工,专门打击国内和国际知识产权犯罪.

通过 保护知识产权« USDOJ: 司法部博客.

进取的知识产权执法是必须的 | 副AG加里摹. Grindles | 国家法律杂志

Businesses that create and rely upon intellectual property, from large entertainment conglomerates to small biotech firms, make up among the fastest-growing sectors of the U.S. 经济. These industries also represent a significant portion of U.S. exports, with intellectual property now comprising a significant — and growing — share of the value of world trade. The proliferation of worldwide Internet access and advances in traditional distribution methods, such as transportation and shipping, now allow American businesses of all sizes to market their intellectual property throughout the world. Digital content, whether embodied in software, books, games, movies or music, can be transmitted from one corner of the world to another almost instantly.

But these unprecedented opportunities for American businesses and entrepreneurs are put at risk by criminals and criminal organizations that seek unlawfully to profit by stealing from the hard work of American artists, authors and inventors. For every new technological advancement by American business, there is, 不幸的是, a criminal who would seek to misuse it for his own illicit purposes. Criminals are responding to American innovation with their own creative methods of committing intellectual property crimes — from widespread online piracy to well-funded corporate espionage to increased trade in counterfeit pharmaceuticals and other goods.

When we fail to enforce intellectual property rights aggressively, we fail to protect some of our nation's most important and valuable resources. The theft of even a single trade secret can completely destroy a burgeoning small business. When criminals sell counterfeit drugs and medical devices to consumers, our nation's public health is compromised. And when illicit products such as counterfeit airplane parts or pirated electronic components make their way into the marketplace, they place our public safety at risk.

In light of these threats, it is imperative that the government act, and act aggressively. And that is exactly what we at the Department of Justice are doing. In cooperation with our partners across the federal government, the Department of Justice has redoubled its commitment to protecting American innovation and technology through aggressive criminal and civil enforcement of our nation&后;s intellectual property laws.

通过 进取的知识产权执法是必须的.

世界知识产权日 | 白宫

In recognition of World Intellectual Property Day, the US government is engaging in activities all over the world to highlight the importance of intellectual property and our commitment to protecting it.

Our law enforcement agencies, the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, announced today the formation of a national network of law enforcement personnel.

The Department of Justice announced that the FBI is increasing its manpower that focuses of IP significantly, by creating regional IP squads in major cities around the nation and adding an additional 20 new agents to those squads.

此外, the DOJ announced that it will be adding 15 new prosecutors throughout the country to add to its current force of 200 prosecutors specially trained to handle IP enforcement.

In collaboration, the Department of Homeland Security announced that its multi-agency IPR Center is creating partnerships with 70 federal, state and local law enforcement in 22 cities to collaborate on IP enforcement actions.

And ICE announced the efforts of a major sweep – Operation Spring cleaningthat resulted so far in 45 逮捕, the seizure of 701,384 counterfeit items valued at $44 万.

Many other agencies that also work on IP enforcement are joining this united effort.  Secretary Clinton and Secretary Locke and Ambassador Ron Kirk are issuing statements highlighting the importance of intellectual property. There are also a numbers of events taking place today where senior government officials are speaking on intellectual property, 包括大使仪Sapiro在全国新闻俱乐部的美国贸易代表办公室, 在美国商会的副国务卿罗伯特 - 霍马茨. 我会讲一个事件的众议院司法委员会的约翰科尼尔斯主席, 的美国贸易代表办公室负责人, 柯克大使, 我们的美国专利和商标局的大卫Kappos和其他高级商务官员的头, 包括副局长弗朗西斯科桑切斯和世界各地的大使馆大使发表声明,重申在教育计划,他们都抱着相同的情绪.

The President has made clear that strong enforcement of America’s intellectual property is a critical part of our plan to promote exports and create jobs.  I look forward to continuing our dialogue and utilizing the expertise out there to harness and protect what has always been one of America’s greatest strengths – the diversity of great ideas.

通过 世界知识产权日 | 白宫.

郡王v沃尔玛 | 第九巡回法院的上诉意见| 法官米高. 霍金斯

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/04/26/04-16688.pdf